The role of the plain radiograph in the characterisation of soft tissue tumours

Practical approach to ultrasound of soft tissue tumors and the added value of MRI: how I do it

This review outlines a practical approach to the everyday assessment of both non-neoplastic and neoplastic soft tissue tumors, focusing on ultrasound examination, though emphasizing the added benefit of magnetic resonance imaging in certain instances. Ultrasound approach and assessment, practical scenarios, reporting, biopsy, and follow-up are covered, as well as the criteria used to distinguish benign from malignant tumors. The potential benefits and current limitations of elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in assessment are also addressed. Examples of commonly encountered soft tissue tumors are shown. Ultrasound can characterize most soft tissue masses based on their ultrasound appearance alone. Following ultrasound examination, three potential scenarios usually exist in clinical practice: (a) confident regarding diagnosis, (b) indeterminate mass with no evidence of malignancy, and (c) indeterminate mass with possibility of malignancy. A diagnostic pathway for each of these scenarios is provided. Magnetic resonance imaging is generally not helpful in further characterizing masses which are indeterminate on ultrasound assessment, though it is helpful in addressing other issues such as exact tumor location and neurovascular bundle involvement that may not be fully resolved on ultrasound examination. In these situations, magnetic resonance imaging examination can be tailored to address those specific questions that have not been adequately addressed on ultrasound examination. In this sense, both examinations are highly complementary. Tips for undertaking magnetic resonance imaging examinations are provided.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Soft Tissue Masses: 2022 Update

Imaging should be performed in patients with a suspected soft tissue mass that cannot be clinically confirmed as benign. Imaging provides essential information necessary for diagnosis, local staging, and biopsy planning. Although the modalities available for imaging of musculoskeletal masses have undergone progressive technological advancements in recent years, their overall purpose in the setting of a soft tissue mass remains unchanged. This document identifies the most common clinical scenarios related to soft tissue masses and the most appropriate imaging for their assessment on the basis of the current literature. It also provides general guidance for those scenarios that are not specifically addressed. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Imaging Recommendations for Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Soft tissue lesions are a wide range of tumors of mesenchymal cell origin, occurring anywhere in the body with a vast number of histological subtypes both benign and malignant. These are common in clinical practice and vast majority are benign. This article focuses on soft tissue sarcoma of the trunk and extremities and discusses their imaging guidelines.

Soft-tissue sarcoma in adults: Imaging appearances, pitfalls and diagnostic algorithms

This article provides an overview of the current knowledge regarding diagnostic imaging of patients with soft-tissue sarcomas, which is a heterogeneous group of rare mesenchymal malignancies. After an initial contextualization, diagnostic flow-chart based on initial radiological findings of soft-tissue masses (with specific focus on adipocytic soft-tissue tumors [STTs], hemorragic STTs and retroperitoneal STTs) are provided considering relevant results from novel researches, guidelines, and experts' viewpoints, with the aim to help radiologists and clinicians in their practice. Particularly, the central place of sarcoma reference centers in the diagnostic and therapeutic management is highlighted, as well as the pivotal role that radiologists should play to correctly identify patients with soft-tissue sarcoma at the initial stage of the disease. Indications and methods for performing imaging-guided biopsies are also discussed, as well as clues to improve soft-tissue sarcoma grading with conventional and quantitative imaging.

Ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging of soft-tissue lesions: competitive or complementary?

Soft-tissue lumps and bumps are a common referral for imaging in children and adolescents. The etiology of these lesions includes benign non-tumorous lesions, as well as benign and malignant tumors. Some of these lesions have a characteristic imaging appearance but others do not and require tissue sampling to make a diagnosis. MRI typically provides the best overall characterization of soft-tissue masses; however, in some cases US provides complementary information to that provided by MRI that can help make a diagnosis.

EWS-FLI1-targeting peptide identifies Ewing sarcoma tumor boundaries and lymph node metastasis via near-infrared imaging

Ewing sarcoma (ES) is one of the most aggressive types of pediatric tumors. The lack of tools for the identification of ES has largely hindered clinical diagnosis and the improvement of treatment. To address this challenge, we synthesized a near‐infrared (NIR) fluorescent probe (CS2‐N‐E9R) that targets the ES‐specific fusion protein EWS–FLI1 (E/F). This probe exhibited specific and high binding affinity to E/F. Further studies in animal models showed that CS2‐N‐E9R can be used to identify the boundaries of ES and lymph node metastases under a complex biological environment. These results demonstrate that CS2‐N‐E9R is a promising probe for early diagnosis and surgical guidance of ES through molecularly targeted NIR imaging.

Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Diagnostic Ultrasound for Soft Tissue Masses Change Clinical Management?

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether a follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan performed after initial ultrasound (US) to evaluate soft tissue mass (STM) lesions of the musculoskeletal system provides additional radiologic diagnostic information and alters clinical management.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of patients undergoing initial US evaluations of STMs of the axial or appendicular skeleton between November 2012 and March 2019. Patients who underwent US examinations followed by MRI for the evaluation of STM lesions were identified. For inclusion, the subsequent pathologic correlation was required from either a surgical or image-guided biopsy. Imaging studies with pathologic correlations were then reviewed by 3 musculoskeletal radiologists, who were blinded to the pathologic diagnoses. The diagnostic utility of MRI was then assessed on the basis of a 5-point grading scale, and inter-reader agreements were determined by the Fleiss κ statistic.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients underwent MRI after US for STM evaluations. Final pathologic results were available in 42 cases. Samples were obtained by surgical excision or open biopsy (n = 34) or US-guided core biopsy (n = 8). The most common pathologic diagnoses were nerve sheath tumors (n = 9), lipomas (n = 5), and leiomyomas (n = 5). Imaging review showed that the subsequent MRI did not change the working diagnosis in 73% of cases, and the subsequent MRI was not considered to narrow the differential diagnosis in 68% of cases. There was slight inter-reader agreement for the diagnostic utility of MRI among individual cases (κ = 0.10) between the 3 readers.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommendation of MRI to further evaluate STM lesions seen with US frequently fails to change the working diagnosis or provide significant diagnostic utility.

Myxofibrosarcoma: Clinical and Prognostic Value of MRI Features

Myxofibrosarcoma is one of the most common soft tissue sarcomas in the elderly. It is characterized by an extremely high rate of local recurrence, higher than other soft tissue tumors, and a relatively low risk of distant metastases.Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the imaging modality of choice for the assessment of myxofibrosarcoma, which plays a key role in the preoperative setting of these patients. MRI features associated with the high risk of local recurrence are: high myxoid matrix content (water-like appearance of the lesions), high grade of contrast enhancement and presence of an infiltrative pattern ("tail sign"). On the other hand, MRI features associated with worse sarcoma specific survival are: large size of the lesion, deep location, high grade of contrast enhancement. Recognizing the above-mentioned imaging features of myxofibrosarcoma may be helpful in stratifying the risk for local recurrence and disease-specific survival. Moreover, the surgical planning should be adjusted according to the MRI features.

MRI evaluation of solid soft tissue masses of the fingers with pathology correlation

OBJECTIVE

Space occupying lesions of the fingers are commonly encountered in clinical and radiology practice. The objective of this study was to determine the characteristics of these lesions on MRI and to correlate with surgical pathology results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This IRB-approved HIPAA-compliant study retrospectively evaluated the clinical, imaging and pathology findings of 100 consecutive patients referred for evaluation of solid soft tissue masses of the fingers. Only solid lesions with MR imaging prior to surgery were included in this study. MR images and when available corresponding radiographs were evaluated by two radiologist in regard to signal characteristics, relation to surrounding structures and enhancement. All masses were classified into different groups based on pathology results.

RESULTS

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TSGCT) and fibroma of the tendon sheath were the most common solid tumors (36 %) and malignant tumors represent only 5% of the cohort. 70 % of masses with low T2 signal were TSGCT and fibroma of tendon sheath; 100 % of masses with peripheral high T2 signal and central low T2 signal/thrombus were vascular lesions, representing 41 % of the total vascular lesions in the cohort. Additionally, 100 % of serpiginous/tubular shaped masses were vascular lesions and 67 % of masses with infiltrative borders were malignant masses. Enhancement was important in identifying solid lesions but there was no statistical difference between groups related to enhancement pattern. There was a good agreement for all analyses between both readers.

CONCLUSION

Typical MR findings can help to narrow the differential diagnosis in the evaluation of finger masses and provide crucial information to guide further management.

Posterior Tibial Tendon Integrity Can Be Screened With Plain Anteroposterior Foot Radiography

Posterior tibial tendon integrity is an important consideration when treating adult-acquired flatfoot caused by posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. The condition of this tendon traditionally has been evaluated with ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging, but recent advances in radiography have increased the resolution of radiographic soft tissue images. The authors examined whether the posterior tibial tendon could be screened with anteroposterior foot radiographs, based on interobserver agreement and accuracy. The authors retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients who underwent weight-bearing foot radiography and ultrasonography based on suspicion of posterior tibial tendinopathy. The integrity of the posterior tibial tendon was evaluated by 2 orthopedic surgeons with foot radiographs and scored as normal or abnormal. The authors evaluated interobserver agreement and compared the findings of ultrasonography and radiography to evaluate diagnostic accuracy. The study included 21 patients with a mean age of 51.5±15.7 years. Ultrasonography showed that 4 patients had normal tendon integrity, 6 patients had tenosynovitis and no tendinopathy, 8 patients had tendinopathy and tendon continuity, and 3 patients had loss of tendon continuity. The surgeons provided consistent radiographic findings for 81.0% of patients (17 of 21). On the basis of the ultrasonographic findings, the surgeons' accuracy was 76.2% (16 of 21) and 61.9% (13 of 21). The results indicate that weight-bearing anteroposterior foot radiography can be used to evaluate posterior tibial tendon integrity, which may allow orthopedic surgeons to predict the prognosis of patients with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction, determine the extent of surgical treatment, and evaluate tendon integrity postoperatively. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(6):e503-e507.].

Brazilian consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of extremities soft tissue sarcomas

INTRODUCTION

Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are rare tumors and constitute only 1% of all tumors in adults. Indeed, due to their rarity, most cases in Brazil are not treated according to primary international guidelines.

METHODS

This consensus addresses the treatment of STSs in the extremities. It was made by workgroups from Brazilian Societies of Surgical Oncology, Orthopaedics, Clinical Oncology, Pathology, Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, and Radiation Oncology. The workgroups based their arguments on the best level of evidence in the literature and recommendations were made according to diagnosis, staging, and treatment of STSs. A meeting was held with all the invited experts and the topics were presented individually with the definition of the degree of recommendation, based on the levels of evidence in the literature.

RESULTS

Risk factors and epidemiology were described as well as the pathological aspects and imaging. All recommendations are described with the degree of recommendation and levels of evidence.

CONCLUSION

Recommendations based on the best literature regional aspects were made to guide professionals who treat STS. Separate consensus on specific treatments for retroperitoneal, visceral, trunk, head and neck sarcomas, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor, are not contemplated into this consensus.

Epithelioid schwannoma: imaging findings on radiographs, MRI, and ultrasound

Epithelioid schwannoma is an uncommon benign peripheral nerve sheath tumor, with distinct morphological and pathological features. To our knowledge, the imaging features of epithelioid schwannoma have not been described. In this case report, we describe the imaging findings of a pathologically proven case of epithelioid schwannoma presenting as a slowly growing painless mass near the ankle. The MR imaging signs commonly associated with conventional schwannoma were absent. On correlative radiographs, there were intra-tumoral calcifications. Radiographs are an essential tool in the imaging evaluation of soft-tissue masses. Knowledge of soft-tissue tumor types that can be associated with intra-tumoral calcifications is helpful in honing the differential diagnosis.

Imaging appearances of soft-tissue tumors of the pediatric foot: review of a 15-year experience at a tertiary pediatric hospital

Tumors of the foot are rare in children. In this review the authors illustrate radiographic, sonographic and MR imaging findings of foot soft-tissue tumors in children based on all cases presenting at a tertiary pediatric hospital during the 15-year period of 1999-2014. Among these cases there were 155 tumors of the foot - 72 of the bones and 83 of the soft tissues. Vascular malformations, fibromatosis and sarcomas were respectively the most frequent benign, intermediate and malignant soft-tissue tumors. Some tumors showed specific imaging findings. In imaging investigations, ultrasound can be used as the first imaging modality for diagnostic workup of most lesions because it is noninvasive, low-cost and readily available, and can confirm the presence of the mass and evaluate cystic components, especially in young children who would otherwise require sedation for MR imaging. MR imaging is the reference standard technique because of its high tissue contrast, which allows for detection and characterization of soft-tissue and bone abnormalities. MR imaging is useful as the first imaging modality in select cases, including those with high suspicion of malignancy, very large lesions or pre-treatment lesions. Recognition of some typical imaging findings in pediatric soft-tissue foot tumors is helpful to establish diagnosis and facilitate patient management.

Imaging of Soft-Tissue Musculoskeletal Masses: Fundamental Concepts

Radiologic evaluation of musculoskeletal soft-tissue masses has changed dramatically with the continued improvements in imaging technology. The integration of advanced imaging has provided the radiologist with a wide range of assessment tools, but as with all powerful arsenals, selection and application of the appropriate imaging method can be problematic. Although the choices available for imaging evaluation of musculoskeletal masses have changed dramatically, the basic objectives of this assessment have remained constant: diagnosis and staging. The basic principles for evaluating musculoskeletal soft-tissue masses and achieving these objectives have not changed. This article addresses application of the current imaging methods to assessment of soft-tissue musculoskeletal masses, emphasizing fundamental concepts. We do not intend to provide a comprehensive review of imaging techniques, but rather to provide a useful review of the concepts needed to select the appropriate initial imaging method, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging field of view, MR imaging sequences, contrast material requirements, and rapid image acquisition techniques. We also address use of the new quantitative techniques of chemical shift and diffusion-weighted imaging. Finally, we review the current uses of computed tomography and ultrasonography. Although the choices available for imaging evaluation of musculoskeletal masses have changed dramatically within the past decade, appropriate application of the fundamental concepts of imaging will maximize the diagnostic utility of imaging examinations. ^©RSNA, 2016.

Soft Tissue Masses of Hand: A Radio-Pathological Correlation

Aim. To evaluate soft tissue masses of the hand with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography (USG) and to correlate imaging findings with pathological findings. Material and Methods. Thirty-five patients with soft tissue masses of the hand were evaluated with high resolution USG and contrast enhanced MRI of the hand, prospectively over a period of 2.5 years. The radiological diagnosis was then compared with cytology/histopathology. Results. There were a total of 19 (55%) females. The mean age was 27.45 ± 14.7 years. Majority (45%) of cases were heteroechoic. Four cases were predominantly hyperechoic. These were later diagnosed as lipomas. Four cases were anechoic (diagnosed as ganglions). Only four lesions showed hyperintense signal on T1-weighted images. Out of these, 3 were lipomas and one was cavernous haemangioma. Three lesions were hypointense on T2-weighted images. All these lesions were diagnosed as giant cell tumor of the tendon sheath. A correct diagnosis was possible on MRI in 80% of cases (n = 28). Conclusion. MRI provides specific findings for diagnosis of certain soft tissue lesions of the hand. Ultrasonography allows accurate diagnosis of hemangioma/vascular malformations. However, in most conditions, imaging findings are nonspecific and diagnosis rests on pathologic evaluation.

Clinical evaluation and management of benign soft tissue tumors of the extremities

Benign lesions comprise a majority of soft tissue tumors. It has been estimated that their incidence outnumbers that of malignant tumors by a factor of at least 100 [1]. While history and physical examination can start the diagnostic process, imaging including the use of magnetic resonance imaging can be more helpful. Biopsy of these tumors is sometimes necessary and can be performed in a number of ways, often in conjunction with definitive treatment. Specific diagnostic and treatment strategies for a number of the more commonly encountered benign soft tissue tumors including lipomas, pigmented villonodular synovitis and hemangiomas are reviewed. An algorithm for the management of benign soft tissue tumors is discussed.

Imaging of the most frequent superficial soft-tissue sarcomas

Superficial soft-tissue sarcomas are malignant mesenchymal tumors located within the cutaneous and/or subcutaneous layers. Most superficial soft-tissue sarcomas are low-grade tumors; yet, the risk of local recurrence is high, and initial wide surgery is the main prognostic factor. Some of these superficial sarcomas may grow, following an infiltrative pattern, and their real extent may be underestimated clinically. Imaging techniques are useful to determine precisely the real margins of the tumor, especially in cases of clinically doubtful or recurrent or large superficial lesions. Imaging tools enable one to determine the relationship with the superficial fascia separating the subcutaneous layer from the underlying muscle. In our institution ultrasonographic examination is followed by magnetic resonance (MR) imaging when the size of the lesion exceeds 3-5 cm. Imaging assessment is performed prior to biopsy, enabling optimal surgical management. Imaging features of the main superficial sarcomas are detailed in the following article, according to their major locations: those arising in the epidermis and/or dermis, which are most often diagnosed by dermatologists, and the subcutaneous sarcomas.