Holmgren M, Henze A, Wåhlin A, Eklund A, Fox AJ, Johansson E. Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging of intracranial and extracranial blood flow in carotid near-occlusion.
Neuroradiology 2024;
66:589-599. [PMID:
38400954 PMCID:
PMC10937755 DOI:
10.1007/s00234-024-03309-y]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE
Compare extracranial internal carotid artery flow rates and intracranial collateral use between conventional ≥ 50% carotid stenosis and carotid near-occlusion, and between symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid near-occlusion.
METHODS
We included patients with ≥ 50% carotid stenosis. Degree of stenosis was diagnosed on CTA. Mean blood flow rates were assessed with four-dimensional phase-contrast MRI.
RESULTS
We included 110 patients of which 83% were symptomatic, and 38% had near-occlusion. Near-occlusions had lower mean internal carotid artery flow (70 ml/min) than conventional ≥ 50% stenoses (203 ml/min, P < .001). Definite use of ≥ 1 collateral was found in 83% (35/42) of near-occlusions and 10% (7/68) of conventional stenoses (P < .001). However, there were no differences in total cerebral blood flow (514 ml/min vs. 519 ml/min, P = .78) or ipsilateral hemispheric blood flow (234 vs. 227 ml/min, P = .52), between near-occlusions and conventional ≥ 50% stenoses, based on phase-contrast MRI flow rates. There were no differences in total cerebral or hemispheric blood flow, or collateral use, between symptomatic and asymptomatic near-occlusions.
CONCLUSION
Near-occlusions have lower internal carotid artery flow rates and more collateral use, but similar total cerebral blood flow and hemispheric blood flow, compared to conventional ≥ 50% carotid stenosis.
Collapse