Efficacy of intraarticular corticosteroid hip injections for osteoarthritis and subsequent surgery

The effect of conventional radiofrequency thermocoagulation of femoral and obturator nerves' articular branches on chronic hip pain: a prospective clinical study

BACKGROUND

Chronic hip pain is one of the most common and difficult-to-treat causes of disability. Our study's primary aim was to investigate the effects of ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation of the femoral and obturator nerve articular branches on chronic hip pain, and the secondary aim was to determine its effects on hip function and quality of life.

METHODS

Fifty-three patients with hip pain lasting more than three months were enrolled in the study. VPS scale and WOMAC, SF-12 questionnaires were applied to the patients before and in the first, third, and sixth months following the procedure.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 60.4% were female, and 39.6% were male. Hip pain was caused by osteoarthritis in 77.1%, postoperative hip pain in 12.5%, malignancy in 8.3%, and avascular necrosis in 2.1%. The VPS scores were 8.9 ± 1.1 (mean±SD) in the baseline period, 2.4 ± 2.5 in the first postoperative week, 3.8 ± 2.5 in the first month, 5.1 ± 2.8 in the third month, and 5.8 ± 2.7 in the sixth month, with a significant decrease in VPS score (P < .001). One patient developed a motor deficit that improved spontaneously.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that radiofrequency thermocoagulation application to the articular branches of the femoral and obturator nerves provides pain relief, hip function improvement, and better quality of life (better physical component scores but no improvement in mental component scores in SF-12) for up to 6 months in chronic hip pain.

Incidence of Rapidly Progressive Osteoarthritis Following Intra-articular Hip Corticosteroid Injection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery recommends intra-articular corticosteroid injections (CSIs) for managing hip osteoarthritis (OA) based on short-term, prospective studies. Recent retrospective studies have raised concerns that CSIs may lead to rapidly progressive OA (RPOA). We sought to systematically review the literature of CSIs for hip OA to estimate the incidence of RPOA.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify original research of hip OA patients receiving CSIs. Overall, 27 articles involving 5831 patients published from 1988 to 2022 were included. Study design, patient characteristics, CSI details, follow-up, and cases of RPOA were recorded. Studies were classified by their ability to detect RPOA based on follow-up. Random effects meta-analysis was used to calculate the incidence of RPOA for studies able to detect RPOA.

Results

The meta-analytic estimate of RPOA incidence was 6% (95% confidence interval, 3%-9%) based on 10 articles classified as able to detect RPOA. RPOA definitions varied from progression of OA within 6 months to the presence of destructive changes. These studies were subject to bias from excluding patients with missing post-CSI radiographs. The remaining 17 articles were classified as unable to detect RPOA, including all of the studies cited in the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery recommendation.

Conclusions

The incidence of RPOA after CSIs remains unknown due to variation in definitions and follow-up. While RPOA following CSIs may be 6%, many cases are not severe, and this may reflect selection bias. Further research is needed to understand whether clinically significant RPOA is incident enough to limit CSI use.

Outcomes of imaging-guided corticosteroid injections in hip and knee osteoarthritis patients: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the current literature on the use of image-guided corticosteroid injections in the treatment of patients with knee and hip OA.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We conducted a comprehensive literature search through June 30, 2022. Publication type, study design, imaging guidance modality, osteoarthritis severity, number of injections, steroid type and dose, anesthetic type and dose, the total number of patients, follow-up intervals, and measured outcomes were extracted from the included studies.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

There were 23 included studies (10 hips, 12 knees, 1 both hip and knee). Hip injections were found to be effective in treating short- and long-term pain and more effective than hyaluronic acid, Mepivacaine, NSAIDs, and normal saline in terms of improvement in pain and/or function. There was less impact on QoL. Knee injections were found either to have little or no impact or were similar or inferior to comparison injections (intra-articular hyaluronic acid, PRP, NSAIDs, normal saline, adductor canal blocks). Study data could not be aggregated because the corticosteroid types and doses, methods of outcome assessment, and follow-up time points varied widely.

CONCLUSION

Our systematic review found generally positive outcomes for the hip, but overall negative outcomes for the knee, although hip injections may carry a risk of serious adverse outcomes. A larger trial with uniform methodology is warranted. Specific studies on the adverse effects of corticosteroid injections are also warranted.

Ultrasound-guided joint interventions of the lower extremity

The purpose of this article is to better understand the role ultrasound plays in lower extremity joint interventions. Ultrasound is an important and reliable tool diagnostically and therapeutically. Real-time feedback, lack of ionizing radiation, and dynamic maneuverability make ultrasound an important tool in the proceduralist's armament. This article will touch upon the important anatomic considerations, clinical indications, and technical step-by-step details for lower extremity ultrasound interventions. Specifically, we will look at interventions involving the hip, knee, ankle, and foot. In addition, this article will discuss the roles corticosteroid and platelet-rich plasma may play in certain interventions.

Alternative treatment of hip pain from advanced hip osteoarthritis utilizing cooled radiofrequency ablation: single institution pilot study

OBJECTIVE

To establish the effectiveness of cooled radiofrequency ablation in managing hip pain from osteoarthritis at 6 months after receiving treatment in patients who failed conservative treatments and are not surgical candidates due to comorbidities or unwillingness to undergo arthroplasty surgery by targeting the femoral and obturator branches and assessing the degree of hip pain relief and change of function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective pilot study includes a total of 11 consecutive patients experiencing persistent chronic hip pain in the setting of advanced osteoarthritis. Patients initially underwent anesthetic blocks of the obturator and femoral nerve branches to determine cooled radiofrequency ablation candidacy. After adequate response to the anesthetic blocks (> 50% immediate pain relief), patients were subjected to the procedures 2-3 weeks later. Treatment response was evaluated utilizing clinically validated questionnaires and visual analog score in order to assess impact on pain severity, stiffness, and functional activities of daily living. Follow-up outcome scores were collected up to 6 months after cooled radiofrequency ablation procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 11 hips were treated consecutively between August 2019 and March 2020 (mean patient age 61.4 years; 8 M:3F). The mean total HOOS score improved significantly from baseline at 17.0 ± 6.0 to 52.9 ± 5.4 at a mean of 6.2 months after treatment (p < 0.0001), with significant improvement in mean pain score from 16.1 ± 6.6 to 53.4 ± 7.4 (p < 0.0001) and mean stiffness score from 15.0 ± 8.1 to 53.6 ± 11.0 (p < 0.0001). No major complications were encountered. No patients went on to re-treatment, surgery, or other intervention.

CONCLUSION

Image-guided obturator and femoral nerve cooled radiofrequency ablation is effective and safe in treating chronic hip pain/stiffness in the setting of advanced osteoarthritis.

Hematoma Formation After Hip Corticosteroid Injection in a Patient with Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia: A Case Report

CASE

We present a 70-year-old woman with history of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia with a right thigh hematoma after a corticosteroid hip injection. Aspiration of the hematoma was attempted, but she developed a significant transfusion requirement with paresthesias in a lateral femoral cutaneous nerve distribution, prompting transfer. Imaging demonstrated no active extravasation, and she was managed conservatively. At 8-month follow-up, she had a persistent consolidated hematoma on the right side, and she subsequently died of complications of her cancer.

CONCLUSION

This case demonstrates an unusual complication from a common nonoperative modality, as well as important coagulopathies that must be considered in patients with leukemia.

Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Joint Pain Secondary to Hip and Shoulder Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the shoulder and hip is a leading cause of physical disability and mental distress. Traditional nonsurgical management alone is often unable to completely address the associated chronic joint pain. Moreover, a large number of patients are not eligible for joint replacement surgery owing to comorbidities or cost. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of articular sensory nerve fibers can disrupt the transmission of nociceptive signals by neurolysis, thereby providing long-term pain relief. A subtype of RFA, cooled RFA (CRFA), utilizes internally cooled electrodes to generate larger ablative zones compared with standard RFA techniques. Given the complex variable innervation of large joints such as the glenohumeral and hip joints, a larger ablative treatment zone, such as that provided by CRFA, is desired to capture a greater number of afferent nociceptive fibers. The suprascapular, axillary, and lateral pectoral nerve articular sensory branches are targeted during CRFA of the glenohumeral joint. The obturator and femoral nerve articular sensory branches are targeted during CRFA of the hip. CRFA is a promising tool in the interventionalist's arsenal for management of OA-related pain and symptoms, particularly in patients who cannot undergo, have long wait times until, or have persistent pain following joint replacement surgery. An invited commentary by Tomasian is available online. ^©RSNA, 2022.

Clinical Fate of Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis Following Intraarticular Corticosteroid Injection: An Analysis in 311 Shoulders

Background

Intraarticular corticosteroid injection is commonly used conservative treatment for glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical fate of symptomatic glenohumeral OA following intraarticular corticosteroid injection and to identify factors associated with undergoing shoulder arthroplasty.

Methods

Glenohumeral OA patients who had undergone at least one glenohumeral corticosteroid injection from 2012 to 2017 were identified. Data for demographics, comorbidities, number of injections, severity of radiographic arthritis, and subsequent treatment were collected up to February 2020. Data were analyzed to compare between patients who had eventually undergone shoulder arthroplasty and those who had not.

Results

A total of 311 shoulders (275 patients) were followed up for 3 to 8 years after the index injection. The mean age of patients was 64.7 years. There were 148 females, and 116 shoulders (37.3%) eventually underwent arthroplasty, 68 (21.9%) further injections only, 104 (33.4%) no further treatment, 14 (4.5%) a non-arthroplasty surgical procedure, and 9 (2.9%) were lost to follow up. Severity of radiographic arthritic changes, female sex, younger age, and nonsmoking status were found to be significantly associated with undergoing arthroplasty (p < 0.001, p = 0.014, p = 0.003, and p = 0.043, respectively).

Conclusion

Approximately one third of glenohumeral OA patients who had received an intraarticular corticosteroid injection eventually elected to undergo shoulder arthroplasty within 3 to 8 years of the injection. High-grade arthritic changes in radiographs, female gender, and younger age were found to be independent factors associated with undergoing arthroplasty. This information may be useful in counseling patients about their future clinical course.

Level of Evidence: Level III Retrospective comparative study

A Single Injection of Amniotic Suspension Allograft Is Safe and Effective for Treatment of Mild to Moderate Hip Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Study

PURPOSE

The purpose of our study was to examine the effects of a commercially available amniotic suspension allograft (ASA) (ReNu, Organogenesis, Canton, MA) in a patient population with moderate osteoarthritis of the hip.

METHODS

Ten patients with symptomatic hip osteoarthritis, defined as Tonnis grade 1 or 2 on radiographic examination, were prospectively enrolled. Each patient received a single image-guided injection of ASA into the hip joint. Patient-reported outcomes measures, including the 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool, Modified Harris Hip Score, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores were recorded at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months postinjection. A linear regression model was performed to detect differences in outcome scores from baseline.

RESULTS

Nine patients had complete 12-month data available for analysis. One patient failed treatment and underwent arthroplasty at 2 months postinjection. The cohort includes 5 males and 4 females, aged 47-67. International Hip Outcome Tool scores demonstrated a significant improvement between baseline and 12 months (P = .02). Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores demonstrated a significant difference between baseline and 6 months (P < .01), as well as between baseline and 12 months (P < .01). Modified Harris Hip Scores demonstrated a significant difference between baseline and 6 months (P = .02) and between baseline and 12 months (P = .01). There were no major adverse events in the course of the study period.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates promising results for relief of pain and improvement in patient-reported outcomes with intra-articular ASA in patients with moderate osteoarthritis of the hip for up to one year, although the exact mechanism of action remains unknown. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, case series.

Review of Extraosseous Applications of Thermal Ablation in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Large Joint Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disease worldwide, leading to significant pain, restricted range of motion, and disability. A gap exists between short- and long-term symptom-relieving therapies. Although arthroplasty is an effective treatment for symptomatic end-stage disease, most patients ultimately do not receive a joint replacement due to suboptimal surgical qualifications, comorbidities, or an aversion to surgery. The lack of additional treatment options in this setting makes opioid agonists a commonly used pharmacologic agent, contributing to the addiction epidemic that greatly afflicts our communities. Cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) has arisen as a treatment modality in the setting of moderate to severe OA among patients refractory to conservative management, generally showing greater efficacy compared with other existing strategies. This review focuses on the benefits of CRFA and its technical feasibility as a management option among patients experiencing debilitating large joint OA with limited clinical options.

Accuracy and Feasibility of Ultrasound-Guided Intra-articular Injection of the Rat Hip Joint

Intra-articular injection is frequently used as an effective diagnostic and treatment tool for hip joint diseases. However, the underlying treatment mechanism remains unclear because of a lack of experimental animal models. A challenge facing researchers is how to accurately and consistently perform injections involving animal hip joints. The purpose of this study, then, was to establish an ultrasound (US)-guided intra-articular (IA) injection technique using rat hip joints and to evaluate its accuracy and feasibility versus a fluoroscopy (FL)-guided technique. For this study, 20 US-guided and 20 FL-guided IA injections were administered to separate groups of Sprague-Dawley rats. For each procedure, 50 μL of iohexol was injected into the hip joint using a 25G needle. The US-guided injections were performed using a linear probe, and the FL-guided IA injections were performed using C-arm X-ray fluoroscopy. All injections were verified by computed tomography imaging. The number of successful injections and needle repositions per injection, as well as operating times, were recorded, and the rats were observed for complications for 10 d after the injections. Statistical analysis was used to compare US-guided and FL-guided techniques with significance set at p < 0.05. The success rate was markedly higher for the US-guided interventions (90%) than for the FL-guided interventions (75%) (p<0.05). The intervention time was shorter in the US-guided group (95.95 ± 8.376 s) than in the FL-guided group (110.70 ± 20.236 s) (p < 0.05), and the median number of needles repositioned per injection in the US-guided group (1.20 ± 0.41) was notably less than that in the FL-guided group (1.60 ± 0.68) (p < 0.05). A puncture site hematoma was noted in two rat hips (10%) the day after injection in the FL-guided group. Overall, the study indicated that ultrasound-guided intra-articular injection of the hip is a feasible, accurate and safe method for use in rats. This makes it a promising tool for diagnosing coxofemoral pain, producing hip osteoarthritis animal models and administering intra-articular medication.

Predicting outcomes in patients undergoing intra-articular corticosteroid hip injections

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the associations between clinical, procedural, and radiographic factors and outcomes of steroid hip injections, including long-term and immediate pain reduction, time to arthroplasty, time to reinjection, and the total number of injections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All intra-articular anesthetic and steroid injections of the hip under fluoroscopic guidance between January 2014 and March 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Hip radiographs were scored using the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) and Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) scores. Immediate pain relief and response were evaluated using a change in visual analog scale and OMERACT-OARSI criteria respectively. Long-term pain relief was evaluated at 2‑7 months after injection by reviewing the medical records. Correlation between patient characteristics, procedural variations, and radiographic factors with injection outcomes was analyzed by using linear and logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Of 361 injections, 79.8% showed an immediate pain response and 32.7% had subjective long-term pain relief (> 2 months). There was no significant correlation between immediate pain relief and response with long-term pain relief and other outcomes. Older age and higher KL score, OARSI-central joint space narrowing (JSN), and inferior acetabular osteophyte were correlated with long-term pain relief (p = 0.01‑0.03). Higher KL and OARSI grades, particularly JSN, were significantly correlated with increased immediate pain relief and total number of injections but decreased time to arthroplasty. Baseline pain positively correlated with immediate pain response (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients with higher grades of radiographic OA and high baseline pain were good candidates for steroid injections, particularly for those patients awaiting hip arthroplasty.

Development of a technique for MRI gold-standard direct volumetric measurement of complex joint effusion, and validation at the hip

OBJECTIVE

Accurate joint fluid quantification on MRI cannot simply rely on measuring the maximum fluid depth or using an ellipsoid approximation as this does not fully characterize the complex shape of a fluid-filled joint. As per the Outcome Measurement in Rheumatology (OMERACT) filter, we sought to evaluate the feasibility, reliability, and validity of a semi-automated supervised technique to quantify hip effusion volume.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-three hip osteoarthritis patients were imaged with coronal short TI inversion recovery (STIR) and sagittal intermediate weighted fat-suppressed (IWFS) sequences at two time points (Fig. 1). Volumetric quantitative measurement (VQM) of joint fluid and measurement of the largest femoral neck fluid thickness (FTM) was performed using the custom MATLAB software. Self-reported Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and clinical measures of pain, stiffness, and function were recorded.

RESULTS

Inter-observer reliability was significantly higher for VQM than FTM (ICC = 0.96 vs. 0.85, p < 0.05). VQM and FTM correlated moderately (r = 0.76, p < 0.0001). There was significantly more articular fluid in symptomatic than asymptomatic hips at baseline (mean = 9.8 vs. 5.9 mL). Volumetric quantitative measurement generally displayed more frequent and stronger correlations to clinical parameters than FTM. Volumetric quantitative measurement required 3.9 min/hip vs. < 1 min/hip for femoral neck fluid thickness.

CONCLUSION

Volumetric quantitative measurement of joint effusion can serve as an MRI gold-standard, could apply to other joints and collections, and is highly suited to future automation.

Do preoperative intra-articular corticosteroid and hyaluronic acid injections affect time to total joint arthroplasty?

INTRODUCTION

Intra-articular corticosteroid (CSI) or hyaluronic acid (HAI) injections alleviate symptoms of osteoarthritis in patients who may be candidates for total hip or total knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA). However, their effect on time to total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and complications remains uncertain. We sought to evaluate (1) delay in time to surgery for patients receiving injections prior to THA/TKA (2) incidence of patients that receive injections, (3) type and number of injections, and (4) compare complication rates between patients with and without injections.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 3340 consecutive TJA (1770 THA and 1570 TKA). Patients were divided into two cohorts depending if they received preoperative intra-articular injection or not. We identified dates of first clinic presentation and index surgery, injection type, total administered, and 90-day complications, including periprosthetic joint infection.

RESULTS

150/1770 THA and 192/1570 TKA patients received injections (8.5%vs.12.2%,p = 0.0004). Time from first presentation to clinic to TJA was significantly greater in patients receiving injections [12.4 ± 11 months vs.7.3 ± 10.7,p < 0.001 for THA; 20.0 ± 17.4 months vs.11.6 ± 15.4,p < 0.001 for TKA]. This delay in time was greater in TKA versus THA (8.4 months vs.5.1,p < 0.001). TKA patients had a higher incidence of receiving HAI versus THA patients (9%vs.0.6%,p < 0.0001). There were no differences in overall complication profiles (p = 0.19 for THA, p = 0.3 for TKA).

CONCLUSION

Injections are associated with an increased time to TJA by a statistically significant amount, however its clinical significance is debatable. Injections are safe if administered at least three months preoperatively. If patients present with appropriate surgical indications and are ready, we do not recommend intra-articular injections to delay surgery.

Minimally Invasive Therapies for Osteoarthritic Hip Pain: a Comprehensive Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a highly prevalent cause of chronic hip pain, affecting 27% of adults aged over 45 years and 42% of adults aged over 75 years. Though OA has traditionally been described as a disorder of "wear-and-tear," recent studies have expanded on this understanding to include a possible inflammatory etiology as well, damage to articular cartilage produces debris in the joint that is phagocytosed by synovial cells which leads to inflammation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with OA of the hip frequently have decreased quality of life due to pain and limited mobility though additional comorbidities of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, poor sleep quality, and obesity have been correlated. Initial treatment with conservative medical management can provide effective symptomatic relief. Physical therapy and exercise are important components of a multimodal approach to osteoarthritic hip pain. Patients with persistent pain may benefit from minimally invasive therapeutic approaches prior to consideration of undergoing total hip arthroplasty. The objective of this review is to provide an update of current minimally invasive therapies for the treatment of pain stemming from hip osteoarthritis; these include intra-articular injection of medication, regenerative therapies, and radiofrequency ablation.

Editorial Commentary: Intra-articular Injection for Osteoarthritis-Is It Hip or Not?

Intra-articular injections are commonly used in the treatment algorithm for osteoarthritis of the hip. A number of different adjuvants can be used, such as corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid, and platelet-rich plasma, but there is no consensus regarding indications for or anticipated outcomes of each of these interventions. Recent data suggest that corticosteroids provide the best relief in the short term whereas platelet-rich plasma may be more beneficial in the mid term, but the results are variable. Ultimately, more rigorous studies are needed to evaluate these adjuvants, in particular biologics, while remaining fastidious with our indications for injection therapy.

Prediction of intra-articular pathology and arthroscopic outcomes for femoroacetabular impingement and labral tear based on the response to preoperative anaesthetic hip joint injections

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated whether the preoperative response to intra-articular injections is associated with intra-articular pathological findings and arthroscopy outcomes.

METHODS

This study included 49 patients who underwent arthroscopic hip surgery for femoroacetabular impingement and labral tear after receiving preoperative hip joint injections. The response to anaesthetic injections was categorized as poor (0-50%) or good (51-100%). With respect to anatomical indices, we evaluated the lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA), acetabular roof obliquity (ARO), vertical-centre-anterior angle (VCA), and the alpha angle (on a lateral view). We evaluated the association between these indices (including the types of hip labral tears and cartilage damage) and the effectiveness of intra-articular injections.

RESULTS

The study included 22 men and 27 women, and the mean age of patients was 36.4 years. No statistically significant association was observed between the response to preoperative anaesthetic hip joint injections and patient demographics (age, sex) and anatomical indices (LCEA, ARO, VCA, and alpha angle) (p > 0.05). All patients showed labral damage; however, labral tear classification or cartilage damage was not significantly associated with the effectiveness of joint injections. At the 1-year post-operative follow-up, patients with a good response to anaesthetic hip joint injections showed a significantly better outcome than patients with a poor response to these injections (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The response to preoperative anaesthetic hip joint injections may indicate the presence of intra-articular pathology. Furthermore, this association may have predictive value in determining post-operative outcomes following hip arthroscopy.