Comparability of semiautomatic tortuosity measurements in the carotid artery

Transcarotid vascular access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: is choosing the left side always right?

BACKGROUND

The transcarotid (TC) vascular access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as the first-choice alternative to the transfemoral access, in patients unsuitable for the latter. The use of both the left and right common carotid arteries (CCAs) for TC-TAVI has been described, but the optimal side is subject to debate. We conducted this pilot study to compare the level of vessel tortuosity and plaque burden from either the left CCA to the aortic annulus, or the right CCA to the aortic annulus, considering them as surrogates for technical and procedural complexity.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent TC-TAVI between 2018 and 2021 in our institution were included. Using three-dimensional reconstruction, pre-TAVI neck and chest computed tomography angiography exams were reviewed to assess the tortuosity index (TI), sum of angles metric, as well as plaque burden, between each CCA and the aortic annulus.

RESULTS

We included 46 patients who underwent TC-TAVI. No significant difference regarding the mean TIs between the left and right sides (respectively 1.20 and 1.19, p = 0.82), the mean sum of angles (left side: 396°, right side: 384°, p = 0.27), and arterial plaque burden (arterial plaque found in 30% of left CCAs and 45% of right CCAs, p = 0.19) was found.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no convincing data favoring the use of one particular access side over the other one. The choice of the CCA side in TC-TAVI should to be made on a case-by-case basis, in a multidisciplinary fashion, and may also depend on the operators' experience.

Comparison of Three Workstations For Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Sizing: Impact in Decision Making and Graft Selection

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the agreement of multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) and semiautomated central lumen line (CLL) analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), with 3 different software workstations (WS1, WS2, WS3) and 2 experienced practitioners as well as to analyze its eventual impact in graft selection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty computed tomography (CT) angiography data sets were randomly chosen from a series of 100 consecutive studies. Measurements were performed twice by each reader, in random order, and included 8 parameters (5 diameters and 3 lengths). Each observer performed a complete set of 60 studies. Intra-observer and interobserver variability for every WS was assessed. Measurements were evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis, correlation coefficients (r), and concordance correlation coefficients (CCC [95% confidence interval (CI)]).

RESULTS

A high overall agreement between repeated measurements for both observers was obtained (r=0.989; CCC=0.988 [0.982-0.992] and r=0.998; CCC=0.996 [0.994-0.997], for observers 1 and 2, respectively). However, reproducibility for individual parameters was excellent for observer 2 and only moderate for observer 1. A high overall agreement was obtained for interobserver concordance (r=0.987; CCC=0.986 [0.982-0.989]). When analyzing for individual parameters, greatest interobserver differences were found at CLL measurement of the diameter of aortic neck (WS2) and bifurcation (WS1 and WS2) as well as iliac diameter in all 3 WS for both CLL and MPR. Similar differences were observed in paired comparison between WS when involving these parameters. Careful inspection of Bland-Altman charts revealed some cases of disagreement between WS and observers that would affect decision making on graft selection, changing the neck diameter to a different size, in 2 cases when measuring with WS1, and iliac diameter in 4 cases (2 of them with WS1 and 2 with WS2). Greatest discordance was observed regarding ipsilateral iliac length affecting 7 measurements that would lead to change the length of the selected limb graft (2 with WS1, 3 with WS2, and 2 with WS3).

CONCLUSIONS

Although a high agreement between different observers using different WS for AAA measurements is to be expected, small differences may lead to the selection of a different graft size. The use of a single software by experienced users, and double check by a different one, may be advisable.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Influence of inter and intraobserver variability in CT measurements during planning of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been extensively reviewed. However, its impact in graft selection (final choose of diameter and lengths) has been scarcely analyzed. The results of this study suggest that, although a high agreement between different observers using different workstations for AAA measurements is to be expected, small differences may lead to the selection of a different graft size. The use of a single software by experienced users, and double check by a different one, may be advisable.

Analysis of the correlations between the extracranial internal carotid artery and extracranial vertebral artery and mild cognitive impairment

BACKGROUND

Vascular tortuosity is a prevalent morphological change that frequently occurs in arteries across different parts of the body.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the relationship between the tortuosities of the extracranial internal carotid artery (EICA) and extracranial vertebral artery (EVA) with mild cognitive impairment.

METHODS

The tortuosity index (TI), vascular deviation degree, tortuosity degree, and angle number of the EICA and EVA were retrospectively analyzed and calculated in 160 patients who underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA) in this study's department, and the Montreal cognitive assessment was adopted to evaluate the cognitive function of the patients.

RESULTS

The differences in age, gender, arterial hypertension (AH), and diabetes mellitus (DM) between the normal group and the mild cognitive impairment group were statistically significant (p< 0.01). The TI was negatively correlated with the score of cognitive function. The tortuosities of the EICA and EVA were correlated with mild cognitive impairment (p< 0.05). The reduction in visual-spatial ability was correlated with the right EICA tortuosity, and the reduction in memory was correlated with the EVA tortuosity. Age, gender, HP, DM, and coronary heart disease (CHD) were potential risk factors for carotid tortuosity (p< 0.05).

CONCLUSION

There was a significant correlation observed between the TIs of both the EICA and EVA and the presence of mild cognitive impairment. Advanced age, female, HP, DM, and CHD were independent risk factors for EICA and EVA tortuosities.

Analysis of independent risk factors for aneurysm rupture based on carotid tortuosity index and morphological parameters of single intracranial aneurysms in anterior circulation

PURPOSE

Our study focused on the risk factors associated with anterior circulation intracranial aneurysm (IA) rupture by examining the carotid artery (CA) tortuosity index (TI) and anterior circulation IA morphological parameters.

METHOD

This study conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical and imaging data from 163 patients with anterior circulation IA diagnosed by head and neck computed tomography angiography (CTA). The patients were categorized into two groups: the ruptured group (57 cases) and the unruptured group (106 cases). CA was categorized based on its location into three segments: the extracranial segment of the internal carotid artery (EICA) TI, the angle of the internal carotid artery (ICA) and the common carotid artery (CCA) TI. Measure the morphological parameters of all IA: IA length neck (L), IA height (H), aneurysm diameter width (D), the ratio of L to the mean diameter of the IA-bearing artery (SR), the ratio of H to D (AR), the angle of flow inflow (FA) and IA angle (AA). The study conducted five types of analysis to determine the risk factors for anterior circulation IA rupture. The first was an univariate analysis of the risk factors. The second was an analysis of the correlation between CA TI and IA morphological parameters. The third used multivariate logistic stepwise regression analysis to analyse independent risk factors for IA rupture. The fourth was to plot ROC curves to build a predictive model for IA rupture and calculate diagnostic thresholds. Finally, a data set from another hospital (78 cases) was used as a validation set to validate the multivariate model.

RESULT

Univariate analysis revealed that there were statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) in gender, EICA TI, location of IA and IA morphological parameters (FA, H, AR, L, SR), which acted as risk factors for anterior circulation IA rupture. The results of Spearman correlation analysis indicate that CCA TI is significantly correlated with SR, H and L (P < 0.05), while EICA TI is significantly correlated with FA and L (P < 0.05). The results of multivariate logistic analysis showed that FA (OR = 1.072, 95%CI = 1.04-1.10, P < 0.001), SR (OR = 4.949, 95%CI = 1.96-12.53, P = 0.001), EICA TI (OR = 1.037, 95%CI = 1.01-1.07, P = 0.003) were independent risk factors for IA rupture. The ROC curve plotting results suggest that the area under the curve (AUC) of FA is 0.860 with a diagnostic threshold of 110.1°; the AUC of SR is 0.786 with a diagnostic threshold of 1.67; the AUC of EICA TI is 0.723 with a diagnostic threshold of 28.845; the AUC of the three combined is 0.903 with a threshold of 0.480. The combined factor diagnostic model is validated according to the validation set, and the results show that the AUC (0.866) of the validation set is not much different from the AUC (0.903) of the multivariate model, and the multivariate model has a better diagnostic effect.

CONCLUSION

In clinical practice, it is important to consider the evaluation of aneurysm rupture in combination with imaging, as FA, SR and ECIA TI are independent risk factors for IA rupture in the anterior circulation. Unlike the IA morphological parameters, EICA TI is an often overlooked extracranial parameter, but is equally important in its power to predict IA rupture. When the EICA TI exceeds 28.845, the IA has the possibility of rupture. Finally, multivariate diagnostic model are of interest when considering rupture of the anterior circulation IA.

Delayed Development of Aneurysmal Dilatations in Patients with Extracranial Carotid Artery Dissections

OBJECTIVE

Dissection of the carotid artery (CaAD) may result in aneurysm formation. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the time of onset of post-dissection extracranial carotid artery aneurysms (ECAA) following CaAD, and to analyse independent risk factors for the development of these aneurysms.

METHODS

From four European stroke centres, 360 patients with extracranial CaAD were included. The time between the estimated dissection onset and aneurysm formation was analysed, and the clinical risk factors increasing the probability of aneurysm were assessed.

RESULTS

The median duration of follow up was 5.2 months (range 0 - 24 months). A total of 75 post-dissection ECAAs were identified in 70 patients (19.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 15.7 - 23.8). In 52 of 70 (74%) patients, the ECAA was diagnosed at the initial clinical work up of CaAD diagnosis, with the median estimated time of dissection onset to ECAA diagnosis being six days (interquartile range [IQR] 0 - 25). In the remaining 18 (26%) patients who had normal carotid arteries at the initial imaging, the aneurysm diagnosis was made a median of 6.2 months (189 days) from the original imaging (IQR 128 - 198). A Cox proportional hazards model showed that both multiple artery dissections (hazard ratio [HR] 2.58, 95% CI 1.54 - 4.33) and arterial tortuosity (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.08 - 2.95) were associated with presence of ipsilateral ECAA.

CONCLUSION

This post hoc cohort analysis showed substantially delayed development of ipsilateral ECAA in patients with CaAD, months after baseline. Multiple dissections and arterial tortuosity are associated with the presence of ECAA and can be used in future prediction models of ECAA development in patients with CaAD.

Carotid tortuosity is associated with extracranial carotid artery aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Tortuous arteries may be associated with carotid dissection. The intima disruption caused by a carotid dissection is a possible cause of extracranial carotid artery aneurysms (ECAAs). The aim was to investigate if carotid tortuosity is also associated with ECAA in patients without presence or history of a carotid artery dissection.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was performed including 35 unilateral ECAA patients (cases) and 105 age- and sex-matched controls. Tortuosity was expressed as tortuosity-index (TI), curvature, and torsion measured on computed tomography angiography (CTA) data in 3Mensio Vascular and MATLAB by two independent investigators. Primary comparison was tortuosity in ipsi- versus contralateral carotid artery within the cohort of ECAA patients. Secondary comparison was tortuosity with ipsilateral carotid arteries in control patients. All observations were assessed on inter- and intra-operator reproducibility.

RESULTS

Carotid tortuosity was comparable within the cohort of ECAA patients (Spearman correlation 0.76, P<0.001), yet distinctively higher in comparison with unilateral controls. After adjustment for patient characteristics, presence of ECAA was associated with TI (β 0.146, 95% CI: 0.100-0.192). All tortuosity observations showed excellent inter- and intra-operator reproducibility.

CONCLUSIONS

Carotid tortuosity seems to be a risk factor for development of ECAA. Surveillance of individuals with increased carotid tortuosity therefore potentially ensures prompt diagnosis and treatment of ECAA. However, future research should investigate if persons with an increased tortuosity do indeed develop ECAA.

Arterial Tortuosity and Its Correlation with White Matter Hyperintensities in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Introduction

The association between arterial tortuosity and acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has been reported, but showing inconsistent results. We hypothesized that tortuosity of extra- and intracranial large arteries might be higher in AIS patients. Furthermore, we explored the correlation between artery tortuosity and white matter hyperintensity (WMH) severity in AIS patients.

Methods

166 AIS patients identified as large artery atherosclerosis, and 83 control subjects were enrolled. All subjects received three-dimensional computed tomography angiography (CTA). Arterial tortuosity was evaluated using the tortuosity index. WMHs were evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging in all AIS patients.

Results

AIS patients showed significantly increased arterial tortuosity index relative to controls, including left carotid artery (CA) (p = 0.001), right CA (p < 0.001), left common carotid artery (CCA) (p < 0.001), right CCA (p < 0.001), left internal carotid artery (p = 0.001), right internal carotid artery (p = 0.01), left extracranial internal carotid artery (EICA) (p < 0.001), right EICA (p = 0.01), and vertebral artery dominance (VAD) (p = 0.001). The tortuosity of all above arteries was associated with the presence of AIS. AIS patients with moderate or severe WMHs had a higher tortuosity index in left CA (p = 0.005), left CCA (p = 0.003), left EICA (p = 0.07), and VAD (p = 0.001). In addition, the tortuosity of left EICA and VAD was associated with WMH severity in AIS patients.

Conclusions

Increased extra- and intracranial large arteries tortuosity is associated with AIS. The tortuosity of left carotid artery system and vertebral artery may be the independent risk factors for WMH severity in AIS patients. Clinical Trial Registration. This trial is registered with NCT03122002 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Cerebral Arterial Bifurcations Harboring D Type Aneurysm are more Asymmetrical than those with C Type Aneurysm

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to determine aneurysm deviation and to compare anatomical differences of bifurcations harboring C and D-type aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 198 arterial bifurcations harboring aneurysms were enrolled in this study, including 58 anterior cerebral arteries (ACAs), 64 middle cerebral arteries (MCAs), 19 basilar arteries (BAs), and 57 internal carotid artery-posterior communicating arteries (ICA-PComAs). Aneurysms were defined as C type if the neck was located on the extension of the parent artery midline and D type if it was not, then, aneurysm deviation was examined. The angles forming between bilateral branching arteries and the main artery were lateral angles, and smaller one named φ2, larger one termed φ3, respectively, D2, S2, C2 and T2 representing the diameter, cross-sectional area, circumference, and tortuosity of the branch forming angle φ2 with the parent vessel, respectively, and D3, S3, C3 and T3 representing the corresponding values of the contralateral branch. The lateral angle ratio (LA ratio; larger lateral angle/smaller lateral angle), daughter artery ratio (DA ratio; the diameter of branch forming larger lateral angle with parent artery/ the diameter of contralateral branch), SA (S3/S2), CA (C3/C2) and TA (T3/T2) ratios were used to describe bifurcation symmetry.

RESULTS

The angle φ2 of the main cerebral bifurcations was significantly smaller than the angle φ3, whereas T2 was significantly larger than T3. Most of the C-type and 100% of the D-type aneurysms deviated toward the angle φ2. The LA, DA, SA and CA ratios of ACA, MCA bifurcations and ICA-PComAs harboring D-type aneurysms were all significantly larger than those harboring C-type aneurysms; moreover, the LA, DA and SA ratios demonstrated significant differences between the bifurcations with C and D-type aneurysms, as determined by ROC analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of C-type and all of the D-type aneurysms deviated toward the smaller lateral angle, and bifurcations harboring D-type aneurysms were more asymmetrical than those harboring C-type aneurysms.

Increased Internal Carotid Artery Tortuosity is a Risk Factor for Spontaneous Cervicocerebral Artery Dissection

OBJECTIVE

Spontaneous cervicocerebral artery dissection (sCCD) is an important cause of ischaemic stroke that often occurs in young and middle aged patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between tortuosity of the carotid artery and sCCD.

METHODS

Patients with confirmed sCCD who underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA) were reviewed retrospectively. Age and sex matched patients having CTA were used as controls. The tortuosity indices of the cervical arteries were measured from the CTA images. The carotid siphon and the extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) were evaluated according to morphological classification. The carotid siphons were classified into five types. The extracranial ICA was categorised as simple tortuosity, coiling or kinking. Independent risk factors for sCCD were investigated using multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

The study included sixty-six patients with sCCD and 66 controls. There were no differences in vascular risk factors between the two groups. The internal carotid tortuosity index (ICTI) (25.24 ± 12.37 vs. 15.90 ± 8.55, respectively; p < .001) and vertebral tortuosity index (VTI) (median 11.28; interquartile range [IQR] 6.88, 18.80 vs. median 8.38; IQR 6.02, 12.20, respectively; p = .008) were higher in the patients with sCCD than in the controls. Type III and Type IV carotid siphons were more common in the patients with sCCD (p = .001 and p < .001, respectively). The prevalence of any vessel tortuosity, coiling and kinking of the extracranial ICA was higher in the patients with sCCD (p < .001, p = .018 and p = .006, respectively). ICTI (odds ratio [OR] 2.964; p = .026), VTI (OR 5.141; p = .009), and Type III carotid siphons (OR 4.654; p = .003) were independently associated with the risk of sCCD.

CONCLUSION

Arterial tortuosity is associated with sCCD, and greater tortuosity of the cervical artery may indicate an increased risk of arterial dissection.

Anatomical Considerations for Endovascular Intervention for Extracranial Carotid Disease: A Review of the Literature and Recommended Guidelines

Patient selection for endovascular intervention in extracranial carotid disease is centered on vascular anatomy. We review anatomical considerations for non-traumatic disease and offer guidelines in patient selection and management. We conducted a systematic literature review without meta-analysis for studies involving anatomical considerations in extracranial carotid intervention for non-traumatic disease. Anatomical considerations discussed included aortic arch variants, degree of vessel stenosis, angulation, tortuosity, and anomalous origins, and atheromatous plaque morphology, composition, and location. Available literature suggests that anatomical risks of morbidity are largely secondary to increased procedural times and difficulties in intervention system delivery. We recommend the prioritization of endovascular techniques on an individual basis in cases where accessible systems and surgeon familiarity provide an acceptable likelihood of rapid access and device deployment.

Contemporary Outcomes of Open and Endovascular Intervention for Extracranial Carotid Artery Aneurysms: A Single Centre Experience

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of open surgery (OS) and endovascular surgery (ES) for extracranial carotid aneurysm (ECCA) in the authors' centre.

METHODS

Fifty-seven consecutive patients who were diagnosed with ECCA and underwent intervention from January 2005 to July 2019 at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, were reviewed retrospectively. Patient characteristics and surgical outcomes for OS and ES were analysed. ECCAs were divided into three morphological subgroups: subgroup Ⅰ, no severe tortuosity of the internal carotid artery (ICA) or common carotid artery (CCA) proximal to the aneurysm, tortuosity of the aneurysm and 1 cm of peri-aneurysmal carotid artery ≤ 90°; subgroup Ⅱ, severe ICA or CCA tortuosity proximal to the aneurysm, tortuosity of the aneurysm and 1 cm of peri-aneurysmal carotid artery ≤ 90°; subgroup Ⅲ, aneurysm tortuosity and 1 cm peri-aneurysmal carotid artery > 90°.

RESULTS

35 patients underwent OS, 20 patients underwent ES and 2 patients underwent OS after the failure of ES. Thirty-six cases were classified in subgroup Ⅰ, 11 cases in subgroup Ⅱ, and 10 cases in subgroup Ⅲ. ES was achieved successfully in all 18 cases of subgroup I, but failed in three of four cases in subgroups Ⅱ and Ⅲ. With a mean duration of 62.9 ± 44.5 months of follow up, five deaths were recorded in the OS group, two of which were caused by ipsilateral stroke and three were not neurologically related. There was no stroke or death in the ES group during follow up. One case of stroke and two cases of death occurred in symptomatic patients, while one case of stroke and three cases of death occurred in asymptomatic patients.

CONCLUSION

This series demonstrates that ES may be a safe and durable option for ECCA in subgroup Ⅰ, while in subgroups Ⅱ and Ⅲ, ES alone may be difficult to apply. A 30 day stroke rate around 5% existed in ECCAs with interventions, which should be considered before the intervention.