Subperiosteal new bone formation with the distal tibial classic metaphyseal lesion: prevalence on radiographic skeletal surveys

Diagnosis of metaphyseal fractures in infants and young children with suspected inflicted injury: a systematic review of cross-sectional imaging techniques

AIM

To compare the diagnostic accuracy, advantages, and disadvantages of different medical imaging techniques for detecting metaphyseal fractures (also known as classic metaphyseal lesions [CMLs]) in infants and young children with suspected inflicted trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool criteria. Predefined keywords were used to search online databases for English articles published between 1 January 1980 and 31 March 2023.

RESULTS

The initial search revealed 83 studies, only five of which met the inclusion criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of positron-emission tomography (PET) were 67% and 99%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound were 55-61% and 96-97%, respectively. The sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) whole-body screening was 31%. The sensitivity of bone scintigraphy was 17% in one and 35% in a second study. Computed tomography was not used to detect CMLs in any diagnostic accuracy study.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review has identified only a small number of relevant studies. In addition to the skeletal survey, PET and ultrasound may be helpful for the diagnosis of CMLs in infants and young children with suspected abuse; however, ultrasound has greater potential than PET due to its higher specificity, lack of radiation exposure, low cost, and wider availability.

Temporal Pattern of Radiographic Findings of Costochondral Junction Rib Fractures on Serial Skeletal Surveys in Suspected Infant Abuse

BACKGROUND. Costochondral junction (CCJ) rib fractures pose a challenge in the radiographic detection and dating of infant abuse. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to assess the temporal pattern of radio-graphic findings of CCJ fractures on a serial skeletal survey (SS). METHODS. Reports of SSs performed for suspected infant abuse were reviewed to identify those reporting a CCJ fracture. Study inclusion required undergoing initial and approximately 2-week follow-up SSs that included anteroposterior and bilateral oblique radiographs of the reported CCJ rib fracture. Two pediatric radiologists retrospectively classified fractures in terms of the primary injury pattern (bucket-handle: visible crescentic fracture line; corner: visible triangular fracture line; other) and secondary healing pattern (growth disturbance; sclerosis; subperiosteal new bone formation [SPNBF]). Discrepant readings were resolved by consensus. RESULTS. The final cohort included 26 infants with 81 CCJ fractures. On initial SS, 59% (48/81) of fractures showed a primary pattern, most commonly a bucket-handle pattern (46%; 37/81); 6% (5/81) showed a primary pattern on follow-up SS (p < .001). On initial SS, the prevalence of a secondary pattern was 89% (72/81), most commonly a growth disturbance (85%; 69/81), followed by sclerosis (57%; 46/81); 80% (65/81) showed a secondary pattern on follow-up SS (p = .12). Overall prevalence of SPNBF was 28% (23/81). Addition of bilateral oblique views on initial SS resulted in a significant increase relative to the anteroposterior views alone in the detection of primary and secondary patterns by 15% (p = .04) and 30% (p < .001), respectively. CONCLUSION. A bucket-handle appearance is the most common primary pattern of fracture. The significantly lower prevalence of a primary pattern on follow-up vs initial SSs suggests that the CCJ fracture line is usually visible for only approximately 2 weeks. A growth disturbance of the rib end is the most common secondary pattern, followed by bony sclerosis, consistent with a healing injury. SPNBF is uncommon. Most CCJ fractures are in a healing phase at initial diagnosis. The signs of repair commonly remain visible on 2-week follow-up. The increased diagnostic yield of oblique views provides support to the inclusion of these projections in routine SS protocols. CLINICAL IMPACT. The findings will help radiologists improve the diagnosis and dating of CCJ rib fractures.

Fractures of child abuse

The objective of this paper is to review common challenges when evaluating fractures in the setting of possible child abuse and approaches to navigate them. This paper reviews the variety of imaging modalities available for evaluating child abuse and the advantages/disadvantages of each. Additionally, the authors discuss management of equivocal fractures, including the impact of double-reading skeletal surveys. The complexity of dating the acuity of fractures in young children is discussed. Utilizing the knowledge of fracture type, fracture patterns and patient history, as well as in the setting of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the authors provide methods for determining the likelihood of abuse.

Establishing signs for acute and healing phases of distal tibial classic metaphyseal lesions

BACKGROUND

Stages of healing for classic metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are not well established. Follow-up skeletal surveys provide an opportunity to evaluate signs of healing CMLs.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the sequence of CML healing phases by comparing initial and follow-up skeletal surveys in children with distal tibial CMLs on the initial survey. Findings could assist in child abuse investigations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified all distal tibia CMLs with initial and follow-up skeletal surveys performed January 2009 through December 2018 at our institution. Two pediatric radiologists reviewed the surveys using Likert score from 1 (no CML) to 5 (definite CML). Only cases with score of 4 or 5 by both radiologists were selected for the study. The initial and 2-week follow-up skeletal surveys were reviewed in consensus for presence of the following signs: corner fracture, thin bucket handle fracture, thick bucket handle fracture, bucket handle fracture with endochondral bone filling the gap, subphyseal lucency, deformed corner, and subperiosteal new bone formation. We used the Kruskal-Wallis test to evaluate for significant difference in thickness among thin bucket handle fracture, thick bucket handle fracture, and bucket handle fracture with endochondral bone filling the gap.

RESULTS

We included 26 children (12 girls) with age range 1-9.9 months who had a combined 34 distal tibia CMLs. Thin bucket handle fracture (n=13, 38.2%) was only seen on initial survey. On follow-up, six children had thick bucket handle fracture and four had bucket handle fracture with endochondral bone filling the gap. Fourteen thick bucket handle fractures (n=9) or bucket handle fractures with endochondral bone filling the gap (n=5) were noted on initial surveys; on follow-up, three (21.4%) had deformed corner, one (7.1%) had corner fracture, one (7.1%) had subphyseal lucency, and five (35.7%) were normal. None demonstrated thin bucket handle fracture on follow-up. Two of the nine (22.2%) thick bucket handle fractures became thicker, and 3/9 (33.3%) became bucket handle fractures with endochondral bone filling the gap. The metaphysis normalized in 8/34 (23.5%) CMLs on follow-up surveys. The thickness of thin bucket handle fracture was less than 1 mm (mean±standard deviation [SD] = 0.6±0.2 mm), which was significantly thinner (P<0.0001) compared with thick bucket handle fracture (1.7±0.5 mm) and bucket handle fracture with endochondral bone filling the gap (1.9±0.6 mm).

CONCLUSION

The lack of thin bucket handle fractures on any follow-up skeletal surveys suggests this sign represents an acute phase of injury. The next phases of healing appear to be thick bucket handle fracture followed by bucket handle fracture with endochondral bone filling the gap. It is important to note that normalization of the metaphysis at 2-week follow-up does not exclude CML because this was seen in about one-fifth of cases.