Comparison of qualitative and quantitative CT and MRI parameters for monitoring of longitudinal spine involvement in patients with multiple myeloma

Diagnostic value of WB-DWI versus 18F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of multiple myeloma

Background

Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (WB-DWI) is commonly used for the detection of multiple myeloma (MM). Comparative data on the efficiency of WB-DWI compared with F-18 fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) to detect MM is limited.

Methods

This was a retrospective, single-center study of 22 patients with MM enrolled from January 2018 to December 2019. All patients underwent WB-DWI and 18F-FDG PET/CT. Pathological and clinical manifestations, as well as radiologic follow-up, were used for diagnosis. The overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of both methods were compared. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of MM lesions and false-positive lesions were estimated.

Results

A total of 214 MM bone lesions were evaluated. There was no significant difference in the accuracy of WB-DWI and PET/CT (86.92 versus 88.32%). Though WB-DWI had a higher sensitivity (99.26% versus84.56%) and PET-CT had a higher specificity (96.10% versus 64.56%), these differences were not statistically significant. There was a statistically significant difference in PPV (83.33% versus 96.64%) and NPV (98.08% versus 77.89%) of WB-DWI and PET/CT, respectively. The ADC value for MM lesions was significantly lower than that for false-positive lesions (P < 0.001). Receiver operating curve analysis showed that the AUC was 0.846, and when the cut-off value was 0.745 × 10-3 mm2/s, the sensitivity and specificity were 86.3 and 83.4%, respectively, which distinguished MM lesions from non-MM lesions.

Conclusion

WB-DWI and PET-CT scans have similar overall accuracy for detecting MM lesions. The higher PPV of PET-CT and NPV of WB-DWI make them complementary imaging modalities. The ADC value for MM lesions is significantly lower than that for false-positive lesions. An ADC cutoff value of 0.745 × 10-3 mm2/s results in sensitivity and specificity of 86.3 and 83.4%, respectively.

Imaging of treatment response and minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: state of the art WB-MRI and PET/CT

Bone imaging has been intimately associated with the diagnosis and staging of multiple myeloma (MM) for more than 5 decades, as the presence of bone lesions indicates advanced disease and dictates treatment initiation. The methods used have been evolving, and the historical radiographic skeletal survey has been replaced by whole body CT, whole body MRI (WB-MRI) and [¹⁸F]FDG-PET/CT for the detection of bone marrow lesions and less frequent extramedullary plasmacytomas.Beyond diagnosis, imaging methods are expected to provide the clinician with evaluation of the response to treatment. Imaging techniques are consistently challenged as treatments become more and more efficient, inducing profound response, with more subtle residual disease. WB-MRI and FDG-PET/CT are the methods of choice to address these challenges, being able to assess disease progression or response and to detect "minimal" residual disease, providing key prognostic information and guiding necessary change of treatment.This paper provides an up-to-date overview of the WB-MRI and PET/CT techniques, their observations in responsive and progressive disease and their role and limitations in capturing minimal residual disease. It reviews trials assessing these techniques for response evaluation, points out the limited comparisons between both methods and highlights their complementarity with most recent molecular methods (next-generation flow cytometry, next-generation sequencing) to detect minimal residual disease. It underlines the important role of PET/MRI technology as a research tool to compare the effectiveness and complementarity of both methods to address the key clinical questions.

Quantitative Imaging and Radiomics in Multiple Myeloma: A Potential Opportunity?

Multiple Myeloma (MM) is the second most common type of hematological disease and, although it is rare among patients under 40 years of age, its incidence rises in elderly subjects. MM manifestations are usually identified through hyperCalcemia, Renal failure, Anaemia, and lytic Bone lesions (CRAB). In particular, the extent of the bone disease is negatively related to a decreased quality of life in patients and, in general, bone disease in MM increases both morbidity and mortality. The detection of lytic bone lesions on imaging, especially computerized tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), is becoming crucial from the clinical viewpoint to separate asymptomatic from symptomatic MM patients and the detection of focal lytic lesions in these imaging data is becoming relevant even when no clinical symptoms are present. Therefore, radiology is pivotal in the staging and accurate management of patients with MM even in early phases of the disease. In this review, we describe the opportunities offered by quantitative imaging and radiomics in multiple myeloma. At the present time there is still high variability in the choice between various imaging methods to study MM patients and high variability in image interpretation with suboptimal agreement among readers even in tertiary centers. Therefore, the potential of medical imaging for patients affected by MM is still to be completely unveiled. In the coming years, new insights to study MM with medical imaging will derive from artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics usage in different bone lesions and from the wide implementations of quantitative methods to report CT and MRI. Eventually, medical imaging data can be integrated with the patient’s outcomes with the purpose of finding radiological biomarkers for predicting the prognostic flow and therapeutic response of the disease.

Role of whole-body MRI for treatment response assessment in multiple myeloma: comparison between clinical response and imaging response

BACKGROUND

Whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) including diffusion-weighted image (DWI) have been widely used in patients with multiple myeloma. However, evidence for the value of WB-MRI in the evaluation of treatment response remains sparse. Therefore, we evaluated the role of WB-MRI in the response assessment.

METHODS

In our WB-MRI registry, we searched multiple myeloma patients treated with chemotherapy who underwent both baseline and follow-up WB-MRI scans. Clinical responses were categorized as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD), using IMWG criteria. Using RECIST 1.1, MD Anderson (MDA) criteria, and MDA-DWI criteria, imaging responses on WB-MRI were rated as CR, PR, SD, or PD by two radiologists independently. Then, discrepancy cases were resolved by consensus. Weighted Kappa analysis was performed to evaluate agreement between the imaging and clinical responses. The diagnostic accuracy of image responses in the evaluation of clinical CR, objective response (CR and PR), and PD was calculated.

RESULTS

Forty-two eligible patients were included. There was moderate agreement between imaging and clinical responses (κ = 0.54 for RECIST 1.1, κ = 0.58 for MDA criteria, κ = 0.69 for MDA-DWI criteria). WB-MRI showed excellent diagnostic accuracy in assessment of clinical PD (sensitivity 88.9%, specificity 94.7%, positive predictive value [PPV] 84.2%, negative predictive value [NPV] 96.4% in all three imaging criteria). By contrast, WB-MRI showed low accuracy in assessment of clinical CR (sensitivity 4.5%, specificity 98.1%, PPV 50.0%, NPV 71.2% in all three imaging criteria). As to the clinical objective response, the diagnostic accuracy was higher in MDA-DWI criteria than RECIST 1.1 and MDA criteria (sensitivity/specificity/PPV/NPV, 84.2%/94.4%/98.0%/65.4, 54.4%/100%/100%/40.9, and 61.4%/94.4%/97.2%/43.6%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In the imaging response assessment of multiple myeloma, WB-MRI showed excellent performance in the evaluation of PD, but not in the assessment of CR or objective response. When adding DWI to imaging response criteria, diagnostic accuracy for objective response was improved and agreement between imaging and clinical responses was increased.

Clinical utility of virtual noncalcium dual-energy CT in imaging of the pelvis and hip

Dual-energy virtual noncalcium images are increasingly used to identify marrow edema which accompanies bony pelvic injuries and marrow pathology obscured by cancellous bone. We present a clinical perspective of our experience using virtual noncalcium images in the work up of pelvic osseous pathology.

Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI for evaluation of response in multiple myeloma patients following bortezomib-based therapy: A large single-center cohort study

PURPOSE

To determine the feasibility of whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (WB-DWI) MRI for evaluation of response in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) following bortezomib-based therapy and to explore the direction of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) changes upon treatment.

METHOD

Seventy-two MM patients who underwent WB-DWI MRI before and after bortezomib-based chemotherapy (21 weeks) were evaluated retrospectively. The estimated tumor volume (eTV) and ADC_mean values before and after chemotherapy were calculated and compared between deep and non-deep responders. Predictive value of baseline ADC_mean was calculated to predict the trend of ADC_mean change following treatment.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients were classified as deep responders, and 17 cases were assigned as non-deep responders. For 327 focal lesions (FLs), the ADC_mean value was significantly increased from baseline to post-treatment. However, the ADC_mean value was significantly decreased following treatment in 846 representative diffuse lesions. Diffuse lesions showed a significantly decreased ADC_mean value in deep responders, whereas no significant variation in ADC_mean value in FLs was found between deep and non-deep responders. Baseline ADC_mean at a specific value (0.808 × 10^-3  mm²/s) yielded a maximum specificity (68.05%) and sensitivity (54.09%) in predicting increase of post-treatment ADC_mean.

CONCLUSIONS

The ADC_mean value was significantly decreased in MM patients with diffuse pattern, while it was significantly increased in those with focal pattern following bortezomib-based treatment. WB-DWI MRI could be used to discriminate deep response to induction treatment in MM patients with diffuse infiltration pattern. Baseline ADC_mean value might have a potential to predict the trend of ADC_mean change following treatment.