Benign enlargement of the subarachnoid spaces and subdural collections-when to evaluate for abuse

Association of enlarged extra-axial spaces and subdural hemorrhage in preterm infants at term-equivalent age

To determine the incidence of enlarged extra-axial space (EES) and its association with subdural hemorrhage (SDH) in a regional cohort of preterm infants. As part of a prospective cohort study of 395 preterm infants, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was collected on each infant at term-equivalent age. Six preterm infants showed evidence of SDH. We reviewed the MRIs to identify the incidence of EES in these 6 infants and the cohort broadly. We then completed a retrospective chart review of the 6 infants to identify any concerns for non-accidental trauma (NAT) since the MRI was obtained. The incidence of SDH in the cohort was 1.6%. The incidence of EES was 48.1% including all 6 infants with SDH. The incidence of SDH in infants with EES was 3.2%. The retrospective chart review of the 6 infants did not yield any evidence of NAT. The incidence of EES and SDH in our cohort was significantly higher than similar cohorts of term infants, demonstrating an increased risk in preterm infants. The incidence of SDH in infants with EES was greater than in the total cohort, suggesting that it is a risk factor for asymptomatic SDH in preterm infants.

Neuroimaging considerations in abusive head trauma

This focused review on abusive head trauma describes the injuries to the head, brain and/or spine of an infant or young child from inflicted trauma and their neuroimaging correlates. Accurate recognition and diagnosis of abusive head trauma is paramount to prevent repeated injury, provide timely treatment, and ensure that accidental or underlying medical contributors have been considered. In this article, we aim to discuss the various findings on neuroimaging that have been associated with AHT, compared to those that are more consistent with accidental injuries or with underlying medical causes that may also be on the differential.

Retinodural haemorrhage of infancy, abusive head trauma, shaken baby syndrome: The continuing quest for evidence

The shaken baby syndrome was originally proposed in the 1970s without any formal scientific basis. Once data generated by scientific research was available, the hypothesis became controversial. There developed essentially two sides in the debate. One side claimed that the clinical triad of subdural haemorrhage, retinal haemorrhage, and encephalopathy, or its components, is evidence that an infant has been shaken. The other side stated this is not a scientifically valid proposal and that alternative causes, such as low falls and natural diseases, should be considered. The controversy continues, but the contours have shifted. During the last 15 years, research has shown that the triad is not sufficient to infer shaking or abuse and the shaking hypothesis does not meet the standards of evidence-based medicine. This raises the issue of whether it is fit for either clinical practice or for the courtroom; evidence presented to the courts must be unassailable. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: There is insufficient scientific evidence to assume that an infant with the triad of subdural haemorrhage (SDH), retinal haemorrhage, and encephalopathy must have been shaken. Biomechanical and animal studies have failed to support the hypothesis that shaking can cause SDH and retinal haemorrhage. Patterns of retinal haemorrhage cannot distinguish abuse. Retinal haemorrhages are commonly associated with extracerebral fluid collections (including SDH) but not with shaking. Infants can develop SDH, retinal haemorrhage, and encephalopathy from natural diseases and falls as low as 1 foot. The shaking hypothesis and the literature on which it depends do not meet the standards of evidence-based medicine.