Identification of quality improvement areas in pediatric MRI from analysis of patient safety reports

Fast and reliable quantitative measures of white matter development with magnetic resonance fingerprinting

Developmental cognitive neuroscience aims to shed light on evolving relationships between brain structure and cognitive development. To this end, quantitative methods that reliably measure individual differences in brain tissue properties are fundamental. Standard qualitative MRI sequences are influenced by scan parameters and hardware-related biases, and also lack physical units, making the analysis of individual differences problematic. In contrast, quantitative MRI can measure physical properties of the tissue but with the cost of long scan durations and sensitivity to motion. This poses a critical limitation for studying young children. Here, we examine the reliability and validity of an efficient quantitative multiparameter mapping method - Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) - in children scanned longitudinally. We focus on T1 values in white matter, since quantitative T1 values are known to primarily reflect myelin content, a key factor in brain development. Forty-nine children aged 8-13y (mean 10.3y ±1.4) completed two scanning sessions 2-4 months apart. In each session, two 2-minute 3D-MRF scans at 1mm isotropic resolution were collected to evaluate the effect of scan duration on image quality and scan-rescan reliability. A separate calibration scan was used to measure B0 inhomogeneity and correct for bias. We examined the impact of scan time and B0 inhomogeneity correction on scan-rescan reliability of values in white matter, by comparing single 2-min and combined two 2-min scans, with and without B0-correction. Whole-brain voxel-based reliability analysis showed that combining two 2-min MRF scans improved reliability (pearson's r=0.87) compared with a single 2-min scan (r=0.84), while B0-correction had no effect on reliability in white matter (r=0.86 and 0.83 4-min vs 2-min). Using diffusion tractography, we delineated MRF-derived T1 profiles along major white matter fiber tracts and found similar or higher reliability for T1 from MRF compared to diffusion parameters (based on a 10-minute dMRI scan). Lastly, we found that T1 values in multiple white matter tracts were significantly correlated with age. In sum, MRF-derived T1 values were highly reliable in a longitudinal sample of children and replicated known age effects. Reliability in white matter was improved by longer scan duration but was not affected by B0-correction, making it a quick and straightforward scan to collect. We propose that MRF provides a promising avenue for acquiring quantitative brain metrics in children and patient populations where scan time and motion are of particular concern.

Disparities in Patient Safety Voluntary Event Reporting: A Scoping Review

Voluntary event reporting (VER) systems underestimate the incidence of safety events and often capture only serious events. A limited amount of data is collected through these systems, and they may be inadequate to characterize disparities in reported safety events. We conducted a scoping review of the literature to summarize the state of the evidence as it relates to differences in safety events and safety event reporting by age, gender, and race. Using a broad-based query, a systematic search for published, peer-reviewed literature that discusses patient safety event reporting and differences by age, gender, race, and socioeconomic status was conducted. Based on modified Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, 283 studies underwent title and abstract review, yielding 56 studies for full text review. After full text review, 23 studies were carefully reviewed individually, grouped thematically, and summarized to highlight the most pertinent findings. The studies reviewed yielded important insights, particularly with regard to race, gender, and the ways events are identified. Patients from minoritized groups may be less likely to have events reported and more likely to suffer serious events. Some studies found differences in rates of reporting safety events for female vs. male providers. The rate of VER is consistently lower than the rate of events identified through identified using automated detection. The current literature describing VER data shows disparities by race, language, age, and gender for patients and providers. Further research and systematic change are needed to specifically study these disparities to guide health care institutions on ways to mitigate bias and deliver more equitable care.

The radiology department as a sentinel in fall prevention among Filipino older adult patients

Accidental falls are a serious yet underreported form of adverse event in hospitals. Falls account for the leading cause of injury and mortality among older adults. The World Health Organization (WHO) in 2021 reported that an estimated 64,000 individuals die annually from falls globally. In the Philippines, about 53.6% of older Filipinos are experiencing falls from a small population-specific setting and they are more likely to experience functional declines than the younger population. The radiology departments and radiologic technologists (RTs) play a vital role in preventing accidental falls among Filipino older adult patients. Despite the existing safety standards promulgated by national health agencies, awareness of healthcare professionals such as radiologic technologists (RTs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) such as the Philippines remains limited. As such, promoting a safety culture is deemed a main strategy for patient safety from adverse occurrences of falls among Filipino older adults. In doing so, there is a need to establish an incident reporting system for sentinel events, develop risk assessment tools, and define the needed competencies of RTs in preventing catastrophic falls involving Filipino older adult patients. To the authors' knowledge, this paper is the first of its kind to better understand the safety and predisposing risks for falling among older adults in the field of radiology in the Philippines.

Testing a Home Solution for Preparing Young Children for an Awake MRI: A Promising Smartphone Application

Thanks to its non-invasive nature and high-resolution imaging capabilities, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a valuable diagnostic tool for pediatric patients. However, the fear and anxiety experienced by young children during MRI scans often result in suboptimal image quality and the need for sedation/anesthesia. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a smartphone application called COSMO@home to prepare children for MRI scans to reduce the need for sedation or general anesthesia. The COSMO@home app was developed incorporating mini-games and an engaging storyline to prepare children for learning goals related to the MRI procedure. A multicenter study was conducted involving four hospitals in Belgium. Eligible children aged 4-10 years were prepared with the COSMO@home app at home. Baseline, pre-scan, and post-scan questionnaires measured anxiety evolution in two age groups (4-6 years and 7-10 years). Eighty-two children participated in the study, with 95% obtaining high-quality MRI images. The app was well-received by children and parents, with minimal technical difficulties reported. In the 4-6-year-old group (N = 33), there was a significant difference between baseline and pre-scan parent-reported anxiety scores, indicating an increase in anxiety levels prior to the scan. In the 7-10-year-old group (N = 49), no significant differences were observed between baseline and pre-scan parent-reported anxiety scores. Overall, the COSMO@home app proved to be useful in preparing children for MRI scans, with high satisfaction rates and successful image outcomes across different hospitals. The app, combined with minimal face-to-face guidance on the day of the scan, showed the potential to replace or assist traditional face-to-face training methods. This innovative approach has the potential to reduce the need for sedation or general anesthesia during pediatric MRI scans and its associated risks and improve patient experience.

Provision of Safe Anesthesia in Magnetic Resonance Environments: Degree of Compliance with International Guidelines in Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND

The lack of local guidelines and regulations for the administration of anesthesia in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) units presents a potential risk to patient safety in Saudi Arabia. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the extent to which hospitals in Saudi Arabia follow international guidelines and recommendations for the safe and effective administration of anesthesia in an MRI environment.

METHODS

This study used a questionnaire that was distributed to 31 medical facilities in Saudi Arabia that provided anesthesia in MRI units.

RESULTS

The findings of the study revealed that the mean compliance with the 17 guidelines across the 31 sites was 77%; 5 of the 31 sites (16.1%) had a compliance rate of less than 50% with the recommended guidelines. Only 19.4% of the institutes provided general safety education. Communication breakdowns between anesthesia providers and MRI teams were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

To conclude, this survey highlights the status of anesthesia standards in Saudi Arabian MRI units and emphasizes areas that require better adherence to international guidelines. The results call for targeted interventions, including the formulation of specific national anesthesia guidelines for MRI settings. Communication breakdowns between anesthesia providers and MRI teams were reported at a rate of 83.9% during the administration of a gadolinium contrast agent. There were additional breakdowns, particularly for high-risk patients with implants, such as impaired respirators (74.2%), thus requiring further investigation due to potential safety incidents during MRI procedures. While considering the limitations of this study, such as potential biases and the low response rate, it provides a valuable foundation for refining protocols and promoting standardized practices in Saudi Arabian healthcare.

Pediatric cervical spine clearance: A 10-year evaluation of multidetector computed tomography at a level 1 pediatric trauma center

INTRODUCTION

Efficient and accurate evaluation of the pediatric cervical spine (c-spine) for both injury identification and posttraumatic clearance remains a challenge. We aimed to determine the sensitivity of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for identification of cervical spine injuries (CSIs) in pediatric blunt trauma patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a level 1 pediatric trauma center from 2012 to 2021. All pediatric trauma patients age younger than 18 years who underwent c-spine imaging (plain radiograph, MDCT, and/or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) were included. All patients with abnormal MRIs but normal MDCTs were reviewed by a pediatric spine surgeon to assess specific injury characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 4,477 patients underwent c-spine imaging, and 60 (1.3%) were diagnosed with a clinically significant CSI that required surgery or a halo. These patients were older, more likely to be intubated, have a Glasgow Coma Scale score of <14, and more likely to be transferred in from a referring hospital. One patient with a fracture on radiography and neurologic symptoms got an MRI and no MDCT before operative repair. All other patients who underwent surgery including halo placement for a clinically significant CSI had their injury diagnosed by MDCT, representing a sensitivity of 100%. There were 17 patients with abnormal MRIs and normal MDCTs; none underwent surgery or halo placement. Imaging from these patients was reviewed by a pediatric spine surgeon, and no unstable injuries were identified.

CONCLUSION

Multidetector computed tomography appears to have 100% sensitivity for detecting clinically significant CSIs in pediatric trauma patients, regardless of age or mental status. Forthcoming prospective data will be useful to confirm these results and inform recommendations for whether pediatric c-spine clearance can be safely performed based on the results of a normal MDCT alone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Tests or Criteria; Level IV.

Factors and Labor Cost Savings Associated with Successful Pediatric Imaging without Anesthesia: a Single-Institution Study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

In pediatric imaging, sedation is often necessary to obtain diagnostic quality imaging. We aim to quantify patient and imaging-specific factors associated with successful pediatric scans without anesthesia and to evaluate labor cost savings associated with our institutional Scan Without Anesthesia Program (SWAP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who participated in SWAP between 2019-2022 were identified. Chart review was conducted to obtain sociodemographic and clinical information. Radiology database was used to obtain scan duration, modality/body part of examination, and administration of contrast. Mann-Whitney U and Chi-Square tests were used for univariate analysis of factors associated with success. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate independent contributions to success. Associated hospital labor cost savings were estimated using salary information obtained through publicly available resources.

RESULTS

Of 731 patients, 698 had successful and 33 had unsuccessful scans (95% success rate). In univariate analysis, older age, female sex, absence of developmental delay, and administration of contrast were significantly associated with successful scans. Multivariate analyses revealed that older age, female sex, and absence of developmental delay were significant independent factors lending toward success. Imaging-related factors were not associated with outcome in multivariate analysis. Estimated labor cost savings were $139,367.80 per year for the medical center.

CONCLUSION

SWAP had an overall success rate of 95%. Older age, absence of developmental delay, and female sex were independently significantly associated with successful outcome. Cost analysis reveals substantial labor cost savings to the institution compared with imaging under anesthesia.

Pediatric Sedation/Anesthesia for MRI: Results From the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most common imaging procedure requiring sedation/anesthesia in children. Understanding adverse events associated with sedation/anesthesia is important in making decisions regarding MRI vs. other imaging modalities. No large studies have evaluated the practice of pediatric sedation/anesthesia for MRI by a variety of pediatric specialists.

PURPOSE

Utilize a large pediatric sedation database to characterize the patients and adverse events associated with sedation/anesthesia for pediatric MRI.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

SUBJECTS

The Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium (PSRC) has 109,947 entries for sedations for MRI from November 10, 2011 through December 18, 2017.

ASSESSMENT

Patient demographics, sedative medications, interventions, and adverse events are described. Associations with adverse events were assessed. Trends in sedative medications used over time are examined.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Descriptive statistics, Chi-Squared and Fisher's Exact tests for categorical variables, logistic regression and assessment of trend using logistic regression and other method.

RESULTS

A total of 109,947 MRI-related sedations were examined. Most subjects (66.2%) were 5 years old or younger. Seizure or other neurologic issue prompted MRI in 63.7% of cases. Providers responsible for sedation/anesthesia included intensivists (49.3%), emergency medicine physicians (28.2%), hospitalists (10.2%), and anesthesiologists (9.8%). The most commonly used sedative agent was propofol (89.1%). The most common airway intervention was supplemental oxygen (71.7%), followed by head/airway repositioning (20.6%). Airway-related adverse events occurred in 8.4% of patients. Serious adverse events occurred in only 0.06% of patients, including three cases of cardiac arrest. No mortality was recorded. There was a statistically significant increase in the use of dexmedetomidine over time.

DATA CONCLUSIONS

Overall, adverse event rates were low. Sedation/anesthesia with propofol infusion and natural airway was the most common method used by this varied group of sedation providers. The use of dexmedetomidine increased over time.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.

The Influence of Patient-Centered Communication on Children's Anxiety and Use of Anesthesia for MR

Background: The aim of this study was to inspect the influence of patient-centered communication (PCC) with 4- to 10-year-old children on the use of anesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging exams (MRs). Methods: A total of thirty children received the PCC and pre-simulated the exam with an MR toy. Another 30 children received routine information about the MR and pre-simulated the exam with the toy. Anesthesia use in these two groups was additionally compared with a previously existing group of children (n = 30) who had received only routine information about the exam (CG). Children’s anxiety was assessed with a self-report question plus heartbeat frequency. Children’s satisfaction was assessed through several questions. The analyses were based on group comparisons and regression. Results: A total of two children (7%) in the PCC + simulation group used sedation compared with 14 (47%) in the simulation group and 21 (70%) in the CG. Differences between the PCC + simulation and the other two groups were significant (p < 0.001), although not between the simulation and the CG. The decrease in anxiety was significantly greater (self-reported p < 0.001; heart rate p < 0.05) and satisfaction was higher (p = 0.001) in the PCC + simulation, when compared with the simulation group. Reduced anxiety was associated with less anesthesia use (OR 1.39; CI 1.07−1.79; p = 0.013). Conclusions: PCC + simulation was more effective than simulation and routine practice in decreasing children’s anxiety, increasing satisfaction, and reducing the use of anesthesia for MRs.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis of the knee: is contrast needed to score disease activity when using an augmented MRI protocol comprising PD-weighted sequences?

Objective

To compare unenhanced versus enhanced knee joint magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess disease activity of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).

Methods

Fifty-three knee joint MRI examinations were performed on a 3-Tesla system in 27 patients (age: 11.40 ± 3.61 years; 21 females, 6 males). MRI protocols comprised PD-weighted sequences in addition to the widely used standard protocol. JIA subgroups comprised oligoarticular arthritis (n = 16), extended oligoarthritis (n = 6), rheumatoid factor-negative polyarticular arthritis (n = 3), enthesitis-related arthritis (n = 1), and psoriatic arthritis (n = 1). MR images were retrospectively analyzed by 3 experienced radiologists in two readings, using JAMRIS (juvenile arthritis MRI scoring) system and a modified IPSG (international prophylaxis study group) classification. In the first reading session, only unenhanced MR images were evaluated. In a second reading session, all images before and after contrast medium application were included. In order to avoid bias, an interval of at least 2 weeks was set between the two readings. The clinical JADAS10 (juvenile arthritis disease activity score) was calculated including clinical assessment and laboratory workup and correlated with MRI scores. Statistical analysis comprised Pearson’s correlation for correlating two scoring results of unenhanced and the enhanced MRI, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for inter- and intra-reader agreement. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated using ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curve analysis.

Results

Inter-reader agreement determined by ICC for unenhanced and enhanced MRI scores for IPSG was moderate (0.65, 95% CI 0.51–0.76, and 0.62, 95% CI 0.48–0.75) and high for JAMRIS (0.83, 95% CI 0.75–0.89, and 0.82, 95% CI 0.74–0.89). Intra-reader agreement was good to very good for JAMRIS (0.85 95% CI 0.81–0.88, 0.87 95% CI 0.83–0.89 and 0.96 95% CI 0.92–0.98) and IPSG (0.76 95% CI 0.62–0.86, 0.86 95% CI 0.77–0.92 and 0.92 95% CI 0.86–0.96). Scores of unenhanced MRI correlated with contrast-enhanced MRI: JAMRIS (r = 0.97, R2 = 0.93, p < 0.01), modified IPSG (r = 0.95, R2 = 0.91, p < 0.01). When using JADAS10 as a reference standard, moderate accuracy for both unenhanced and enhanced MRI scores was noted: JAMRIS (AUC = 0.68, 95% CI 0.51–0.85, and AUC = 0.66, 95% 0.49–0.82), IPSG score (AUC = 0.68, 95% 0.50–0.86, and AUC = 0.61, 95% 0.41–0.81).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that contrast agent application could be omitted in JIA patients with an augmented knee MRI protocol comprising PD-weighted sequence.

Key Points

• Unenhanced MRI can detect disease activity of the knee joint in patients with JIA with equally high accuracy compared to contrast-enhanced MRI.

• The intra- and inter-reader agreement was high for unenhanced and enhanced MRI JAMRIS scores, which indicate relatively good applicability of the scoring system, even for less experienced readers.

• When using the clinical JADAS10 as a reference standard for the detection of disease activity, moderate accuracy for both unenhanced and enhanced MRI scores, both JAMRIS and IPSG, was noted, which might be caused by the fact that the majority of patients had either no or minimal clinical disease activity.

Children and neonates anesthesia in magnetic resonance environment in Italy: an active call survey

Background

Pediatric anesthesia care in the Magnetic Resonance Imaging is a challenge for clinicians. The recent debate about the role of anesthetic agent on neural development, encouraged an evaluation of their actual activity in this environment. In this active call survey, the authors sought to delineate the Italian situation regarding national centers, staff involved, monitoring tools available and sedation techniques.

Methods

A complete sample of all national centers performing almost a pediatric discharge in the 2014 was obtained from Health Ministry registers. All Institutions were contacted for a prospective phone investigation and a three-section survey was fill out with the Physician in charge. A descriptive and exploratory analyzes about the organization setting of the Centers were performed.

Results

Among 876 Institution screened, only 106 (37%) met minimal criteria for inclusion. Children are managed by anesthesiologists in the 95% of cases, while neonates in the 54%. A dedicated nurse is present in 74% of centers. While a pulse oximetry is present in 100% of centers, the rate of prevalence of other monitoring is lower. A specific MRI-compatible ventilator is available in the 95% of Centers, but many tools are not equally homogenously distributed. Pharmacological approach is preferred in pediatric age (98%), but its use for newborns is reduced to 43%.

Conclusions

We found significant heterogeneity in the daily clinical practice of sedation in MRI. Our results could be a starting point to evaluate the further evolution of approach to children and neonates in magnetic resonance setting.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04775641.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01821-3.

Neuroimaging of Headache: Indications and Controversies

Headache is a common presenting symptom in the ambulatory setting that often prompts imaging. The increased use and associated health care money spent in the setting of headache have raised questions about the cost-effectiveness of neuroimaging in this setting. Neuroimaging for headache in most cases is unlikely to reveal significant abnormality or impact patient management. In this article, reasons behind an observed increase in neuroimaging and its impact on health care expenditures are discussed. The typical imaging modalities available and various imaging guidelines for common clinical headache scenarios are presented, including recommendations from the American College of Radiology.

Evaluation of highly accelerated wave controlled aliasing in parallel imaging (Wave-CAIPI) susceptibility-weighted imaging in the non-sedated pediatric setting: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) is highly sensitive for intracranial hemorrhagic and mineralized lesions but is associated with long scan times. Wave controlled aliasing in parallel imaging (Wave-CAIPI) enables greater acceleration factors and might facilitate broader application of SWI, especially in motion-prone populations.

OBJECTIVE

To compare highly accelerated Wave-CAIPI SWI to standard SWI in the non-sedated pediatric outpatient setting, with respect to the following variables: estimated scan time, image noise, artifacts, visualization of normal anatomy and visualization of pathology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight children (11 girls, 17 boys; mean age ± standard deviation [SD] = 128.3±62 months) underwent 3-tesla (T) brain MRI, including standard three-dimensional (3-D) SWI sequence followed by a highly accelerated Wave-CAIPI SWI sequence for each subject. We rated all studies using a predefined 5-point scale and used the Wilcoxon signed rank test to assess the difference for each variable between sequences.

RESULTS

Wave-CAIPI SWI provided a 78% and 67% reduction in estimated scan time using the 32- and 20-channel coils, respectively, corresponding to estimated scan time reductions of 3.5 min and 3 min, respectively. All 28 children were imaged without anesthesia. Inter-reader agreement ranged from fair to substantial (k=0.67 for evaluation of pathology, 0.55 for anatomical contrast, 0.3 for central noise, and 0.71 for artifacts). Image noise was rated higher in the central brain with wave SWI (P<0.01), but not in the peripheral brain. There was no significant difference in the visualization of normal anatomical structures and visualization of pathology between the standard and wave SWI sequences (P=0.77 and P=0.79, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Highly accelerated Wave-CAIPI SWI of the brain can provide similar image quality to standard SWI, with estimated scan time reduction of 3-3.5 min depending on the radiofrequency coil used, with fewer motion artifacts, at a cost of mild but perceptibly increased noise in the central brain.

Strategies to optimize a pediatric magnetic resonance imaging service

A pediatric MRI service is a vital component of a successful radiology department. Building an efficient and effective pediatric MRI service is a multifaceted process that requires detailed planning for considerations related to finance, operations, quality and safety, and process improvement. These are compounded by the unique challenges of caring for pediatric patients, particularly in the setting of the recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In addition to material resources, a successful pediatric MRI service depends on a collaborative team consisting of radiologists, physicists, technologists, nurses and vendor specialists, among others, to identify and resolve challenges and to strive for continued improvement. This article provides an overview of the factors involved in both starting and optimizing a pediatric MRI service, including commonly encountered obstacles and some proposed solutions to address them.

Using intranasal dexmedetomidine with buccal midazolam for magnetic resonance imaging sedation in children: A single-arm prospective interventional study

OBJECTIVE

Although numerous intravenous sedative regimens have been documented, the ideal non-parenteral sedation regimen for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has not been determined. This prospective, interventional study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of buccal midazolam in combination with intranasal dexmedetomidine in children undergoing MRI.

METHODS

Children between 1 month and 10 years old requiring sedation for MRI examination were recruited to receive buccal midazolam 0.2 mg⋅kg^-1 with intranasal dexmedetomidine 3 μg⋅kg^-1. The primary outcome was successful sedation following the administration of the initial sedation regimens and the completion of the MRI examination.

RESULTS

Sedation with dexmedetomidine-midazolam was administered to 530 children. The successful sedation rate was 95.3% (95% confidence interval: 93.5-97.1%) with the initial sedation regimens and 97.7% (95% confidence interval: 96.5-99%) with a rescue dose of 2 μg⋅kg^-1 intranasal dexmedetomidine. The median sedation onset time was 10 min, and a significant rising trend was observed in the onset time concerning age (R = 0.2491, P < 0.001). The wake-up and discharge times significantly correlated with the duration of the procedure (R = 0.323, P < 0.001 vs. R = 0.325, P < 0.001). No oxygen deficiency nor medication intervention due to cardiovascular instability was observed in any of the patients. History of a prior failed sedation was considered a statistically significant risk factor for failed sedation in the multivariate logistic regression model [odds ratio = 4.71 (95% confidence interval: 1.24-17.9), P = 0.023].

CONCLUSION

In MRI examinations, the addition of buccal midazolam to intranasal dexmedetomidine is associated with a high success rate and a good safety profile. This non-parenteral sedation regimen can be a feasible and convenient option for short-duration MRI in children between 1 month and 10 years.

Success of Nonsedated Neuroradiologic MRI in Children 1-7 Years Old

BACKGROUND. MRI use and the need for monitored anesthesia care (MAC) in children have increased. However, MAC is associated with examination delays, increased cost, and safety concerns. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the success rate of nonsedated neuroradiologic MRI studies in children 1-7 years old and to investigate factors associated with success. METHODS. We retrospectively reviewed data from our institutional nonsedated MRI program. Inclusion criteria were outpatient nonsedated MRI referral, age 1-7 years old, and neuroradiologic indication. Exclusion criteria were MRI examinations for ventricular checks and contrast material use. Success was determined by reviewing the clinical MRI report. We recorded patient age and sex, type of MRI examination (brain, spine, craniospinal, head and neck, and brain with MRA), protocol length, presence of child life specialist, video goggle use, and MRI appointment time (routine daytime appointment or evening appointment). We used descriptive statistics to summarize patient demographics and clinical data and logistic regression models to evaluate predictors of success in the entire sample. Subset analyses were performed for children from 1 to < 3 years old and 3 to 7 years old. RESULTS. We analyzed 217 patients who underwent nonsedated MRI examinations (median age, 5.1 years). Overall success rate was 82.0% (n = 178). The success rates were 81.4% (n = 127) for brain, 90.3% (n = 28) for spine, 71.4% (n = 10) for craniospinal, 66.7% (n = 6) for head and neck, and 100% (n = 7) for brain with MRA. Age was significantly associated with success (odds ratio [OR], 1.33; p = .009). In children 1 to < 3 years old, none of the factors analyzed were significant predictors of success (all, p > .48). In children 3-7 years old, protocol duration (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.99; p = .02) and video goggle use (OR, 6.38; 95% CI, 2.16-18.84; p = .001) were significantly associated with success. CONCLUSION. A multidisciplinary approach with age-appropriate resources enables a high success rate for nonsedated neuroradiologic MRI in children 1-7 years old. CLINICAL IMPACT. Using age as the primary criterion to determine the need for MAC may lead to overuse of these services. Dissemination of information regarding nonsedated MRI practice could reduce the rate of sedated MRI in young children.

Safety challenges related to the use of sedation and general anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging examinations

The use of sedation and general anesthesia has facilitated the significant growth of MRI use among children over the last years. While sedation and general anesthesia are considered to be relatively safe, their use poses potential risks in the short term and in the long term. This manuscript reviews the reasons why MRI examinations require sedation and general anesthesia more commonly in the pediatric population, summarizes the safety profile of sedation and general anesthesia, and discusses an amalgam of strategies that can be implemented and can ultimately lead to the optimization of sedation and general anesthesia care within pediatric radiology departments.

Magnetic resonance imaging in children with implants

As access to MRI in pediatrics increases, the radiologist needs to become acquainted with the basic principles of MRI safety. As part of the image acquisition, the static magnetic field, gradient system, and the radiofrequency transmit-receive coil interact with medical and non-medical implants and can result in serious injury. The main stage of risk triage is based on the determination of whether the implant is MRI-safe, conditional, unsafe or unknown. Guiding principles include the strict adherence to manufacturer specifications for MRI-conditional implants and the assumption that an unknown implant is MR-unsafe. In this article we review considerations for common medical implants encountered in pediatrics including ventriculoperitoneal shunts, orthopedic hardware, orthodontic hardware, pacemakers, vascular stents, vagal nerve stimulators and cochlear implants. Finally, we review a set of high-yield considerations, including the non-communicative patient (sedated or non-verbal), susceptibility artifacts from unclear source, and the approach to an unknown implant.

Predictors of Anesthetic Exposure in Pediatric MRI

BACKGROUND. Anesthetic exposure in children may impact long-term neurocognitive outcomes. Therefore, minimizing pediatric MRI scan time in children under anesthesia and the associated anesthetic exposure is necessary. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate pediatric MRI scan time as a predictor of total propofol dose, considering imaging and clinical characteristics as covariates. METHODS. Electronic health records were retrospectively searched to identify MRI examinations performed from 2016 to 2019 in patients 0-18 years old who received propofol anesthetic. Brain; brain and spine; brain and abdomen; and brain, head, and neck MRI examinations were included. Demographic, clinical, and imaging data were extracted for each examination, including anesthesia maintenance phase time, MRI scan time, and normalized propofol dose. MRI scan time and propofol dose were compared between groups using a t test. A multiple linear regression with backward selection (threshold, p < .05) was used to evaluate MRI scan time as a predictor of total propofol dose, adjusting for sex, age, time between scan and study end, body part, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, diagnosis, magnet strength, and IV contrast medium administration as covariates. RESULTS. A total of 501 examinations performed in 426 patients (172 girls, 254 boys; mean age, 6.55 ± 4.59 [SD] years) were included. Single body part examinations were shorter than multiple body part examinations (mean, 52.7 ± 18.4 vs 89.3 ± 26.4 minutes) and required less propofol (mean, 17.7 ± 5.7 vs 26.1 ± 7.7 mg/kg; all p < .001). Among single body part examinations, a higher ASA classification, oncologic diagnosis, 1.5-T magnet, and IV contrast medium administration were associated with longer MRI scan times (all p ≤ .009) and higher propofol exposure (all p ≤ .005). In multivariable analysis, greater propofol exposure was predicted by MRI scan time (mean dose per minute of examination, 0.178 mg/kg; 95% CI, 0.155-0.200; p < .001), multiple body part examination (p = .04), and IV contrast medium administration (p = .048); lower exposure was predicted by 3-T magnet (p = .04). CONCLUSION. Anesthetic exposure during pediatric MRI can be quantified and predicted based on imaging and clinical variables. CLINICAL IMPACT. This study serves as a valuable baseline for future efforts to reduce anesthetic doses and scan times in pediatric MRI.

[Application of vacuum stretcher combined with feeding in cranial magnetic resonance imaging examination for neonates: a prospective randomized controlled study]

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect and safety of vacuum stretcher combined with feeding in cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination for neonates.

METHODS

A prospective study was performed for the neonates with hyperbilirubinemia, with a gestational age of >34 weeks and stable vital signs, who needed cranial MRI examination and did not need oxygen inhalation hospitalized in the Department of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, from September to November, 2019. The neonates were randomly divided into a vacuum stretcher combined with feeding group and a conventional sedation group. Vital signs were monitored before, during, and after MRI examination. The success rate of MRI procedure was recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 80 neonates were enrolled in the study, with 40 neonates in the vacuum stretcher combined with feeding group and 40 in the conventional sedation group. The vacuum stretcher combined with feeding group had a significantly higher success rate of MRI procedure than the conventional sedation group (P<0.05). As for the neonates who underwent successful MRI examination, the fastest heart rate after examination in the vacuum stretcher combined with feeding group was significantly lower than that in the conventional sedation group (P<0.05), while there were no significant differences between the two groups in transcutaneous oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, and body temperature before and after MRI examination (P>0.05). No complications, such as apnea, acute allergic reactions, and malignant fever, were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Vacuum stretcher combined with feeding can improve the success rate of MRI procedure and reduce the use of sedatives, and meanwhile, it does not increase related risks.

Diagnostic equivalency of fast T2 and FLAIR sequences for pediatric brain MRI: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Faster and motion robust magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences are desirable in pediatric brain MRI as they can help reduce the need for monitored anesthesia care, which is a costly and limited resource that carries medical risks.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic equivalency of commercially available accelerated motion robust MR sequences relative to standard sequences.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was an institutional review board-approved prospective study. Subjects underwent a clinical brain MRI using conventional multiplanar images at 3 Tesla followed by fast axial T2 and FLAIR (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) sequences optimized for an approximately 50% reduction in acquisition time. Conventional and fast images from each subject were reviewed by two blinded pediatric neuroradiologists. The readers evaluated the presence of 12 findings. Intra-observer agreement was estimated for fast versus conventional sequences. For each set of sequences, interobserver agreement calculations and chi-square tests were used to evaluate differences between fast and conventional acquisitions. An independent third reader reviewed the intra-observer discrepancies and adjudicated them as being more conspicuous on fast sequence, conventional sequence or the equivalent. The readers also were asked to rate motion artifacts with a previously validated score.

RESULTS

Images from 77 children (mean age: 11.3 years) were analyzed. Intra-observer agreement (fast versus conventional) ranged between 89.2% and 92.3%. Interobserver agreement ranged between 86.1% and 88.4%. Interobserver agreement was significantly higher for conventional FLAIR relative to fast FLAIR for small (<5 mm) foci of T2 in the white matter. Otherwise, interobserver agreement was not different between the fast and conventional sequences. For awake subjects, fast sequences had significantly fewer artifacts (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Conventional T2 and FLAIR sequences can be optimized to shorten acquisition while maintaining diagnostic equivalency. These faster sequences were also less susceptible to motion artifacts.

MRI Techniques to Decrease Imaging Times in Children

Long acquisition times can limit the use of MRI in pediatric patients, and the use of sedation or general anesthesia is frequently necessary to facilitate diagnostic examinations. The use of sedation or anesthesia has disadvantages including increased cost and imaging time and potential risks to the patient. Reductions in imaging time may decrease or eliminate the need for sedation or general anesthesia. Over the past decade, a number of imaging techniques that can decrease imaging time have become commercially available. These products have been used increasingly in clinical practice and include parallel imaging, simultaneous multisection imaging, radial k-space acquisition, compressed sensing MRI reconstruction, and automated protocol selection software. The underlying concepts, supporting data, current clinical applications, and available products for each of these strategies are reviewed in this article. In addition, emerging techniques that are still under investigation may provide further reductions in imaging time, including artificial intelligence-based reconstruction, gradient-controlled aliasing sampling and reconstruction, three-dimensional MR spectroscopy, and prospective motion correction. The preliminary results for these techniques are also discussed. ^©RSNA, 2020 See discussion on this article by Greer and Vasanawala.

Review of learning opportunity rates: correlation with radiologist assignment, patient type and exam priority

BACKGROUND

Common cause analysis of learning opportunities identified in a peer collaborative improvement process can gauge the potential risk to patients and opportunities to improve.

OBJECTIVE

To study rates of learning opportunities based on radiologist assignment, patient type and exam priority at an academic children's hospital with 24/7 in-house attending coverage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Actively submitted peer collaborative improvement learning opportunities from July 2, 2016, to July 31, 2018, were identified. Learning opportunity rates (number of learning opportunities divided by number of exams in each category) were calculated based on the following variables: radiologist assignment at the time of dictation (daytime weekday, daytime weekend and holiday, evening, and night) patient type (inpatient, outpatient or emergency center) and exam priority (stat, urgent or routine). A statistical analysis of rate differences was performed using a chi-square test. Pairwise comparisons were made with Bonferroni method adjusted P-values.

RESULTS

There were 1,370 learning opportunities submitted on 559,584 studies (overall rate: 0.25%). The differences in rates by assignment were statistically significant (P<0.0001), with the highest rates on exams dictated in the evenings (0.31%) and lowest on those on nights (0.19%). Weekend and holiday daytime (0.26%) and weekday daytime (0.24%) rates fell in between. There were significantly higher rates on inpatients (0.33%) than on outpatients (0.22%, P<0.0001) or emergency center patients (0.16%, P<0.0001). There were no significant differences based on exam priority (stat 0.24%, urgent 0.26% and routine 0.24%, P=0.55).

CONCLUSION

In this study, the highest learning opportunity rates occurred on the evening rotation and inpatient studies, which could indicate an increased risk for patient harm and potential opportunities for improvement.

Easing anxiety in preparation for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging: a pilot study using animal-assisted therapy

BACKGROUND

Children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can experience negative emotions both before and during their scan, causing them to move and often necessitating the use of procedural sedation. Several strategies to improve patient compliance have been attempted.

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a non-pharmacological intervention to reduce anxiety in pediatric patients preparing for MRI using animal-assisted therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An animal intervention pilot study was performed in patients who agreed in advance to interact with a dog. Patients and caregivers filled out questionnaires, including questions designed to capture changes in patient emotion before and after the intervention. MRI diagnostic quality was compared to age- and gender-matched control groups with and without general anesthesia.

RESULTS

The intervention in 21 patients comparing pre- and post-scan surveys demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in patient anxiety levels (P<0.01). Diagnostic MRI scans were achieved in 19/21 (90%), with no significant difference in exam quality or times compared against control groups. The majority of caregivers and staff members agreed strongly that patients benefited from the therapy dog's presence.

CONCLUSION

The use of animal-assisted therapy in a pilot group in our MRI division resulted in a beneficial effect on patients' emotional status, easing anxiety in preparation for scheduled scans, without impacting MRI quality or duration. Further randomized studies will be needed to demonstrate its significance in reducing sedation rates in children undergoing MRI.

Functional magnetic resonance urography in infants: feasibility of a feed-and-sleep technique

BACKGROUND

Functional magnetic resonance (MR) urography has been well established in the diagnostic workup of congenital anomalies of kidneys and urinary tract, though long acquisition time requires sedation or general anesthesia in infants.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the success rate of an optimized functional MR urography protocol in infants carried out in natural sleep.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated all functional MR urographies performed under general anesthesia or during natural sleep in infants younger than 1 year between 2010 and 2017 and rated image quality in both cohorts using a 3-point Likert scale. We tested the analyzability of functional sequences using a free available software. We also calculated examination time. Finally, we compared examinations in natural sleep and those with general anesthesia using independent t-test for continuous data and Mann-Whitney U test for categorical data.

RESULTS

Functional MR urography could be performed successfully during natural sleep in 38 of 42 (90%) infants younger than 10 months. Four examinations were aborted before contrast medium was administrated. In the same period, 19 functional MR urographies were performed successfully under general anesthesia. Although image quality was significantly better in this group (P<0.0001), image quality was at least diagnostic in all finished examinations in natural sleep, and the functional analyzability was given in all completed examinations. There was a significant saving in examination time during natural sleep (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Functional MR urography can be successfully performed in natural sleep in infants younger than 10 months.

Gauging potential risk for patients in pediatric radiology by review of over 2,000 incident reports

BACKGROUND

Incident reporting can be used to inform imaging departments about adverse events and near misses.

OBJECTIVE

To study incident reports submitted during a 5-year period at a large pediatric imaging system to evaluate which imaging modalities and other factors were associated with a greater rate of filed incident reports.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All incident reports filed between 2013 and 2017 were reviewed and categorized by modality, patient type (inpatient, outpatient or emergency center) and use of sedation/anesthesia. The number of incident reports was compared to the number of imaging studies performed during that time period to calculate an incident report rate for each factor. Statistical analysis of whether there were differences in these rates between factors was performed.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 2,009 incident reports filed and 1,071,809 imaging studies performed for an incident report rate of 0.19%. The differences in rates by modality were statistically significant (P=0.0001). There was a greater rate of incident reports in interventional radiology (1.54%) (P=0.0001) and in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (0.62%) (P=0.001) as compared to other imaging modalities. There was a higher incident report rate for inpatients (0.34%) as compared to outpatient (0.1%) or emergency center (0.14%) (P=0.0001). There was a higher rate of incident reports for patients under sedation (1.27%) as compared to non-sedated (0.12%) (P=0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Using incident report rates as a proxy for potential patient harm, the areas of our pediatric radiology service that are associated with the greatest potential for issues are interventional radiology, sedated patients, and inpatients. The areas associated with the least risk are ultrasound (US) and radiography. Safety improvement efforts should be focused on the high-risk areas.

Fast, free-breathing and motion-minimized techniques for pediatric body magnetic resonance imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the preferred imaging modality in children with complex medical issues. Patient motion and respiration remain major challenges in pediatric abdominal MRI. Young children ages 3 months to 6 years are unable to cooperate or perform breath-holding and frequently require deep sedation or general anesthesia to undergo MRI. Given the growing concerns associated with the use of sedation and anesthesia as well as the adverse impact on workflow, developing and implementing fast and motion-resistant MRI sequences are of great interest. Fast sequences such as single-shot fast spin echo and balanced steady-state free precession are useful as quick anatomical surveys on routine abdominal MRI. The widespread utilization of parallel imaging and sequences with radial k-space sampling has contributed to decreasing scan time and improving image quality, respectively. Newer strategies including compressed sensing, simultaneous multi-slice acquisition, and hybrid approaches hold the prospect of faster image acquisition that could significantly reduce the need for sedation in this vulnerable population and decrease the time of anesthesia in cases where it is indicated.