Effect of comfort pads and incubator design on neonatal radiography

Neonatal digital chest radiography- should we be using additional copper filtration?

OBJECTIVES

Copper filtration removes lower energy X-ray photons, which do not enhance image quality but would otherwise contribute to patient radiation dose. This study explores the use of additional copper filtration for neonatal mobile chest imaging.

METHODS

A controlled factorial-designed experiment was used to determine the effect of independent variables on image quality and radiation dose. These variables included: copper filtration (0 Cu, 0.1 Cu and 0.2 Cu), exposure factors, source-to-image distance and image receptor position (direct / tray). Image quality was evaluated using absolute visual grading analysis (VGA) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and entrance surface dose (ESD) was derived using an ionising chamber within the central X-ray beam.

RESULTS

VGA, CNR and ESD significantly reduced (p < 0.01) when using added copper filtration. For 0.1 Cu, the percentage reduction was much greater for ESD (60%) than for VGA (14%) and CNR (20%), respectively. When compared to the optimal combinations of parameters for incubator imaging using no copper filtration, an increase in kV and mAs when using 0.1-mm Cu resulted in better image quality at the same radiation dose (direct) or, equal image quality at reduced dose (in-tray). The use of 0.1-mm Cu for neonatal chest imaging with a corresponding increase in kV and mAs is therefore recommended.

CONCLUSION

Using additional copper filtration significantly reduces radiation dose (at increased mAs) without a detrimental effect on image quality.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This is the first study, using an anthropomorphic phantom, to explore the use of additional Cu for digital radiography neonatal chest imaging and therefore helps inform practice to standardise and optimise this imaging examination.

Evaluation of radiation dose to organs of neonatal patients during portable X-ray examination in incubators: A Monte Carlo simulation study

BACKGROUND

Infants admitted to neonate intensive care units (NICUs) are placed in incubators to maintain body temperature and condition, which undergo normal radiographs and are exposed to radiation. Furthermore, different incubator structures in different hospitals exhibit varying object to image receptor distance (OID), source to image receptor distance (SID), presence of canopy, which results in variations in X-ray radiation conditions and doses absorbed by the neonatal patients.

OBJECTIVE

To measure organ dose exposed to neonatal patient in different incubator settings.

METHODS

A portable X-ray was performed on a neonatal patient placed in an incubator to identify disease progress, the injection path of the drug, and various factors. To minimize direct contact between neonatal patients and image receptor, radiologic technologists place the image receptor on a tray underneath the incubator and place the portable X-ray tube on top of the acrylic canopy of the incubators. SID and OID settings and value of organ dose exposed to the patient varied based on the incubator structure, and the organ absorbed dose was determined using Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) simulation, PC-based Monte Carlo program (PCXMC) 2.0 simulation, and neonate phantoms.

RESULTS

Evaluations of organ dose of neonatal patients in three hospitals with different incubator settings reveal that the average organ dose differs by 36% depending on change in OID and SID settings and reduces by 10% with an acrylic canopy. Therefore, owing to the presence of an acrylic canopy on the top of the incubator and the longer SID with the corresponding shorter OID, a lower dose was absorbed by organs of neonatal patient.

CONCLUSION

Our results provide proof that proper incubator standard decreases organ dose to neonatal patient during continuously diagnostic X-ray procedure.

Image quality of bedside chest radiographs in intensive care beds with integrated detector tray: A phantom study

INTRODUCTION

Vendors offer intensive care beds with integrated detector trays for bedside radiography, promoting better ergonomics and patient comfort. However, no documentation of the effects on diagnostic image quality has been located. This study examines measured and subjective image quality of supine bedside chest radiographs with and without use of such a detector tray.

METHODS

A contrast-detail phantom (CDRAD 2.0) was exposed using standard supine chest exposure parameters. Plexiglass plates of 16 and 21 cm were placed in front to simulate patient attenuation for standard and adipose patients. Exposures were repeated with the detector placed in tray and directly in bed. Images were analysed using dedicated software giving a figure-of-merit IQFinv. Results were compared using ANOVA. Then an anthropomorphic chest phantom (Lungman) was exposed using the same parameters, and the same placements of the detector. Exposures were done with and without extra conformal tissue to simulate varying patient sizes, and with and without added typical intensive care equipment. Images were analysed by two radiologists using a three-point scale, on five image quality criteria. Radiologist also stated whether the images were sufficient for diagnosis. Results were compared using Visual Grading Characteristics, using dedicated software, resulting in Areas Under the Curve (AUC-VGC) for each combination and criteria. Inter- and intra-rater reliability were assessed with kappa statistics. Composite Visual Grading Analysis (VGAS) scores were calculated for each image. Both IQFinv and were normalized and compared.

RESULTS

For all criteria both IQFinv and AUC-VGC was significantly better when exposing the detector directly in bed, than with the detector placed in the tray across all exposures. When stratified into thin and adipose patients, IQFinv decreased significantly for thin patients, while VGAS-scores did not. For adipose patients, both figures were significantly lower with the detector in the tray.

CONCLUSION

Use of detector tray for bedside chest imaging decreases image quality.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Radiographers should critically evaluate image quality and experimentally determine optimal exposure factors, when taking equipment with integrated trays into use.

Mobile chest imaging of neonates in incubators: Optimising DR and CR acquisitions

INTRODUCTION

Neonates are a particularly vulnerable patient group with complex medical needs requiring frequent radiographic examinations. This study aims to compare computed radiography (CR) and direct digital radiography (DDR) portable imaging systems used to acquire chest x-rays for neonates within incubators.

METHODS

An anthropomorphic neonatal chest phantom was imaged under controlled conditions using one portable machine but captured using both CR and DDR technology. Other variables explored were: image receptor position (direct and incubator tray), tube current and kV. All other parameters were kept consistent. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was measured using ImageJ software and dose-area-product (DAP) was recorded. Optimisation score was calculated by dividing CNR with the DAP for each image acquisition.

RESULTS

The images with the highest CNR were those acquired using DDR direct exposures and the images with lowest CNR were those acquired using CR with the image receptor placed within the incubator tray. This is also supported by the optimisation scores which demonstrated DDR direct produced the optimal combination with regards to CNR and radiation dose. The CNR had a mean increase of 50.3% when comparing DDR direct with CR direct respectively. This was also evident when comparing DDR and CR for in-tray acquisitions, with CNR increasing by a mean of 43.5%. A mean increase of 20.4% was seen in CNR when comparing DDR tray exposures to CR direct.

CONCLUSION

DDR direct produced images of highest CNR, with incubator tray reducing CNR for both CR and DDR. However, DDR tray still had better image quality compared to CR direct.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Where possible, DDR should be the imaging system of choice for portable examinations on neonates owing to its superior image quality at lower radiation dose.

Optimising image quality and radiation dose for neonatal incubator imaging

INTRODUCTION

Neonates often require imaging within incubators however limited evidence exists as to the optimal method and acquisition parameters to achieve these examinations. This study aims to standardise and optimise neonatal chest radiography within incubators.

METHODS

A neonatal anthropomorphic phantom was imaged on two different incubators under controlled conditions using a DR system. Exposure factors, SID and placement of image receptor (direct v tray) were explored whilst keeping all other parameters consistent. Image quality was evaluated using absolute visual grading analysis (VGA) with contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) also calculated for comparison. Effective dose was established using Monte Carlo simulation using entrance surface dose within its calculations.

RESULTS

VGA and CNR reduced significantly (p < 0.05) whilst effective dose increased significantly (p < 0.05) for images acquired using the incubator tray. The optimal combinations of parameters for incubator imaging were: image receptor directly behind neonate, 0.5 mAs, 60 kV at 100 cm SID, however, if tray needs to be used then these need to be adapted to: 1 mAs at maximum achievable SID. Effective dose was highest for images acquired using both incubator tray and 100 cm SID owing to a decrease in focus to skin distance. There is significant increase (p < 0.01) in VGA between using 0.5 mAs and 1 mAs but an apparent lack of increase between 1 and 1.5 mAs.

CONCLUSION

Using the incubator tray has an adverse effect on both image quality and radiation dose for incubator imaging. Direct exposure is optimal for this type of examination but if tray needs to be used, both mAs and SID need to be increased slightly to compensate.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This study can help inform practice in order to both standardise and optimise chest imaging for neonates in incubators.

Neonatal chest radiography: Influence of standard clinical protocols and radiographic equipment on pathology visibility and radiation dose using a neonatal chest phantom

INTRODUCTION

Little is known about the variations in pathology visibility (PV) and their corresponding radiation dose values for neonatal chest radiography, between and within hospitals. Large variations in PV could influence the diagnostic outcome and the variations in radiation dose could affect the risk to patients. The aim of this study is to compare the PV and radiation dose for standard neonatal chest radiography protocols among a series of public hospitals.

METHODS

A Gammex 610 neonatal chest phantom was used to simulate the chest region of neonates. Radiographic acquisitions were conducted on 17 X-ray machines located in eight hospitals, utilising their current neonatal chest radiography protocols. Six qualified radiographers assessed PV visually using a relative visual grading analysis (VGA). Signal to noise ratios (SNR) and contrast to noise ratios (CNR) were measured as a measure of image quality (IQ). Incident air kerma (IAK) was measured using a solid-state dosimeter.

RESULTS

PV and radiation dose varied substantially between and within hospitals. For PV, the mean (range) VGA scores, between and within the hospitals, were 2.69 (2.00-3.50) and 2.73 (2.33-3.33), respectively. For IAK, the mean (range), between and within the hospitals, were 24.45 (8.11-49.94) μGy and 34.86 (22.26-49.94) μGy, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Between and within participating hospitals there was wide variation in the visibility of simulated pathology and radiation dose (IAK).

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

X-ray units with lower PV and higher doses require optimisation of their standard clinical protocols. Institutions which can offer acceptable levels of PV but with lower radiation doses should help facilitate national optimisation processes.

Imaging neonates within an incubator - A survey to determine existing working practice

INTRODUCTION

There is limited and confusing evidence within the literature regarding the optimal techniques when imaging neonates within incubators; in particular, whether to place the image receptor directly behind the neonate or in the incubator tray. For this reason, radiology departments across Wales and North West England were surveyed to explore existing working practice with regards to incubator imaging.

METHOD

A self-designed survey was developed using a systematic approach. The survey was sent to 31 radiology departments across Wales and North West England whom had a neonatal unit in order to assess existing techniques used when imaging neonates within the incubator. The survey was split into three main domains: 1) general/demographics, 2) exposure factors and technique, and 3) incubator design.

RESULTS

Nineteen departments responded (64%) demonstrating a wide variation in practice for incubator imaging. The minimum and maximum exposure factors used for neonatal chest x-ray imaging varied from 55 kV to 65 kV and 0.5 mAs-2 mAs. Fifty-eight percent of departments used the incubator tray as standard practice with the remaining forty two percent not using the tray for various reasons including, image quality, artefacts and misalignment. Sixty-three percent of departments use the maximum achievable SID for incubator imaging which demonstrates wide variability as the SID would be dependent upon: incubator design, portable machine and radiographer height.

CONCLUSION

The survey demonstrates a wide variation in existing practice for neonatal incubator imaging.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This study supports the need for standardisation and further optimisation work to ensure best practice for this vulnerable patient group.

A systematic review of incubator-based neonatal radiography - What does the evidence say?

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aimed to explore the impact of incubator design (canopy, mattress, and mattress support) on neonatal imaging in terms of imaging technique, radiation dose and image quality.

KEY FINDINGS

A systematic literature review was performed by searching multiple healthcare databases. Following study selection and extraction, 7 articles were deemed eligible and included within the study. Of these 7 studies, six were experimental phantom based with the remaining one being a retrospective analysis. Four studies reported a percentage reduction in beam attenuation for incubator components ranging from 12% to 72% with one other study reporting a reduction but with no numerical data. This wide variation in radiation beam attenuation from the incubator components was correlated with image quality within five studies, two suggesting reduced image quality when using the incubator tray under the mattress support whilst the other three found no significant difference. Although the seven studies reported that incubator components reduced X-ray beam intensity, there was limited evidence on whether this required an increase in exposure factors. Only one study suggested increasing exposure parameters to accommodate for the increase in beam attenuation when using an incubator tray.

CONCLUSION

The literature clearly demonstrates that with existing incubator designs, there is considerable beam attenuation between placing the image receptor directly behind the neonate as oppose to the incubator tray. However, this radiation beam attenuation is not well correlated to neonatal radiation dose or image quality effects and therefore is very confusing when considering clinical implementation.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This review highlights the need for standardisation and further optimisation work to ensure best practice for this vulnerable patient group.

A novel method for comparing radiation dose and image quality, between and within different x-ray units in a series of hospitals

OBJECTIVES

To develop a novel method for comparing radiation dose and image quality (IQ) to evaluate adult chest x-ray (CXR) imaging among several hospitals.

METHODS

CDRAD 2.0 phantom was used to acquire images in eight hospitals (17 digital x-ray units) using local adult CXR protocols. IQ was represented by image quality figure inverse (IQF_inv), measured using CDRAD analyser software. Signal to noise ratio, contrast to noise ratio and conspicuity index were calculated as additional measures of IQ. Incident air kerma (IAK) was measured using a solid-state dosimeter for each acquisition. Figure of merit (FOM) was calculated to provide a single estimation of IQ and radiation dose.

RESULTS

IQ, radiation dose and FOM varied considerably between hospitals and x-ray units. For IQF_inv, the mean (range) between and within the hospitals were 1.42 (0.83-2.18) and 1.87 (1.52-2.18), respectively. For IAK, the mean (range) between and within the hospitals were 93.56 (17.26-239.15) μGy and 180.85 (122.58-239.15) μGy, respectively. For FOM, the mean (range) between and within hospitals were 0.05 (0.01-0.14) and 0.03 (0.02-0.05), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The suggested method for comparing IQ and dose using FOM concept along with the new proposed FOM, is a valid, reliable and effective approach for monitoring and comparing IQ and dose between and within hospitals. It is also can be beneficial for the optimisation of x-ray units in clinical practice. Further optimisation for the hospitals/x-ray units with low FOM are required to minimise radiation dose without degrading IQ.

Neonatal Bowel Disorders: Practical Imaging Algorithm for Trainees and General Radiologists

OBJECTIVE

Neonatal bowel disorders require prompt and accurate diagnosis to avoid potential morbidity and mortality. Symptoms such as feeding intolerance, emesis, or failure to pass meconium may prompt a radiologic evaluation.

CONCLUSION

We discuss the most common neonatal bowel disorders and present a practical imaging algorithm for trainees and general radiologists.