Versatile distally based neurocutaneous saphenous flap in the era of microsurgery

The Lateral Antebrachial Neurocutaneous Flap: Case Series

BACKGROUND

The neurocutaneous flap was developed based on the understanding that every superficial cutaneous nerve includes vessels, also known as vasa nervorum or paraneural vessels, which run around and inside the nerves and deliver blood to the skin above. A cutaneous perforator connected to paraneural vessels that vascularize the skin and nerves is referred to as a neurocutaneous perforator. The lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LACN), the most dependable blood supply from the primary underlying veins of the neurocutaneous flap, is the subject of this study.

METHODS

We reviewed the results of 30 flap coverage procedures in 10 children. The applied flap was based distally along the radial aspect of the hand and wrist. The pivot point of the flap was located dorsally. This study considered patients with posttraumatic tissue loss, vital structure exposure, or hand contractures with an LACN flap. There was a case-by-case assessment.

RESULTS

Thirteen male patients were included; their ages ranged from 6 to 65 years. Demographic data, preoperative cause of trauma, and postoperative complications were collected. Statistically significant improvements were observed after flap healing.

CONCLUSIONS

The LACN flap is a more versatile flap with less morbidity than other alternative flaps for coverage of soft tissue defect restoration around the hand, wrist, and distal forearm.

The superficial peroneal neurocutaneous flap: a cadaveric study

Soft tissue defects around the ankle are common and must be covered with thin and pliable flaps. A regional flap, particularly from the dorsum of the foot was considered ideal. A neurocutaneous flap, based on the superficial peroneal nerve (SPN) and its branches was designed as a proximally based flap via cadaveric dissection. This study aimed to demonstrate the vascularity and characteristics of the superficial peroneal neurocutaneous (SPNC) flap. The SPNC flap was created in 11 lower limbs (seven cadavers) using a proximally based design. The skin flap was dissected at the dorsum of the foot, followed by injection of diluted methylene blue through the anterior tibial artery, to visualize the vascularity. The flap pedicle above the anterior ankle joint line was dissected along the SPN for anatomical study of perforating branches, paraneural vessels, and flap territory. The mean distances of the most proximal perforating branches were 1.51 ± 1.48 cm from the anterior ankle joint line, and 5.12 ± 1.78 cm from the lateral malleolus. The mean distances of the most distal perforating branches were 2.75 ± 1.54 cm from the anterior ankle joint line, and 5.90 ± 1.81 cm from the lateral malleolus. The mean number of perforating branches was 3.73 ± 1.49. The mean flap territories were 5.51 ± 0.59 cm in length, and 7.15 ± 0.64 cm in width. The SPNC flap is an alternative method for soft tissue reconstruction around the ankle with a proximally based flap design. The antegrade flow has been shown to offer effective vascularity in flaps prepared via cadaveric dissection.

The Distally Based Posterior Tibial Artery Flap

Soft tissue defects to the distal leg and hindfoot are challenging with only the smallest defects closed primarily without tissue transposition. These defects to the distal leg and hindfoot can lead to tendon desiccation, damaged neurovascular structures, and exposed joint surfaces. These wounds can be the result of postoperative dehiscence and exposed orthopedic hardware, with high susceptibility to infection. Pedicled fasciocutaneous flaps of the medial leg provide an excellent solution with good outcomes that do not require microanastomosis and have similar outcomes as compared with free flap reconstruction in the lower extremity.

The Effect of Perforator Skeletonization on Pedicled Fasciocutaneous Flaps of the Lower Extremity: A Systematic Review

Background Lower extremity defects often require free tissue transfer due to a paucity of local donor sites. Locoregional perforator-based flaps offer durable, single-stage reconstruction while avoiding the pitfalls of microsurgery. Multiple harvest techniques are described, yet few studies provide outcome comparisons. Specifically, no study has examined the impact of perforator flap pedicle skeletonization on reconstructive outcomes. This systematic review characterizes technique and impact of pedicle skeletonization on perforator-based fasciocutaneous flaps of the lower extremity.

Methods PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were reviewed for literature examining perforator-based fasciocutaneous flaps from knee to ankle, from January 2000 through November 2018. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews-Individual Participant Data (PRISMA-IPD) structure was used.

Results Thirty-six articles were included for quantitative analysis. Of 586 flaps, 365 were skeletonized (60.1%) with 58 major (9.9%) and 19 minor complications (3.2%). With skeletonization, overall reoperative rate was higher (odds ratio [OR]: 9.71, p = 0.004), specifically in propeller (OR: 12.50, p = 0.004) and rotational flaps (OR: 18.87, p = 0.004). The complication rate of rotational flaps also increased (OR: 2.60, p = 0.04). Notably, skeletonization reduced complications in flaps rotated 90 degrees or more (OR: 0.21, p = 0.02). Reoperative rate of distal third defects (OR: 14.08, p = 0.02), flaps over 48 cm2 (OR: 33.33, p = 0.01), and length to width ratios over 1.75 (OR: 7.52, p = 0.03) was increased with skeletonization. Skeletonization increased complications in traumatic defects (OR: 2.87, p = 0.04) and reduced complications in malignant defects (OR: 0.10, p = 0.01).

Conclusion Pedicled, perforator-based flaps can provide a reliable locoregional alternative to free tissue transfer for lower extremity defects. Though skeletonization increased the overall reoperative rate, the complication rate for flaps with 90 degrees or more of rotation was significantly reduced. This suggests skeletonization should be considered when large rotational movements are anticipated to reduce complications that can arise from pedicle compression and venous congestion.