Ultrasound of congenital spine anomalies

Delphi Consensus on Diagnostic Criteria for LUMBAR Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To develop consensus on diagnostic criteria for LUMBAR syndrome, the association of segmental infantile hemangiomas that affect the Lower body with Urogenital anomalies, Ulceration, spinal cord Malformations, Bony defects, Anorectal malformations, Arterial anomalies and/or Renal anomalies.

STUDY DESIGN

These diagnostic criteria were developed by an expert multidisciplinary and multi-institutional team based on analysis of peer-reviewed data, followed by electronic-Delphi consensus of a panel of 61 international pediatric specialists.

RESULTS

After two Delphi rounds, a 92% or higher level of agreement was reached for each Delphi statement. 98% of panelists agreed with the diagnostic criteria, and 100% agreed the criteria would be useful in clinical practice. The diagnosis of LUMBAR requires the presence of a segmental, or patterned, infantile hemangioma of the lumbosacral, sacrococcygeal, or pelvic cutaneous regions plus one additional criterion of the urogenital, spinal, bony, anorectal, arterial, or renal organ systems.

CONCLUSIONS

These diagnostic criteria will enhance clinical care by improving screening, detection, and overall awareness of this poorly understood neurocutaneous disorder. The criteria can be utilized by a wide variety of pediatric subspecialists. In addition, formal criteria will improve phenotypic uniformity among LUMBAR syndrome cohorts and a patient registry, allowing investigators to assess clinical features, long-term outcomes, and results of genetic sequencing in a standardized manner. Finally, these criteria will serve as a starting point for prospective studies to establish formal screening and management guidelines.

Prenatal imaging of the normal and abnormal spinal cord: recommendations from the Fetal Task Force of the European Society of Paediatric Radiology (ESPR) and the European Society of Neuroradiology (ESNR) Pediatric Neuroradiology Committee

Spinal dysraphisms are amenable to diagnosis in utero. The prognosis and the neonatal management of these conditions differ significantly depending on their types, mainly on the distinction between open and closed defects. A detailed evaluation not only of the fetal spine, but also of the brain, skull, and lower limbs is essential in allowing for the right diagnosis. In this article, recommendations from the Fetal Task Force of the European Society of Paediatric Radiology (ESPR) and the European Society of Neuroradiology (ESNR) Pediatric Neuroradiology Committee will be presented. The aim of this paper is to review the imaging features of the normal and abnormal fetal spinal cord, to clarify the prenatal classification of congenital spinal cord anomalies and to provide guidance in their reporting.

Tethered Cord Syndrome: Role of Imaging Findings in Surgical Decision-Making

For infants presenting with urinary problems or lower extremity weakness, imaging is ordered to investigate spinal pathology. Tethered cord syndrome (TCS) often manifests without conclusive anatomic evidence. In our case, a premature infant presented with urosepsis and was found to have an asymmetric gluteal crease and a sacral dimple. Renal ultrasound showed mild hydronephrosis, and a cystourethrogram revealed bilateral high-grade vesicoureteral reflux. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a borderline low-lying spinal cord at the mid-L3 vertebral level. Urodynamic testing to confirm neurogenic bladder could not be completed on the first attempt due to urinary tract infection and on the second attempt due to instrument intolerance. Despite the lack of conclusive imaging evidence of a tethered cord, enough supportive clinical data was present to proceed with surgical intervention with the goal of preventing the progression of neurological dysfunction. Because TCS is ultimately a clinical diagnosis, appropriate management should not be discouraged by inconclusive or borderline imaging findings.

Developmental Abnormalities of the Pediatric Spine: A Review of the Correlation Between Ultrasound and MRI Findings

A broad spectrum of spinal pathologies can affect the pediatric population. Ultrasound (US) is the primary modality for pediatric spine assessment due to its widespread availability, non-requirement of sedation, and absence of ionizing radiation. Supplementing this, MRI offers an in-depth exploration of these conditions, aiding in preoperative strategizing. In this review, we examine the clinical indications, methodologies, and protocols for US and MRI scans of the pediatric spine. Additionally, we illustrate normal pediatric spinal anatomy, highlighting several examples of normal variants that are often misinterpreted. Through a series of case-based illustrations, we offer a comprehensive overview of various pathological conditions such as tethered cord, spinal dysraphism, spinal lipoma, diastematomyelia, and dermal sinus tract, among others. Furthermore, we explore the correlation between US and MRI findings for these lesions, employing real-world cases to enhance our understanding of this topic.

Role of ultrasonography in screening of spinal dysraphism in infants at risk

Background

Spinal dysraphism (SD) encompasses congenital spinal defects that result from inappropriate fusion of the different midline osseous, mesenchymal, and neural elements. The primary tools for diagnosis of SD are both spinal ultrasonography (USG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Spinal USG is growingly being used as an initial screening modality with sensitivities and accuracies equivalent to those of MRI. Anorectal malformations (ARM) have ultimate association with many other congenital abnormalities, of which spinal dysraphism is one of the most common. The main aim of study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of spinal USG as a screening modality in comparison with MRI in infants with closed spinal dysraphism. We also endeavored to highlight the associated spinal dysraphism radiological findings in patients with either ARM or back cutaneous stigmata.

Results

Our prospective diagnostic comparative study included 33 patients, all of whom underwent both MRI and USG. Both MRI and USG showed appreciable agreement in the assessment of spinal dysraphism. In comparison with the gold standard MRI, spinal USG revealed comparable diagnostic metrics: specificity (98.6–100%), sensitivity (66.6–91.6%), PPV (90–100%) and NPV (94.1–98.7%) in diagnosis of different types of spinal dysraphism. The main clinical presentation of nineteen patients was anorectal malformation (ARM), 11 of whom (57.9%) had evidence of associated spinal dysraphism. The most common types of ARM were cloacal malformation, recto-urethral fistula, and rectal atresia with no fistula. On the other hand, sixteen patients were mainly presented with back cutaneous stigmata, 11 of whom (68.8%) had associated spinal dysraphism. The most common presenting cutaneous stigmata were low back swelling and atypical dimples.

Conclusion

The front-line screening modality for infants with closed SD should be spinal USG, however, its main limitation is the restrained time window in the first 6 months of life. Infants with ARM should be screened for spinal anomalies, especially those with high and complex types. Infants with high-risk back cutaneous stigmata should be similarly screened, as well.