Paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma presenting as thickening of the tunica vaginalis

The fate of paratesticular masses: 13 years' experience in a tertiary referral centre

OBJECTIVE

Paratesticular neoplasms exhibit different behaviours, depending on the embryological tissue of origin. Treatment modalities can depend on the differential diagnosis. The aim of this study is to present the clinical, morphological and histopathological features of patients with paratesticular masses and their follow-ups and is intended to increase awareness of the issues.

METHODOLOGY

We included 31 excisions of paratesticular masses, after radiological diagnosis as paratesticular mass in our hospital between 2007-2020. Information on treatment modalities, tumour recurrence, metastasis, and survival rates were obtained from hospital archives. All patients were evaluated by taking patients' history, physical examination, scrotal ultrasound, chest radiography, and serum tumour markers. Treatment modality was selected according to intraoperative findings. Haematoxylin-eosin sections were examined, and immunohistochemical analyses were performed for smooth muscle actin, desmin, Ki67, CD34, S100, and myogenin. Ten high-power fields were counted to document Ki67 and p53 nuclear positivity rates.

RESULTS

A total of 31 operations were performed with recurrence in three patients. Histomorphological and immunohistochemical examination revealed eleven malignant masses; eight rhabdomyosarcomas, a leiomyosarcoma, a liposarcoma and a large B cell lymphoma. Other excised masses were benign and infective lesions.

CONCLUSION

Paratesticular masses are heterogeneous tumours that follow different clinical courses. Clinicians must be aware of this histological diversity in order to plan a treatment pathway. This study is one of the largest published series, with a long follow-up period. It shows that the most critical features in determining prognosis are histopathological subtype and tumour grade.

Rare benign and malignant testicular lesions: histopathology and management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The presence of vascular solid tumors within the testicle is considered to be malignant until proven otherwise. However, it is prudent for clinicians to be aware of rare benign and malignant intratesticular lesions as management can differ from the established treatment algorithms for germ-cell tumors.

RECENT FINDINGS

Utilizing certain histopathologic findings can assist with the diagnosis of rare testis tumors. Often times the tumor subtypes are an important consideration in the grading and classification of the disease, which drives management. The multidisciplinary management of rare malignant testis tumors at an experienced center seems to provide optimal patient outcomes. Regardless of the primary treatment, prolonged follow-up for sex cord stromal tumors and other rare testis malignancies is advocated due to the delayed metastatic potential.

SUMMARY

The clinical presentation of rare benign and malignant testis tumors is often similar to that of germ-cell tumors. Likewise, imaging characteristics are also often indistinguishable. However, the management of these rare tumors is often different from the well established treatment algorithms of germ-cell tumors. To that end, it is important for the practicing urologist to be familiar with the current principles of these tumor characteristics and the management.

Primary rhabdomyosarcoma of tunica vaginalis misdiagnosing as hydrocele: A case report and literature review

Primary rhabdomyosarcoma of tunica vaginalis is very rare. We report a case of a 15-year-old man presenting as hydrocele. Pre-operatively, no masses were detected by ultrasonography. Hydrocelectomy was performed. At surgery, a 0.8 cm polypoid nodule and diffusely thickened tunica were found. Pathologic examination finally revealed rhabdomyosarcoma. A PET-CT was then performed and indicated scrotal implantation metastasis. The patient underwent radical inguinal orchiectomy and was treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy after surgery. At 12 months of follow-up, he remained disease-free.

The diagnosis and management of scrotal masses

When evaluating a patient with a scrotal mass, a careful history and inguinoscrotal examination are necessary. Malignant scrotal wall, paratesticular, or spermatic cord tumors are rare. Scrotal ultrasound can confirm the precise location of a mass or rule out the presence of an inguinal hernia. Testicular masses deserve a formal workup, with serum tumor markers, a scrotal ultrasound as needed, and prompt consultation with a urologist for further staging and intervention. Scrotal masses in children are much rarer than in adults and should be evaluated by a urologist.