Update on radiation safety and dose reduction in pediatric neuroradiology

Exploring the Necessity of Routine Daily Chest X-rays for Mechanically Ventilated Patients in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: An Integrative Review

PROBLEM

In the PICU of a university teaching hospital, daily chest X-rays (CXR) are performed on all intubated and non-invasive ventilation-assisted patients, even when the patient is stable with no changes in clinical status. Inconsistent practice was identified with PICUs globally. This review aims to address the risk-benefit balance of clinical value, outcomes, cost, and radiation exposure when performing routine daily CXRs in the PICU.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

CINAHL, Medline, and Embase (Ovid) were searched for relevant articles within the last ten years (2009 to 2019). Articles involving routine daily CXR on adult patients were included due to limited pediatric research.

SAMPLE

18 articles were included in this review which evaluated the necessity of routine daily CXR protocol in the ICU setting and the risks of radiation exposure (pediatric n = 5, adult n = 10, both n = 3).

RESULTS

When comparing the routine daily to on-demand CXR ordering protocols, there was no difference noted in clinical outcomes including mortality, complications, length of stay in hospital or ICU, and number of ventilator days. The on-demand CXR protocol decreased the number of CXRs per patient, which thereby decreased radiation exposure for patients, decreasing their risk of potential toxicity and malignancy.

CONCLUSION

Routine daily CXR protocols are no longer recommended due to lack of clinical value, similar outcomes, increased cost, and since it places patients at risk for undue radiation exposure.

IMPLICATIONS

Further studies should evaluate clinical and physical exam findings that would trigger ordering a CXR in order to optimize their diagnostic value in the pediatric setting.

Paediatric Trauma Score as a non-imaging tool for predicting intracranial haemorrhage in patients with traumatic brain injury

To identify a useful non-imaging tool to screen paediatric patients with traumatic brain injury for intracranial haemorrhage (ICH). We retrospectively analysed patients aged < 15 years who visited the emergency department with head trauma between January 2015 and September 2020. We divided patients into two groups (ICH and non-ICH) and compared their demographic and clinical factors. Among 85 patients, 21 and 64 were in the ICH and non-ICH groups, respectively. Age (p = 0.002), Pediatric trauma score (PTS; p < 0.001), seizure (p = 0.042), and fracture (p < 0.001) differed significantly between the two groups. Factors differing significantly between the groups were as follows: age (odds ratio, 0.84, p = 0.004), seizure (4.83, p = 0.013), PTS (0.15, p < 0.001), and fracture (69.3, p < 0.001). Factors with meaningful cut-off values were age (cut-off [sensitivity, specificity], 6.5 [0.688, 0.714], p = 0.003) and PTS [10.5 (0.906, 0.81), p < 0.001]. Based on the previously known value for critical injury (≤ 8 points) and the cut-off value of the PTS identified in this study (≤ 10 points), we divided patients into low-risk, medium-risk, and high-risk groups; their probabilities of ICH (95% confidence intervals) were 0.16-12.74%, 35.86-89.14%, and 100%, respectively. PTS was the only factor that differed significantly between mild and severe ICH cases (p = 0.012). PTS is a useful screening tool with a high predictability for ICH and can help reduce radiation exposure when used to screen patient groups before performing imaging studies.

Retrospective review of CT brain image quality, diagnostic adequacy and radiation dose in a paediatric population imaged at a non-paediatric tertiary hospital

INTRODUCTION

Minimising radiation exposure in paediatric imaging examinations whilst maintaining acceptable diagnostic quality continues to present a challenge. The aims of this study were to assess institutional compliance of paediatric CT brain (CTB) examinations performed in an adult hospital with ARPANSA radiation dose recommendations and to compare qualitative CTB diagnostic acceptability with objective imaging parameters and radiation dose.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 115 consecutive paediatric CTB examinations was undertaken at an adult tertiary referral centre in Australia over a 2-year period. Dose length product (DLP) was compared with the ARPANSA standards. CTB image quality was subjectively classified by two neuroradiologists independently, with discordant results resolved by consensus. Objective assessment of image quality included measurements of signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) of grey and white matter.

RESULTS

All patient scans complied with ARPANSA DLP recommendations; however, 10 out of 115 scans were classified as being of diagnostically suboptimal image quality. These scans had significantly lower mean DLP values compared with diagnostically adequate examinations (105.1 vs 379.2 mGy.cm; P < 0.0001). CTB scans of adequate diagnostic quality, when compared to suboptimal scans, had significantly higher CNR (1.8 vs 1.1; P < 0.0001) and SNR in grey (7.1 vs 4.6; P < 0.0001) and white matter (5.6 vs 3.8; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

All CTB examinations in this series complied with the ARPANSA DLP recommendations; however, 9% were of suboptimal diagnostic image quality. While it is important to minimize unnecessary radiation exposure, our results suggest that excessively low DLP values can lead to suboptimal diagnostic image quality.

A Toolkit for Pediatric CT Dose Reduction in Community Hospitals

Pediatric CT radiation dose optimization is a challenging process for pediatric-focused facilities and community hospitals alike. Ongoing experience and trial-and-error approaches to dose reduction in the large academic hospital setting may position these centers to help community hospitals that strive for CT quality improvement. We describe our hands-on approach in a pilot project to create a partnership between an academic medical center and a community hospital to develop a toolkit for implementing CT dose reduction. Our aims were to (1) assess the acceptability of an interactive educational program and electronic toolkit booklet, (2) conduct a limited test of the efficacy of the toolkit in promoting knowledge and readiness to change, and (3) assess the acceptability and practicality of a collaborative approach to implementing dose reduction protocols in community hospitals. In partnering with the community hospital, we found that they had size-specific radiation doses two to three times higher than those at our center. Survey results after a site visit with interactive educational presentations revealed an increase in knowledge, stronger opinions about the health risks of radiation from CT scans, and willingness and perceived ability to reduce pediatric CT doses.