Comparison of acetabular version angle measurements between prone and reformatted supine computed tomography images

The "true" acetabular anteversion angle (AV angle): 2D CT versus 3D model

INTRODUCTION

Different factors can lead to inconsistencies in measurement for the acetabular version using 2D axial CT-cuts. We have defined a "true" anteversion angle (AV angle) in the physiological position of the pelvis in 3D with the largest European population measured to our knowledge.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed 258 hemipelvises and created 3D models. We compared the results of our AV angle 3D method with the cross-sectional cuts of the same acetabula. We included factors like side, sex, body mass index, and patient positioning.

RESULTS

Overall, the mean (SD) AV angle was 16.1 (5.9)° as measured with the 3D method and 22.0 (6.0)° as measured with the 2D method (p < 0.0001). Measured with both the 3D and the 2D method, the AV angle was significantly larger in female than in male individuals (p < 0.0001). In the 2D method, the AV angle estimation was influenced by the pelvic tilt.

CONCLUSION

We propose a more accurate method for the measurement of the AV angle of the acetabulum in a 3D model that is not influenced by patient positioning or pelvic tilt. We provide a computational model that will facilitate operative decisions and improve preoperative planning. We confirm that 3D measurement should be the gold standard in measuring the acetabular anteversion.

Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of acetabular orientation in normal Chinese children

There are no data regarding the acetabular orientation on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); this study investigates the changes of acetabular orientation with age in normal Chinese children.We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of children who underwent hip MRI examination at our hospital from January 2009 to December 2015. A total of 180 patients with normal MRI reading of the hip joints were included and were divided into 14 groups according to age: from 6 months of age and then for each year from 1 to 16 years. The bony and cartilage acetabular anteversion angle (AAA), acetabular inclination angle (AIA), and acetabular index (AI) were measured. Total bony and cartilage femoral head coverage angles were measured on axial section total femoral head coverage angle (a-TCA) and coronal section total femoral head coverage angle (c-TCA).The mean bony AAA and AIA were 12.2 ± 2.5° and 50.9 ± 2.5°, respectively; both of them stayed constant from the age of 6 months to 16 years. Similar results were found in cartilage AAA (12.1 ± 2.5°) and AIA (41.2 ± 3.0°). There was no difference between bony and cartilage AAA, but bony AIA was significantly larger than cartilage AIA. Bony AI was 24.1 ± 2.4° at the age of 6 months, decreasing to 12.5 ± 2.3° by 12 to 13 years of age; cartilage AI (5.9 ± 1.7°) maintained a steady value with age. The mean bony a-TCA and c-TCA at 6 months were 117.0 ± 5.8° and 127.5 ± 5.1°, increasing to 144.5 ± 4.6° and 140.7 ± 2.5° at the age of 16 years. However, the cartilage a-TCA (145.2 ± 7.2°) and c-TCA (154.1 ± 5.7°) did not change significantly with age.Both bony and cartilage AAA and AIA remain constant up to the age of 16 years in normal Chinese pediatric population. Although the cartilage coverage of femoral head by the acetabulum remains unchanged with age, the bony coverage of femoral head increases.

Validation of a new radiographic measurement of acetabular version: the transverse axis distance (TAD)

OBJECTIVES

This study has three aims: (1) validate a new radiographic measure of acetabular version, the transverse axis distance (TAD) by showing equivalent TAD accuracy in predicting CT equatorial acetabular version when compared to a previously validated, but more cumbersome, radiographic measure, the p/a ratio; (2) establish predictive equations of CT acetabular version from TAD; (3) calculate a sensitive and specific cut point for predicting excessive CT acetabular anteversion using TAD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 14-month retrospective review was performed of patients who had undergone a dedicated MSK CT pelvis study and who also had a technically adequate AP pelvis radiograph. Two trained observers measured the radiographic p/a ratio, TAD, and CT acetabular equatorial version for 110 hips on a PACS workstation. Mixed model analysis was used to find prediction equations, and ROC analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of p/a ratio and TAD.

RESULTS

CT equatorial acetabular version can accurately be predicted from either p/a ratio (p < 0.001) or TAD (p < 0.001). The diagnostic accuracies of p/a ratio and TAD are comparable (p =0.46). Patients whose TAD is higher than 17 mm may have excessive acetabular anteversion. For that cutpoint, the sensitivity of TAD is 0.73, with specificity of 0.82.

CONCLUSION

TAD is an accurate radiographic predictor of CT acetabular anteversion and provides an easy-to-use and intuitive point-of-care assessment of acetabular version in patients with hip pain.