1
|
Park EJ, Lee Y, Lee J. Impact of Deep-Learning Based Reconstruction on Single-Breath-Hold, Single-Shot Fast Spin-Echo in MR Enterography for Crohn's Disease. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGY 2023; 84:1309-1323. [PMID: 38107694 PMCID: PMC10721413 DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2023.0008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To assess the quality of four images obtained using single-breath-hold (SBH), single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) and multiple-breath-hold (MBH) SSFSE with and without deep-learning based reconstruction (DLR) in patients with Crohn's disease. Materials and Methods This study included 61 patients who underwent MR enterography (MRE) for Crohn's disease. The following images were compared: SBH-SSFSE with (SBH-DLR) and without (SBH-conventional reconstruction [CR]) DLR and MBH-SSFSE with (MBH-DLR) and without (MBH-CR) DLR. Two radiologists independently reviewed the overall image quality, artifacts, sharpness, and motion-related signal loss using a 5-point scale. Three inflammatory parameters were evaluated in the ileum, the terminal ileum, and the colon. Moreover, the presence of a spatial misalignment was evaluated. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was calculated at two locations for each sequence. Results DLR significantly improved the image quality, artifacts, and sharpness of the SBH images. No significant differences in scores between MBH-CR and SBH-DLR were detected. SBH-DLR had the highest SNR (p < 0.001). The inter-reader agreement for inflammatory parameters was good to excellent (κ = 0.76-0.95) and the inter-sequence agreement was nearly perfect (κ = 0.92-0.94). Misalignment artifacts were observed more frequently in the MBH images than in the SBH images (p < 0.001). Conclusion SBH-DLR demonstrated equivalent quality and performance compared to MBH-CR. Furthermore, it can be acquired in less than half the time, without multiple BHs and reduce slice misalignments.
Collapse
|
2
|
Gallo-Bernal S, Bedoya MA, Gee MS, Jaimes C. Pediatric magnetic resonance imaging: faster is better. Pediatr Radiol 2022:10.1007/s00247-022-05529-x. [PMID: 36261512 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-022-05529-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as the preferred imaging modality for evaluating a wide range of pediatric medical conditions. Nevertheless, the long acquisition times associated with this technique can limit its widespread use in young children, resulting in motion-degraded or non-diagnostic studies. As a result, sedation or general anesthesia is often necessary to obtain diagnostic images, which has implications for the safety profile of MRI, the cost of the exam and the radiology department's clinical workflow. Over the last decade, several techniques have been developed to increase the speed of MRI, including parallel imaging, single-shot acquisition, controlled aliasing techniques, compressed sensing and artificial-intelligence-based reconstructions. These are advantageous because shorter examinations decrease the need for sedation and the severity of motion artifacts, increase scanner throughput, and improve system efficiency. In this review we discuss a framework for image acceleration in children that includes the synergistic use of state-of-the-art MRI hardware and optimized pulse sequences. The discussion is framed within the context of pediatric radiology and incorporates the authors' experience in deploying these techniques in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Gallo-Bernal
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - M Alejandra Bedoya
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave., 2nd floor, Main Building, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Michael S Gee
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Camilo Jaimes
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. .,Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave., 2nd floor, Main Building, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Free-breathing magnetic resonance imaging with radial k-space sampling for neonates and infants to reduce anesthesia. Pediatr Radiol 2022; 52:1326-1337. [PMID: 35169882 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-022-05298-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conventional chest and abdominal MRI require breath-holds to reduce motion artifacts. Neonates and infants require general anesthesia with intubation to enable breath-held acquisitions. OBJECTIVE We aimed to validate a free-breathing approach to reduce general anesthesia using a motion-insensitive radial acquisition with respiratory gating. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively enrolled children <3 years old who were referred for MRI of the chest or abdomen. They were divided into two groups according to MRI protocol: (1) breath-held scans under general anesthesia with T2-weighted single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted modified Dixon, and (2) free-breathing scans using radial sequences (T2-W MultiVane XD and contrast-enhanced T1-W three-dimensional [3-D] Vane XD). Two readers graded image quality and motion artifacts. RESULTS We included 23 studies in the free-breathing cohort and 22 in the breath-hold cohort. The overall imaging scores for the free-breathing radial T2-W sequence were similar to the scores for the breath-held T2-W SSFSE sequence (chest, 3.6 vs. 3.2, P=0.07; abdomen, 3.9 vs. 3.7, P=0.66). The free-breathing 3-D radial T1-W sequence also had image quality scores that were similar to the breath-held T1-W sequence (chest, 4.0 vs. 3.0, P=0.06; abdomen, 3.7 vs. 3.9, P=0.15). Increased motion was seen in the abdomen on the radial T2-W sequence (P<0.001), but increased motion was not different in the chest (P=0.73) or in contrast-enhanced T1-W sequences (chest, P=0.39; abdomen, P=0.15). The mean total sequence time was longer in free-breathing compared to breath-held exams (P<0.01); however, this did not translate to longer overall exam times (P=0.94). CONCLUSION Motion-insensitive radial sequences used for infants and neonates were of similar image quality to breath-held sequences and had decreased sedation and intubation.
Collapse
|
4
|
Herrmann J, Nickel D, Mugler JP, Arberet S, Gassenmaier S, Afat S, Nikolaou K, Othman AE. Development and Evaluation of Deep Learning-Accelerated Single-Breath-Hold Abdominal HASTE at 3 T Using Variable Refocusing Flip Angles. Invest Radiol 2021; 56:645-652. [PMID: 33965966 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Deep learning (DL) reconstruction enables substantial acceleration of image acquisition while maintaining diagnostic image quality. The aims of this study were to overcome the drawback of specific absorption rate (SAR)-related limitations at 3 T and to develop a DL-accelerated single-breath-hold half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) sequence for 2-dimesional T2-weighted fat-suppressed magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen at 3 T using a variable flip angle (FA) evolution for the refocusing radiofrequency pulses, as well as to evaluate its feasibility and image quality in comparison to state-of-the-art T2-weighted fat-suppressed imaging technique (BLADE). MATERIALS AND METHODS First, a suitable FA evolution with low cardiac motion-related signal loss (CRSL) and low SAR was determined through a prospective volunteer study with 11 participants. Image quality and diagnostic confidence with 5 different FA evolutions of a HASTEDL were assessed to identify the most suitable FA evolution. Second, the identified FA evolution was implemented clinically and evaluated in 51 patients undergoing a clinically indicated liver magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T. Two radiologists assessed the HASTEDL and standard sequences regarding overall image quality, noise, contrast, sharpness, artifacts, CRSL, and diagnostic confidence using a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 4, with 4 being the best. Comparative analyses were conducted to assess the differences between HASTEDL (acquisition time, 21 seconds; single breath-hold) and the routinely used T2-weighted BLADE sequence (acquisition time, 4 minutes; respiratory triggering). RESULTS From the volunteer study, the FA evolution characterized by the control points 130-90-110-130 degrees (HASTEDL) was identified as optimal among the 5 evolutions evaluated and was implemented in our clinical protocol. In all 51 patients, HASTEDL was successfully acquired at 3 T and showed excellent image quality (median, 4; interquartile range, 3-4). Although BLADE was rated significantly higher for overall image quality, noise, contrast, sharpness, artifacts, CRSL, and diagnostic confidence than HASTEDL, no differences were found concerning the number (n = 102) and measured diameter of the detected hepatic lesions between the 2 sequences BLADE and HASTEDL. CONCLUSIONS The proposed single-breath-hold abdominal HASTEDL with variable refocusing FAs is feasible at 3 T within SAR limits and yields high image quality and diagnostic confidence as compared with a standard T2-weighted acquisition technique, at a 10th of the acquisition time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith Herrmann
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen
| | - Dominik Nickel
- MR Applications Predevelopment, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
| | - John P Mugler
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Simon Arberet
- Digital Technology & Innovation, Siemens Healthineers, Princeton, NJ
| | - Sebastian Gassenmaier
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen
| | - Saif Afat
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen
| | - Konstantin Nikolaou
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang X, Udayakumar D, Xi Y, Rofsky NM, Pedrosa I, Madhuranthakam AJ. Single-shot RARE with Dixon: Application to robust abdominal imaging with uniform fat and water separation at 3T. Magn Reson Med 2021; 86:1463-1471. [PMID: 33929055 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a true single shot turbo spin echo (SShTSE) acquisition with Dixon for robust T2 -weighted abdominal imaging with uniform fat and water separation at 3T. METHODS The in-phase (IP) and out-of-phase (OP) echoes for Dixon processing were acquired in the same repetition time of a SShTSE using partial echoes. A phase-preserved bi-directional homodyne reconstruction was developed to compensate the partial echo and the partial phase encoding of SShTSE. With IRB approval, the SShTSE-Dixon was compared against standard SShTSE, without and with fat suppression using spectral adiabatic inversion recovery (SPAIR) in 5 healthy volunteers and 5 patients. The SNR and contrast ratio (CR) of spleen to liver were compared among different acquisitions. RESULTS The bi-directional homodyne reconstruction successfully minimized ringing artifacts because of partial acquisitions. SShTSE-Dixon achieved uniform fat suppression compared to SShTSE-SPAIR with fat suppression failures of 1/10 versus 10/10 in the axial plane and 0/5 versus 5/5 in the coronal plane, respectively. The SNRs of the liver (12.2 ± 4.9 vs. 11.7 ± 5.2; P = .76) and spleen (25.9 ± 11.6 vs. 23.7 ± 9.7; P = .14) were equivalent between fat-suppressed images (SShTSE-Dixon water-only and SShTSE-SPAIR). The SNRs of liver (14.4 ± 5.7 vs. 13.4 ± 5.0; P = .60) and spleen (26.5 ± 10.1 vs. 25.7 ± 8.5; P = .56) were equivalent between non-fat-suppressed images (SShTSE-Dixon IP and SShTSE). The CRs of spleen to liver were also similar between fat-suppressed images (2.6 ± 0.4 vs. 2.5 ± 0.5; P =.92) and non-fat-suppressed images (2.3 ± 0.6 vs. 2.2 ± 0.4; P =.84). CONCLUSION SShTSE-Dixon generates robust abdominal T2 -weighted images at 3T with and without uniform fat suppression, along with perfectly co-registered fat-only images in a single acquisition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinzeng Wang
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Global MR Application and Workflow, GE Healthcare, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Durga Udayakumar
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Advanced Imaging Research Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Yin Xi
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Population and Data Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Neil M Rofsky
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Advanced Imaging Research Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Ivan Pedrosa
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Advanced Imaging Research Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Ananth J Madhuranthakam
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Advanced Imaging Research Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fast, free-breathing and motion-minimized techniques for pediatric body magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Radiol 2018; 48:1197-1208. [PMID: 30078042 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-018-4116-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2017] [Revised: 01/26/2018] [Accepted: 03/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the preferred imaging modality in children with complex medical issues. Patient motion and respiration remain major challenges in pediatric abdominal MRI. Young children ages 3 months to 6 years are unable to cooperate or perform breath-holding and frequently require deep sedation or general anesthesia to undergo MRI. Given the growing concerns associated with the use of sedation and anesthesia as well as the adverse impact on workflow, developing and implementing fast and motion-resistant MRI sequences are of great interest. Fast sequences such as single-shot fast spin echo and balanced steady-state free precession are useful as quick anatomical surveys on routine abdominal MRI. The widespread utilization of parallel imaging and sequences with radial k-space sampling has contributed to decreasing scan time and improving image quality, respectively. Newer strategies including compressed sensing, simultaneous multi-slice acquisition, and hybrid approaches hold the prospect of faster image acquisition that could significantly reduce the need for sedation in this vulnerable population and decrease the time of anesthesia in cases where it is indicated.
Collapse
|
7
|
Variable refocusing flip angle single-shot fast spin echo imaging of liver lesions: increased speed and lesion contrast. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018; 43:593-599. [PMID: 28689221 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1252-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate acquisition time and clinical image quality of a variable refocusing flip angle (vrf) single-shot fast spin echo (SSFSE) sequence in comparison with a conventional SSFSE sequence for imaging of liver lesions in patients undergoing whole-body PET/MRI for oncologic staging. METHODS A vrfSSFSE sequence was acquired in 43 patients with known pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors undergoing 68Ga-DOTA-TOC PET on a simultaneous time-of-flight 3.0T PET/MRI. Liver lesions ≥1.5 cm with radionucleotide uptake were analyzed. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were measured, and four blinded radiologists assessed overall image quality. Differences in repetition time and CNR were assessed using a paired Student's t test with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Inter-reader variability was assessed with Fleiss' kappa statistic. RESULTS 53 eligible lesions in 27 patients were included for analysis. vrfSSFSE demonstrated higher mean lesion CNR compared to SSFSE (9.9 ± 4.1 vs. 6.7 ± 4.1, p < 0.001). Mean repetition time (TR) was 679 ± 97 ms for the vrfSSFSE sequence compared to 1139 ± 106 ms for SSFSE (p < 0.0001), corresponding to a 1.7-fold decrease in acquisition time. Overall quality of liver lesion and common bile duct images with the vrfSSFSE sequence was graded as superior than or equivalent to the SSFSE sequence for 59% and 67% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Compared to conventional SSFSE, vrfSSFSE resulted in improved lesion contrast on simultaneous PET/MRI in patients with liver metastases. Due to decreased SAR demands, vrfSSFSE significantly decreased TR, allowing coverage of the entire liver in a single twenty-second breath hold. This may have important clinical implications in the setting of PET/MRI, where scan time is limited by the necessity of whole-body image acquisition in addition to bed specific imaging.
Collapse
|
8
|
Loening AM, Litwiller DV, Saranathan M, Vasanawala SS. Increased Speed and Image Quality for Pelvic Single-Shot Fast Spin-Echo Imaging with Variable Refocusing Flip Angles and Full-Fourier Acquisition. Radiology 2016; 282:561-568. [PMID: 27564132 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016151574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To assess image quality and speed improvements for single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) with variable refocusing flip angles and full-Fourier acquisition (vrfSSFSE) pelvic imaging via a prospective trial performed in the context of uterine leiomyoma evaluation. Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. vrfSSFSE and conventional SSFSE sagittal and coronal oblique acquisitions were performed in 54 consecutive female patients referred for 3-T magnetic resonance (MR) evaluation of known or suspected uterine leiomyomas. Two radiologists who were blinded to the image acquisition technique semiquantitatively scored images on a scale from -2 to 2 for noise, image contrast, sharpness, artifacts, and perceived ability to evaluate uterine, ovarian, and musculoskeletal structures. The null hypothesis of no significant difference between pulse sequences was assessed with a Wilcoxon signed rank test by using a Holm-Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Results Because of reductions in specific absorption rate, vrfSSFSE imaging demonstrated significantly increased speed (more than twofold, P < .0001), with mean repetition times compared with conventional SSFSE imaging decreasing from 1358 to 613 msec for sagittal acquisitions and from 1494 to 621 msec for coronal oblique acquisitions. Almost all assessed image quality and perceived diagnostic capability parameters were significantly improved with vrfSSFSE imaging. These improvements included noise, sharpness, and ability to evaluate the junctional zone, myometrium, and musculoskeletal structures for both sagittal acquisitions (mean values of 0.56, 0.63, 0.42, 0.56, and 0.80, respectively; all P values < .0001) and coronal oblique acquisitions (mean values of 0.81, 1.09, 0.65, 0.93, and 1.12, respectively; all P values < .0001). For evaluation of artifacts, there was an insufficient number of cases with differences to allow statistical testing. Conclusion Compared with conventional SSFSE acquisition, vrfSSFSE acquisition increases 3-T imaging speed via reduced specific absorption rate and leads to significant improvements in perceived image quality and perceived diagnostic capability when evaluating pelvic structures. © RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas M Loening
- From the Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307 MC 5621, Stanford, CA 94305 (A.M.L., S.S.V.); GE Healthcare Global MR Applications and Workflow, Rochester, Minn (D.V.L.); and Department of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz (M.S.)
| | - Daniel V Litwiller
- From the Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307 MC 5621, Stanford, CA 94305 (A.M.L., S.S.V.); GE Healthcare Global MR Applications and Workflow, Rochester, Minn (D.V.L.); and Department of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz (M.S.)
| | - Manojkumar Saranathan
- From the Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307 MC 5621, Stanford, CA 94305 (A.M.L., S.S.V.); GE Healthcare Global MR Applications and Workflow, Rochester, Minn (D.V.L.); and Department of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz (M.S.)
| | - Shreyas S Vasanawala
- From the Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307 MC 5621, Stanford, CA 94305 (A.M.L., S.S.V.); GE Healthcare Global MR Applications and Workflow, Rochester, Minn (D.V.L.); and Department of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz (M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|