Diagnostic performance of an unenhanced MRI exam for tumor follow-up of the optic pathway gliomas in children

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Orbital Imaging and Vision Loss-Child

Orbital disorders in children consist of varied pathologies affecting the orbits, orbital contents, visual pathway, and innervation of the extraocular or intraocular muscles. The underlying etiology of these disorders may be traumatic or nontraumatic. Presumed location of the lesion along with the additional findings, such as eye pain, swelling, exophthalmos/enophthalmos, erythema, conjunctival vascular dilatation, intraocular pressure, etc, help in determining if imaging is needed, modality of choice, and extent of coverage (orbits and/or head). Occasionally, clinical signs and symptoms may be nonspecific, and, in these cases, diagnostic imaging studies play a key role in depicting the nature and extent of the injury or disease. In this document, various clinical scenarios are discussed by which a child may present with an orbital or vision abnormality. Imaging studies that might be most appropriate (based on the best available evidence or expert consensus) in these clinical scenarios are also discussed. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Brain Tumor Imaging without Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents: Feasible or Fantasy?

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) form the cornerstone of current primary brain tumor MRI protocols at all stages of the patient journey. Though an imperfect measure of tumor grade, GBCAs are repeatedly used for diagnosis and monitoring. In practice, however, radiologists will encounter situations where GBCA injection is not needed or of doubtful benefit. Reducing GBCA administration could improve the patient burden of (repeated) imaging (especially in vulnerable patient groups, such as children), minimize risks of putative side effects, and benefit costs, logistics, and the environmental footprint. On the basis of the current literature, imaging strategies to reduce GBCA exposure for pediatric and adult patients with primary brain tumors will be reviewed. Early postoperative MRI and fixed-interval imaging of gliomas are examples of GBCA exposure with uncertain survival benefits. Half-dose GBCAs for gliomas and T2-weighted imaging alone for meningiomas are among options to reduce GBCA use. While most imaging guidelines recommend using GBCAs at all stages of diagnosis and treatment, non-contrast-enhanced sequences, such as the arterial spin labeling, have shown a great potential. Artificial intelligence methods to generate synthetic postcontrast images from decreased-dose or non-GBCA scans have shown promise to replace GBCA-dependent approaches. This review is focused on pediatric and adult gliomas and meningiomas. Special attention is paid to the quality and real-life applicability of the reviewed literature.

Non-inferiority of a non-gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging follow-up protocol for isolated optic pathway gliomas

BACKGROUND

Pediatric patients with optic pathway gliomas (OPGs) typically undergo a large number of follow-up MRI brain exams with gadolinium-based contrast media (GBCM), which have been associated with gadolinium tissue retention. Therefore, careful consideration of GBCM use in these children is warranted.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether GBCM is necessary for OPG MR imaging response assessment using a blinded, non-inferiority, multi-reader study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified children with OPG and either stable disease or change in tumor size on MRI using a regional cancer registry serving the U.S. Pacific Northwest. For each child, the two relevant, consecutive MRI studies were anonymized and standardized into two imaging sets excluding or including GBCM-enhanced images. Exam pairs were compiled from 42 children with isolated OPG (19 with neurofibromatosis type 1), from a population of 106 children with OPG. We included 28 exam pairs in which there was a change in size between exams. Seven pediatric radiologists measured tumor sizes during three blinded sessions, spaced by at least 1 week. The first measuring session excluded GBCM-enhanced sequences; the others did not. The primary endpoint was intra-reader agreement for ≥ 25% change in axial cross-product measurement, using a 12% non-inferiority threshold.

RESULTS

Analysis demonstrated an overall 1.2% difference (95% confidence interval, -3.2% to 5.5%) for intra-reader agreement using a non-GBCM-enhanced protocol and background variability.

CONCLUSION

A non-GBCM-enhanced protocol was non-inferior to a GBCM-enhanced protocol for assessing change in size of isolated OPGs on follow-up MRI exams.

Gadolinium is not necessary for surveillance MR imaging in children with chiasmatic-hypothalamic low-grade glioma

BACKGROUND

Patients with chiasmatic-hypothalamic low-grade glioma (CHLGG) have frequent MRIs with gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) for disease monitoring. Cumulative gadolinium deposition in the brains of children is a potential concern. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether MRI with GBCA is necessary for determining radiographic tumor progression in children with CHLGG.

METHODS

Children who were treated for progressive CHLGG from 2005 to 2019 at Texas Children's Cancer Center were identified. Pre- and post-contrast MRI sequences were separately reviewed by one neuroradiologist who was blinded to the clinical course. Three dimensional measurements and tumor characteristics were evaluated. Radiographic progression was defined as a 25% increase in size (product of two largest dimensions) compared with baseline or best response after initiation of therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 28 patients with progressive CHLGG were identified with a total of 683 MRIs with GBCA reviewed (mean 24 MRIs/patient; range, 11-43 MRIs). Radiographic progression was observed 92 times, 91 (99%) on noncontrast and 90 (98%) on contrast imaging. Sixty-seven progressions necessitating management changes were identified in all (100%) noncontrast sequences and 66 (99%) contrast sequences. Tumor growth > 2 mm in any dimension was identified in 184/187 (98%) noncontrast and 181/187 (97%) with contrast imaging. Metastatic tumors were better visualized on contrast imaging in 4/7 (57%).

CONCLUSION

MRI without GBCA effectively identifies patients with progressive disease. When imaging children with CHLGG, eliminating GBCA should be considered unless monitoring patients with metastatic disease.

Surveillance imaging of grade 1 astrocytomas in children: can duration and frequency of follow-up imaging and the use of contrast agents be reduced?

Purpose

The optimum strategy for the surveillance of low-grade gliomas in children has not been established, and there is concern about the use of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs), particularly in children, due to their deposition in the brain. The number of surveillance scans and the use of GBCAs in surveillance of low-risk tumours should ideally be limited. We aimed to investigate the consistency and utility of our surveillance imaging and also determine to what extent the use of GBCAs contributed to decisions to escalate treatment in children with grade 1 astrocytomas.

Methods

This was a retrospective single-centre study at a tertiary paediatric hospital. All children with a new diagnosis of a non-syndromic World Health Organization (WHO) grade 1 astrocytoma between 2007 and 2013 were included, with surveillance imaging up to December 2018 included in analysis. The intervals of surveillance imaging were recorded, and imaging and electronic health records were examined for decisions related to treatment escalation.

Results

Eighty-eight patients had 690 surveillance scans in the study period. Thirty-one patients had recurrence or progression leading to treatment escalation, 30 of whom were identified on surveillance imaging. The use of GBCAs did not appear to contribute to multidisciplinary team (MDT) decisions in the majority of cases.

Conclusion

Surveillance imaging could be reduced in number and duration for completely resected cerebellar tumours. MDT decisions were rarely made on the basis of post-contrast imaging, and GBCA administration could therefore potentially be restricted in the setting of surveillance of grade 1 astrocytomas in children.

Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of subependymal giant cell astrocytomas in follow-up of children with tuberous sclerosis complex: should we always use contrast enhancement?

BACKGROUND

Subependymal giant cell astrocytomas (SEGAs) arise in 10-26% of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) patients. SEGAs cause obstructive hydrocephalus and increase morbi-mortality. It is recommended that TSC patients be followed with contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI), but repetitive use of gadolinium-based contrast-agents (GBCAs) may cause organ deposits.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic performances of non-CE- and CE-MRI to differentiate SEGAs from subependymal nodules in TSC patients during follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-five TSC patients (median age: 2.4 years) were enrolled in this retrospective single-center study from September 2007 to January 2019. Inclusion criteria were a certain diagnosis of TSC and at least three follow-up brain MRIs with GBCA injection. Two consecutive MRI scans per patient were selected and anonymized. Three radiologists performed a blinded review of non-enhanced and enhanced MRI sequences during different sessions. The diagnostic performances were compared (sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive values, accuracy, inter/intra-observer agreements).

RESULTS

The accuracies for detecting SEGAs were good and similar between the non-enhanced and enhanced MRI sequences. The sensitivity and specificity of non-CE-MRI to diagnose SEGA ranged from 75% to 100% and from 94% to 100%, respectively. The differences in numbers of false-positive and false-negative patients between non-CE- and CE-MRI never exceeded one case. Nodules size >10 mm, location near the Monro foramen, hydrocephalus and modifications between two consecutive MRI scans were significantly associated with the diagnosis of SEGA for the three readers (all P-values <0.05). Inter- and intra-observer agreements were also excellent for non-enhanced and enhanced MRI sequences (kappa=0.85-1 and 0.81-0.93, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The performances of non-enhanced and enhanced MRI sequences are comparable for detecting SEGAs, questioning the need for systematic GBCA injections for TSC patients.