The internal acoustic canal--another review area in paediatric sensorineural hearing loss

Diameter of the Cochlear Nerve Canal predicts Cochlear Nerve Deficiency in Children with Sensorineural Hearing Loss

PURPOSE

 Detection of cochlear nerve deficiency (CND) is usually straightforward using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In patients in whom MRI cannot be performed or imaging provides equivocal findings, computed tomography (CT) of the temporal bone might offer indirect evidence of CND. Our study aimed to derive a cut-off value for the diameter of the cochlear nerve canal (CNC) and internal auditory canal (IAC) in temporal bone CT to predict CND.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 This retrospective study included 70 children with sensorineural hearing loss (32 with CND and 38 control patients). The height, width, and cross-sectional area of the IAC and diameter of the CNCs were determined using temporal bone CT. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Student's t-tests were performed for each parameter.

RESULTS

 The mean diameter of the CNCs was significantly smaller in children with CND than in the control group (1.2 mm versus 2.4 mm, p < .001). The optimal threshold for CNC for separation of the two groups was 1.9 mm, resulting in a sensitivity of 98.7 % and specificity of 89.2 %. The IAC dimensions could not distinguish between children with CND and controls.

CONCLUSION

 A CNC diameter of less than 1.9 mm is a reliable predictor of CND in children with sensorineural hearing loss.

KEY POINTS

  · A small cochlear nerve canal predicts cochlear nerve deficiency (CND). · The size of the internal auditory canal cannot predict CND. · Whenever MRI is impossible or ambigous, CT can rule out CND.

CITATION FORMAT

· Sorge M, Sorge I, Pirlich M et al. Diameter of the Cochlear Nerve Canal predicts Cochlear Nerve Deficiency in Children with Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; DOI: 10.1055/a-1826-0641.

Investigating the association of electrically-evoked compound action potential thresholds with inner-ear dimensions in pediatric cochlear implantation

OBJECTIVES

A narrow bony cochlear nerve canal (BCNC), as well as a hypoplastic and aplastic cochlear nerve (CN) have been associated with increased electrically-evoked compound action potential (eCAP) thresholds in some studies, suggesting poorer neural excitability in cochlear implantation. Also, in large cochleae the extent of activated spiral ganglion neurons with electrical stimulation is less than in smaller ones. However, a detailed description of the relationship between eCAP thresholds for a lateral-wall electrode array and dimensions of the inner-ear structures and internal auditory canal (IAC) is missing.

DESIGN

The study subjects were 52 pediatric patients with congenital severe-to-profound hearing loss (27 females and 25 males; ages 0.7-2.0 years; 1.0 ± 0.3 years, mean ± SD) implanted bilaterally with Cochlear Nucleus CI422, CI522, or CI622 implants with full insertion of the Slim Straight electrode array. Diameters of the cochlea and the BCNC as well as the widths and heights of the IAC and the CN were evaluated from preoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance images. These anatomical dimensions were compared with each other and with the patients' intraoperative eCAP thresholds.

RESULTS

The eCAP thresholds increased from the apical to basal direction (r = 0.89, p < 0.001). After sorting the cochleae into four size categories, higher eCAP thresholds were found in larger than in smaller cochleae (p < 0.001). With similar categorization, the eCAP thresholds were higher in cochleae with a larger BCNC than in cochleae with a smaller BCNC (p < 0.001). Neither IAC nor CN cross-sectional areas affected the eCAP thresholds. Correlations were found between cochlea and BCNC diameters and between IAC and CN cross-sectional areas (r = 0.39 and r = 0.48, respectively, p < 0.001 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

In the basal part of the electrode array, higher stimulation levels to elicit measurable neural responses (eCAP thresholds) were required than in the apical part. Increased eCAP thresholds associated with a larger cochlear diameter, but contrary to the earlier studies, not with a small size of the BCNC or the CN. Instead, the BCNC diameter correlated significantly with the cochlea diameter.

Clinical Value of Measurement of Internal Auditory Canal in Pediatric Cochlear Implantation

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to clarify the clinical value of the bony cochlear nerve canal (BCNC) and internal auditory canal (IAC) in children with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (b-SNHL) and to reveal the correlation between these parameters and outcomes after cochlear implantation (CI).

METHODS

Ninety-four ears with b-SNHL that received CI and 100 ears with normal hearing were enrolled. Parameters of IAC and pre- and post-CI categories of auditory performance scores were analyzed.

RESULTS

The width of the BCNC and the width, height, and length of the IAC were shorter in the b-SNHL group. BCNC and IAC width were associated with b-SNHL. The calculated cutoff values for BCNC and IAC width were 2.055 mm in the BCNC and 4.245 mm in the IAC, setting the sensitivity to 90%. Patients with narrow BCNCs and IACs had significantly worse post-CI auditory performance.

CONCLUSIONS

BCNC and IAC widths were narrower in children with b-SNHL than in normal-hearing children. Narrow BCNC and IAC width had a negative impact on post-CI outcomes. The proposed cutoff values for BCNC and IAC width were meaningful when predicting the auditory outcome after CI, especially considering both.