Effect of elbow MRI with axial traction on articular cartilage visibility-a feasibility study

T1ρ relaxation mapping in osteochondral lesions of the talus: a non-invasive biomarker for altered biomechanical properties of hyaline cartilage?

BACKGROUND

To evaluate T1ρ relaxation mapping in patients with symptomatic talar osteochondral lesions (OLT) and healthy controls (HC) at rest, with axial loading and traction.

METHODS

Participants underwent 3-T ankle magnetic resonance imaging at rest and with 500 N loading and 120 N traction, without axial traction for a subcohort of 17/29 HC. We used a fast low-angle shot sequence with variable spin-lock intervals for monoexponential T1ρ fitting. Cartilage was manually segmented to extract T1ρ values.

RESULTS

We studied 29 OLT patients (age 31.7 ± 7.5 years, 15 females, body mass index [BMI] 25.0 ± 3.4 kg/m2) and 29 HC (age 25.2 ± 4.3 years, 17 females, BMI 22.5 ± 2.3 kg/m2. T1ρ values of OLT (50.4 ± 3.4 ms) were higher than those of intact cartilage regions of OLT patients (47.2 ± 3.4 ms; p = 0.003) and matched HC cartilage (48.1 ± 3.3 ms; p = 0.030). Axial loading and traction induced significant T1ρ changes in the intact cartilage regions of patients (loading, mean difference -1.1 ms; traction, mean difference 1.4 ms; p = 0.030 for both) and matched HC cartilage (-2.2 ms, p = 0.003; 2.3 ms, p = 0.030; respectively), but not in the OLT itself (-1.3 ms; p = 0.150; +1.9 ms; p = 0.150; respectively).

CONCLUSION

Increased T1ρ values may serve as a biomarker of cartilage degeneration in OLT. The absence of load- and traction-induced T1ρ changes in OLT compared to intact cartilage suggests that T1ρ may reflect altered biomechanical properties of hyaline cartilage.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

DRKS, DRKS00024010. Registered 11 January 2021, https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00024010 .

RELEVANCE STATEMENT

T1ρ mapping has the potential to evaluate compositional and biomechanical properties of the talar cartilage and may improve therapeutic decision-making in patients with osteochondral lesions.

KEY POINTS

T1ρ values in osteochondral lesions increased compared to intact cartilage. Significant load- and traction-induced T1ρ changes were observed in visually intact regions and in healthy controls but not in osteochondral lesions. T1ρ may serve as an imaging biomarker for biomechanical properties of cartilage.

Direct MR arthrography without image guidance: a practical guide, joint-by-joint

Direct MR arthrography (dMRA) is a fundamental technique in diagnosing pathology in major peripheral joints, allowing for precise evaluation of intra-articular structures. Although injection guidance is typically performed using imaging techniques such as ultrasound or fluoroscopy, puncture via anatomical landmarks may be useful in certain circumstances where it has been proven to be a safe and effective procedure. This paper describes the indications and injection technique of dMRA, joint by joint, focusing on the different technical details, from the most common locations, like the shoulder or hip, to those with more restricted clinical indications, such as the wrist, knee, elbow, or ankle. The most relevant anatomical landmarks are detailed for each joint, aiding in the intra-articular introduction of diluted contrast, highlighting the most accessible trajectories and structures to avoid when inserting the needle. Additionally, tips are provided to facilitate proper joint distension. With all this information, this paper aims to serve as a suitable reference guide for performing dMRA without image guidance if needed.

SSR white paper: guidelines for utilization and performance of direct MR arthrography

OBJECTIVE

Direct magnetic resonance arthrography (dMRA) is often considered the most accurate imaging modality for the evaluation of intra-articular structures, but utilization and performance vary widely without consensus. The purpose of this white paper is to develop consensus recommendations on behalf of the Society of Skeletal Radiology (SSR) based on published literature and expert opinion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Standards and Guidelines Committee of the SSR identified guidelines for utilization and performance of dMRA as an important topic for study and invited all SSR members with expertise and interest to volunteer for the white paper panel. This panel was tasked with determining an outline, reviewing the relevant literature, preparing a written document summarizing the issues and controversies, and providing recommendations.

RESULTS

Twelve SSR members with expertise in dMRA formed the ad hoc white paper authorship committee. The published literature on dMRA was reviewed and summarized, focusing on clinical indications, technical considerations, safety, imaging protocols, complications, controversies, and gaps in knowledge. Recommendations for the utilization and performance of dMRA in the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee, and ankle/foot regions were developed in group consensus.

CONCLUSION

Although direct MR arthrography has been previously used for a wide variety of clinical indications, the authorship panel recommends more selective application of this minimally invasive procedure. At present, direct MR arthrography remains an important procedure in the armamentarium of the musculoskeletal radiologist and is especially valuable when conventional MRI is indeterminant or results are discrepant with clinical evaluation.

Acute and Chronic Elbow Disorders

Elbow pain is very common and can be due to many pathologic conditions. After radiographs are obtained, advanced imaging is often necessary. Both ultrasonography and MR imaging can be used to evaluate the many important soft-tissue structures of the elbow, with each modality having advantages and disadvantages in certain clinical scenarios. Imaging findings between the two modalities often correlate. It is important for musculoskeletal radiologists to understand normal elbow anatomy and how best to use ultrasonography and MR imaging to evaluate elbow pain. In this way, radiologists can provide expert guidance to referring clinicians and best guide patient management.

Improving visualization of the articular cartilage of the knee with magnetic resonance imaging under axial traction: a comparative study of different traction weights

OBJECTIVE

Lesions of the articular cartilage of the knee, especially early grades, are not always accurately detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) because of contact between the articular cartilage surfaces of the femur and the tibia. This study aimed to assess the effects of axial leg traction during knee MRI examination on joint space widening and articular cartilage visualization and evaluate the ideal weight for traction.

METHODS

MRI was performed on ten healthy volunteers using a 3-T MRI unit with a 3D dual-echo steady-state gradient-recalled echo sequence. Conventional MRI was performed first, followed by traction MRI. The traction weight increased in the order of 5 kg, 10 kg, and 15 kg. Joint space widths were measured, and articular cartilage visualization was assessed at the medial and lateral tibiofemoral joints. Volunteers were asked to evaluate pain and discomfort using a visual analog scale during each procedure with axial traction to assess the safety of traction MRI.

RESULTS

The medial tibiofemoral joint space width significantly increased, and the visualization of the articular cartilage significantly improved by applying traction. The joint space width and the articular cartilage visualization showed no significant differences among traction weights of 5 kg, 10 kg, and 15 kg. Pain and discomfort during traction MRI examination were lowest with a traction weight of 5 kg.

CONCLUSION

Traction MRI examination may be useful in evaluating articular cartilage lesions at the medial tibiofemoral joint. A traction weight of 5 kg may be sufficient with minimum pain and discomfort.

Effects of Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Axial Traction of the Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint on Articular Cartilage Visibility: A Feasibility Study

Objectives

The objective of this study was to verify the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with axial traction of the thumb for observing articular cartilage.

Materials and methods

Eleven healthy adult volunteers (39.7 ± 7.4 years) without thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis or trauma were included in this study. A 3-tesla (3T) MRI (Magnetom Skyra, Siemens Healthineers AG, Munich, Germany) of the right thumb with axial traction applied by a finger trap with three traction weights (0, 2, and 5 kg) was performed. A 3D T2* multiecho data imaging combination (MEDIC) was selected to visualize the articular cartilage. After multiplanar reconstruction, sagittal and coronal images of the thumb carpometacarpal joint were used to evaluate the articular cartilage visibility and joint space widths at five locations. Articular cartilage visibility was evaluated using our original classification method that used the percentage of the cartilage detectable area. The Friedman test was used to compare the differences between each traction weight and location.

Results

Articular cartilage visibility significantly improved with axial traction. The average joint space widths with the 5-kg application were 1.9 ± 0.8, 3.9 ± 0.6, 2.0 ± 0.9, 3.9 ± 1.1, and 2.5 ± 1.4 mm at the center, volar edge, dorsal edge, radial edge, and ulnar edge, respectively. The joint space widths significantly increased proportionally with the traction weight at all locations. The joint space widths at the volar and radial edges were significantly greater than those at other locations.

Conclusion

Applying axial traction to the thumb increased the joint space widths and improved the visibility of the articular cartilage in the carpometacarpal joint on MRI.

Preoperative Evaluation and Surgical Simulation for Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Elbow Using Three-Dimensional MRI-CT Image Fusion Images

We used our novel three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging-computed tomography fusion images (3D MRI-CT fusion images; MCFIs) for detailed preoperative lesion evaluation and surgical simulation in osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the elbow. Herein, we introduce our procedure and report the findings of the assessment of its utility. We enrolled 16 men (mean age: 14.0 years) and performed preoperative MRI using 7 kg axial traction with a 3-Tesla imager and CT. Three-dimensional-MRI models of the humerus and articular cartilage and a 3D-CT model of the humerus were constructed. We created MCFIs using both models. We validated the findings obtained from the MCFIs and intraoperative findings using the following items: articular cartilage fissures and defects, articular surface deformities, vertical and horizontal lesion diameters, the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) classification, and surgical procedures. The MCFIs accurately reproduced the lesions and correctly matched the ICRS classification in 93.5% of cases. Surgery was performed as simulated in all cases. Preoperatively measured lesion diameters exhibited no significant differences compared to the intraoperative measurements. MCFIs were useful in the evaluation of OCD lesions and detailed preoperative surgical simulation through accurate reproduction of 3D structural details of the lesions.

A novel three-dimensional MRI-CT image fusion technique for precise preoperative evaluation and treatment of capitellar osteochondritis dissecans

OBJECTIVES

We developed a novel method to create three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging-CT (3D MRI-CT) fusion images for detailed lesion evaluation and surgical simulation in capitellar osteochondritis dissecans (COCD). This study aimed to clarify its usefulness.

METHODS

We enrolled 12 boys with COCD (mean age, 13.8 years) and preoperatively constructed 3D models of the humerus and articular cartilage from MR images obtained with a 3-T imager. For better visualization of the articular cartilage outline, we applied 7 kg of axial traction to the elbow during MRI. We also constructed a 3D model of the humerus from CT images. 3D MRI-CT fusion images were created using both models. The average distance difference between two corresponding points as per the 3D CT and 3D MRI models of the humerus was evaluated. Using the 3D MRI-CT fusion images, we measured longitudinal and transverse lesion diameters; evaluated articular cartilage fissures and defects, articular surface deformities, and the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) classification; and validated the results using intraoperative findings.

RESULTS

The mean average distance difference was 0.75 mm. The 3D MRI-CT fusion images accurately reproduced lesion conditions in every case and correctly predicted the ICRS classification with 100% accuracy. Preoperatively measured longitudinal and transverse lesion diameters were not significantly different from intraoperative measurements (p = 0.79, 0.32 respectively).

CONCLUSION

3D MRI-CT fusion images provide a detailed evaluation of COCD lesion severity by presenting the exact positional relationship between the articular cartilage and subchondral bone.

KEY POINTS

• We developed a novel method to create three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging-computed tomography (3D MRI-CT) fusion images for the evaluation of capitellar osteochondritis dissecans. • 3D MRI-CT fusion images enabled the accurate prediction of lesions and provided a detailed evaluation of lesion severity by presenting the exact positional relationship between the articular cartilage and subchondral bone.