Contrast-induced encephalopathy following endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms-risk factors analysis and clinical strategy

Contrast Medium-Induced Transient Cortical Blindness: A Systematic Review of the Literature

PURPOSE

To summarize identified risk factors, the most common clinical presentations, radiological and neurophysiological features, and proposed pathophysiological mechanisms of contrast medium-induced transient cortical blindness (TCB).

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and clinicaltrials.gov was performed. A total of 115 patients from 2 retrospective cohort studies, 10 case series, and 52 case reports were included.

RESULTS

The available evidence suggests that TCB can manifest after both invasive and noninvasive contrast-enhanced procedures. The pathophysiology of TCB is unclear; however, the primary mechanism suggested involves the direct neurotoxic effect of the contrast medium. Ionic, nonionic, hyperosmolar, isoosmolar, and even ethiodized oil have been implicated. Imaging findings are nonspecific, and absent in about half of patients. Onset is within 30 minutes in about half of patients and resolves within 1 day in about half of patients, but delayed onset after a day and delayed resolution after a week may occur. Higher contrast medium dosage and its injection solely into the posterior circulation were the only risk factors identified in association with TCB.

CONCLUSIONS

TCB is a rare, idiopathic, and typically self-limited condition associated with direct posterior cerebral neurotoxicity of iodinated contrast media, and appears to be dose-dependent.

Medulla and cervical cord contrast-induced encephalopathy detected by neuromonitoring during coil embolization of posterior circulation aneurysms

Understanding the risks of contrast-induced encephalopathy (CIE), a serious complication of contrast agents, is crucial in endovascular treatment. We present the case of a 73-year-old woman who developed CIE in the medulla and cervical cord during coil embolization for unruptured left basilar-superior cerebellar artery and basilar artery tip aneurysms. The CIE was identified via neuromonitoring. In this case, spinal cord ischemia might have occurred due to reduced perfusion pressure after inserting the distal access catheter (DAC) in the vertebral artery. Multiple injections of contrast medium via the DAC during coil embolization likely contributed to an unusual form of CIE. Extreme caution is warranted during endovascular treatments involving the posterior circulation, due to the relatively high incidence of contrast-mediated encephalopathy, which can lead to severe consequences such as perforator infarction. Neuromonitoring is very useful for the early detection of neurological changes, particularly because intraoperative angiography may not reveal all irregularities.

Risk factor analyses of contrast leakage and contrast-induced encephalopathy following coil embolization for unruptured intracranial aneurysm

BACKGROUND

Contrast-induced encephalopathy (CIE) following endovascular interventions is a rare but serious complication. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors of contrast leakage (CL) and CIE in patients who underwent coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs).

METHODS

Patients with UIAs who underwent coil embolization at a single tertiary institute between January 2019 and January 2022 were enrolled retrospectively. CL was defined as cortical or subcortical contrast enhancement with effacement of the cortical sulci. CIE was defined as the new onset of neurological deficits associated with CL. Following the procedure, all patients underwent CT scans, and MRI scans were performed on those with symptoms. Patient and procedural risk factors were investigated.

RESULTS

In total, 459 patients were analyzed. The median procedure time and contrast dose were 69 min and 96 mL, respectively. CL was evident in 35 patients. In the multivariate analysis, hypertension, large aneurysm, longer procedure time, and greater contrast dose were associated with CL. CIE was diagnosed in 19 patients, and the risk factors included large aneurysm, longer procedure time, and greater contrast dose. The procedure time was predictive of both CL (P<0.001) and CIE (P=0.01). The optimal cut-off value for procedure time was 81.5 min. All CIE patients recovered completely within 8-96 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

A large aneurysm and prolonged procedure time may increase the patient's risk of CL and CIE due to increased contrast exposure. Patients who underwent a procedure that exceeded 1.5 hours necessitate post-procedure evaluation and monitoring.

Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy after Endovascular Treatment: Two Case Reports

Contrast-induced encephalopathy (CIE) is a rare neurological complication that occurs after the use of contrast medium in various angiographic procedures. Symptoms can be different, from headache to severe neurological deficit and coma. In the articles published to date, symptoms appeared immediately after application of contrast agent or within 24 hours. Here we present two cases of patients in whom CIE developed delayed after endovascular treatment.

Contrast Injection from an Intermediate Catheter Placed in an Intradural Artery is Associated with Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy following Neurointervention

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Contrast-induced encephalopathy can result from neurotoxicity of contrast medium in the affected area. The development of intermediate catheters has allowed guidance of catheters to more distal arteries. This study focused on the association between contrast-induced encephalopathy and contrast injection from an intermediate catheter guided into a distal intradural artery during neurointervention for cerebral aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 420 consecutive aneurysms in 396 patients who underwent neurointervention for extracranial aneurysms and unruptured intracranial aneurysms at our institution from February 2012 to January 2023. Patients were divided into a group with contrast-induced encephalopathy and a group without. To identify risk factors for contrast-induced encephalopathy, we compared clinical, anatomic, and procedural factors between groups by multivariate logistic regression analysis and stepwise selection.

RESULTS

Among the 396 patients who underwent neurointervention for cerebral aneurysms, 14 (3.5%) developed contrast-induced encephalopathy. Compared with the group without contrast-induced encephalopathy, the group with contrast-induced encephalopathy showed significantly higher rates of patients on hemodialysis, previously treated aneurysms, intradural placement of a catheter for angiography, nonionic contrast medium, and flow-diversion procedures in univariate analyses. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed intradural placement of a catheter for angiography (OR = 40.4; 95% CI, 8.63-189) and previously treated aneurysms (OR = 8.20; 95% CI, 2.26-29.6) as independent predictors of contrast-induced encephalopathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast injection from an intradural artery and retreatment of recurrent aneurysms were major risk factors for contrast-induced encephalopathy. Attention should be paid to the location of the intermediate catheter for angiography to avoid developing contrast-induced encephalopathy.

Reversible intracranial contrast medium accumulation after embolization of unruptured cerebral aneurysms and its association with transient neurological deficits: A single center experience

BACKGROUND

Use of iodine-containing contrast medium (CM) is obligatory for endovascular treatment (EVT) of cerebral aneurysms. After EVT, intracranial density increases (DIs) can be detected in cranial computed tomography (CT). Those DI can correspond to subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), infarction or reversible CM accumulation (RCMA). The latter can be mistaken for hemorrhage, especially if they are accompanied by neurological deficits.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze postinterventional DI after EVT of unruptured cerebral aneurysms and associated clinical symptoms and to identify risk factors for the occurrence of RCMA.

METHODS

For differentiation of DI, we compared CT scans following EVT and additionally 24 h ± 5 h later. Diagnosis of RCMA was based on marked regression of DI on follow-up scans. We analyzed continuous variables (age, duration of intervention and anesthesia, aneurysm diameter, amount of CM and renal function) and categorial variables (gender, aneurysm location, devices for EVT, antiplatelet therapy [APT] and associated neurological deficits) to identify risk factors for the occurrence of RCMA.

RESULTS

We studied 58 patients (44 female, mean age 59.5 [range 39-81]) who underwent EVT for a total of 68 cerebral aneurysms in 62 therapy sessions over a 3-year period without periprocedural complications. Postinterventional DI occurred after 17 therapy sessions. All 17 DI turned out to be RCMA in the follow-up imaging. Two patients who had no DI on initial postinterventional CT showed new SAH on follow-up CT. Infarctions were not observed. Transient neurological deficits occurred in eight patients (12.9%) and were associated with RCMA (P = 0.010). Postinterventional RCMA was associated with the duration of EVT (P = 0.038) and with APT (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA] + clopidogrel: P =0.040; ASA alone: P =0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

RCMA is common after EVT of unruptured cerebral aneurysms and often accompanied by transient neurological deficits. Long procedure duration and APT appear to predispose to the occurrence of RCMA.