Clinical safety of intracranial EEG electrodes in MRI at 1.5 T and 3 T: a single-center experience and literature review

Safety of intracranial electrodes in an MRI environment: a technical report

INTRODUCTION

Intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) involves placing intracranial electrodes to localise seizures in patients with medically refractory epilepsy. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables visualisation of electrodes within patient-specific anatomy, the safety of these electrodes must be confirmed prior to routine clinical utilisation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of iEEG electrodes from a particular manufacturer in a 3.0-Tesla (3.0T) MRI environment.

METHODS

Measurements of magnetically induced displacement force and torque were determined for each of the 10 test articles using standardised techniques. Test articles were subsequently evaluated for radiofrequency-induced heating using a Perspex phantom in both open and 'fault' conditions. Additionally, we assessed radiofrequency (RF)-induced heating with all test articles placed into the phantom simultaneously to simulate an implantation, again in both open and 'fault' conditions. Finally, each test article was evaluated for MRI artefacts.

RESULTS

The magnetically induced displacement force was found to be less than the force on the article due to gravity for all test articles. Similarly, the maximum magnetically induced torque was less than the worst-case torque due to gravity for all test articles apart from the 8-contact strip - for which it was 11% greater - and the depthalon cap. The maximum temperature change for any portion of any test article assessed individually was 1.7°C, or 1.2°C for any device component meant to be implanted intracranially. In the implantation configuration, the maximum recorded temperature change was 0.7°C.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI may be safely performed for localising iEEG electrodes at 3.0T under certain conditions.

Beyond Stereo-EEG: Is It Worth Combining Stereo-EEG With Other Diagnostic Methods?

SUMMARY

Stereo-EEG is a widely used method to improve the diagnostic precision of presurgical workup in patients with refractory epilepsy. Its ability to detect epileptic activity and identify epileptic networks largely depends on the chosen implantation strategy. Even in an ideal situation, electrodes record activity generated in <10% of the brain and contacts only record from brain tissue in their immediate proximity. In this article, the authors discuss how recording stereo-EEG simultaneously with other diagnostic methods can improve its diagnostic value in clinical and research settings. It can help overcome the limited spatial coverage of intracranial recording and better understand the sources of epileptic activity. Simultaneous scalp EEG is the most widely available method, often used to understand large epileptic networks, seizure propagation, and EEG activity occurring on the contralateral hemisphere. Simultaneous magnetoencephalography allows for more precise source localization and identification of deep sources outside the stereo-EEG coverage. Finally, simultaneous functional MRI can highlight metabolic changes following epileptic activity and help understand the widespread network changes associated with interictal activity. This overview highlights advantages and methodological challenges for all these methods. Clinical use and research applications are presented for each approach.

Accuracy and Utility of Frameless Stereotactic Placement of Stereoelectroencephalography Electrodes

BACKGROUND

Successful surgery for epilepsy hinges on identification of the epileptogenic focus. Stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) is the most effective way to identify most seizure foci. There are multiple methods of inserting depth electrodes, including frame-based, frameless, and robot-assisted techniques. Studies have shown the accuracy of frame-based and robotic-assisted techniques to be statistically similar, while only one study has detailed the frameless sEEG insertion technique.

METHODS

Patients underwent placement of sEEG depth electrodes using frameless stereotaxy from September 2019 to September 2021 at Geisinger Medical Center by a single surgeon. Seizure history, electrode placement accuracy relative to the planned trajectories, surgical times, success rate of identifying the epileptogenic focus, and subsequent seizure control rates after surgical treatment were documented.

RESULTS

Data were available for 21 patients and 181 electrodes inserted using the VarioGuide frameless stereotactic system. Each insertion took an average of 14.5 minutes per lead. Average entry variance was 2.7 mm with an average target variance of 4.6 mm. The epileptogenic focus was identified in 19 of 21 patients, and further surgical treatment was performed in 18 of 21 patients (85.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

VarioGuide frameless stereotaxy for sEEG placement is comparable to frame-based and robotic-assisted techniques with statistically similar rates of epileptic focus identification. Lead placement accuracy is slightly lower and time per lead is slightly higher relative to robot-assisted surgeries. When a robot system is unavailable, surgeons can consider using a frameless stereotactic technique for sEEG insertion, allowing patients to benefit from a similarly high rate of epileptic zone identification.

Physical behavior of PEDOT polymer electrode during magnetic resonance imaging and long-term test in the climate chamber

The PEDOT polymer electrode is a metal-free electrode, consisting of an acrylate (dental composite) and the conductive polymer poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS). The electrode is applied as gel onto the skin and cured with blue light for 10-20 s in order to achieve a conductive bond to the skin. The electrodes are used in combination with polymer cables consisting of a textile backbone and PEDOT:PSS. To test this new electrode and cable type under different conditions we designed two stress-tests: highly sensitive temperature recordings within a head phantom during Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and long-term stability inside a climate chamber with high humidity. To study the physical behavior inside the strong magnetic field (3 Tesla), the PEDOT polymer electrode was attached to an agarose head-phantom inside a magnetic resonance tomograph during an image sequence. MRI-safe temperature sensors were placed nearby in order to measure possible heating effects. In comparison to a metal cable, nearly no rise in temperature could be observed if the electrode was used in combination with a conductive textile cable. Furthermore, the electrode showed stable impedance values inside a climate chamber for 4 consecutive days. These results pave the way for testing the PEDOT polymer electrode as biosignal recording electrode during MRI, especially for cardio MRI and Electroencephalography in combination with functional MRI (EEG-fMRI).

Intraoperative MR Imaging during Glioma Resection

One of the major issues in the surgical treatment of gliomas is the concern about maximizing the extent of resection while minimizing neurological impairment. Thus, surgical planning by carefully observing the relationship between the glioma infiltration area and eloquent area of the connecting fibers is crucial. Neurosurgeons usually detect an eloquent area by functional MRI and identify a connecting fiber by diffusion tensor imaging. However, during surgery, the accuracy of neuronavigation can be decreased due to brain shift, but the positional information may be updated by intraoperative MRI and the next steps can be planned accordingly. In addition, various intraoperative modalities may be used to guide surgery, including neurophysiological monitoring that provides real-time information (e.g., awake surgery, motor-evoked potentials, and sensory evoked potential); photodynamic diagnosis, which can identify high-grade glioma cells; and other imaging techniques that provide anatomical information during the surgery. In this review, we present the historical and current context of the intraoperative MRI and some related approaches for an audience active in the technical, clinical, and research areas of radiology, as well as mention important aspects regarding safety and types of devices.