Effects of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction on radiation dose reduction and diagnostic accuracy of pediatric abdominal CT

Image quality assessment of pediatric chest and abdomen CT by deep learning reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Efforts to reduce the radiation dose have continued steadily, with new reconstruction techniques. Recently, image denoising algorithms using artificial neural networks, termed deep learning reconstruction (DLR), have been applied to CT image reconstruction to overcome the drawbacks of iterative reconstruction (IR). The purpose of our study was to compare the objective and subjective image quality of DLR and IR on pediatric abdomen and chest CT images.

METHODS

This retrospective study included pediatric body CT images from February 2020 to October 2020, performed on 51 patients (34 boys and 17 girls; age 1-18 years). Non-contrast chest CT (n = 16), contrast-enhanced chest CT (n = 12), and contrast-enhanced abdomen CT (n = 23) images were included. Standard 50% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V (ASIR-V) images were compared to images with 100% ASIR-V and DLR at medium and high strengths. Attenuation, noise, contrast to noise ratio (CNR), and signal to noise (SNR) measurements were performed. Overall image quality, artifacts, and noise were subjectively assessed by two radiologists using a four-point scale (superior, average, suboptimal, and unacceptable). A phantom scan was performed including the dose range of the clinical images used in our study, and the noise power spectrum (NPS) was calculated. Quantitative and qualitative parameters were compared using repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.

RESULTS

DLR had better CNR and SNR than 50% ASIR-V in both pediatric chest and abdomen CT images. When compared with 50% ASIR-V, high strength DLR was associated with noise reduction in non-contrast chest CT (33.0%), contrast-enhanced chest CT (39.6%), and contrast-enhanced abdomen CT (38.7%) with increases in CNR at 149.1%, 105.8%, and 53.1% respectively. The subjective assessment of overall image quality and the noise was also better on DLR images (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in artifacts between reconstruction methods. From NPS analysis, DLR methods showed a pattern of reducing the magnitude of noise while maintaining the texture.

CONCLUSION

Compared with 50% ASIR-V, DLR improved pediatric body CT images with significant noise reduction. However, artifacts were not improved by DLR, regardless of strength.

Extent of tube-current reduction using sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction in pediatric computed tomography: phantom study

BACKGROUND

Iterative image reconstruction techniques can produce diagnostic-quality computed tomography (CT) images with lower radiation dose.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the reduction in x-ray tube-current setting and optimize pediatric CT scans using different strengths of an iterative reconstruction technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The head, chest and abdomen regions of an anthropomorphic phantom representing a 5-year-old patient were scanned using standard CT protocols. Images were reconstructed using filtered back projection and different strengths of a sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction technique. Repeated measurements of contrast-to-noise ratios in the lungs, bone and soft-tissue regions of the phantom were carried out. Maximum increase in contrast-to-noise ratio with iterative reconstruction strength was identified and a tube-current reduction factor was calculated. Head scans were repeated with reduced tube current and compared to filtered back projection images.

RESULTS

Iterative reconstruction strength of 3 for head and chest images and 4 for abdomen images were optimum, resulting in contrast-to-noise ratio increase of about 50%. A tube-current reduction factor of 1.2 for head images was calculated. Images of the head acquired using reduced tube-current showed similar contrast-to-noise ratio as images form filtered back projection with full tube current.

CONCLUSION

Optimum strength of iterative reconstruction technique has been identified for head, chest and abdomen images. Reductions in tube current of 20%, resulting in similar radiation dose reduction, have been established.

ASSESSMENT OF CLINICAL IMAGE QUALITY IN PAEDIATRIC ABDOMINAL CT EXAMINATIONS: DEPENDENCY ON THE LEVEL OF ADAPTIVE STATISTICAL ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION (ASiR) AND THE TYPE OF CONVOLUTION KERNEL

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different combinations of convolution kernel and the level of Adaptive Statistical iterative Reconstruction (ASiR™) on diagnostic image quality as well as visualisation of anatomical structures in paediatric abdominal computed tomography (CT) examinations. Thirty-five paediatric patients with abdominal pain with non-specified pathology undergoing abdominal CT were included in the study. Transaxial stacks of 5-mm-thick images were retrospectively reconstructed at various ASiR levels, in combination with three convolution kernels. Four paediatric radiologists rated the diagnostic image quality and the delineation of six anatomical structures in a blinded randomised visual grading study. Image quality at a given ASiR level was found to be dependent on the kernel, and a more edge-enhancing kernel benefitted from a higher ASiR level. An ASiR level of 70 % together with the Soft™ or Standard™ kernel was suggested to be the optimal combination for paediatric abdominal CT examinations.