1
|
Tatanis V, Spinos T, Lamprinou Z, Kanna E, Mulita F, Peteinaris A, Achilleos O, Skondras I, Liatsikos E, Kallidonis P. Successful Treatment of Multiple Large Intrarenal Stones in a 2-Year-Old Boy Using a Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope and High-Power Laser Settings. Pediatr Rep 2024; 16:806-815. [PMID: 39311331 PMCID: PMC11417899 DOI: 10.3390/pediatric16030068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2024] [Accepted: 09/09/2024] [Indexed: 09/26/2024] Open
Abstract
The standard treatment procedures for managing renal calculi in the pediatric population are similar to those in adults. The application of flexible ureteroscopy has contributed to the increased popularity of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) as an alternative therapeutic modality that can be successfully applied in children. One of the most significant innovations of the last decade is the introduction of single-use flexible ureteroscopes (fURSs). In this case report, we present the case of a 2-year-old boy with multiple large calculi in his right kidney, which were successfully removed after a single session of RIRS using a 7.5 F single-use fURS and high-power laser settings. The total operative and lithotripsy times were estimated at 90 and 75 min, respectively. No complications were recorded. The hemoglobin loss was calculated at 0.3 mg/dL, while the creatinine level was decreased by 0.1 mg/dL. The urethral catheter was removed on the first postoperative day, and the patient was discharged. The management of multiple or large kidney stones is very challenging in the pediatric population under the age of three years. Convenient preoperative planning and the appropriate use of available equipment may lead to excellent outcomes accompanied by a reduced risk for complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasileios Tatanis
- Department of Urology, University of Patras Hospital, 26504 Patras, Greece; (T.S.); (A.P.); (E.L.); (P.K.)
| | - Theodoros Spinos
- Department of Urology, University of Patras Hospital, 26504 Patras, Greece; (T.S.); (A.P.); (E.L.); (P.K.)
| | - Zoi Lamprinou
- 2nd Department of Pediatric Surgery, P & A Kyriakou Children’s Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece; (Z.L.); (E.K.); (O.A.); (I.S.)
| | - Elisavet Kanna
- 2nd Department of Pediatric Surgery, P & A Kyriakou Children’s Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece; (Z.L.); (E.K.); (O.A.); (I.S.)
| | - Francesk Mulita
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece;
| | - Angelis Peteinaris
- Department of Urology, University of Patras Hospital, 26504 Patras, Greece; (T.S.); (A.P.); (E.L.); (P.K.)
| | - Orthodoxos Achilleos
- 2nd Department of Pediatric Surgery, P & A Kyriakou Children’s Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece; (Z.L.); (E.K.); (O.A.); (I.S.)
| | - Ioannis Skondras
- 2nd Department of Pediatric Surgery, P & A Kyriakou Children’s Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece; (Z.L.); (E.K.); (O.A.); (I.S.)
| | - Evangelos Liatsikos
- Department of Urology, University of Patras Hospital, 26504 Patras, Greece; (T.S.); (A.P.); (E.L.); (P.K.)
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Panagiotis Kallidonis
- Department of Urology, University of Patras Hospital, 26504 Patras, Greece; (T.S.); (A.P.); (E.L.); (P.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tanidir Y, Sekerci CA, Bujons A, Castellani D, Ferretti S, Gatti C, Campobasso D, Quiroz Y, Teoh JYC, Pietropaolo A, Ragoori D, Bhatia TP, Vaddi CM, Shrestha A, Lim EJ, Fong KY, Sinha MM, Griffin S, Sarica K, Somani BK, Traxer O, Gauhar V. The Utility and Safety of Ureteral Access Sheath During Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Children. Urology 2024; 187:71-77. [PMID: 38432431 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.02.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) with and without ureteral access sheath (UAS) in different pediatric age groups. METHODS The data of RIRS for kidney stone in children were obtained from 9 institutions. Demographic characteristics of patients and stones, intraoperative and postoperative results were recorded. While analyzing the data, patients who underwent RIRS without UAS (group 1) (n = 195) and RIRS with UAS (group 2) (n = 194) were compared. RESULTS Group 1 was found to be young, thin, and short (P <.001, P = .021, P <.001), but there was no gender difference and similar symptoms were present except hematuria, which was predominant in group 2 (10.6% vs 17.3%, P <.001). Group 1 had smaller stone diameter (9.91 ± 4.46 vs 11.59 ± 4.85 mm, P = .001), shorter operation time (P = .040), less stenting (35.7% vs 72.7%, P = .003). Re-intervention rates and stone-free rates (SFR) were similar between groups (P = .5 and P = .374). However, group 1 had significantly high re-RIRS (P = .009). SFR had a positive correlation with smaller stone size and thulium fiber laser usage compared to holmium fiber laser (HFL) (P <.001 and P = .020), but multivariate analysis revealed only large stone size as a risk factor for residual fragments (P = .001). CONCLUSION RIRS can be performed safely in children with and without UAS. In children of smaller size or younger age (<5 years), limited use of UAS was observed. UAS may be of greater utility in stones larger than 1 cm, regardless of the age, and using smaller diameter UAS and ureteroscopes can decrease the complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiloren Tanidir
- Department of Urology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Cagri Akin Sekerci
- Division of Pediatric Urology, Department of Urology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Anna Bujons
- Urology Department, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Daniele Castellani
- Urology Division, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti Di Ancona, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
| | - Stefania Ferretti
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy.
| | - Claudia Gatti
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy.
| | - Davide Campobasso
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy.
| | - Yesica Quiroz
- Urology Department, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
| | - Amelia Pietropaolo
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
| | - Deepak Ragoori
- Department of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
| | - Tanuj Paul Bhatia
- Department of Urology, Sarvodaya Healthcare, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
| | - Chandra Mohan Vaddi
- Department of Urology, Preeti Urology and Kidney Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
| | - Anil Shrestha
- Department of Urology, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir Hospital, Kanti Path, Kathmandu, Nepal.
| | - Ee Jean Lim
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Khi Yung Fong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Mriganka Mani Sinha
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
| | - Stephen Griffin
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
| | - Kemal Sarica
- Department of Urology, Biruni University, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Bhaskar Kumar Somani
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
| | - Olivier Traxer
- Department of Urology Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
| | - Vineet Gauhar
- Department of Urology, Ng Teng Fong Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hughes T, Tzelves L, Somani BK. Cystine Stones: Developments in Minimally Invasive Surgery and Their Impact on Morbidity and Stone Clearance. Res Rep Urol 2023; 15:175-185. [PMID: 37303487 PMCID: PMC10254682 DOI: 10.2147/rru.s381190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Cystinuria is a rare genetic condition that is responsible for cystine stones. Besides stone recurrence, patients with cystine stones have reduced health-related quality of life, increased rates of chronic kidney disease and hypertension. Although lifestyle measures, medical therapy and close follow up are essential to reduce and monitor cystine stone recurrences, surgical intervention is frequently needed for most cystinuria patients. Shock wave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and active surveillance all have a role, and technological advances in endourology are vital in achieving a stone-free status and to prevent recurrences. The complexity of managing cystine stones necessitates a multidisciplinary team discussion, patient involvement and an individualised approach in a specialist centre for optimum management. Thulium fibre laser and virtual reality may have an increasing role in the future of cystine stone management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Hughes
- Department of Urology, Warwick Hospital, Warwick, UK
| | - Lazaros Tzelves
- Department of Urology, Sismanogleio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Bhaskar K Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
García-Rojo E, Traxer O, Vallejo Arzayús DM, Castellani D, Ferretti S, Gatti C, Bujons Tur A, Quiroz Madarriaga Y, Teoh JYC, Ragoori DR, Bhatia TP, Chandra Mohan V, Shrestha A, Lim EJ, Sinha M, Griffin S, Pietropaolo A, Fong KY, Tanidir Y, Somani BK, Gauhar V. Comparison of Low-Power vs High-Power Holmium lasers in pediatric RIRS outcomes. J Endourol 2023; 37:509-515. [PMID: 36860192 DOI: 10.1089/end.2022.0778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES to compare the outcomes of using low-power (up to 30W) vs high-power (up to 120W) holmium lasers in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in children and to analyse if lasering techniques and the use of access sheath have any influence on the outcomes. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed data from 9 centres of children who underwent RIRS with holmium laser for the treatment of kidney stones between January 2015 and December 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: high-power and low-power holmium laser. Clinical, perioperative variables and complications were analysed. Outcomes were compared between groups using Student's T-test for continuous variables, and Chi-square and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. A multivariable logistic regression analysis model was also performed. RESULTS 314 patients were included. A high-power and low-power holmium laser was used in 97 and 217 patients, respectively. Clinical and demographic variables were comparable between both groups, except for stone size where the low-power group treated larger stones (mean 11.11 mm vs 9.70 mm; p 0.018). In the high-power laser group, a reduction in surgical time was found (mean 64.29 min vs 75.27 min; p 0.018) with a significantly higher stone-free rate (SFR) (mean 81.4% vs 59%; p <0.001). We found no statistical differences in complication rates. The multivariate logistic regression model showed lower SFR in the low-power holmium group, especially with larger (p = 0.011) and multiple stones (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Our real-world pediatric multicenter study favours high-power holmium laser and establishes its safety and efficacy in children. .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther García-Rojo
- Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, 221921, Department of Urology, Calle Oña, 10, Madrid, 28050, Madrid, Spain, 28050;
| | - Olivier Traxer
- Sorbonne Universite, 27063, GRC#20 Lithiase Urinaire, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, Île-de-France, France;
| | | | - Daniele Castellani
- AOU Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, 18494, via conca 71, Ancona, Italy, 60126;
| | | | - Claudia Gatti
- University Hospital of Parma, 18630, Pediatric Surgery, Parma, Emilia-Romagna, Italy;
| | - Anna Bujons Tur
- Fundacio Puigvert, 16444, Pediatric Urology, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain;
| | | | - Jeremy Y C Teoh
- Prince of Wales Hospital, Surgery, 30-32 Ngan Shing Street, Shatin, New Territories., Hong Kong, Hong Kong;
| | - Deepak Reddy Ragoori
- Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, 519389, Urology, 6-3-562/A, behind MORE megamart, Errum Manzil, Hyderabad, Telangana, India, 500082;
| | - Tanuj Paul Bhatia
- Sarvodaya Hospital, 76257, Urology, Sector 8, Faridabad, Faridabad, Haryana, India, 121006.,Sarvodaya Hospital and research centre, Sector 8, Faridabad, Faridabad, India;
| | - Vaddi Chandra Mohan
- preeti urology and kidney hospital, Urology, MIG-1,307, Raod No.4 , KPHB Colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, hyderabad, Telangana, India, 500072;
| | | | - Ee Jean Lim
- Singapore General Hospital, Department of Urology, Academia Level 5, 20 College Rd, Singapore 169856, Singapore, Singapore, 169856;
| | - Mrigyanka Sinha
- University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Urology, Southampton, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;
| | - Stephen Griffin
- University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Paediatric Urology, Southampton, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;
| | - Amelia Pietropaolo
- University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Urology, Southampton, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;
| | - Khi Yung Fong
- National University of Singapore, 37580, Singapore, Singapore;
| | - Yiloren Tanidir
- Marmara University School of Medicine, Urology, Marmara Universitesi Pendik EAH, Fevzi Cakmak Mah. Mimar Sinan Cad., No:41 Uroloji AD. Kat:4, Ust kaynarca / Pendik, Istanbul, Turkey, 34899;
| | - Bhaskar K Somani
- University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Urology, Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, SO16 6YD.,United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;
| | - Vineet Gauhar
- Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, 242949, Urology, Singapore, Singapore;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Juliebø-Jones P, Ulvik Ø, Beisland C, Somani BK. Paediatric Ureteroscopy (P-URS) reporting checklist: a new tool to aid studies report the essential items on paediatric ureteroscopy for stone disease. Urolithiasis 2023; 51:35. [PMID: 36695936 PMCID: PMC9876849 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-023-01408-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
The burden of urolithiasis in children is increasing and this is mirrored by the number of surgical interventions in the form of ureteroscopy (URS). There exist many challenges in performing this surgery for this special patient group as well as a lack of consensus on technique. There is also large variation in how results are described and reported. There exists therefore, a need to improve and standardise the core outcomes, which are reported. To this end, we developed a new checklist to aid studies report the essential items on paediatric URS for stone disease. The Paediatric Ureteroscopy (P-URS) reporting checklist comprises four main sections (study details, pre-operative, operative and post-operative) and a total of 20 items. The tool covers a range of important elements, such as pre-stenting, complications, follow-up, stone-free rate, concomitant medical expulsive therapy and imaging, which are often lacking in studies. The checklist provides a summary of essential items that authors can use as a reference to improve general standards of reporting paediatric URS studies and increase the body of knowledge shared accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Juliebø-Jones
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
- EAU YAU Urolithiasis Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
| | - Øyvind Ulvik
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Christian Beisland
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Bhaskar K Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Juliebø-Jones P, Keller EX, Tzelves L, Beisland C, Somani BK, Gjengstø P, Æsøy MS, Ulvik Ø. Paediatric kidney stone surgery: state-of-the-art review. Ther Adv Urol 2023; 15:17562872231159541. [PMID: 36950219 PMCID: PMC10026105 DOI: 10.1177/17562872231159541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023] Open
Abstract
While urolithiasis in children is rare, the global incidence is rising, and the volume of minimally invasive surgeries being performed reflects this. There have been many developments in the technology, which have supported the advancement of these interventions. However, innovation of this kind has also resulted in wide-ranging practice patterns and debate regarding how they should be best implemented. This is in addition to the extra challenges faced when treating stone disease in children where the patient population often has a higher number of comorbidities and for example, the need to avoid risk such as ionising exposure is higher. The overall result is a number of challenges and controversies surrounding many facets of paediatric stone surgery such as imaging choice, follow-up and different treatment options, for example, medical expulsive therapy, shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. This article provides an overview of the current status of paediatric stone surgery and discussion on the key topics of debate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Etienne Xavier Keller
- Department of Urology, University Hospital
Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland EAU YAU Urolithiasis
Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Lazaros Tzelves
- Second Department of Urology, National and
Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens,
Greece EAU YAU Urolithiasis Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Christian Beisland
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University
Hospital, Bergen, NorwayDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of
Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Bhaskar K Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital
Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Peder Gjengstø
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University
Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Øyvind Ulvik
- Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen,
NorwayDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen,
Norway
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ripa F, Tokas T, Griffin S, Ferretti S, Bujons Tur A, Somani BK. Role of Pediatric Ureteral Access Sheath and Outcomes Related to Flexible Ureteroscopy and Laser Stone Fragmentation: A Systematic Review of Literature. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 45:90-98. [PMID: 36267473 PMCID: PMC9576810 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Context Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy (FURSL) represent a good treatment option for pediatric urolithiasis. Scarce evidence is available about the safety and efficacy of the concomitant use of a ureteral access sheath (UAS) in the setting of pediatric ureteroscopy (URS). Objective To acquire all the available evidence on UAS usage in pediatric FURSL, focusing on intra- and postoperative complications and stone-free rates (SFRs). Evidence acquisition We performed a systematic literature research using PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases. The inclusion criteria were cohorts of pediatric patients <18 yr old, submitted to URS for FURSL, reporting on more than ten cases of UAS placement. The primary outcomes were prestenting rates, operating time, ureteric stent placement rates after surgery, rates and grades of complications, ureteral injuries, and overall SFR. A total of 22 articles were selected. Evidence synthesis In total, 26 intraoperative and 130 postoperative complications following URS with UAS placement were reported (1.8% and 9.18% of the overall procedures, respectively). According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, 32 were classified as Clavien I, 29 as Clavien II, 43 as Clavien I or II, six as Clavien III, and one as Clavien IV. Twenty-one cases of ureteral injuries (1.59%) were noted in the whole cohort; most of them were ureteral perforation or extravasation, and were treated with a temporary indwelling ureteric stent. The overall SFR after a single URS procedure was 76.92%; after at least a second procedure, it was 84.9%. Conclusions FURSL is a safe and effective treatment option for pediatric urolithiasis. UAS use was associated with a low rate of ureteric injuries, mostly treated and resolved with a temporary indwelling ureteric stent. Patient summary We performed a systematic literature research on the utilization of a UAS during ureteroscopy for stone treatment in pediatric patients. We assessed the outcomes related to the rates of intra- and postoperative complications and the rates of efficacy of the procedure in the clearance of stones. The evidence shows a low rate and grade of complications associated with UAS placement and good stone-free outcomes. A ureteric injury may occur in 1.6% of cases, but it is usually managed and resolved with a temporary indwelling ureteric stent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Ripa
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Theodoros Tokas
- Department of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall in Tirol, Hall in Tirol, Austria,Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.) Group
| | - Stephen Griffin
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | | | - Bhaskar K. Somani
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK,Corresponding author. University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK. Tel. +44 02381206873.
| |
Collapse
|