New software and breast boundary landmarks to calculate breast volumes from 3D surface images

Comparison of analog and digitally evaluated volume of the female breast in reconstructive breast surgery. Validation of a noninvasive measurement method with 3D camera1

BACKGROUND

Reconstructive surgery is established as a standard treatment option after mastectomy due to cancer. It is crucial to patients to achieve a natural and symmetric looking breast through reconstruction. Anthropometric measurements are used to assess the objective symmetry of the breast, which are prone to errors and difficult to reproduce.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work is to validate breast volumetry using three-dimensional surface imaging.

METHODS

We compared preoperatively analog and digitally evaluated volume of the breast with our gold standard, direct water displacement measurement of the mastectomy specimen. We examined 34 breast specimens in total.

RESULTS

Each measurement method (Breast Sculptor, VAM, Breast-V) for breast volume/mass determination demonstrates acceptable agreement ranges when compared with resected volumes and masses. The strongest volumetry instrument is Breast Sculptor (digital), the weakest is Breast-V (analog).

CONCLUSIONS

3D surface imaging is a quick, effective, and convenient method to evaluate breast shape and volume. The accuracy, reproducibility, and reliability of 3D surface imaging were comparable with MRI in our study.This takes us a step closer to the long-term goal of establishing robust instruments to plan breast reconstructive surgery, achieve better surgical results, and contribute to quality assurance in breast surgery.

Reliability and Measurement Error of Breast Volume Calculation Using Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging

Background: Breast lymphedema after breast cancer is challenging to quantify. Three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging is one available technique to measure breast volume, however, the measurement properties of available software programs have not been fully determined. The aim of this study was to determine equivalency of measurements with two software programs as well as reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM), and smallest detectable change (SDC). Methods and Results: Retrospective three-dimensional surface imaging (3D-SI) of 100 breasts taken before or after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer were retrieved for reliability analysis. Three assessors followed a standardized measurement technique using two software programs, Vectra^® 3D Analysis Module (VAM) and Breast Sculptor^®. Mean breast volume was 489.9 ± 206 cc using VAM and 480.1 ± 229.1 cc using Breast Sculptor. Lin's concordance showed poor agreement between programs (0.81-0.88). Measurements using VAM had excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability with SEM = 4.1% for one assessor and 8.7% for multiple assessors. Breast Sculptor also had excellent intra-rater and substantial inter-rater reliability but the SEM was much larger at 14.5% (intra-rater) and 19.1% (inter-rater). The SDC value was lowest for VAM and a single rater with 56 cc indicating a meaningful change beyond measurement error. Conclusion: Breast volume measurements captured with 3D-SI using VECTRA-XT are highly reliable, but the volumes, SEM, and SDC varied between the two software programs. Measurement error was lowest with VAM software. Although the usefulness of VECTRA-XT and VAM software to detect change in breast volume is promising, further solutions to reduce measurement error are required to improve clinical utility to measure breast lymphedema.

Is 3-Dimensional Scanning Really Helpful in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction?: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Breast reconstruction is an integral part of breast cancer treatment, and implant-based breast reconstruction is the most commonly used method worldwide. However, there is still no technique that allows surgeons to predict the volume of the required implant. Although computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging provide adequate representations of the breast, these procedures are time-consuming, expensive, and expose patients to radiation. Therefore, there is a need for safer, noninvasive alternatives for preoperative breast volume measurements.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study is a prospective review of 12 patients with early-stage breast cancer who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implants. Preoperatively, the Artec Eva 3D scanner was used to acquire volumetric measurements of the breasts. Intraoperatively, the volume of the mastectomy specimen was measured using the water displacement method. Correlations among the preoperative breast, mastectomy specimen, and estimated and final implant volumes were analyzed through Pearson correlation coefficient. A correction prediction factor of 85% was applied where necessary. Patient and physician satisfaction were evaluated 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Our study found a statistically significant correlation between the preoperative breast volumes measured by the Artec Eva 3D scanner and intraoperative mastectomy specimen volumes (r = 0.6578). There was no correlation between the preoperative breast volumes and final implant volumes, mastectomy specimen volumes and final implant volumes, and estimated implant volumes and final implant volumes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the Artec Eva 3D scanner can offer relatively accurate measurement of breast volumes, multiple studies still need to be done to determine how these data can be applied to the mastectomy procedure and breast implant selection. It may be more applicable for preoperative planning in breast augmentation surgery. Future surgeons should also take into account that variabilities in natural breast size, tumor size, cancer stage, and in patient and physician preferences all influence the outcome of breast reconstruction surgery.

Volumetry in Breast Reconstruction: Always New, Always Better?

Although breast surgeries for aesthetic or reconstructive purposes are regularly performed, no focus has been laid on establishing an adequate and reliable volumetry method. While CT and MRI scan represent methods that are already in clinical use, the 3D scan  is a novel and promising tool, easy to use with the possibility to measure the anatomic breast volume in an upright position. Nevertheless, its reliability is broadly underinvestigated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V : This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Surgery of congenital breast asymmetry-which objective parameter influences the subjective satisfaction with long-term results

PURPOSE

Congenital breast asymmetry is a serious gynecological malformation for affected patients. The condition hits young women in puberty and is associated with socio-esthetic handicap, depression, and psychosexual problems. Surgical treatment is usually early in the patient's lifetime, so a long-term sustainable solution is important. Although postoperative outcome has been evaluated in several studies before, this study is the first to analyze which objective parameters have the greatest influence on subjective satisfaction with long-term results.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients diagnosed with congenital breast asymmetry that underwent either lipofilling or implant therapy between the years of 2008 to 2019 were examined. On average, our collective comprised patients seven years after surgery. Data were mainly gathered through manual measurements, patient-reported outcome measures (Breast Q^™), and breast volumetry based on 3D scans (Vectra^® H2, Canfield Scientific).

RESULTS

Among all analyzed parameters, only areolar diameter correlated significantly negatively with the subjective outcome satisfaction of the patient. Regarding the subjective assessment of postoperative satisfaction with similarity of the breasts, again the mean areolar diameter, but also the difference in areolar diameter and breast volume between the right and left breasts correlated significantly negatively.

CONCLUSION

Areolar diameter was revealed as being a significant factor influencing subjective long-term satisfaction in breast asymmetry patients. Moreover, 3D volumetry proves to be an effective tool to substantiate subjective patient assessments. Our findings may lead to further improvements to surgical planning and will be expanded in further studies.

The Use of a 3D Simulator Software and 3D Printed Biomodels to Aid Autologous Breast Reconstruction

Aesthetically pleasing and symmetrical breasts are the goal of reconstructive breast surgery. However, multiple procedures are sometimes needed to improve a reconstructed breast's symmetry and appearance. Since all breasts vary in terms of volume, height, width, projection, orientation, and shape, the lack of attention to these details at the moment of flap shaping in autologous reconstruction can lead to poor results. Recent advances in 3-dimensional (3D) surface imaging and printing technologies have allowed for improvement in autologous breast reconstruction symmetry. While 3D printing technology is becoming faster, more accurate, and less expensive, the technology required to obtain proper 3D breast images remains expensive, including laser scanners or 3D photogrammetric cameras. In this study, we present a novel use of an aesthetic surgery simulator software as an affordable alternative to obtaining 3D breast images and creating 3D printed biomodels to aid in the precise shaping of the flap. This approach aims to optimize aesthetic results in autologous breast reconstruction avoiding surgical revisions and reducing surgical times. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Hybrid Breast Augmentation: A Reliable Formula for Preoperative Assessment of Fat Graft Volume Based on Implant Volume and Projection

BACKGROUND

Autogenous fat grafting (AFG) is an established technique used as an adjunct to breast augmentation (BA) to redesign breast shape. Surgeons often use experience and intuition to estimate AFG volume, which can result in incorrect assessment of donor areas and unnecessary fat removal.

OBJECTIVES

This aim of this study was to develop a method based on a mathematical formula, which utilizes implant volume and projection to predict AFG volume.

METHODS

Thirty patients (60 breasts) underwent primary hybrid BA. A software package (SketchUp) was used to simulate 3-dimensional AFG and implant volumes, which in turn were used to develop an equation for estimating AFG volume according to 3 different implant projections. The results for each group were compared, via Pearson's correlation coefficient, with the results of the clinical series.

RESULTS

All patients received Motiva Ergonomix SmoothSilk/SilkSurface implants, ranging in volume from 175 to 355 cc (mean, 265 cc), as well as an average AFG volume of 79.2 cc/breast (range, 50-110 cc). Twenty-nine patients (96.6%) were either very satisfied or satisfied during a mean follow-up of 18 months (range, 6-28 months). A high correlation was observed between the AFG performed in the cohort and predictions obtained from the formula (r = 0.938, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The AFG volume in hybrid BA procedures can be estimated utilizing measurements based on implant volume/projection. This low-cost method can be applied to guide surgical decision-making in patients who are candidates for BA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4