Reproducibility of joint space width and the intermargin distance measurements in patients with medial osteoarthritis of the knee in various degrees of flexion

Potential of the non-weight-bearing tunnel view in diagnosing medial meniscus posterior root tear: a pilot study of X-ray characteristics

PURPOSE

Early detection of medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) is important in preventing the rapid onset and progression of degenerative knee disease. Diagnosis is facilitated by the availability of non-weight-bearing X-ray view, but information on the X-ray characteristics of MMPRT is scarce. Here, we conducted a pilot study of the X-ray characteristics of MMPRT on non-weight-bearing tunnel view.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 43 consecutive patients treated in the outpatient department for medial knee pain or popliteal pain. Patients were divided into MMPRT (21 knees) and non-MMPRT groups (22 knees). We investigated X-ray characteristics and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Femorotibial angle, posterior tibial slope, medial tibial eminence (MTE)-medial femoral condyle (MFC) distance (contralateral and affected sides, and difference between the two), medial tibiofemoral joint (MTFJ) width (contralateral and affected sides, and difference between the two), and meniscus radial dislocation between the groups were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test. The association between X-ray characteristics and MMPRT was determined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

A highly significant difference between the affected and contralateral sides was seen in MTFJ width and MTE-MFC distance on non-weight-bearing tunnel view between the MMPRT and non-MMPRT groups. Moreover, a difference in MTFJ width of <-0.575 mm and in MTE-MFC distance of >0.665 mm between the affected and contralateral sides was useful in predicting MMPRT.

CONCLUSIONS

The non-weight-bearing tunnel view is useful for the initial diagnosis of MMPRT. Prospective evaluation in a larger population is warranted.

EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in the clinical management of peripheral joint osteoarthritis

The increased information provided by modern imaging has led to its more extensive use. Our aim was to develop evidence-based recommendations for the use of imaging in the clinical management of the most common arthropathy, osteoarthritis (OA). A task force (including rheumatologists, radiologists, methodologists, primary care doctors and patients) from nine countries defined 10 questions on the role of imaging in OA to support a systematic literature review (SLR). Joints of interest were the knee, hip, hand and foot; imaging modalities included conventional radiography (CR), MRI, ultrasonography, CT and nuclear medicine. PubMed and EMBASE were searched. The evidence was presented to the task force who subsequently developed the recommendations. The strength of agreement for each recommendation was assessed. 17 011 references were identified from which 390 studies were included in the SLR. Seven recommendations were produced, covering the lack of need for diagnostic imaging in patients with typical symptoms; the role of imaging in differential diagnosis; the lack of benefit in monitoring when no therapeutic modification is related, though consideration is required when unexpected clinical deterioration occurs; CR as the first-choice imaging modality; consideration of how to correctly acquire images and the role of imaging in guiding local injections. Recommendations for future research were also developed based on gaps in evidence, such as the use of imaging in identifying therapeutic targets, and demonstrating the added value of imaging. These evidence-based recommendations and related research agenda provide the basis for sensible use of imaging in routine clinical assessment of people with OA.

The Combination of the Tunnel View and Weight-Bearing Anteroposterior Radiographs Improves the Detection of Knee Arthritis

Imaging used for the evaluation of knee pain has historically included weight-bearing anteroposterior (AP), lateral, and sunrise radiographs. We wished to evaluate the utility of adding the weight-bearing (WB) posteroanterior (PA) view of the knee in flexion. We hypothesize that (1) the WB tunnel view can detect radiographic osteoarthritis (OA) not visualized on the WB AP, (2) the combination of the AP and tunnel view increases the radiographic detection of OA, and (3) this may provide additional information to the clinician evaluating knee pain. We retrospectively reviewed the WB AP and tunnel view radiographs of 100 knees (74 patients) presenting with knee pain and analyzed for evidence of arthritis. The combination of the WB tunnel view and WB AP significantly increased the detection of joint space narrowing in the lateral (p < 0.001) and medial (p = 0.006) compartments over the AP view alone. The combined views significantly improved the identification of medial subchondral cysts (p = 0.022), sclerosis of the lateral tibial plateau (p = 0.041), and moderate-to-large osteophytes in the medial compartment (p = 0.012), intercondylar notch (p < 0.001), and tibial spine (p < 0.001). The WB tunnel view is an effective tool to provide additional information on affected compartments in the painful knee, not provided by the AP image alone.

Can standing knee radiographs predict chondral lesions in young- and middle-aged population?

PURPOSE

The aim of the study is to investigate the correlation between arthroscopic findings and joint space width on the standing knee radiographs at various flexion degrees in the young- and middle-aged patients with complaints of knee pain.

METHODS

Middle-aged patients with complaint of knee pain ongoing more than 6 months and failure in conservative treatment methods were included. Weight-bearing full extension, 30 and 45° of flexion radiographs were obtained. Joint space width was calculated on radiograms. Arthroscopy was performed to evaluate the chondral pathologies. Correlation analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Fourty-three patients (18 female, 25 male) with a mean age of 44.6 (20-63) were included. Mean joint space width was 4.87 mm ± 1.45 (2-10) mm in medial and 5.43 mm ± 1.47 (1-9) in lateral on standing extension radiographs. In 30° flexion radiographs, mean joint space width was 4.33 mm ± 1.25 (1.5-7.5) in medial and 5.36 mm ± 1.69 (1-9) in lateral. In 45° flexion radiographs, medial joint space was 4.28 mm ± 1.59 (2-9) in medial and 5.15 mm ± 1.59 (1.5-9) in lateral. In arthroscopic evaluation, one knee had grade 1 (2.3%), three knees had grade 2 (7%), nine knees had grade 3 (20.9%), and twelve knees had grade 4 (27.9%) lesions in the medial compartment. In the lateral compartment, two knees had grade 3 (4.7%) and one knee had grade 4 lesion (2.3%). Radiological data did not correlate with the arthroscopic findings.

CONCLUSION

Standing knee radiographs do not correlate with the arthroscopic findings in the middle-aged population with chondral lesions in knee joint.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case series with no comparison group, Level IV.

Differences between X-ray and MRI-determined knee cartilage thickness in weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions

OBJECTIVE

Determine the effect of loading upon MRI-based mean medial femorotibial cartilage thickness (mMFT_th) and radiograph-based minimum joint space width (mJSW), and determine loading's effect on the relationship between these measures.

METHODS

MRI and radiographs were analyzed of 25 knees in weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions. Eight subjects had a Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade of 0, indicating no evidence of radiographic OA. The rest were KL = 2 or KL = 3, indicating mild to moderate OA. The change from unloaded to loaded conditions was calculated.

RESULTS

Joint space measures decreased from unloaded to loaded conditions for both radiographs (mJSW = 3.29 mm unloaded to 3.16 mm loaded, P < 0.05) and MRI (mMFT_th = 2.70 mm unloaded to 2.55 mm loaded P < 0.001). The mean absolute difference measured from radiographs was larger for the OA group than the control group, at -0.20 mm for OA vs +0.01 mm for control. Loaded X-ray and loaded MRI joint space values from our study were no better correlated to one another than loaded X-ray and unloaded MRI.

CONCLUSION

Knee loading does not add a very significant value to the study of joint space on healthy knees, but loading may play a role in the study of OA knees. Unloaded MRI assessments of cartilage thickness are as correlated to loaded JSW as to loaded MRI measurements. More study is necessary to determine whether loaded MRI adds significant value to the study of OA progression.

Assessment of early tibiofemoral joint space width changes after anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction: a matched case-control study

BACKGROUND

Progression of primary knee osteoarthritis (OA) is often quantified by measuring structural alterations of the joint such as those in tibiofemoral joint space width (JSW) over time. Limited information is available regarding changes that occur during the onset and progression of posttraumatic OA (PTOA) that are often associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Furthermore, there is a paucity of information regarding JSW changes in healthy patients, making JSW interpretation challenging during early PTOA progression.

PURPOSE

To evaluate tibiofemoral JSW after ACL injury, ACL reconstruction, and rehabilitation compared with healthy, matched controls.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A total of 39 ACL-injured patients and 32 matched controls were evaluated. Injured patients were assessed at presurgical baseline and after ACL reconstruction (mean follow-up, 46 months), as were controls. Bilateral, standing, fluoroscopy-assisted, and posterior-anterior metatarsal-phalangeal view knee radiographs were obtained at each visit and JSW was measured.

RESULTS

The JSW differences between knees in control patients were not significantly different and did not change over time. Baseline JSW differences in the ACL group were significantly different than in controls. Three patients (7.9% of total) had an increased JSW difference, and 1 patient (2.6%) had a decreased medial JSW difference. In the lateral compartment, 6 patients (15.8%) had a decreased JSW difference. At follow-up, 2 patients in the ACL group (5%) had a decreased medial JSW difference, and 3 (7.9%) had a significantly increased difference in relation to controls. Lateral compartment analyses revealed 7 (18.4%) patients with a significantly decreased JSW difference and no patients with an increased difference compared with controls.

CONCLUSION

One third of ACL-injured knees underwent significant JSW change soon after injury; consequently, evaluation of within-knee JSW changes over time in ACL-injured patients may not be appropriate with a study based on case-control analysis. The JSWs in the healthy knee of ACL-injured patients do not change over time, allowing this knee to be used as a control for the injured knee. This is important when evaluating the earliest stages of PTOA after ACL injury, when patients are asymptomatic and intervention may be most beneficial.