Measuring stem anteversion after total hip arthroplasty: posterior condylar tangent versus transepicondylar axis

Femoral anteversion angle is more advantageous than TT-TG distance in evaluating patellar dislocation: A retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to report the parameter characteristics of the femoral anteversion angle (FAA) and tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance in patients with patellar instability compared to healthy individuals and to evaluate their reliability in predicting patellar dislocation, providing potential indications for osteotomy.

METHODS

A retrospective collection of consecutive patients with patellar instability constituted the study group, while individuals without patellofemoral disorder served as the control group. Measurement of the FAA and TT-TG distance were conducted by lower extremity computed tomography scans and knees with true patellar dislocation were recorded. The diagnostic capability of the FAA and TT-TG distance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC), determining the pathological values by sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

The FAA (21.6 ± 9.0°) and TT-TG distance (20.1 ± 4.8 mm) in the study group were significantly greater than the control group (10.6 ± 7.9° and 15.6 ± 4.6 mm, respectively) (p < 0.001). The AUCs for patellar dislocation were 0.869 for FAA and 0.712 for TT-TG distance, with pathological cut-off values of 18.2° and 18.2 mm, respectively. The odds ratios for FAA and TT-TG distance were 1.185 and 1.125, respectively (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with patellar instability exhibited significantly greater FAA and TT-TG distance compared to healthy individuals. The FAA demonstrated superior predictive capability for patellar dislocation compared to the TT-TG distance. The FAA (>18.2°) measured by surgical transepicondylar axis and TT-TG distance (>18.2 mm) were the potential pathological thresholds. Additionally, an increase of 1° in FAA and 1 mm in TT-TG distance was associated with a 18.5% and 12.5% increased risk of patellar dislocation, respectively. Surgeons should be aware of the risk of patellar dislocation associated with rotational malalignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Femoral Neck Anteversion: Which Distal Femur Landmark Matters?

Background

Femoral neck anteversion has traditionally been measured by the angle between the distal femur posterior condylar axis (PCA) and a line drawn through the center of the femoral head and neck. While less common, the transepicondylar axis (TEA) has also been used to reference femoral neck anteversion. The purpose of this study was to compare femoral neck version of the PCA vs the TEA using computerized tomography (CT).

Methods

A total of 1507 femoral CTs were included. Precise bony landmarks were established: lateral epicondyle, medial epicondyle, posteromedial condyle, posterolateral condyle, center of the femoral neck, and center of the femoral head. Femoral version was calculated between the head and neck axis and either the PCA or TEA. Differences between sex and ethnicity were evaluated.

Results

The mean femoral anteversion was 12.7° ± 9.1° based on the PCA and 11.5° ± 7.9° based on the TEA (mean difference 1.2° ± 1.9°, P < .001). Males were less anteverted than females (9.8° ± 7.6° vs 13.5° ± 7.8°, P < .001). African Americans had less anteversion than other groups (8.1° ± 9.2° vs 11.5° ± 7.8°, P = .04), while Asians were more anteverted than other groups (12.1° ± 9.0° vs 11.2° ± 7.3°, P = .04). These values were referenced on the TEA.

Conclusions

In this series of over 1500 femoral CT scans, the mean difference between anteversion measurements referencing the PCA and TEA was 1.2°. Native femoral version varied widely between gender and ethnic groups. Extreme femoral version, defined as <0° or >30°, was present in 11.8% of patients referencing the PCA.

MRI quantification of femoral neck version using the posterior lesser trochanteric line: a comparison of three measurements

OBJECTIVE

To validate MRI for the quantification of the femoral neck version (FNV) using posterior lesser trochanteric Line (PLTL) and to compare reliability of the PLTL to the epicondylar and retrocondylar measurements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 3 T MRI scans performed for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Two musculoskeletal radiologists performed the measurements. MRI measurements of the PLTL were compared to CT using Bland Altman, Lin's concordance, and Lin's correlation coefficients. Interobserver reliability was determined using Bland Altman, Lin's concordance, and Lin's correlation coefficients. Intraobserver reliability was determined using Lin's concordance and Lin's correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients (90 lower extremities) met the inclusion criteria. Ages ranged from 20 to 41 years, with a mean of 31.5 years. There were 22 females and 23 males. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient for MRI and CT measurements of PLTL was substantial: 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.98). PLTL Lin's correlation coefficient was 0.825 (95% CI 0.732-0.918) and indicated good interobserver reliability. Epicondylar and retrocondylar methods Lin's correlation coefficients demonstrated moderate interobserver reliability at 0.601 (0.415-0.786) and 0.632 (0.456-0.807), respectively. There was moderate 95% confidence interval overlap between the PLTL and the other measurements. Bland-Altman plots for each measurement were similar and demonstrated no bias. There was excellent intraobserver reliability (> 0.900) with significant 95% confidence interval overlap.

CONCLUSION

MRI measurements of the PLTL are comparable to CT. The PLTL has good reliability between readers for the quantification of FNV using MRI, which could help avoid unnecessary radiation exposure using CT and reduce MRI scan time.