1
|
Yi H, Chen H, Lian P, Ji X, Cunningham ME, Boachie-Adjei O, Kim HJ, Ross T, Nemani VM, Xia H. Trans-sacral interbody fixation in long fusions to the sacrum for adult spinal deformity: complications and fusion rates at minimum two years follow-up. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2024; 48:193-200. [PMID: 37620580 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-023-05951-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to investigate the fusion rate and complications associated with trans-sacral interbody fusion (TSIF) in long fusions to the sacrum for adult spinal deformity (ASD) over a two year follow-up period. Potential predictor variables associated with pseudarthrosis were also examined. METHODS A retrospective clinical review was conducted on a consecutive series of ASD patients who underwent long fusions to the sacrum, with TSIF performed as a same-day or staged procedure. Patient demographics, bone mineral density, operative details, perioperative and late complications, and fusion rates were reviewed. Univariate analysis was used to identify the risk factors associated with pseudarthrosis. RESULTS The study included 43 patients with an average age of 55.3 ± 8.9 years. The perioperative complication rate was 28%, with 12% of the complications directly related to TSIF. The late complication rate was 33%, with 16% related to TSIF. The most common complications were pseudarthrosis (14%) and postoperative ileus (7%). The overall radiographic fusion rate at two years was 86%. Univariate analysis revealed that revision surgery was significantly associated with pseudarthrosis (p = 0.027). Over the follow-up period, patients who underwent TSIF during long posterior fusions to the sacrum showed improvement in overall SRS scores, ODI scores, and SF-36 physical health and mental health (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION TSIF is a relatively safe and minimally invasive method for achieving interbody fusion at the lumbosacral junction in the treatment of ASD, with acceptable fusion rates and a low complication rate. However, TSIF is not recommended for revision reconstruction in ASD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Honglei Yi
- People's Liberation Army General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| | - Hu Chen
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Peirong Lian
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xinran Ji
- Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | | | | | - Han Jo Kim
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Thomas Ross
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Venu M Nemani
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Hong Xia
- People's Liberation Army General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dastagirzada YM, Alexiades NG, Kurland DB, Anderson SN, Brockmeyer DL, Bumpass DB, Chatterjee S, Groves ML, Hankinson TC, Harter D, Hedequist D, Jea A, Leonard JR, Martin JE, Oetgen ME, Pahys J, Rozzelle C, Strahle JM, Thompson D, Yaszay B, Anderson RCE. Developing consensus for the management of pediatric cervical spine disorders and stabilization: a modified Delphi study. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2023; 31:32-42. [PMID: 36308472 DOI: 10.3171/2022.9.peds22319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cervical spine disorders in children are relatively uncommon; therefore, paradigms for surgical and nonsurgical clinical management are not well established. The purpose of this study was to bring together an international, multidisciplinary group of pediatric cervical spine experts to build consensus via a modified Delphi approach regarding the clinical management of children with cervical spine disorders and those undergoing cervical spine stabilization surgery. METHODS A modified Delphi method was used to identify consensus statements for the management of children with cervical spine disorders requiring stabilization. A survey of current practices, supplemented by a literature review, was electronically distributed to 17 neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons experienced with the clinical management of pediatric cervical spine disorders. Subsequently, 52 summary statements were formulated and distributed to the group. Statements that reached near consensus or that were of particular interest were then discussed during an in-person meeting to attain further consensus. Consensus was defined as ≥ 80% agreement on a 4-point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree). RESULTS Forty-five consensus-driven statements were identified, with all participants willing to incorporate them into their practice. For children with cervical spine disorders and/or stabilization, consensus statements were divided into the following categories: A) preoperative planning (12 statements); B) radiographic thresholds of instability (4); C) intraoperative/perioperative management (15); D) postoperative care (11); and E) nonoperative management (3). Several important statements reaching consensus included the following recommendations: 1) to obtain pre-positioning baseline signals with intraoperative neuromonitoring; 2) to use rigid instrumentation when technically feasible; 3) to provide postoperative external immobilization for 6-12 weeks with a rigid cervical collar rather than halo vest immobilization; and 4) to continue clinical postoperative follow-up at least until anatomical cervical spine maturity was reached. In addition, preoperative radiographic thresholds for instability that reached consensus included the following: 1) translational motion ≥ 5 mm at C1-2 (excluding patients with Down syndrome) or ≥ 4 mm in the subaxial spine; 2) dynamic angulation in the subaxial spine ≥ 10°; and 3) abnormal motion and T2 signal change on MRI seen at the same level. CONCLUSIONS In this study, the authors have demonstrated that a multidisciplinary, international group of pediatric cervical spine experts was able to reach consensus on 45 statements regarding the management of pediatric cervical spine disorders and stabilization. Further study is required to determine if implementation of these practices can lead to reduced complications and improved outcomes for children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yosef M Dastagirzada
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, New York University, Hassenfeld Children's Hospital, New York, New York
| | | | - David B Kurland
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, New York University, Hassenfeld Children's Hospital, New York, New York
| | | | - Douglas L Brockmeyer
- 4Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Primary Children's Medical Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - David B Bumpass
- 5Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Arkansas, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | | | - Mari L Groves
- 7Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Todd C Hankinson
- 8Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - David Harter
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, New York University, Hassenfeld Children's Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Daniel Hedequist
- 9Department of Neurosurgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew Jea
- 10Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Jeffrey R Leonard
- 11Department of Neurosurgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Jonathan E Martin
- 12Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Connecticut Children's, Hartford, Connecticut
| | - Matthew E Oetgen
- 13Division of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Joshua Pahys
- 14Department of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Shriners Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Curtis Rozzelle
- 15Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Jennifer M Strahle
- 16Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Dominic Thompson
- 17Department of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Burt Yaszay
- 18Department of Orthopedics, University of Washington, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington
| | - Richard C E Anderson
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, New York University, Hassenfeld Children's Hospital, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Paediatric Spinal Deformity Surgery: Complications and Their Management. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10122519. [PMID: 36554043 PMCID: PMC9778654 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10122519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Surgical correction of paediatric spinal deformity is associated with risks, adverse events, and complications that must be preoperatively discussed with patients and their families to inform treatment decisions, expectations, and long-term outcomes. The incidence of complications varies in relation to the underlying aetiology of spinal deformity and surgical procedure. Intraoperative complications include bleeding, neurological injury, and those related to positioning. Postoperative complications include persistent pain, surgical site infection, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary complications, superior mesenteric artery syndrome, and also pseudarthrosis and implant failure, proximal junctional kyphosis, crankshaft phenomenon, and adding-on deformity, which may necessitate revision surgery. Interventions included in enhanced recovery after surgery protocols may reduce the incidence of complications. Complications must be diagnosed, investigated and managed expeditiously to prevent further deterioration and to ensure optimal outcomes. This review summarises the complications associated with paediatric spinal deformity surgery and their management.
Collapse
|