3D fast low-angle shot (FLASH) technique for 3T contrast-enhanced brain MRI in the inpatient and emergency setting: comparison with 3D magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo (MPRAGE) technique

Role of pulmonary perfusion magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension: A review

Among five types of pulmonary hypertension, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is the only curable form, but prompt and accurate diagnosis can be challenging. Computed tomography and nuclear medicine-based techniques are standard imaging modalities to non-invasively diagnose CTEPH, however these are limited by radiation exposure, subjective qualitative bias, and lack of cardiac functional assessment. This review aims to assess the methodology, diagnostic accuracy of pulmonary perfusion imaging in the current literature and discuss its advantages, limitations and future research scope.

Clinical feasibility of CS-VIBE accelerates MRI techniques in diagnosing intracranial metastasis

Our objective was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of post-contrast 3D compressed-sensing volume-interpolated breath-hold examination (CS-VIBE) and 3D T1 magnetization-prepared rapid-acquisition gradient-echo (MPRAGE) in detecting intracranial metastasis. Additionally, we analyzed and compared the image quality between the two. We enrolled 164 cancer patients who underwent contrast-enhanced brain MRI. Two neuroradiologists independently reviewed all the images. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to noise ratio (CNR) were compared between two sequences. For patients with intracranial metastasis, we measured enhancement degree and CNR_{lesion/parenchyma} of the lesion. The overall image quality, motion artifact, gray-white matter discrimination and enhancing lesion conspicuity were analyzed. Both MPRAGE and CS-VIBE showed similar performance in diagnosing intracranial metastasis. Overall image quality of CS-VIBE was better with less motion artifact; however conventional MPRAGE was superior in enhancing lesion conspicuity. Overall, the SNR and CNR of conventional MPRAGE were higher than those of CS-VIBE. For 30 enhancing intracranial metastatic lesions, MPRAGE showed a lower CNR (p = 0.02) and contrast ratio (p = 0.03). MPRAGE and CS-VIBE were preferred in 11.6 and 13.4% of cases, respectively. In comparison with conventional MPRAGE, CS-VIBE achieved comparable image quality and visualization, with the scan time being half of that of MPRAGE.

Accelerated Nonenhanced 3D T1-MPRAGE Using Wave-Controlled Aliasing in Parallel Imaging for Infant Brain Imaging

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

MPRAGE is the most commonly used sequence for high-resolution 3D T1-weighted imaging in pediatric patients. However, its longer scan time is a major drawback because pediatric patients are prone to motion and frequently require sedation. This study compared nonenhanced accelerated MPRAGE using wave-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging (wave-T1-MPRAGE) with standard MPRAGE in infants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 68 infants (mean age, 1.78 [SD. 1.70] months) who underwent nonenhanced standard and wave-T1-MPRAGE. Two neuroradiologists independently assessed each image for image quality, artifacts, myelination degree, and anatomic delineation using the 4-point Likert scale. For diagnostic performance, both observers determined whether nonenhancing lesions were present in the brain parenchyma in 2 types of nonenhanced MPRAGE sequences.

RESULTS

Wave-T1-MPRAGE showed a significantly lower mean score and lower interobserver agreement for overall image quality and anatomic delineation than standard MPRAGE (P< .001 for each). However, there were no significant differences between the 2 types of MPRAGE sequences for motion artifacts (P = .90 for observer 1, P = .14 for observer 2) and degree of myelination (P = .16 for observer 1, P = .32 for observer 2). Among the nonenhancing pathologic lesions observed on standard MPRAGE by both observers, only 2 were missed on wave-T1-MPRAGE, and they were very tiny, faint, nonhemorrhagic WM injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

Although wave-T1-MPRAGE showed lower overall image quality than standard MPRAGE, the diagnostic performance for nonenhancing parenchymal lesions was comparable. Wave-T1-MPRAGE could be an alternative for diagnosing intracranial lesions in infants, with marked scan time reduction.

Usefulness of Wave-CAIPI for Postcontrast 3D T1-SPACE in the Evaluation of Brain Metastases

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

High-resolution postcontrast 3D T1WI is a widely used sequence for evaluating brain metastasis, despite the long scan time. This study aimed to compare highly accelerated postcontrast 3D T1-weighted sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts by using different flip angle evolution by using wave-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging (wave-T1-SPACE) with the commonly used standard high-resolution postcontrast 3D T1-SPACE for the evaluation of brain metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among the 387 patients who underwent postcontrast wave-T1-SPACE and standard SPACE, 56 patients with suspected brain metastases were retrospectively included. Two neuroradiologists assessed the number of enhancing lesions according to lesion size, contrast-to-noise ratio_{lesion/parenchyma}, contrast-to-noise ratio_{white matter/gray matter}, contrast ratio_{lesion/parenchyma}, and overall image quality for the 2 different sequences.

RESULTS

Although there was no significant difference in the evaluation of larger enhancing lesions (>5 mm) between the 2 different sequences (P = .66 for observer 1, P = .26 for observer 2), wave-T1-SPACE showed a significantly lower number of smaller enhancing lesions (<5 mm) than standard SPACE (1.61 [SD, 0.29] versus 2.84 [SD, 0.47] for observer 1; 1.41 [SD, 0.19] versus 2.68 [SD, 0.43] for observer 2). Furthermore, mean contrast-to-noise ratio_{lesion/parenchyma} and overall image quality of wave-T1-SPACE were significantly lower than those in standard SPACE.

CONCLUSIONS

Postcontrast wave-T1-SPACE showed comparable diagnostic performance for larger enhancing lesions (>5 mm) and marked scan time reduction compared with standard SPACE. However, postcontrast wave-T1-SPACE showed underestimation of smaller enhancing lesions (<5 mm) and lower image quality than standard SPACE. Therefore, postcontrast wave-T1-SPACE should be interpreted carefully in the evaluation of brain metastasis.

MRI and MR angiography evaluation of pulsatile tinnitus: A focused, physiology-based protocol

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Pulsatile tinnitus (PT) is the subjective sensation of a pulse-synchronous sound, most often due to a cerebrovascular etiology. PT can severely impact quality of life and may indicate a life-threatening process, yet a timely and accurate diagnosis can often lead to effective treatment. Clinical assessment with a history and physical examination can often suggest a diagnosis for PT, but is rarely definitive. Therefore, PT should be evaluated with a comprehensive and targeted radiographic imaging protocol. MR imaging provides a safe and effective means to evaluate PT. Specific MR sequences may be used to highlight different elements of cerebrovascular anatomy and physiology. However, routine MR evaluation of PT must comply with economic and practical constraints, while effectively capturing both common and rarer, life-threatening etiologies of PT.

METHODS

In this state-of-the-art review, we describe our institutional MR protocol for evaluating PT.

RESULTS

This protocol includes the following dedicated sequences: time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography; arterial spin labeling; spoiled gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state; time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics; diffusion weighted imaging, and 3-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe the physiologic and clinical rationale for including each MR sequence in a comprehensive PT imaging protocol, and detail the role of MR within the broader evaluation of PT, from clinical presentation to treatment.