Cost effectiveness of antihypertensive drugs and treatment guidelines

[Antihypertensive prescription in type 2 diabetes patients in Andalusia and SEH-LELHA 2022 guidelines: An economic cost evaluation]

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to analyze the prescription of antihypertensive drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Andalusia, comparing it with the SEH-LELHA 2022 guidelines, and to assess the direct cost of these treatments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multicentric, cross-sectional, and descriptive study was conducted with 385 T2D patients. Participants were randomly selected from the patient lists of 120 primary care physicians from Andalusia. Inclusion criteria included a diagnosis of T2D and complete clinical records for the year 2022. Demographic data and drug prescription information were collected, with the average cost per patient being calculated.

RESULTS

The mean age of the subjects was 70.72 years, with 53.51% being male. A total of 70.9% of the patients were taking antihypertensive drugs, the most common being ACE inhibitors/ARBs (70.9%), diuretics (70.1%), beta-blockers (40.0%), and calcium channel blockers (20.0%). Each patient took an average of 2.46±1.06 antihypertendsive, and fixed association of 2 or more antihypertensive drugs were used by 40.9% of the studied patients. The annual cost per patient was 141.45€/year.

CONCLUSIONS

The study reveals strong adherence to the SEH-LELHA 2022 guidelines among physicians in Andalusia regarding the of antihypertensives for T2D patients, with a significant preference for Renin-Angiotensin System blockers, diuretics, and beta-blockers. However, a notable deviation in prescription practices was observed with the frequent choice of doxazosin over spironolactone, despite the latter being the recommended option for resistant hypertension. Although the overall expenditure on antihypertensives is moderate, their cost-effectiveness is enhanced by the efficacy of these treatments in preventing cardiovascular complications.

A cost-effectiveness evaluation of a high-sensitivity troponin I guided voluntary cardiovascular risk assessment program for asymptomatic women in Croatia

Background

To estimate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a high-sensitivity troponin I (hsTnI) guided cardiovascular risk assessment program in women in Croatia.

Methods

An observational study of a voluntary program for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment in women aged above 45 years with no specific symptoms, no confirmed or known coronary artery disease was conducted (WHP). Participants were stratified into three categories according to their hsTnI level. Subjects in the moderate or high-risk class were referred to cardiac work-up and invasive cardiovascular investigation as appropriate. Study information were applied to a discrete-event simulation model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of WHP against current practice. The number of CVD events and deaths, costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were assessed over 10 years from a societal perspective.

Results

Of 1034 women who participated in the program, 921 (89.1%), 100 (9.7%), and 13 (1.3%) subjects fall into the low, moderate, and high-risk class. Of 26 women referred for angiography, significant coronary artery disease (CAD) was diagnosed in 12 women (46.1%). WHP gained 15.8 (95%CI 12.8; 17.2) QALYs per 1000 subjects, increased costs by 490€ (95%CI 487; 500), decreased CVD-related mortality by 40%. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of 45,000 €/QALY, WHP was cost-effective with a probability of 90%. Model results were most sensitive to utility weights and cost of medical prevention.

Conclusions

Assessing the cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic women with hsTnI and guiding those at higher risk to further cardiac testing, identified individuals with CAD, could reduce CVD related burden, and would be cost-effective.