Duplicate prescriptions in the emergency department: a retrospective cohort study

The Nudging Effect of a Reminder Letter to Reduce Duplicated Medications: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The increasing trend of multiple chronic conditions across the world has worsened the problem of medication duplication in health care systems without gatekeeping or referral requirement. Thus, to overcome this problem, a reminder letter has been developed in Taiwan to nudge patients to engage in medication management.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of reminder letter on reducing duplicated medications.

RESEARCH DESIGN

A 2-arm randomized controlled trial design.

SUBJECTS

Patients with duplicated medications in the first quarter of 2019.

MEASURES

The Taiwanese single-payer National Health Insurance Administration identified the eligible patients for this study. A postal reminder letter regarding medication duplication was mailed to the patients in the study group, and no information was provided to the comparison group. Generalized estimation equation models with a difference-in-differences analysis were used to estimate the effects of the reminder letters.

RESULTS

Each group included 11,000 patients. Those who had received the reminder letter were less likely to receive duplicated medications in the subsequent 2 quarters (postintervention 1: odds ratio [OR]=0.95, 95% CI=0.87-1.03; postintervention_2: OR=0.99, 95% CI=0.90-1.08) and had fewer days of duplicated medications (postintervention 1: β=-0.115, P =0.015; postintervention 2 (β=-0.091, P =0.089) than those who had not received the reminder letter, showing marginal but significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

A one-off reminder letter nudge could mildly decrease the occurrence of duplicated medications. Multiple nudges or nudges incorporating behavioral science insights may be further considered to improve medication safety in health systems without gatekeeping.

Characteristics of clinical-pharmacological recommendations in psychiatry in Germany

OBJECTIVE

Psychiatric patients in general, and elderly psychiatric patients in particular, are at risk of adverse drug reactions due to comorbidities and inappropriate polypharmacy. Interdisciplinary and clinical-pharmacologist-led medication reviews may contribute to medication safety in the field of psychiatry. In this study, we reported the frequency and characteristics of clinical-pharmacological recommendations in psychiatry, with a particular focus on geriatric psychiatry.

METHOD

A clinical pharmacologist, in collaboration with the attending psychiatrists and a consulting neurologist, conducted interdisciplinary medication reviews in a general psychiatric ward with a geropsychiatric focus at a university hospital over a 25-week period. All clinical and pharmacological recommendations were recorded and evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 316 recommendations were made during 374 medication reviews. Indications/contraindications of drugs were the most frequently discussed topics (59/316; 18.7 %), followed by dose reductions (37/316; 11.7 %), and temporary or permanent discontinuation of medications (36/316; 11.4 %). The most frequent recommendations for dose reduction involvedbenzodiazepines (9/37; 24.3 %). An unclear or absent indication was the most common reason for recommending temporary or permanent discontinuation of the medication (6/36; 16.7 %).

CONCLUSION

Interdisciplinary clinical pharmacologist-led medication reviews represented a valuable contribution to medication management in psychiatric patients, particularly the elderly ones.

Concordance of emergency department physicians' decisions on HIV post-exposure prophylaxis with national guidelines: results from a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is an effective tool to prevent infection with HIV. Patients seeking PEP after potential HIV exposure usually present to the emergency department (ED). Our study sought to determine the concordance of ED physicians' decisions on HIV-PEP with national guidelines (primary objective) and to assess the clinical relevance of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between the HIV-PEP regimen and patients' concomitant medication (secondary objective).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study at the ED of Hannover Medical School, Germany. Between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2019, 113 of 11 246 screened patients presented to the ED after potential HIV exposure and were enrolled in the study.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients (82.3% male) was 30 y (IQR 25-35.5), 85.8% of potential HIV exposures were characterised as sexual and 85.0% presented within 72 h. ED physicians' decisions on HIV-PEP were concordant with national guidelines in 93.8%. No clinically relevant DDIs were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

ED physicians' decisions on HIV-PEP were highly concordant with national guidelines. Approximately 1% of patient presentations to the ED were related to HIV exposure; therefore, training ED physicians on HIV transmission risk assessment and indications/contraindications for HIV-PEP is paramount.