Multiple malignant and benign lesions in the liver in a child with adrenocortical carcinoma

Focal nodular hyperplasia in children: an institutional experience with review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) is uncommonly diagnosed in pediatric patients and may be difficult to distinguish from a malignancy. We present a review of all children with a tissue diagnosis of FNH at our institution, describe the diagnostic modalities, and provide recommendations for diagnosis and follow-up based on our experience and review of the literature.

METHODS

A retrospective review of children <18years of age diagnosed with FNH at a single institution was performed from 2000 to 2013.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were identified with a tissue diagnosis of FNH. Two patients required surgical resection of their lesion owing to concern for malignancy. Ten patients were managed expectantly with imaging surveillance after biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of FNH. All patients who underwent MRI had very typical findings including hypointensity on T1 weighted sequences, hyperintensity on T2, and homogenous uptake of contrast on the arterial phase. On follow-up all patients had either a stable lesion or reduction in size.

CONCLUSIONS

Focal nodular hyperplasia presents typically in children with liver disease, have undergone chemotherapy, and adolescent females. Young children, particularly <5years of age, without underlying liver disease or history of chemotherapy can pose a diagnostic dilemma. In this unique subgroup of children with FNH, MRI and/or needle biopsy should be adequate diagnostic modalities for these lesions.

Incidence and etiology of new liver lesions in pediatric patients previously treated for malignancy

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the time course, cause, and imaging characteristics of all new liver lesions in pediatric patients with a previously treated malignancy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our hospital cancer registry was used to identify patients between 1980 and 2005 who met the following criteria: solid tumor, survival > 2 years after diagnosis, no liver lesions at a posttreatment baseline, and cross-sectional imaging follow-up of > 2 years. Final dictated reports of all cross-sectional imaging examinations including the abdomen were reviewed for any mention of new liver lesions. Positive reports were followed by consensus review of the images and clinical data. Patients were divided into three groups: those with suspected or proven focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), those with suspected or proven metastases, and those with other lesions. An exact Wilcoxon test was used to evaluate the differences between the groups.

RESULTS

Of 967 patients who met the initial inclusion criteria, 273 had adequate follow-up to be included in the study. Forty-six patients (16.8%) developed new liver lesions during the study period, and 14 of those 46 were classified into the FNH group (30.4%) and seven were classified into the metastasis group (15.2%). A significant difference was found in the median time to the development of FNH versus metastasis and other lesions (FNH, 92.9 months; metastasis, 43.2 months; other lesions, 18.5 months; p < 0.0001). A significant difference was also seen in the median length of follow-up between the groups (FNH, 115.6 months; metastasis, 57 months; other lesions, 50.8 months; p = 0.002). The imaging features of the groups also differed.

CONCLUSION

The most common liver lesion encountered in pediatric patients previously treated for malignancy was FNH, which occurred farther from the time of diagnosis and had different imaging characteristics from both metastases and other liver lesions.

Hypervascular hepatic nodules in childhood cancer survivors: clinical and imaging features

AIM

The aim was to review the clinical and imaging features of hypervascular hepatic nodule (HHN) in childhood cancer survivors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 11 pediatric patients (female:male, 7:4; age range, 4.0-12.3 years) who had HHNs detected by surveillance computed tomography (CT) after treatment of a malignant solid tumor and subsequently followed by serial imaging without evidence of recurrent malignancy. The lesions were analyzed in terms of number, size, location, CT and ultrasonographic (US) features, and changes in background liver. In addition, clinical features were investigated along with follow-up changes of HHNs by imaging monitoring.

RESULTS

Time between initial diagnosis of malignancy and HHN occurrence ranged from 3.2 to 8.5 years (median, 5.8 years). Ten patients had received high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for advanced neuroblastoma. A total of 22 nodules were detected, being multiple in six patients and measuring 0.5-3.0 cm in size. At sequential postcontrast CT, nodules demonstrated moderate to strong enhancement during the earlier phase and were isoattenuated during the later phase. On US, they appeared as hypo- or isoechoic lesions. During follow-up, 11 nodules (50%) regressed, 6 (27%) progressed, and 5 (23%) remained stable. Additional HHNs were noted in four patients during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Childhood cancer survivors are at risk of developing HHNs, which are often multiple and small, years after completing chemotherapy. They are nonaggressive and tend to have a benign course, making conservative management reasonable.

Focal nodular hyperplasia in children, adolescents, and young adults

BACKGROUND

Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) is a benign hepatic tumor that is rare in children. In order to understand whether there are differences in the etiology or appearance of FNH in children, we analyzed the clinical information and imaging of pathologically proven cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A pathology database was used to identify all cases of FNH diagnosed at our institution. Each patient's imaging was evaluated for the characteristics of FNH lesions. Clinical information was obtained on each patient.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients with FNH were identified (7 male/6 female, mean age 14.3 years, range 1-27 years). Seven patients (5 male/2 female) had a remote history of childhood malignancy. The time interval between the diagnoses of malignancy and FNH ranged from 9 to 27 years (mean 14.4 years). On imaging, all seven cancer survivors had multiple liver lesions. In the remaining six patients (2 male/4 female), there was no history of malignancy and all but one of these patients had a solitary FNH.

CONCLUSION

Half of the patients with FNH in this study were long-term cancer survivors and each of these patients had multiple masses. Recognizing the features of FNH will aid in diagnosis and appropriate management.

Focal nodular hyperplasia in children: clinical features and current management practice

BACKGROUND

Although nonoperative management is an accepted practice for most adults with focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), questions remain about the safety and feasibility of this strategy in children. Our aim was to review the clinical features of children with FNH and determine current management patterns.

METHODS

We reviewed records of all children and adolescents with FNH managed at our institution from 1999 to 2009 and performed a MEDLINE search to identify all published cases of FNH in the pediatric population.

RESULTS

A total of 172 patients with FNH were identified, including 11 at our institution. The median age at diagnosis was 8.7 years and 66% were female. Median tumor size was 6 cm, and 25% had multiple lesions. Thirty-six percent were symptomatic at presentation. Twenty-four percent had a history of malignancy. Management included resection (61%), biopsy followed by observation (21%), and observation alone (18%). Indications for resection included symptoms (48%), inability to rule out malignancy (24%), tumor growth (15%), and biopsy-proven concurrent malignancy (9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although FNH is a benign lesion that is typically managed nonoperatively in adults, most children with FNH currently undergo resection because of symptoms, increasing size, or inability to confidently rule out malignancy.

Surgical management of giant liver tumor involving the hepatic hilum of children

BACKGROUND

Surgical management of giant liver tumors involving the hepatic hilum tends to be very difficult. The present study assessed the feasibility and safety of resection of such liver tumors.

METHODS

We evaluated 27 patients with liver tumors involving the hepatic hilum. The patients ranged in age from 3 months to 14 years (mean, 4.2 years). Of the 27 cases, 23 were resected completely during the past 10 years. The other four cases did not undergo operation because of their parents' decisions to discontinue treatment; these cases had multiple space-occupying lesions in addition to tumors involving the hepatic hilum. Before resection, the tumor was fully exposed and an occluding tape was placed around the vena cava when necessary.

RESULTS

The hepatectomies were performed under intermittent portal triad clamping; 23 cases were successfully resected without postoperative mortality or morbidity. The mean operation duration was 205 min and mean blood loss was 120 ml. Pathological diagnoses included hepatoblastoma (n = 9), endotheliosarcoma (n = 1), mesenchymal hamartoma (n = 4), teratoma (n = 1), adenoma (n = 3), and hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 4). The nine cases with benign liver tumors were healthy at follow-up at 11 months to 9 years after operation. Of the 14 cases with malignant tumors, six died from recurrence, metastasis, or other complications. The other eight cases were still alive without clinical tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Resecting giant liver tumors involving the main hepatic veins and/or the retrohepatic vena cava, although challenging, is feasible and safe.