QT Dynamics During Exercise in Asymptomatic Children with Long QT Syndrome Type 3

The Effects of Cycle Ergometer Versus Treadmill Exercise Stress Testing on QTc Interval Prolongation in Patients With Long QT Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The safest and most effective exercise stress tests (EST) modalities for long QT syndrome (LQTS) are currently unknown. The main objective was to explore the effects of EST on the corrected QT interval (QTc) in patients with LQTS, and to compare the effects of different EST modalities (cycle ergometer vs treadmill).

DATA SOURCES

Systematic searches were performed in September 2022 in accordance with the PRISMA statement through PubMed, Medline, EBM Reviews, Embase, and Web of Science.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 1728 patients with LQTS, whether congenital or acquired, without any age restrictions (pediatric age ≤18 years and adult age >19 years), and 2437 control subjects were included in the 49 studies. The QT interval data were available for 15 studies. Our analyses showed that the QT interval prolonged in a similar manner using either a cycle ergometer or a treadmill (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 1.89 [95% CI, 1.07-2.71] vs SMD = 1.46 [95% CI, 0.78-2.14], respectively). Therefore, it seems that either modality may be used to evaluate patients with LQTS.

CONCLUSIONS

The methodology for the measurement of the QT interval was very heterogeneous between studies, which inevitably influenced the quality of the analyses. Hence, researchers should proceed with caution when exploring and interpreting data in the field of exercise and LQTS.

Utility of Provocative Testing in the Diagnosis and Genotyping of Congenital Long QT Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background Diagnosis is particularly challenging in concealed or asymptomatic long QT syndrome (LQTS). Provocative testing, unmasking the characterization of LQTS, is a promising alternative method for the diagnosis of LQTS, but without uniform standards. Methods and Results A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library through October 14, 2021. The fixed effects model was used to assess the effect of the provocative testing on QTc interval. A total of 22 studies with 1137 patients with LQTS were included. At baseline, QTc interval was 40 ms longer in patients with LQTS than in controls (mean difference [MD], 40.54 [95% CI, 37.43-43.65]; P<0.001). Compared with the control group, patients with LQTS had 28 ms longer ΔQTc upon standing (MD, 28.82 [95% CI, 23.05-34.58]; P<0.001), nearly 30 ms longer both at peak exercise (MD, 27.31 [95% CI, 21.51-33.11]; P<0.001) and recovery 4 to 5 minutes (MD, 29.85 [95% CI, 24.36-35.35]; P<0.001). With epinephrine infusion, QTc interval was prolonged both in controls and patients with QTS, most obviously in LQT1 (MD, 68.26 [95% CI, 58.91-77.60]; P<0.001) and LQT2 (MD, 60.17 [95% CI, 50.18-70.16]; P<0.001). Subgroup analysis showed QTc interval response to abrupt stand testing and exercise testing varied between LQT1, LQT2, and LQT3, named Type Ⅰ, Type Ⅱ, and Type Ⅲ. Conclusions QTc trend Type Ⅰ and Type Ⅲ during abrupt stand testing and exercise testing can be used to propose a prospective evaluation of LQT1 and LQT3, respectively. Type Ⅱ QTc trend combined epinephrine infusion testing could distinguish LQT2 from control. A preliminary diagnostic workflow was proposed but deserves further evaluation.

OUP accepted manuscript

Current exercise recommendations make it difficult for long QT syndrome (LQTS) patients to adopt a physically active and/or athletic lifestyle. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current evidence, identify knowledge gaps, and discuss research perspectives in the field of exercise and LQTS. The first aim is to document the influence of exercise training, exercise stress, and postural change interventions on ventricular repolarization in LQTS patients, while the second aim is to describe electrophysiological measurements used to study the above. Studies examining the effects of exercise on congenital or acquired LQTS in human subjects of all ages were included. Systematic searches were performed on 1 October 2021, through PubMed (NLM), Ovid Medline, Ovid All EBM Reviews, Ovid Embase, and ISI Web of Science, and limited to articles written in English or French. A total of 1986 LQTS patients and 2560 controls were included in the 49 studies. Studies were mainly case-control studies (n = 41) and examined exercise stress and/or postural change interventions (n = 48). One study used a 3-month exercise training program. Results suggest that LQTS patients have subtype-specific repolarization responses to sympathetic stress. Measurement methods and quality were found to be very heterogeneous, which makes inter-study comparisons difficult. In the absence of randomized controlled trials, the current recommendations may have long-term risks for LQTS patients who are discouraged from performing physical activity, rendering its associated health benefits out of range. Future research should focus on discovering the most appropriate levels of exercise training that promote ventricular repolarization normalization in LQTS.

Dynamic QT response to cold-water face immersion in long-QT syndrome type 3

BACKGROUND

Abnormal dynamics of QT intervals in response to sympathetic nervous system stimulation are used to diagnose long-QT syndrome (LQTS). We hypothesized that parasympathetic stimulation with cold-water face immersion following exercise would influence QT dynamics in patients with LQTS type 3 (LQT3).

METHODS

Study participants (n = 42; mean age = 11.2 years) comprised 20 genotyped LQTS children and 22 healthy children. The LQTS group was divided into LQT3 (n = 12) and non-LQT3 (n = 8) subgroups. Provocative testing for assessing QT dynamics comprised a treadmill exercise followed by cold-water face immersion. The QT intervals were automatically measured at rest and during exercise, recovery, and cold-water face immersion. The QT/heart rate (HR) relationship was visualized by plotting beat-to-beat confluence of the data.

RESULTS

The QT/HR slopes, determined by linear regression analysis, were steeper in the LQTS group than in the control group during exercise and immersion tests: -2.16 ± 0.63 versus -1.21 ± 0.28, P < 0.0001, and -2.02 ± 0.76 vs -0.75 ± 0.24, P < 0.0001, respectively. The LQT3 patients had steeper slopes in the immersion test than did non-LQT3 and control individuals: -2.42 ± 0.52 vs -1.40 ± 0.65, P < 0.0001, and vs -0.75 ± 0.24, P < 0.0001.

CONCLUSIONS

The QT dynamics of LQT3 patients differ from those of other LQTS subtypes during the post-exercise cold-water face immersion test in this study. Abnormal QT dynamics during the parasympathetic provocative test are concordant with the fact that cardiac events occur when HRs are lower or during sleep in LQT3 patients.

Assessment of the QT Interval in Athletes: Red Flags and Pitfalls

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pre-participation athlete screening has led to the referral of asymptomatic athletes with a prolonged QT interval warranting their evaluation for long QT syndrome (LQTS). Establishing a diagnosis of LQTS can be difficult, particularly in asymptomatic athletes presenting with a prolonged QTc < 500 ms. This review examines the evaluatory pathway to ascertain the common pitfalls leading to mis- or overdiagnosis. We discuss the advanced ECG-based tools and consider their application in the diagnostic process.

RECENT FINDINGS

Critical analysis of the ECG, symptom, and pedigree analysis has established value but relies on experienced interpretation. Protocolisation of the former has effectively reduced error. Exercise recovery ECG testing has demonstrated diagnostic value and provocation testing, reliant on QT hysteresis in LQTS, have shown reasonable sensitivity. Although it is becoming more established in experienced centres, its diagnostic value relies on effective risk stratification and subject selection. LQTS is a rare condition and the precision of any available test is greatly diluted if pre-test probability is low. Clinical and familial evaluation and exercise ECG testing are the foundation of the evaluatory process following referral. Adjunctive tests may have high sensitivity for LQTS but rely on high pre-test probability. Several pitfalls have been identified that can lead to misdiagnosis and thus informed evaluation at an experienced specialist centre is appropriate.

The congenital long QT syndrome Type 3: An update

Congenital long QT syndrome type 3 (LQT3) is the third in frequency compared to the 15 forms known currently of congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS). Cardiac events are less frequent in LQT3 when compared with LQT1 and LQT2, but more likely to be lethal; the likelihood of dying during a cardiac event is 20% in families with an LQT3 mutation and 4% with either an LQT1 or an LQT2 mutation. LQT3 is consequence of mutation of gene SCN5A which codes for the Nav1.5 Na+ channel α-subunit and electrocardiographically characterized by a tendency to bradycardia related to age, prolonged QT/QTc interval (mean QTc value 478 ± 52 ms), accentuated QT dispersion consequence of prolonged ST segment, late onset of T wave and frequent prominent U wave because of longer repolarization of the M cell across left ventricular wall.