Metabolic engineering for high glycerol production by the anaerobic cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Engineering Glucose-to-Glycerol Pathway in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Boosting 3-Hydroxypropionic Acid Production Through CRISPR Interference

The recent decline of the international biodiesel industry has led to decreased production and therefore increased the price of glycerol, which is a major by-product of biodiesel but a substrate for production of 3-hydroxypropionic acid (3-HP), that is, glycerol as a feedstock has no advantage over glucose in price. Hence, we engineered glucose to the glycerol pathway and improved 3-HP production by CRISPR interference (CRISPRi). To begin with, we cloned the genes encoding glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gpd1) and glycerol 3-phosphatase (gpp2) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which jointly catalyze glucose into glycerol. The genes gpd1 and gpp2 were co-expressed in K. pneumoniae with the dCas9 gene integrated in genome, and this recombinant strain produced 2 g/L glycerol in the shake flask. To minimize the glucose consumption by competing pathways including the EMP pathway, glycerol oxidation pathway, and by-products pathways, we developed an CRISPRi system in aforementioned recombinant K. pneumoniae strain to inhibit the expression of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene (gapA) and 2,3-butanediol production gene (budA), resulting in a bi-functional strain harboring both glucose-to-glycerol pathway and CRISPRi system. Reverse transcription and quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) results showed that this engineered CRISPRi system transcriptionally inhibited gapA and budA by 82% and 24%, respectively. In shake flask cultivation, this bi-functional strain produced 2.8 g/L glycerol using glucose as the carbon source, which was 46.6% increase compared to the strain without the engineered CRISPRi system. Moreover, this bi-functional strain produced 0.78 g/L 3-HP using glucose as the sole carbon source. In fed-batch cultivation, this bi-functional strain produced 1.77 g/L 3-HP. This study provides insights for co-utilization of distinct carbon sources.

Genome-wide transcriptional regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to carbon dioxide

Sugar metabolism by Saccharomyces cerevisiae produces ample amounts of CO2 under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. High solubility of CO2 in fermentation media, contributing to enjoyable sensory properties of sparkling wine and beers by S. cerevisiae, might affect yeast metabolism. To elucidate the overlooked effects of CO2 on yeast metabolism, we examined glucose fermentation by S. cerevisiae under CO2 as compared to N2 and O2 limited conditions. While both CO2 and N2 conditions are considered anaerobic, less glycerol and acetate but more ethanol were produced under CO2 condition. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that significantly decreased mRNA levels of GPP1 coding for glycerol-3-phosphate phosphatase in glycerol synthesis explained the reduced glycerol production under CO2 condition. Besides, transcriptional regulations in signal transduction, carbohydrate synthesis, heme synthesis, membrane and cell wall metabolism, and respiration were detected in response to CO2. Interestingly, signal transduction was uniquely regulated under CO2 condition, where up-regulated genes (STE3, MSB2, WSC3, STE12 and TEC1) in the signal sensors and transcriptional factors suggested that MAPK signaling pathway plays a critical role in CO2 sensing and CO2-induced metabolisms in yeast. Our study identifies CO2 as an external stimulus for modulating metabolic activities in yeast and a transcriptional effector for diverse applications.

Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the production of top value chemicals from biorefinery carbohydrates

The implementation of biorefineries for a cost-effective and sustainable production of energy and chemicals from renewable carbon sources plays a fundamental role in the transition to a circular economy. The US Department of Energy identified a group of key target compounds that can be produced from biorefinery carbohydrates. In 2010, this list was revised and included organic acids (lactic, succinic, levulinic and 3-hydroxypropionic acids), sugar alcohols (xylitol and sorbitol), furans and derivatives (hydroxymethylfurfural, furfural and furandicarboxylic acid), biohydrocarbons (isoprene), and glycerol and its derivatives. The use of substrates like lignocellulosic biomass that impose harsh culture conditions drives the quest for the selection of suitable robust microorganisms. The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, widely utilized in industrial processes, has been extensively engineered to produce high-value chemicals. For its robustness, ease of handling, genetic toolbox and fitness in an industrial context, S. cerevisiae is an ideal platform for the founding of sustainable bioprocesses. Taking these into account, this review focuses on metabolic engineering strategies that have been applied to S. cerevisiae for converting renewable resources into the previously identified chemical targets. The heterogeneity of each chemical and its manufacturing process leads to inevitable differences between the development stages of each process. Currently, 8 of 11 of these top value chemicals have been already reported to be produced by recombinant S. cerevisiae. While some of them are still in an early proof-of-concept stage, others, like xylitol or lactic acid, are already being produced from lignocellulosic biomass. Furthermore, the constant advances in genome-editing tools, e.g. CRISPR/Cas9, coupled with the application of innovative process concepts such as consolidated bioprocessing, will contribute for the establishment of S. cerevisiae-based biorefineries.

Glycerol uptake and synthesis systems contribute to the osmotic tolerance of Kluyveromyces marxianus

The accumulation of glycerol is essential for yeast viability upon hyperosmotic stress. In this study, the STL1 homolog KmSTL1, encoding a putative glycerol transporter contributing to cell osmo-tolerance, was identified in Kluyveromyces marxianus NBRC1777. We constructed the KmSTL1, KmGPD1, and KmFPS1 single-deletion mutants and the KmSTL1/KmGPD1 and KmSTL1/KmFPS1 double-deletion mutants of K. marxianus. Deletion of KmSTL1 or KmGPD1 resulted in K. marxianus cell sensitization to hyperosmotic stress, whereas deletion of KmFPS1 improved stress tolerance. The expression of KmSTL1 was osmotically induced, whereas that of KmFPS1 was osmotically inhibited. The expression of KmGPD1 was constitutive and continuous in the ΔKmSTL1 mutant strain but inhibited in the ΔKmFPS1 mutant strain due to feedback suppression by glycerol. In summary, our findings indicated that K. marxianus would increase glycerol synthesis by increasing GPD1 expression, increase glycerol import from the extracellular environment by increasing STL1 expression, and reduce glycerol efflux by reducing FPS1 expression under hyperosmotic stress.

100 Years Later, What Is New in Glycerol Bioproduction?

Industrial production of glycerol by yeast, which began during WWI in the so-called Neuberg fermentation, was the first example of metabolic engineering. However, this process, based on bisulfite addition to fermentation liquid, has many drawbacks and was replaced by other methods of glycerol production. Osmotolerant yeasts and other microorganisms that do not require addition of bisulfite to steer cellular metabolism towards glycerol synthesis have been discovered or engineered. Because the glycerol market is expected to reach 5 billion US$ by 2024, microbial fermentation may again become a promising way to produce glycerol. This review summarizes some problems and perspectives on the production of glycerol by natural or engineered eukaryotic and prokaryotic microorganisms.

Engineered Microorganisms for the Production of Food Additives Approved by the European Union-A Systematic Analysis

In the 1950s, the idea of a single harmonized list of food additives for the European Union arose. Already in 1962, the E-classification system, a robust food safety system intended to protect consumers from possible food-related risks, was introduced. Initially, it was restricted to colorants, but at later stages also preservatives, antioxidants, emulsifiers, stabilizers, thickeners, gelling agents, sweeteners, and flavorings were included. Currently, the list of substances authorized by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (referred to as "E numbers") comprises 316 natural or artificial substances including small organic molecules, metals, salts, but also more complex compounds such as plant extracts and polymers. Low overall concentrations of such compounds in natural producers due to inherent regulation mechanisms or production processes based on non-regenerative carbon sources led to an increasing interest in establishing more reliable and sustainable production platforms. In this context, microorganisms have received significant attention as alternative sources providing access to these compounds. Scientific advancements in the fields of molecular biology and genetic engineering opened the door toward using engineered microorganisms for overproduction of metabolites of their carbon metabolism such as carboxylic acids and amino acids. In addition, entire pathways, e.g., of plant origin, were functionally introduced into microorganisms, which holds the promise to get access to an even broader range of accessible products. The aim of this review article is to give a systematic overview on current efforts during construction and application of microbial cell factories for the production of food additives listed in the EU "E numbers" catalog. The review is focused on metabolic engineering strategies of industrially relevant production hosts also discussing current bottlenecks in the underlying metabolic pathways and how they can be addressed in the future.