Transseptal Puncture for Catheter Ablation in Children

Transseptal approach for catheter ablation of left-sided accessory pathways in children with Marfan syndrome: A case report

BACKGROUND

Left-sided accessory pathways (APs) can be accessed with either a transaortic (TA) or transseptal approach (TS). For children with Marfan syndrome (MFS) who have aortic disease, the use of TA can aggravate the disease, making TS the best choice for these patients.

CASE SUMMARY

A 10-year-old girl was hospitalized because of intermittent heart palpitations and chest tightness. She was diagnosed with MFS, supraventricular tachycardia, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, and left-sided AP was detected by cardiac electrophysiological. Catheter ablation was successfully performed via TS under the guidance of the Ensite system. During the follow-up, no recurrence or complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

The TS for catheter ablation of left-sided APs can be considered in children with MFS. Adequate evaluation and selection of the appropriate puncture site are particularly important.

Transseptal Approach Versus Transaortic Approach for Catheter Ablation of Left-Sided Accessory Pathways in Children

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation is recommended to eradicate supraventricular tachycardia caused by left-sided accessory pathways (APs) in children. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of the transseptal approach (TS) and aortic approach (TA) for catheter ablation of left-sided APs in a pediatric cohort.

METHODS

Patients < 18 years of age with left-sided APs who had undergone ablation at Beijing Children's Hospital between 13 January 2018 and 7 January 2020 were included and randomly categorized into either TS or TA group (follow-up for 22 months). In all, 60 patients in TS group and 41 patients in TA group were included in this study. Principal endpoints were success rate, recurrence rate, complications, procedure time, and radiation dose.

RESULTS

For TS group versus TA group, success rate was observed in 100 versus 97.56% (p = 0.402). The procedure time was 27.0 (32.0-23.0) versus 29.0 (38.0-24.5) min (p = 0.092). The rate of success or the procedure time was similar, but for the patients with Aps located in left posterior septum (LPS) or left posterior lateral (LPL), the TS group had a shorter procedure time compared with TA group (p < 0.01). The radiation dose was 28.0 (20.0-41.75) versus 0 mGy (p < 0.001). After successful ablation, no recurrence and complication were observed in either group.

CONCLUSION

Both TS and TA for catheter ablation of left-sided Aps were shown to be safe and effective in children. Zero radiation and ease of mastery make TA the preferred choice. TS is recommended to be used by properly trained medical professionals, especially for patient with AP localized in the LPL or LPS. However, TS is a good alternative where patients have aortic lesions or when TA fails.

Safety of Transseptal Puncture for Access to the Left Atrium in Infants and Children

Transseptal puncture (TSP) is a standard procedure to obtain access to the left heart. However, data on TSP in infants and children particularly with congenital heart defects (CHD) is sparse. Safety and efficacy of TSP in infants and children < 18 years with normal cardiac anatomy and with CHD were assessed. 327 TSP were performed in a total of 300 individuals < 18 years from 10/2002 to 09/2018 in our tertiary pediatric referral center. Median age at TSP was 11.9 years (IQR 7.8-15; range: first day of life to 17.9 years). 13 subjects were < 1 year. Median body weight was 43.8 kg (IQR 26.9-60; range: 1.8-121 kg). CHD was present in 28/327 (8.6%) procedures. TSP could be successfully performed in 323/327 (98.8%) procedures and was abandoned in 4 procedures due to imminent or incurred complications. Major complications occurred in 4 patients. 3 of these 4 subjects were ≤ 1 year of age and required TSP for enlargement of a restrictive atrial septal defect in complex CHD. Two of these babies deceased within 48 h after TSP attempt. The third baby needed urgent surgery in the cath lab. Pericardial effusion requiring drainage was noted in the forth patient (> 1 year) who was discharged well later. Minor complications emerged in 5 patients. The youngest of these individuals (0.3 years, 5.8 kg) developed small pericardial effusion after anterograde ballon valvuloplasty for critical aortic stenosis. The remaining 4/5 patients developed small pericardial effusion after ablation of a left-sided accessory atrioventricular pathway (6.1-12.2 years, 15.6-34.0 kg). TSP for access to the left heart was safe and effective in children and adolescents > 1 year of age. However, TSP was a high-risk procedure in small infants with a restrictive interatrial septum with need for enlargement of interatrial communication.

Electroanatomic guidance versus conventional fluoroscopy during transseptal puncture for atrial fibrillation ablation

INTRODUCTION

Technological advancement in the setting of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation has decreased radiation exposure and complications associated with the procedure. Yet, transseptal puncture (TSP) remains a challenging step that necessitates accurate guidance. We describe our experience performing TSP under electroanatomic (EA) guidance.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The analysis included 145 consecutive EA-guided ablation procedures performed between June 2018 and April 2019 and 145 consecutive standard ablations performed before June 2018. EA guidance utilized the CARTO 3 three-dimensional mapping system to reconstruct anatomic and electrical characteristics of the right atrium and fossa ovalis. Patients with a history of previous cardiac surgery were excluded. For EA-guided procedures, the mean patient age was 60 ± 10 years, 75.2% were male, and 69.0% had paroxysmal AF. Similarly, the mean age for conventional procedures was 60 ± 11 years, 71.0% were male, and 71.7% had paroxysmal AF. The fossa ovalis was detected as a region of low voltage, <0.75 mV. EA guidance yielded shorter fluoroscopy times (EA vs. conventional, 3.6 ± 2.5 vs. 13.5 ± 10.5 min; p < .001) and a lower dose area product than conventional guidance (13 ± 11 Gy* cm² vs. 28 ± 27  Gy* cm² ; p < .001). The total procedure duration was similar between groups (146 ± 48 vs. 148 ± 54 min). There were no significant complications related to TSP.

CONCLUSION

During AF ablation, TSP with EA guidance facilitated safe access to the left atrium while reducing radiation risk to both patients and operators.