Variations in Criteria and Practices for Heart Transplantation Listing Among Pediatric Transplant Cardiologists

Improvement in patient selection, management and outcomes in infant heart transplant from 2000 to 2020

OBJECTIVES

The study's primary outcome was to evaluate if post-transplant survival has improved over the last 2 decades. Secondary outcomes were the infant's waitlist mortality, waitlist time and identifying factors that affected the infant's survival.

METHODS

United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried for infants (age ≤ 1) who were listed for heart transplantation between 2000 and 2020. The years were divided into 3 eras (Era 1 2000-2006, Era 2 2007-2013 and Era 3 2014-2020). Non-parametric tests, Chi-Squared, Log-Rank test and Cox-Proportional hazard ratio were used for analysis (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

4234 infants were listed for heart transplants between 2000 and 2020. At the time of listing, Infants in era 3 were more likely to be heavier [in kg (P < 0.001)] and had better renal function (P < 0.001). Additionally, they were less likely to be on dialysis (P < 0.001), on a ventilator (P < 0.001) and on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (P < 0.001). There has been a significant increase in left ventricular assist device use (P < 0.001), though there was no difference in waitlist (0.154) or post-transplant survival (0.51). In all 3 eras, waitlist survival (P < 0.001) and post-transplant survival (P < 0.001) have improved significantly. Congenital heart disease and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were associated with worse waitlist survival in all 3 eras (P < 0.05). Infants are now waiting longer on the waitlist (in days) (33 Era 1 vs 46 Era 2 vs 67 Era 3, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Infant heart transplant outcomes have improved, but they are now waiting longer on the waitlist. Further improvement in increasing the donor pool, expert consensus on listing strategies and donor utilization is needed to improve outcomes.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cardiac Reintervention After Pediatric Cardiac Surgical Procedures

BACKGROUND

Children undergoing cardiac surgical procedures may require postoperative surgical or catheter-based reintervention before discharge. We examined racial/ethnic variations in reintervention and associated in-hospital death.

METHODS

Children undergoing cardiac surgical procedures from 2004 to 2015 were identified in the Pediatric Health Information Systems (PHIS) database. Regression analysis measured associations between race/ethnicity, in-hospital death, and postoperative cardiac surgical or catheter-based reintervention (surgical/catheter reintervention).

RESULTS

Of 124,263 patients, 8265 (6.7%) had a surgical/catheter reintervention. Black patients had fewer reinterventions (5.9% vs 6.7%) and higher in-hospital mortality (3.9% vs 2.7%, P < .01) than White patients. After adjusting for sociodemographic and illness severity indicators, Black patients remained less likely to receive surgical/catheter reintervention (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.98) despite having similar risk of death after reintervention (adjusted odds ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.98-1.41) compared with White patients. The risk of death without surgical/catheter reintervention was also higher for Black (aHR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.08-1.47) and other race/ethnicity (aHR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.13-1.57) patients than for White patients. Similar trends were demonstrated when mechanical circulatory support and cardiac transplantation were included as reinterventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients of Black and other race/ethnicity undergoing pediatric cardiac surgical procedures are more likely to die without postoperative cardiac reintervention than White patients. Black patients are also less likely to receive reintervention despite no significant difference in mortality with reintervention. Further studies should evaluate etiologies and methods of addressing these disparities.

Review on clinician bias and its impact on racial and socioeconomic disparities in pediatric heart transplantation

This expert review seeks to highlight implicit bias in health care, transplant medicine, and pediatric heart transplantation to focus attention on the role these biases may play in the racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities noted in pediatric heart transplantation. This review breaks down the transplant decision making process to highlight points at which implicit bias may affect outcomes and discuss how the science of human decision making may help understand these complex processes.

Prevalence and Long-Term Outcomes of Solid Organ Transplant in Children with Intellectual Disability

OBJECTIVES

To describe the prevalence and long-term outcomes of kidney, liver, and heart transplant for children with an intellectual disability.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of children receiving a first kidney, liver, or heart-alone transplant in the United Network for Organ Sharing dataset from 2008 to 2017. Recipients with definite intellectual disability were compared with those possible/no intellectual disability. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated for graft and patient survival. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the association between intellectual disability and graft and patient survival.

RESULTS

Over the study period, children with definite intellectual disability accounted for 594 of 6747 (9%) first pediatric kidney-alone, 318 of 4566 (7%) first pediatric liver-alone, and 324 of 3722 (9%) first pediatric heart-alone transplant recipients. Intellectual disability was not significantly associated with patient or graft survival among liver and heart transplant recipients. Among kidney transplant recipients, definite intellectual disability was significantly associated with higher graft survival and lower patient survival, but the absolute differences were small.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with intellectual disability account for 7%-9% of pediatric transplant recipients with comparable long-term outcomes to other pediatric recipients. These findings provide important empirical support for policies that include children with intellectual disability as transplant candidates.

Ethical and practical dilemmas in cardiac transplantation in infants: a literature review

The waiting time in infants for a cardiac transplant remains high, due to the scarcity of donors. Consequently, waiting list morbidity and mortality are higher than those in other age groups. Therefore, the decision to list a small infant for cardiac transplantation is seen as an ethical dilemma by most physicians. This review aims to describe outcomes, limitations, and ethical considerations in infant heart transplantation. We used Medline and Embase as data sources. We searched for publications on infant (< 1 year) heart transplantation, bridge-to-transplant and long-term outcomes, and waiting list characteristics from January 2009 to March 2021. Outcome after cardiac transplant in infants is better than that in older children (1-year survival 88%), and complications are less frequent (25% CAV, 10% PTLD). The bridge-to-transplant period in infants is associated with increased mortality (32%) and decreased transplantation rate (43%). This is mainly due to MCS complications or the limited MCS options (with 51% mortality in infancy). Outcomes are worse for infants with CHD or in need of ECMO-support.Conclusion: Infants listed for cardiac transplantation have a high morbidity and mortality, especially in the period between diagnosis and transplantation. For those who receive cardiac transplant, the outlook is encouraging. Unfortunately, despite growing experience in VAD, mortality in children < 10 kg and children with CHD remains high. After transplantation, patients carry a psychological burden and there is a probability of re-transplantation later in life, with decreased outcomes compared to primary transplantation. These considerations are seen as an important ethical dilemma in many centers, when considering cardiac transplantation in infants (< 1 year). What is Known: • For infants, waitlist mortality remains high. In the pediatric population, MCS reduces the waiting list mortality. What is New: • Outcomes after infant cardiac transplantation are better than other age groups; however, MCS options remain limited, with persistently high waiting list mortality. • Future developments in MCS and alternative options to reduce waiting list mortality such as ABO-incompatible transplantation and pulmonary artery banding are encouraging and will improve ethical decision-making when an infant is in need of a cardiac transplant.

Association of low center performance evaluations and pediatric heart transplant center behavior in the United States

BACKGROUND

To date, no study has evaluated the effects of low center performance evaluations (CPE) on pediatric heart transplant center behavior. We sought to assess the impact of low CPE flags on pediatric heart transplant center listing and transplant volumes and center recipient and donor characteristics.

METHODS

We included centers performing at least 10 pediatric (age <18 years) transplants during the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients reporting period January 2009-June 2011 and evaluated consecutive biannual program specific reports until the last reporting period January 2016-June 2018. We evaluated changes in center behavior at following time points: a year before flagging, a year and two years after the flag; and at last reporting period.

RESULTS

During our study period, 24 pediatric centers were non-flagged and 6 were flagged. Compared to non-flagged centers, there was a decline in candidate listings in flagged centers at the last reporting period (mean increase of 5.5 ± 12.4 listings vs"?> mean decrease of 14.0 ± 14.9 listings; p = .003). Similarly, the number of transplants declined in flagged centers (mean increase of 2.6 ± 9.6 transplants vs"?> mean decrease of 10.0 ± 12.8 transplants; p = .012). Flagged centers had declines in listings for patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy, re-transplant, renal dysfunction, those on mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. There was no significant change in donor characteristics between flagged and non-flagged centers.

CONCLUSIONS

Low CPE may have unintended negative consequences on center behavior leading to declines in listing and transplant volumes and potentially leading to decreased listing for higher risk recipients.

Variability in clinical decision-making for ventricular assist device implantation in pediatrics

BACKGROUND

Minimal data exist on clinical decision-making in VAD implantation in pediatrics. This study aims to identify areas of consensus/variability among pediatric VAD physicians in determining eligibility and factors that guide decision-making.

METHODS

An 88-item survey with clinical vignettes was sent to 132 pediatric HT cardiologists and surgeons at 37 centers. Summary statistics are presented for the variables assessed.

RESULTS

Total respondents were 65 (72% cardiologists, 28% surgeons) whose centers implanted 1-5 (34%), 6-10 (40%), or >10 (26%) VADs in the past year. Consensus varied by patients' age, diagnosis, and Pedimacs profile. Highest agreement to offer VAD (97%) was a mechanically ventilated teenager with dilated cardiomyopathy. Patients stable on inotropes were less likely offered VAD (11%-25%). SV infant with Pedimacs profile 2 had the most varied responses: 37% offered VAD; estimated survival ranged from 15% to 90%. Variables considered for VAD eligibility included mild developmental delays (100% offered VAD), moderate-severe behavioral concerns (46%), cancer in remission >2 years (100%), active malignancy with good prognosis (68%) or uncertain prognosis (36%), and BMI >35 (74%) or <15 (69%). Most respondents (91%) would consider destination therapy VADs in pediatrics, though not currently feasible at 1/3 of centers. Factors with greatest influence on decision-making included HT candidacy, families' goals of care, and risks of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant variation exists among pediatric VAD physicians when determining VAD eligibility and estimating survival, which can lead to differences in access to emerging technologies across institutions. Further work is needed to understand and mitigate these differences.

Review of interactions between high-risk pediatric heart transplant recipients and marginal donors including utilization of risk score models

BACKGROUND

Donor organ acceptance practices vary among pediatric heart transplant professionals. We sought to understand what is known about the interactions between the "high-risk" recipient and the "marginal donor," and how donor risk scores can impact this discussion.

METHODS

A systematic review of published literature on pediatric HTx was undertaken with the assistance of a medical librarian. Two authors independently assessed search results, and papers were reviewed for inclusion.

RESULTS

We found that there are a large number of individual factors, and clusters of factors, that have been used to label individual recipients "high-risk" and individual donors "marginal." The terms "high-risk recipient" and "marginal donor" have been used broadly in the literature making it virtually impossible to make comparisons between publications. In general, the data support that patients who could be easily agreed to be "sicker recipients" are at more risk compared to those who are clearly "healthier," albeit still "sick enough" to need transplantation. Given this variability in the literature, we were unable to define how being a "high-risk" recipient interplays with accepting a "marginal donor." Existing risk scores are described, but none were felt to adequately predict outcomes from factors available at the time of offer acceptance.

CONCLUSIONS

We could not determine what makes a donor "marginal," a recipient "high-risk," or how these factors interplay within the specific recipient-donor pair to determine outcomes. Until there are better risk scores predicting outcomes at the time of organ acceptance, programs should continue to evaluate each organ and recipient individually.