External physical vibration lithecbole facilitating the expulsion of upper ureteric stones 1.0-2.0 cm after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial

SLAP Trial: Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Mechanical Percussion Therapy Post ESWL for Renal Calculi

Methods

We conducted a prospective randomised control trial. Included patients were males and females greater than 18 years of age with single or multiple ipsilateral renal calculi of total ≤10 mm on plain X-ray and noncontrast CT KUB. ESWL was performed at a single centre, at supine position under general anaesthesia with maximum 3000 shocks at a rate of 100 shocks per minute. Patients were discharged and randomised to either the control arm or MPI therapy. MPI therapy was self-directed in a home setting for 10 minutes a day, three times per week. Both arms had standard follow-up at 12 weeks with a plain X-ray KUB. Patients in the control group were offered cross over to the MPI arm after 12 weeks if residual stone fragments were detected. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software via Chi squared and Fisher's exact tests. Ethical approval was obtained via the Prince Charles Hospital HREC Committee, HREC/2022/QPCH/84961.

Results

70 patients met inclusion criteria and underwent ESWL, and 5 were withdrawn. 33 patients were randomised to the MPI group and 32 to the control group. MPI significantly increased the stone clearance rate anywhere in the kidney (87.9% in the MPI group versus 59.4% in the control group, p=0.089), as well as the clearance rate in the lower pole (91.7% in the MPI group versus 63.2% in the control group, p=0.022). Delayed percussion did not improve the clearance rate over primary percussion (p=0.835).

Conclusion

This study has shown that MPI can be effectively performed in a home setting without the need for medical supervision and results in improved stone clearance rates post ESWL. The main limitations to the study were the use of X-ray over CT during the follow-up and variability in MPI compliance and administration. Further research is warranted into standardising home MPI protocols. This trial is registered with ANZCTR387061.

RIRS with FV-UAS vs. MPCNL for 2-3-cm upper urinary tract stones: a prospective study

To observe the efficacy and safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) combined with flexible vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath (FV-UAS) and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) in patients with 2-3 cm upper urinary tract stones. A total of 160 patients with 2-3 cm upper urinary tract stones were prospectively randomized into 2 groups-80 in the FV-UAS group and 80 cases as control in the MPCNL group. The stone-free rates (SFRs) at different times (postoperative 1st day and 4th week) were considered as the primary outcome of the study. The secondary end points were operative time, hemoglobin decrease, postoperative hospital stay, and operation-related complications. There was no obvious difference between the two groups in patient's demographics and preoperative clinical characteristics (all P > 0.05). Postoperative data showed that mean decrease in hemoglobin level was less in FV-UAS group than that in MPCNL group (5.3 vs. 10.8 g/L, P < 0.001). Postoperative hospital stay in FV-UAS group was more shorten than that in MPCNL group (2.7 vs. 4.9 days, P < 0.001). There was no statistical significance between the two groups in SFRs during postoperative 1st day and 4th week (both P > 0.05). However, in terms of the rates of bleeding and pain, MPCNL group were both significantly higher than FV-UAS group (6.2 vs. 0.0%, P = 0.023; 16.2 vs. 2.5%, P = 0.003; respectively). Our study showed that RIRS with FV-UAS, a new partnership to treat 2-3 cm upper urinary tract stones, was satisfying as it achieved a high SFR rate and a low rate of complications. This method was safe and reproducible in clinical practice.

Physical Techniques to Remove Residual Stone Fragments in the Urinary System

BACKGROUND

Although significant progress has been made in treatment techniques for renal and ureteral calculi, residual fragments (RF) persisting long after treatment pose a serious threat to patients' health. A variety of novel physical techniques and extraction devices are currently being developed to promote the removal of RF from the urinary system, and a series of in vivo experiments have demonstrated their safety and efficacy.

SUMMARY

External physical vibration lithecbole, magnetic extraction, biocompatible stone adhesive-based methods, and ultrasonic propulsion technologies are examples of innovative therapies that can promote the clearance of RF and improve the stone-free rate. In conclusion, the physical treatment of these RF needs to be optimized and improved. They are a promising technique for improving the efficiency of endovascular urology, and further in vivo studies are needed to confirm their safety and efficacy.

KEY MESSAGES

We have summarized the literature on removal of RF by physical methods in recent years, especially the new progress.

Best Practice in Interventional Management of Urolithiasis: An Update from the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel for Urolithiasis 2022

PURPOSE

The European Association of Urology (EAU) has updated its guidelines on clinical best practice in urolithiasis for 2021. We therefore aimed to present a summary of best clinical practice in surgical intervention for patients with upper tract urolithiasis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The panel performed a comprehensive literature review of novel data up to May 2021. The guidelines were updated and a strength rating was given for each recommendation, graded using the modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations methodology.

RESULTS

The choice of surgical intervention depends on stone characteristics, patient anatomy, comorbidities, and choice. For shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), the optimal shock frequency is 1.0-1.5 Hz. For ureteroscopy (URS), a postoperative stent is not needed in uncomplicated cases. Flexible URS is an alternative if percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or SWL is contraindicated, even for stones >2 cm. For PCNL, prone and supine approaches are equally safe. For uncomplicated PCNL cases, a nephrostomy tube after PCNL is not necessary. Radiation exposure for endourological procedures should follow the as low as reasonably achievable principles.

CONCLUSIONS

This is a summary of the EAU urolithiasis guidelines on best clinical practice in interventional management of urolithiasis. The full guideline is available at https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The European Association of Urology has produced guidelines on the best management of kidney stones, which are summarised in this paper. Kidney stone disease is a common condition; computed tomography (CT) is increasingly used to diagnose it. The guidelines aim to decrease radiation exposure to patients by minimising the use of x-rays and CT scans. We detail specific advice around the common operations for kidney stones.

Mechanisms of the intestinal and urinary microbiome in kidney stone disease

Kidney stone disease affects ~10% of the global population and the incidence continues to rise owing to the associated global increase in the incidence of medical conditions associated with kidney stone disease including, for example, those comprising the metabolic syndrome. Considering that the intestinal microbiome has a substantial influence on host metabolism, that evidence has suggested that the intestinal microbiome might have a role in maintaining oxalate homeostasis and kidney stone disease is unsurprising. In addition, the discovery that urine is not sterile but, like other sites of the human body, harbours commensal bacterial species that collectively form a urinary microbiome, is an additional factor that might influence the induction of crystal formation and stone growth directly in the kidney. Collectively, the microbiomes of the host could influence kidney stone disease at multiple levels, including intestinal oxalate absorption and direct crystal formation in the kidneys.

Mirabegron in medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: a prospective, randomized, controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To observe the efficacy and safety of Mirabegron in patients with distal, ureteral stones ≤ 10 mm.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 90 patients with distal ureteral stones ≤ 10 mm were prospectively randomized into two groups. Forty-five cases in the study group and 45 cases as control. The stone-free rates (SFRs) and renal colic episodes between two groups were compared at the 1st, 2nd and 4th week end by imaging examinations.

RESULT

All of 90 patients were randomly assigned to two groups. In patients with ≤ 5 mm stones, the SFRs in the 1st week (63.6% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.040), the 2nd week (86.4% vs. 54.2%, P = 0.018), and the 4th week (90.9% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.046) after treatment were all significantly higher than that in the control group by the stratification analysis of stone size. Even though SFRs were all higher for patients with > 5 mm stones in study group, there was no statistically significant difference (All P > 0.05). In terms of renal colic episodes, the frequency of occurrence of the study group was significantly lower than that of the control group and need less antalgic.

CONCLUSIONS

The MET with Mirabegron has a significant role in improve SFR for the patients with distal ureteral stones ≤ 5 mm and no effect in > 5 mm stones. Furthermore, Mirabegron reduces the need for antalgic in ≤ 10 mm stones with low incidence of adverse effects.

Therapeutic effects of flexible ureteroscopy alone and in combination with external physical vibration on upper urinary tract calculi: a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Upper urinary tract calculus is a common disease of the urinary system.

AIM

To compare the therapeutic effects of flexible ureteroscopy alone and in combination with external physical vibration on upper urinary tract calculi.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 146 patients were randomly divided into control and experimental groups (n = 73). The control group received flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy, and the experimental group underwent the same but combined with external physical vibration. The rate of finding stones in the urine on the day after treatment, clearance rate, components of stones, levels of renal function indices blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine (Scr), and incidence of complications were compared. The stone-free rate during 1-year follow-up was analysed by Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The rate of finding stones in the urine on the day after treatment was higher in the experimental group (100%) than that in the control group (29.73%) (p < 0.05). The clearance rates on the day, at 1 week, and at 2 weeks after treatment in the experimental group were 71.23%, 87.67%, and 95.89%, respectively, which surpassed those of the control group at corresponding time points (p < 0.05). BUN and Scr levels decreased after treatment in both groups, especially in the experimental group (p < 0.05). The stone-free rate during 1-year follow-up in the experimental group (n = 71 (97.26%)) exceeded that of the control group (n = 61 (83.56%)) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

External physical vibration combined with flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy significantly increased the rate of finding stones in the urine the day after treatment, the clearance rate of upper urinary tract calculi, and the ameliorated renal function and reduced the stone re-formation rate.

Use of extracorporeal physical vibration lithecbole through greater sciatic foramen for treatment of distal ureteral calculi

Introduction To evaluate the efficacy and safety of preforming extracorporeal physical vibration lithecbole(EVPL)through greater sciatic foramen(GSF)for distal ureteral calculi(DUC) treatment. Materials and methods All patients with a diagnosis of DUC (6 - 10 mm in diameter) were enrolled in this study from October 2018 to May 2020. Patients were randomly divided into three groups receiving EPVL through GSF (Group A, n = 58), or abdominal (Group B, n = 60), or combined with oral use of tamsulosin at 0.4 mg daily (Group C, n = 63). Results There was no significant difference observed in terms of demographic characteristics or size of stones among the three groups (p >0.05). Compared with the group B and C, patients of the group A displayed a significantly higher score of comfort but with significantly decreased number of renal colic attacks or analgesics required (p < 0.01). The stone-free rate also significantly increased after one and two weeks of treatment (p < 0.01), despite such a significant difference among these groups vanished after four weeks of treatment. Conclusion Extracorporeal physical vibrational lithecbole in the prone position use the greater sciatic foramen as the path is the safe and effective approach to treat the distal ureter calculi.

Efficacy and Safety of External Physical Vibration Lithecbole After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy or Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Urinary Stone: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Introduction: The current study evaluated the efficacy and safety of external physical vibration lithecbole (EPVL) after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for urolithiasis. Methods: Publicized literature was systematically searched from EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PubMed, ScienceDirect, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science up to February 2020. Fixed-effects or random-effects model was chosen in risk ratio (RR) calculation according to heterogeneity. Quality of evidence was estimated under the guidance of Cochrane handbook. Stone expulsion rate, stone-free rates (SFRs), and complication rates were set as end points. Results: Six randomized controlled trials, including 853 patients, were eligible for analysis. EPVL significantly increased SFR within 3 weeks (RR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.06-1.29, P = 0.001) and above 3 weeks (RR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.03-1.37, P = 0.02) after SWL. EPVL also improved SFR within 3 weeks (RR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.35-2.49, P < 0.0001) and above 3 weeks (RR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.33-1.77, P < 0.00001) after RIRS. Besides, EPVL can significantly increase SFRs for stones in renal pelvis, lower calix, and multiple locations (all P-value <0.05). Although the overall complication rate was not significantly higher in EPVL + RIRS group, it was found to be 1.38 times higher in EPVL+SWL group (RR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.06-1.79, P = 0.02), especially the incidence of flank pain (RR = 3.11, 95% CI: 1.02-9.46, P = 0.05). Conclusions: EPVL is effective and safe with high SFRs (especially in renal pelvis, lower calix, and multiple locations) after SWL or RIRS and lower overall complication rate after RIRS in patients with urolithiasis. However, the overall complication rate (especially the incidence of flank pain) was higher after EPVL + SWL.

Is physical therapy effective following extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Background

Physical therapy, including percussion, inversion, vibration and combinations, was clinically performed to improve the stone free rate (SFR) following lithotripsy procedures. However, physical therapy is not widely accepted in clinical practice owing to lack of high level evidence support and a standard protocol. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of physical therapy in improving SFR following extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).

Methods

Systematic review of literature from PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane library and Embase was performed in March 2019. The efficacy and safety of physical therapy after ESWL and RIRS were assessed by meta-analysis of SFR and complication rate.

Results

A total of 8 prospective studies with 1065 patients were enrolled. When compared to non-intervention, physical therapy provided a higher SFR (OR:3.38, 95% CI: 2.45–4.66, p < 0.0001) at all time points (week 1, week 2 and month 1), while there was no significant difference in complications such as hematuria, lumbago, dizziness and urinary tract infection (OR: 0.84; 95%CI: 0.62–1.13; p = 0.237). In subgroup analysis of different stone locations, lower calyx stone (OR: 3.51; 95%CI: 2.21–5.55; p < 0.0001), upper ureter and renal pelvic stones (OR:2.79; 95%CI:1.62–4.81; p = 0.0002) had a higher SFR after physical therapy, while there was no significant improvement in SFR in upper and middle calyx stones. In subgroup analysis of different techniques, EPVL (external physical vibration lithecbole, OR:3.47; 95%CI:2.24–5.37; p < 0.0001) and PDI (percussion, diuresis and inversion, OR:3.24; 95%CI:2.01–5.21; p < 0.0001) were both effective in improving SFR when compared to non-intervention.

Conclusions

Physical therapy is effective in improving the SFR after ESWL and RIRS, especially for lower calyx stones, upper ureter and renal pelvic stones, while without significant side effects. External physical vibration lithecbole (EPVL) might provide a relative uniformed and repeatable protocol for clinical practice of physical therapy.

Trial registration

PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019130228.