Influence of renal function on the pharmacokinetics of cerivastatin in normocholesterolemic adults

Effects of renal failure on drug transport and metabolism

Renal failure not only alters the renal elimination, but also the non-renal disposition of drugs that are extensively metabolized by the liver. Although reduced metabolic enzyme activity in some cases can be responsible for the reduced drug clearance, alterations in the transporter systems may also be involved in the process. With the development of renal failure, the renal secretion of organic ions mediated by organic anion transporters (OATs) and organic cation transporters (OCTs) is decreased. 3-Carboxy-4-methyl-5-propyl-2-furanpropanoic acid (CMPF) and other organic anionic uremic toxins may directly inhibit the renal excretion of various drugs and endogenous organic acids by competitively inhibiting OATs. In addition, the expression of OAT1 and OCT2 was reduced in chronic renal failure (CRF) rats. Renal failure also impairs the liver uptake of drugs and organic anions, such as bromosulphophthalein (BSP), indocyanine green (ICG), and thyroxine, where organic anion transport polypeptides (OATPs) are the major transporters. Most previous studies have been done in animals or cell culture, very often in rat models, but these are presumed to reflect the presentation of advanced renal disease in humans as well. Recent studies demonstrate that the uremic toxins CMPF and indoxyl sulfate (IS) can directly inhibit rOatp2 and hOATP-C in hepatocytes. The protein content of the liver uptake transporters Oatp1, 2, and 4 were significantly decreased in CRF rats. Decreased activity of the intestinal efflux transporter, P-glycoprotein (P-gp), was also observed in CRF rats, with no significant change of protein content, suggesting that uremic toxins may suppress P-gp function. However, increased protein levels of multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) 2 in the kidney and MRP3 in the liver were found in CRF rats, suggesting an adaptive response that may serve as a protective mechanism. Increases in drug areas under the curve (AUCs) in subjects with advanced renal disease for drugs that are not renally excreted are consistent with uremic toxin effects on either intestinal or hepatic cell transporters, metabolizing enzymes, or both. In conclusion, alterations of drug transporters, as well as metabolic enzymes, in patients with renal failure can be responsible for reduced drug clearance.

Clinical practice guidelines for managing dyslipidemias in kidney transplant patients: a report from the Managing Dyslipidemias in Chronic Kidney Disease Work Group of the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative

The incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is very high in patients with chronic kidney (CKD) disease and in kidney transplant recipients. Indeed, available evidence for these patients suggests that the 10-year cumulative risk of coronary heart disease is at least 20%, or roughly equivalent to the risk seen in patients with previous CVD. Recently, the National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) published guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemias in patients with CKD, including transplant patients. It was the conclusion of this Work Group that the National Cholesterol Education Program Guidelines are generally applicable to patients with CKD, but that there are significant differences in the approach and treatment of dyslipidemias in patients with CKD compared with the general population. In the present document we present the guidelines generated by this workgroup as they apply to kidney transplant recipients. Evidence from the general population indicates that treatment of dyslipidemias reduces CVD, and evidence in kidney transplant patients suggests that judicious treatment can be safe and effective in improving dyslipidemias. Dyslipidemias are very common in CKD and in transplant patients. However, until recently there have been no adequately powered, randomized, controlled trials examining the effects of dyslipidemia treatment on CVD in patients with CKD. Since completion of the K/DOQI guidelines on dyslipidemia in CKD, the results of the Assessment of Lescol in Renal Transplantation (ALERT) Study have been presented and published. Based on information from randomized trials conducted in the general population and the single study conducted in kidney transplant patients, these guidelines, which are a modified version of the K/DOQI dyslipidemia guidelines, were developed to aid clinicians in the management of dyslipidemias in kidney transplant patients. These guidelines are divided into four sections. The first section (Introduction) provides the rationale for the guidelines, and describes the target population, scope, intended users, and methods. The second section presents guidelines on the assessment of dyslipidemias (guidelines 1-3), while the third section offers guidelines for the treatment of dyslipidemias (guidelines 4-5). The key guideline statements are supported mainly by data from studies in the general population, but there is an urgent need for additional studies in CKD and in transplant patients. Therefore, the last section outlines recommendations for research.

Hepatic drug metabolism and transport in patients with kidney disease

The disposition of many drugs is altered in patients with acute (AKD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). A decline in renal clearance of several drugs has been correlated significantly with residual renal function (ie, creatinine clearance) of subjects. Reductions in nonrenal clearance of some compounds also have been reported and associated with clearance of markers of oxidative and/or conjugative metabolism or P-glycoprotein-mediated transport. Although initial accounts of reduced hepatic microsomal cytochrome P-450 (CYP) content and activity in animal models of AKD and CKD were published almost 25 years ago, it is only in the last decade that technical advances in molecular biology and clinical pharmacology have enabled researchers to begin to characterize the phenotypic expression of individual enzymes and, importantly, distinguish the molecular and/or genetic basis for these changes. The selective modulation of hepatic CYP enzyme activity observed in kidney disease is caused, at least in part, by differentially altered expression of several CYP isoforms. This review summarizes data available through June 2003 regarding the effect of AKD and CKD on drug metabolism. Knowledge of the impact and nature of these alterations associated with kidney disease may facilitate the individualization of medication management in this patient population.

Tacrolimus and cerivastatin pharmacokinetics and adverse effects after single and multiple dosing with cerivastatin in renal transplant recipients

AIMS

In contrast to cyclosporin, only limited information exists on the interaction potential between the immunosuppressive agent tacrolimus and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, which are metabolized via the cytochrome P450 system. The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics, and adverse effects of cerivastatin combined with tacrolimus in renal transplant patients.

METHODS

Ten patients with stable kidney graft functions and LDL-cholesterol serum concentrations > 110 mg dl-1 were included in the study. After an observation period of 3 months, cerivastatin (0.2 mg daily) was administered for an additional 3 months. Tacrolimus steady-state pharmacokinetics and cerivastatin single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics were determined. Lipid concentrations, routine laboratory parameters and adverse events were obtained and analysed throughout the study period of 6 months.

RESULTS

Blood tacrolimus trough concentrations were not affected by cerivastatin (mean +/- SD 8.6 +/- 2.1 ng ml(-1) before, and 8.7 +/- 2.4 ng ml(-1) at day 90 of cerivastatin dosing, with a 95% confidence interval on the difference = 0.97, 1.08). The mean area under the blood concentration-time curve to 24 h (AUC(0,24 h)) for cerivastatin was 14.5 +/- 2.53 micro g l(-1) h(-1) at day 1 after starting treatment and 19.02 +/- 3.55 micro g l(-1) h(-1) (3 months later), resulting in a 35% higher (AUC(0,24 h)) compared with the first dose. Total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations were significantly lowered by cerivastatin whereas no significant effect of cerivastatin on serum creatininkinase concentrations was observed and no adverse effects were documented.

CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus increased the AUC(0, 24 h) of cerivastatin by a mean of 35% in renal transplant patients. Cerivastatin had no detectable effect on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus.

Clinically relevant differences between the statins: implications for therapeutic selection

Although the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, or statins, share a common lipid-lowering effect, there are differences within this class of drugs. The low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol-lowering efficacy, pharmacokinetic properties, drug-food interactions, and cost can vary widely, thus influencing the selection of a particular statin as a treatment option. The statins that produce the greatest percentage change in LDL cholesterol levels are atorvastatin and simvastatin. Atorvastatin and fluvastatin are least affected by alterations in renal function. Fewer pharmacokinetic drug interactions are likely to occur with pravastatin and fluvastatin, because they are not metabolized through the cytochrome P450 (3A4) system. The most cost-effective statins, based on cost per percentage change in LDL cholesterol levels, are fluvastatin, cerivastatin, and atorvastatin. Awareness of these differences may assist in the selection or substitution of an appropriate statin for a particular patient.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of cerivastatin

Cerivastatin sodium, a novel statin, is a synthetic, enantiomerically pure, pyridine derivative that effectively reduces serum cholesterol levels at microgram doses. Cerivastatin is readily and completely absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, with plasma concentrations reaching a peak 2 to 3 hours postadministration followed by a monoexponential decay with an elimination half-life (t1/2beta) of 2 to 3 hours. Cerivastatin pharmacokinetics are linear: maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) are proportional to the dose over the range of 0.05 to 0.8 mg. No accumulation is observed on repeated administration. Cerivastatin interindividual variability is described by coefficients of variation of approximately 30 to 40% for its primary pharmacokinetic parameters AUC, Cmax and t1/2beta. The mean absolute oral bioavailability of cerivastatin is 60% because of presystemic first-pass effects. Its pharmacokinetics are not influenced by concomitant administration of food nor by the time of day at which the dose is given. Age, gender, ethnicity and concurrent disease also have no clinically significant effects. Cerivastatin is highly bound to plasma proteins (>99%). The volume of distribution at steady state of about 0.3 L/kg indicates that the drug penetrates only moderately into tissue; conversely, preclinical studies have shown a high affinity for liver tissue, the target site of action. Cerivastatin is exclusively cleared via metabolism. No unchanged drug is excreted. Cerivastatin is subject to 2 main oxidative biotransformation reactions: demethylation of the benzylic methyl ether moiety leading to the metabolite M-1 [catalysed by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C8 and CYP3A4] and stereoselective hydroxylation of one methyl group of the 6-isopropyl substituent leading to the metabolite M-23 (catalysed by CYP2C8). The product of the combined biotransformation reactions is a secondary minor metabolite, M-24, not detectable in plasma. All 3 metabolites are active inhibitors of hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase with a similar potency to the parent drug. Approximately 70% of the administered dose is excreted as metabolites in the faeces, and 30% in the urine. Metabolism by 2 distinct CYP isoforms renders cerivastatin relatively resistant to interactions arising from inhibition of CYP. If one of the pathways is blocked, cerivastatin can be effectively metabolised by the alternative route. In addition, on the basis of in vitro investigations, there is no evidence for either cerivastatin or its metabolites having any inducing or inhibitory activity on CYP. The apparent lack of any clinically relevant interactions with a variety of drugs commonly used by patients in the target population supports this favourable drug-drug interaction profile.