Breast softness in patients randomised to postmastectomy breast reconstruction with an expander prosthesis or DIEP flap

Expander prosthesis and DIEP flaps in delayed breast reconstruction: Sensibility, patient-reported outcome, and complications in a five-year randomised follow-up study

Breast reconstruction is a given choice for many women following mastectomy. There are a multitude of methods available today, and thus, comparative studies are essential to match patients with suitable methods. The aim of this study was to compare 5-year outcomes following delayed breast reconstruction with expander prosthesis (EP) and with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. Seventy-three patients, previously randomised to either a permanent EP or a DIEP flap breast reconstruction, were invited for a 5-year follow-up. Assessments included symmetry measurements, breast sensibility with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments and patient-reported outcome (PRO) with the BREAST-Q. Complications within the first 5 postoperative years were recorded. Additionally, BREAST-Q questionnaires were collected from non-randomised patients with an EP breast reconstruction. Between 2019 and 2022, 65 patients completed the follow-ups. Symmetry and PRO were significantly higher in the DIEP flap group. However, EP-reconstructed breasts were significantly more sensate and demonstrated areas with protective sensibility, unlike the DIEP flap breasts. The overall complication rates were comparable between the two groups (p = 0.27). Regression analysis identified body mass index as a risk factor for reoperation in general anaesthesia and for wound infection. No significant differences were found in a comparison of the randomised and the non-randomised EP groups' BREAST-Q results. This randomised 5-year follow-up study found PRO to be favourable following a DIEP flap reconstruction and sensibility to be better in EP reconstructions. The complication rates were comparable; however, longer follow-ups are warranted to cover the complete lifespans of the two breast reconstruction methods.

Cost-volume analysis of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps for breast reconstruction in the United States

BACKGROUND

Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps are increasingly utilized over other autologous methods of breast reconstruction. We evaluated the relationship between annual hospital volume and costs after breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap.

METHODS

All female patients undergoing elective implant or autologous tissue breast reconstruction were identified using the 2016-2019 Nationwide Readmission Database. Annual hospital volume of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator reconstructions was tabulated and modeled using restricted cubic splines. Institutions were categorized into high- and low-volume based on the inflection point of the spline between annual caseload and costs. The association between high volume status and costs, complications, length of stay, and 30-day nonelective readmission was assessed using multivariable regression.

RESULTS

Of an estimated 94,524 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 33,046 (34.6%) underwent deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap reconstruction. Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap utilization increased from 31% in 2016 to 40% in 2019 (P < .001) among inpatient breast reconstructions. High-volume hospitals more frequently performed bilateral reconstructions (43.3 vs 37.7%, P = .021) but had similar rates of concurrent mastectomy (28.7 vs 30.6%, P = .46), relative to low-volume hospitals. The median cost of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator reconstruction was lower ($29,900 [interquartile range: 22,400-37,400] vs $31,600 [interquartile range: 22,500-44,900], P = .036) at high-volume hospitals compared to low-volume. On adjusted analysis, high-volume status was associated a $3,800 (95% confidence interval: -6,200 to -1,400) decrement in hospitalization costs, and reduced odds of perioperative complications (adjusted odd ratio: 0.68 95% confidence interval: 0.54-0.86). High-volume status was not associated with length of stay or likelihood of unplanned readmission.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated an inverse cost-volume relationship in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction. In line with goals of value-based health care delivery, our findings may inform referral patterns to suitable centers for deep inferior epigastric artery perforator breast reconstruction.