1
|
Cheng M, Janzekovic J, Finze R, Mohseni M, Saifzadeh S, Savi FM, Ung O, Wagels M, Hutmacher DW. Conceptualizing Scaffold Guided Breast Tissue Regeneration in a Preclinical Large Animal Model. Bioengineering (Basel) 2024; 11:593. [PMID: 38927829 PMCID: PMC11200919 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11060593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2024] [Revised: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Scaffold-guided breast tissue regeneration (SGBTR) can transform both reconstructive and cosmetic breast surgery. Implant-based surgery is the most common method. However, there are inherent limitations, as it involves replacement of tissue rather than regeneration. Regenerating autologous soft tissue has the potential to provide a more like-for-like reconstruction with minimal morbidity. Our SGBTR approach regenerates soft tissue by implanting additively manufactured bioresorbable scaffolds filled with autologous fat graft. A pre-clinical large animal study was conducted by implanting 100 mL breast scaffolds (n = 55) made from medical-grade polycaprolactone into 11 minipigs for 12 months. Various treatment groups were investigated where immediate or delayed autologous fat graft, as well as platelet rich plasma, were added to the scaffolds. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were performed on explanted scaffolds to determine the volume and distribution of the regenerated tissue. Histological analysis was performed to confirm the tissue type. At 12 months, we were able to regenerate and sustain a mean soft tissue volume of 60.9 ± 4.5 mL (95% CI) across all treatment groups. There was no evidence of capsule formation. There were no immediate or long-term post-operative complications. In conclusion, we were able to regenerate clinically relevant soft tissue volumes utilizing SGBTR in a pre-clinical large animal model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Cheng
- Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Q Block—Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia; (M.C.); (J.J.); (R.F.); (M.M.); (S.S.); (F.M.S.); (M.W.)
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woollongabba, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia
| | - Jan Janzekovic
- Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Q Block—Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia; (M.C.); (J.J.); (R.F.); (M.M.); (S.S.); (F.M.S.); (M.W.)
| | - Ronja Finze
- Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Q Block—Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia; (M.C.); (J.J.); (R.F.); (M.M.); (S.S.); (F.M.S.); (M.W.)
- Department of Hand-, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, 67071 Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Mina Mohseni
- Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Q Block—Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia; (M.C.); (J.J.); (R.F.); (M.M.); (S.S.); (F.M.S.); (M.W.)
| | - Siamak Saifzadeh
- Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Q Block—Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia; (M.C.); (J.J.); (R.F.); (M.M.); (S.S.); (F.M.S.); (M.W.)
- Medical Engineering Research Facility, Queensland University of Technology, Staib Road, Chermside, Brisbane, QLD 4032, Australia
| | - Flavia M. Savi
- Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Q Block—Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia; (M.C.); (J.J.); (R.F.); (M.M.); (S.S.); (F.M.S.); (M.W.)
| | - Owen Ung
- Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Butterfield St, Herston, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia;
| | - Michael Wagels
- Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Q Block—Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia; (M.C.); (J.J.); (R.F.); (M.M.); (S.S.); (F.M.S.); (M.W.)
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woollongabba, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia
- Herston Biofabrication Institute, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Level 12 Block 7, Cnr Butterfield St & Bowen Bridge Rd, Herston, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia
| | - Dietmar W. Hutmacher
- Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Q Block—Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia; (M.C.); (J.J.); (R.F.); (M.M.); (S.S.); (F.M.S.); (M.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mayer HF, Palacios Huatuco RM, Pizarro Feijoo BA, Mazzaro EL. Silicone Pectoral Implant to Solve Aesthetic Chest Deformity After Pectoralis Flap Harvesting for Laryngotracheal Reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024; 48:1773-1777. [PMID: 37700195 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-023-03638-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap has been considered for decades the workhorse in head and neck reconstruction. However, the disadvantages of the pectoralis flap include the morbidity of the donor site in terms of cosmetic and functional results. A silicone pectoral implant can be used to solve such aesthetic chest deformity in male patients. METHODS A 33-years-old man with a history of cervical tracheoesophageal fistula after a blunt trauma due to a motorcycle accident, previously reconstructed with a pectoralis major flap, consulted our Plastic Surgery Department for an aesthetic defect of the donor site . The use of an anatomical pectoral implant was planned with the aim of aesthetic reshaping of the male chest. A pocket was created following the preoperative design to position a 190 cc pectoral implant. Dissection was performed in a subcutaneous plane that included the underneath adipose tissue layer and then over the pectoralis minor and the serratus muscle. Three months later, in a second stage, lipofilling of the depressed areas was performed with 100 ml of adipose tissue obtained from the abdomen. RESULTS After two years of follow-up, the patient obtained a satisfactory aesthetic result, with an improvement in the projection of the thorax and the symmetry of the body contour. As the implant was placed into the subcutaneous pocket, no functional compromise in shoulder flexion or adduction was detected during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The pectoral implant technique seems safe and provides reshaping of the male chest wall, significantly improving the cosmetic appearance of the patient. In addition, its use with associated procedures such as lipofilling allows optimal results to be obtained. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case to describe the use of a pectoral implant to solve donor site morbidity after pectoralis flap harvesting for any reconstructive purpose. Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Horacio F Mayer
- Plastic Surgery Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, University of Buenos Aires Medical School, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires University Institute (IUHIBA), 4190 Peron St., 1st. floor, C1991ABB, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - René M Palacios Huatuco
- Plastic Surgery Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, University of Buenos Aires Medical School, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires University Institute (IUHIBA), 4190 Peron St., 1st. floor, C1991ABB, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Byron A Pizarro Feijoo
- Plastic Surgery Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, University of Buenos Aires Medical School, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires University Institute (IUHIBA), 4190 Peron St., 1st. floor, C1991ABB, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Eduardo L Mazzaro
- Head and Neck Surgery Section, General Surgery Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, University of Buenos Aires Medical School, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires University Institute (IUHIBA), 4190 Peron St., C1181ACH, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sparks DS, Savi FM, Dlaska CE, Saifzadeh S, Brierly G, Ren E, Cipitria A, Reichert JC, Wille ML, Schuetz MA, Ward N, Wagels M, Hutmacher DW. Convergence of scaffold-guided bone regeneration principles and microvascular tissue transfer surgery. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2023; 9:eadd6071. [PMID: 37146134 PMCID: PMC10162672 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.add6071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
A preclinical evaluation using a regenerative medicine methodology comprising an additively manufactured medical-grade ε-polycaprolactone β-tricalcium phosphate (mPCL-TCP) scaffold with a corticoperiosteal flap was undertaken in eight sheep with a tibial critical-size segmental bone defect (9.5 cm3, M size) using the regenerative matching axial vascularization (RMAV) approach. Biomechanical, radiological, histological, and immunohistochemical analysis confirmed functional bone regeneration comparable to a clinical gold standard control (autologous bone graft) and was superior to a scaffold control group (mPCL-TCP only). Affirmative bone regeneration results from a pilot study using an XL size defect volume (19 cm3) subsequently supported clinical translation. A 27-year-old adult male underwent reconstruction of a 36-cm near-total intercalary tibial defect secondary to osteomyelitis using the RMAV approach. Robust bone regeneration led to complete independent weight bearing within 24 months. This article demonstrates the widely advocated and seldomly accomplished concept of "bench-to-bedside" research and has weighty implications for reconstructive surgery and regenerative medicine more generally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David S Sparks
- Centre for Biomedical Technologies, School of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
- Southside Clinical Division, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
| | - Flavia M Savi
- Centre for Biomedical Technologies, School of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- ARC Training Centre for Multiscale 3D Imaging, Modelling, and Manufacturing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Constantin E Dlaska
- Centre for Biomedical Technologies, School of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Siamak Saifzadeh
- Centre for Biomedical Technologies, School of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- ARC Training Centre for Multiscale 3D Imaging, Modelling, and Manufacturing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Medical Engineering Research Facility, Queensland University of Technology, Chermside, QLD, Australia
| | - Gary Brierly
- Centre for Biomedical Technologies, School of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Edward Ren
- Centre for Biomedical Technologies, School of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Amaia Cipitria
- Department of Biomaterials, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam, Germany
- Biodonostia Health Research Institute, San Sebastian, Spain
- IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Johannes C Reichert
- Department of Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Straße, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Marie-Luise Wille
- Centre for Biomedical Technologies, School of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- ARC Training Centre for Multiscale 3D Imaging, Modelling, and Manufacturing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Michael A Schuetz
- Centre for Biomedical Technologies, School of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- ARC Training Centre for Multiscale 3D Imaging, Modelling, and Manufacturing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Jamieson Trauma Institute, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Nicola Ward
- Department of Orthopaedics, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
| | - Michael Wagels
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
- Southside Clinical Division, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
- Australian Centre for Complex Integrated Surgical Solutions (ACCISS), Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
| | - Dietmar W Hutmacher
- Centre for Biomedical Technologies, School of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- ARC Training Centre for Multiscale 3D Imaging, Modelling, and Manufacturing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- ARC Training Centre for Additive Biomanufacturing, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang G, Ci H, Ma C, Li Z, Jiang W, Chen L, Wang Z, Zhou M, Sun J. Additive manufactured macroporous chambers facilitate large volume soft tissue regeneration from adipose-derived extracellular matrix. Acta Biomater 2022; 148:90-105. [PMID: 35671873 DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.05.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Breast tissue engineering is a promising alternative intervention for breast reconstruction. Due to their low immunogenicity and well-preserved adipogenic microenvironment, decellularized adipose tissue (DAT) can potentially regenerate adipose tissue in vivo. However, the volume of adipose tissue regenerated from DAT can hardly satisfy the demand for breast reconstruction. Tissue engineering chamber (TEC) is an effective technique for generation of large adipose tissue volumes. However, TEC applications necessitate reoperation to remove non-degradable plastic chambers and harvest autologous tissue flaps, which prolongs the operation time and causes potential damage to donor sites. We improved the TEC strategy by combining bioresorbable polycaprolactone (PCL) chambers and decellularized adipose tissues (DAT). A miniaturized porous PCL chamber was fabricated based on scaling differences between human and rabbit chests, and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF)-loaded DAT successfully prepared. In rabbit models, a highly vascularized adipose tissue that nearly filled up the PCL chamber (5 mL) was generated de novo from 0.5 mL bFGF-loaded DAT. The newly formed tissue had significantly high expressions of adipogenic genes, compared to the endogenous adipose tissue. The concept described here can be exploited for breast tissue engineering. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Decellularized adipose tissue (DAT), which provides infiltrated cells adipogenic microenvironment, can potentially regenerate adipose tissue in vivo. Nevertheless, the volume of regenerated adipose tissue is insufficient to repair large sized tissue defect. Tissue engineering chamber (TEC) could provide a protective space for in situ regeneration of large volume tissue. Herein, a new strategy by combining biodegradable polycaprolactone chambers and basic fibroblast growth factor-loaded decellularized adipose tissue is proposed. In rabbit model, newly formed adipose tissue regenerated from DAT successfully filled the dome shaped chamber with ten folds higher volume than DAT, which is proportionally similar to women breast. This work highlighted the importance of adipogenic microenvironment and protective space for adipose tissue regeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guo Zhang
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China; Wuhan Clinical Research Center for Superficial Organ Reconstruction, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Hai Ci
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China; Wuhan Clinical Research Center for Superficial Organ Reconstruction, Wuhan 430022, China; Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832008, China
| | - Chenggong Ma
- Department of Pathology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Zhipeng Li
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China; Wuhan Clinical Research Center for Superficial Organ Reconstruction, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Wenbin Jiang
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China; Wuhan Clinical Research Center for Superficial Organ Reconstruction, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Lifeng Chen
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China; Wuhan Clinical Research Center for Superficial Organ Reconstruction, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Zhenxing Wang
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China; Wuhan Clinical Research Center for Superficial Organ Reconstruction, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Muran Zhou
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China; Wuhan Clinical Research Center for Superficial Organ Reconstruction, Wuhan 430022, China.
| | - Jiaming Sun
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China; Wuhan Clinical Research Center for Superficial Organ Reconstruction, Wuhan 430022, China.
| |
Collapse
|