C1-2 vertebral anomalies in 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome

The Clinical Utility of Flexion-extension Cervical Spine MRI in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Our goal is to correlate the findings on flexion and extension radiographs with dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the clinical history, in a nonrandomly selected cohort of patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q).

METHODS

All patients with the 22q who had a dynamic MRI from January 2004 to March 2015 were included. We analyzed multiple radiographic measurements on both the dynamic plain films and the MRIs, and correlated these findings with a review of each patient's medical record.

RESULTS

Multiple congenital anomalies were identified as noted in previous studies, and 61% of the patients had a failure of fusion of the anterior (n=2, 9%), posterior (n=2, 9%), or anterior and posterior arches (n=10, 43%). Quantitative measurements were impossible to report with certainty because of the upper cervical anomalies, and no cases of instability were identified using a qualitative assessment. We identified spinal cord encroachment (30%) and impingement (18%); however, none of the patients had any signal change in their spinal cord. None of these findings could be definitively correlated with any clinical symptoms. A single patient was diagnosed with a Chiari I malformation, while another had cerebellar ectopia.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the upper cervical anomalies are extremely common in 22q, we did not identify cases of instability on dynamic plain radiographs and MRI. Although our findings do not support routine screening with flexion and extension MRI, this study may be required in patients with neurological symptoms and/or findings or abnormalities on dynamic plain radiographs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Movement disorders and other motor abnormalities in adults with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome

Movement abnormalities are frequently reported in children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS), but knowledge in this area is scarce in the increasing adult population. We report on five individuals illustrative of movement disorders and other motor abnormalities in adults with 22q11.2DS. In addition to an increased susceptibility to neuropsychiatric disorders, seizures, and early-onset Parkinson disease, the underlying brain dysfunction associated with 22q11.2DS may give rise to an increased vulnerability to multiple movement abnormalities, including those influenced by medications. Movement abnormalities may also be secondary to treatable endocrine diseases and congenital musculoskeletal abnormalities. We propose that movement abnormalities may be common in adults with 22q11.2DS and discuss the implications and challenges important to clinical practice.

Cervical spine abnormalities in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome

OBJECTIVE

The 22q11.2 deletion syndrome is among the most common head-and-neck-related syndromes. The literature has examined many of the phenotypic features of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome; however, few studies have explored the manifestation of cervical spine abnormalities. In this study, we compared the cervical spines of individuals with and without 22q11.2 deletion syndrome using diagnostic imaging.

DESIGN

A retrospective case-control study, with age- and sex-matched control participants who underwent flexion/extension x-rays and either a computed tomography or MRI scan.

SETTING

PARTICIPANTS presented to the velopharyngeal insufficiency clinic at Victoria Hospital in London, Ontario, Canada, a tertiary care center.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixteen pediatric patients (<age 18 at presentation) who had genetically confirmed 22q11.2 deletion syndrome were age- and sex-matched to 16 patients who presented with head and neck trauma without radiographic evidence of injury to the cervical spine. The mean age was 11.7 years (range, 2 to 21 years).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Radiographic evidence of cervical spine abnormalities ± evidence of instability.

RESULTS

Patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome were significantly more likely to have an open posterior arch of C1 (P < .0001), anterior arch cleft of C1 (P < .0001), and platybasia (P = .001). There was also a positive trend for fusion of the C2-C3 vertebrae (P = .051).

CONCLUSION

Significant differences in radiographic cervical spine measurements were found between 22q11.2 deletion syndrome patients and controls. Cervical spine abnormalities are common phenotypic features of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, but the clinical consequences are poorly understood. Further investigation is necessary to understand the possible ramifications of these abnormalities, including precautions during medically necessary interventions, and lifestyle limitations for these individuals.

Persistent right aortic arch and associated axial skeletal malformations in cats

Persistent right aortic arch (PRAA) in cats is an uncommon vascular anomaly with clinical signs referable to oesophageal obstruction. To our knowledge no reports of axial skeletal malformations concomitant to PRAA have been reported in cats. The aim of this study is to depict a new clinical feature in cats affected by PRAA. In the study six cats with a diagnosis of vascular ring anomaly were enrolled. A complete physical examination, a neurological examination and a total body radiograph were performed on each animal. Four of the six cats showed contemporary PRAA and skeletal malformations. Additionally, for the first time, a genetic test was performed on one subject to detect DNA alterations in the homologous DiGeorge region of cat. The percentage of skeletal malformations reported in the normal population was compared with animals with PRAA and showed a higher frequency. Genetic testing failed to demonstrate a correlation between PRAA and DiGeorge genomic deletion. A review of veterinary and human diseases that presented both conditions was assessed. The few animals enrolled do not allow definitive conclusions. Further studies are required to corroborate the correlation between PRAA and axial skeletal malformations in cats.

Chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (DiGeorge syndrome/velocardiofacial syndrome)

Chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome is a common syndrome also known as DiGeorge syndrome and velocardiofacial syndrome. It occurs in approximately 1:4000 births, and the incidence is increasing due to affected parents bearing their own affected children. The manifestations of this syndrome cross all medical specialties, and care of the children and adults can be complex. Many patients have a mild to moderate immune deficiency, and the majority of patients have a cardiac anomaly. Additional features include renal anomalies, eye anomalies, hypoparathyroidism, skeletal defects, and developmental delay. Each child's needs must be tailored to his or her specific medical problems, and as the child transitions to adulthood, additional issues will arise. A holistic approach, addressing medical and behavioral needs, can be very helpful.

Unambiguous molecular detections with multiple genetic approach for the complicated chromosome 22q11 deletion syndrome

Background

Chromosome 22q11 deletion syndrome (22q11DS) causes a developmental disorder during the embryonic stage, usually because of hemizygous deletions. The clinical pictures of patients with 22q11DS vary because of polymorphisms: on average, approximately 93% of affected individuals have a de novo deletion of 22q11, and the rest have inherited the same deletion from a parent. Methods using multiple genetic markers are thus important for the accurate detection of these microdeletions.

Methods

We studied 12 babies suspected to carry 22q11DS and 18 age-matched healthy controls from unrelated Taiwanese families. We determined genomic variance using microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH), quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA).

Results

Changes in genomic copy number were significantly associated with clinical manifestations for the classical criteria of 22q11DS using MPLA and qPCR (p < 0.01). An identical deletion was shown in three affected infants by MLPA. These reduced DNA dosages were also obtained partially using array-CGH and confirmed by qPCR but with some differences in deletion size.

Conclusion

Both MLPA and qPCR could produce a clearly defined range of deleted genomic DNA, whereas there must be a deleted genome that is not distinguishable using MLPA. These data demonstrate that such multiple genetic approaches are necessary for the unambiguous molecular detection of these types of complicated genomic syndromes.