1
|
Casula V, Saarakkala S, Hirvasniemi J. Editorial: Advances in musculoskeletal imaging. Front Physiol 2024; 15:1535622. [PMID: 39712190 PMCID: PMC11659242 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1535622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2024] [Accepted: 11/28/2024] [Indexed: 12/24/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Casula
- Research Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Simo Saarakkala
- Research Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Jukka Hirvasniemi
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fritz J, Rashidi A, de Cesar Netto C. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Total Ankle Arthroplasty: State-of-The-Art Assessment of Implant-Related Pain and Dysfunction. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2024; 41:619-647. [PMID: 39237176 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpm.2024.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/07/2024]
Abstract
Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is an effective alternative for treating patients with end-stage ankle degeneration, improving mobility, and providing pain relief. Implant survivorship is constantly improving; however, complications occur. Many causes of pain and dysfunction after total ankle arthroplasty can be diagnosed accurately with clinical examination, laboratory, radiography, and computer tomography. However, when there are no or inconclusive imaging findings, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is highly accurate in identifying and characterizing bone resorption, osteolysis, infection, osseous stress reactions, nondisplaced fractures, polyethylene damage, nerve injuries and neuropathies, as well as tendon and ligament tears. Multiple vendors offer effective, clinically available MRI techniques for metal artifact reduction MRI of total ankle arthroplasty. This article reviews the MRI appearances of common TAA implant systems, clinically available techniques and protocols for metal artifact reduction MRI of TAA implants, and the MRI appearances of a broad spectrum of TAA-related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Fritz
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Ali Rashidi
- Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 660 1st Ave, 3rd Floor, Rm 313, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Cesar de Cesar Netto
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at StanDepartment of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fritz B, de Cesar Netto C, Fritz J. Multiaxial 3D MRI of the Ankle: Advanced High-Resolution Visualization of Ligaments, Tendons, and Articular Cartilage. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2024; 41:685-706. [PMID: 39237179 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpm.2024.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/07/2024]
Abstract
MRI is a valuable tool for diagnosing a broad spectrum of acute and chronic ankle disorders, including ligament tears, tendinopathy, and osteochondral lesions. Traditional two-dimensional (2D) MRI provides a high image signal and contrast of anatomic structures for accurately characterizing articular cartilage, bone marrow, synovium, ligaments, tendons, and nerves. However, 2D MRI limitations are thick slices and fixed slice orientations. In clinical practice, 2D MRI is limited to 2 to 3 mm slice thickness, which can cause blurred contours of oblique structures due to volume averaging effects within the image slice. In addition, image plane orientations are fixated and cannot be changed after the scan, resulting in 2D MRI lacking multiplanar and multiaxial reformation abilities for individualized image plane orientations along oblique and curved anatomic structures, such as ankle ligaments and tendons. In contrast, three-dimensional (3D) MRI is a newer, clinically available MRI technique capable of acquiring high-resolution ankle MRI data sets with isotropic voxel size. The inherently high spatial resolution of 3D MRI permits up to five times thinner (0.5 mm) image slices. In addition, 3D MRI can be acquired image voxel with the same edge length in all three space dimensions (isotropism), permitting unrestricted multiplanar and multiaxial image reformation and postprocessing after the MRI scan. Clinical 3D MRI of the ankle with 0.5 to 0.7 mm isotropic voxel size resolves the smallest anatomic ankle structures and abnormalities of ligament and tendon fibers, osteochondral lesions, and nerves. After acquiring the images, operators can align image planes individually along any anatomic structure of interest, such as ligaments and tendons segments. In addition, curved multiplanar image reformations can unfold the entire course of multiaxially curved structures, such as perimalleolar tendons, into one image plane. We recommend adding 3D MRI pulse sequences to traditional 2D MRI protocols to visualize small and curved ankle structures to better advantage. This article provides an overview of the clinical application of 3D MRI of the ankle, compares diagnostic performances of 2D and 3D MRI for diagnosing ankle abnormalities, and illustrates clinical 3D ankle MRI applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Fritz
- Department of Radiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Forchstrasse 340, Zurich 8008, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Cesar de Cesar Netto
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
| | - Jan Fritz
- Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 660 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kwee RM, Amasha AAH, Kwee TC. Reading Times of Common Musculoskeletal MRI Examinations: A Survey Study. Tomography 2024; 10:1527-1533. [PMID: 39330758 PMCID: PMC11435788 DOI: 10.3390/tomography10090112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2024] [Revised: 09/09/2024] [Accepted: 09/18/2024] [Indexed: 09/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The workload of musculoskeletal radiologists has come under pressure. Our objective was to estimate the reading times of common musculoskeletal MRI examinations. METHODS A total of 144 radiologists were asked to estimate reading times (including interpretation and reporting) for MRI of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee, and ankle. Multivariate linear regression analyses were performed. RESULTS Reported median reading times with interquartile range (IQR) for the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee, and ankle were 10 (IQR 6-14), 10 (IQR 6-14), 11 (IQR 7.5-14.5), 10 (IQR 6.6-13.4), 8 (IQR 4.6-11.4), and 10 (IQR 6.5-13.5) min, respectively. Radiologists aged 35-44 years reported shorter reading times for the shoulder (β coefficient [β] = B-3.412, p = 0.041), hip (β = -3.596, p = 0.023), and knee (β = -3.541, p = 0.013) than radiologists aged 45-54 years. Radiologists not working in an academic/teaching hospital reported shorter reading times for the hip (β = -3.611, p = 0.025) and knee (β = -3.038, p = 0.035). Female radiologists indicated longer reading times for all joints (β of 2.592 to 5.186, p ≤ 0.034). Radiologists without musculoskeletal fellowship training indicated longer reading times for the shoulder (β = 4.604, p = 0.005), elbow (β = 3.989, p = 0.038), wrist (β = 4.543, p = 0.014), and hip (β = 2.380, p = 0.119). Radiologists with <5 years of post-residency experience indicated longer reading times for all joints (β of 5.355 to 6.984, p ≤ 0.045), and radiologists with 5-10 years of post-residency experience reported longer reading time for the knee (β = 3.660, p = 0.045) than those with >10 years of post-residency experience. CONCLUSIONS There is substantial variation among radiologists in reported reading times for common musculoskeletal MRI examinations. Several radiologist-related determinants appear to be associated with reading speed, including age, gender, hospital type, training, and experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert M Kwee
- Zuyderland Medical Center, 6419 PC Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Asaad A H Amasha
- University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas C Kwee
- University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vosshenrich J, Koerzdoerfer G, Fritz J. Modern acceleration in musculoskeletal MRI: applications, implications, and challenges. Skeletal Radiol 2024; 53:1799-1813. [PMID: 38441617 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-024-04634-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/09/2024]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial for accurately diagnosing a wide spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions due to its superior soft tissue contrast resolution. However, the long acquisition times of traditional two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) fast and turbo spin-echo (TSE) pulse sequences can limit patient access and comfort. Recent technical advancements have introduced acceleration techniques that significantly reduce MRI times for musculoskeletal examinations. Key acceleration methods include parallel imaging (PI), simultaneous multi-slice acquisition (SMS), and compressed sensing (CS), enabling up to eightfold faster scans while maintaining image quality, resolution, and safety standards. These innovations now allow for 3- to 6-fold accelerated clinical musculoskeletal MRI exams, reducing scan times to 4 to 6 min for joints and spine imaging. Evolving deep learning-based image reconstruction promises even faster scans without compromising quality. Current research indicates that combining acceleration techniques, deep learning image reconstruction, and superresolution algorithms will eventually facilitate tenfold accelerated musculoskeletal MRI in routine clinical practice. Such rapid MRI protocols can drastically reduce scan times by 80-90% compared to conventional methods. Implementing these rapid imaging protocols does impact workflow, indirect costs, and workload for MRI technologists and radiologists, which requires careful management. However, the shift from conventional to accelerated, deep learning-based MRI enhances the value of musculoskeletal MRI by improving patient access and comfort and promoting sustainable imaging practices. This article offers a comprehensive overview of the technical aspects, benefits, and challenges of modern accelerated musculoskeletal MRI, guiding radiologists and researchers in this evolving field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Vosshenrich
- Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Jan Fritz
- Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bogdanovic S, Staib M, Schleiniger M, Steiner L, Schwarz L, Germann C, Sutter R, Fritz B. AI-Based Measurement of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis on MRI: External Evaluation of a Fully Automated Model. Invest Radiol 2024; 59:656-666. [PMID: 38426719 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000001070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to clinically validate a fully automated AI model for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based quantifications of lumbar spinal canal stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study included lumbar spine MRI of 100 consecutive clinical patients (56 ± 17 years; 43 females, 57 males) performed on clinical 1.5 (51 examinations) and 3 T MRI scanners (49 examinations) with heterogeneous clinical imaging protocols. The AI model performed segmentations of the thecal sac on axial T2-weighted sequences. Based on these segmentations, the anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) distance, and the area of the thecal sac were measured in a fully automated manner. For comparison, 2 fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists performed the same segmentations and measurements independently. Statistics included 1-sample t tests, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman plots, and Dice coefficients. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS The average measurements of the AI model, reader 1, and reader 2 were 194 ± 72 mm 2 , 181 ± 71 mm 2 , and 179 ± 70 mm 2 for thecal sac area, 13 ± 3.3 mm, 12.6 ± 3.3 mm, and 12.6 ± 3.2 mm for AP distance, and 19.5 ± 3.9 mm, 20 ± 4.3 mm, and 19.4 ± 4 mm for ML distance, respectively. Significant differences existed for all pairwise comparisons, besides reader 1 versus AI model for the ML distance and reader 1 versus reader 2 for the AP distance ( P = 0.1 and P = 0.21, respectively). The pairwise mean absolute errors among reader 1, reader 2, and the AI model ranged from 0.59 mm and 0.75 mm for the AP distance, from 1.16 mm to 1.37 mm for the ML distance, and from 7.9 mm 2 to 15.54 mm 2 for the thecal sac area. Pairwise ICCs among reader 1, reader 2, and the AI model ranged from 0.91 and 0.94 for the AP distance and from 0.86 to 0.9 for the ML distance without significant differences. For the thecal sac area, the pairwise ICC between both readers and the AI model of 0.97 each was slightly, but significantly lower than the ICC between reader 1 and reader 2 of 0.99. Similarly, the Dice coefficient and Hausdorff distance between both readers and the AI model were significantly lower than the values between reader 1 and reader 2, overall ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 for the Dice coefficients and 1.1 to 1.44 for the Hausdorff distances. CONCLUSIONS The investigated AI model is reliable for assessing the AP and the ML thecal sac diameters with human level accuracies. The small differences for measurement and segmentation of the thecal sac area between the AI model and the radiologists are likely within a clinically acceptable range.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanja Bogdanovic
- From the Radiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland (S.B., C.G., R.S., B.F.); Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (S.B., C.G., R.S., B.F.); and ScanDiags AG, Zurich, Switzerland (M. Staib, M. Schleiniger, L. Steiner, and L. Schwarz)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schlicht F, Vosshenrich J, Donners R, Seifert AC, Fenchel M, Nickel D, Obmann M, Harder D, Breit HC. Advanced deep learning-based image reconstruction in lumbar spine MRI at 0.55 T - Effects on image quality and acquisition time in comparison to conventional deep learning-based reconstruction. Eur J Radiol Open 2024; 12:100567. [PMID: 38711678 PMCID: PMC11070664 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate an optimized deep leaning-based image post-processing technique in lumbar spine MRI at 0.55 T in terms of image quality and image acquisition time. Materials and methods Lumbar spine imaging was conducted on 18 patients using a 0.55 T MRI scanner, employing conventional (CDLR) and advanced (ADLR) deep learning-based post-processing techniques. Two musculoskeletal radiologists visually evaluated the images using a 5-point Likert scale to assess image quality and resolution. Quantitative assessment in terms of signal intensities (SI) and contrast ratios was performed by region of interest measurements in different body-tissues (vertebral bone, intervertebral disc, spinal cord, cerebrospinal fluid and autochthonous back muscles) to investigate differences between CDLR and ADLR sequences. Results The images processed with the advanced technique (ADLR) were rated superior to the conventional technique (CDLR) in terms of signal/contrast, resolution, and assessability of the spinal canal and neural foramen. The interrater agreement was moderate for signal/contrast (ICC = 0.68) and good for resolution (ICC = 0.77), but moderate for spinal canal and neuroforaminal assessability (ICC = 0.55). Quantitative assessment showed a higher contrast ratio for fluid-sensitive sequences in the ADLR images. The use of ADLR reduced image acquisition time by 44.4%, from 14:22 min to 07:59 min. Conclusions Advanced deep learning-based image reconstruction algorithms improve the visually perceived image quality in lumbar spine imaging at 0.55 T while simultaneously allowing to substantially decrease image acquisition times. Clinical relevance Advanced deep learning-based image post-processing techniques (ADLR) in lumbar spine MRI at 0.55 T significantly improves image quality while reducing image acquisition time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Schlicht
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, Basel 4031, Switzerland
| | - Jan Vosshenrich
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, Basel 4031, Switzerland
| | - Ricardo Donners
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, Basel 4031, Switzerland
| | - Alina Carolin Seifert
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, Basel 4031, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Fenchel
- Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Magnetic Resonance, Allee am Röthelheimpark 2, Erlangen 91052, Germany
| | - Dominik Nickel
- Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Magnetic Resonance, Allee am Röthelheimpark 2, Erlangen 91052, Germany
| | - Markus Obmann
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, Basel 4031, Switzerland
| | - Dorothee Harder
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, Basel 4031, Switzerland
| | - Hanns-Christian Breit
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, Basel 4031, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Al Mohammad B, Aldaradkeh A, Gharaibeh M, Reed W. Assessing radiologists' and radiographers' perceptions on artificial intelligence integration: opportunities and challenges. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:763-769. [PMID: 38273675 PMCID: PMC11027289 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Revised: 09/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to evaluate radiologists' and radiographers' opinions and perspectives on artificial intelligence (AI) and its integration into the radiology department. Additionally, we investigated the most common challenges and barriers that radiologists and radiographers face when learning about AI. METHODS A nationwide, online descriptive cross-sectional survey was distributed to radiologists and radiographers working in hospitals and medical centres from May 29, 2023 to July 30, 2023. The questionnaire examined the participants' opinions, feelings, and predictions regarding AI and its applications in the radiology department. Descriptive statistics were used to report the participants' demographics and responses. Five-points Likert-scale data were reported using divergent stacked bar graphs to highlight any central tendencies. RESULTS Responses were collected from 258 participants, revealing a positive attitude towards implementing AI. Both radiologists and radiographers predicted breast imaging would be the subspecialty most impacted by the AI revolution. MRI, mammography, and CT were identified as the primary modalities with significant importance in the field of AI application. The major barrier encountered by radiologists and radiographers when learning about AI was the lack of mentorship, guidance, and support from experts. CONCLUSION Participants demonstrated a positive attitude towards learning about AI and implementing it in the radiology practice. However, radiologists and radiographers encounter several barriers when learning about AI, such as the absence of experienced professionals support and direction. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Radiologists and radiographers reported several barriers to AI learning, with the most significant being the lack of mentorship and guidance from experts, followed by the lack of funding and investment in new technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Badera Al Mohammad
- Department of Allied Medical Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan
| | - Afnan Aldaradkeh
- Department of Allied Medical Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan
| | - Monther Gharaibeh
- Department of Special Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa 13133, Jordan
| | - Warren Reed
- Discipline of Medical Imaging Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney 2006, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Faghani S, Patel S, Rhodes NG, Powell GM, Baffour FI, Moassefi M, Glazebrook KN, Erickson BJ, Tiegs-Heiden CA. Deep-learning for automated detection of MSU deposits on DECT: evaluating impact on efficiency and reader confidence. FRONTIERS IN RADIOLOGY 2024; 4:1330399. [PMID: 38440382 PMCID: PMC10909828 DOI: 10.3389/fradi.2024.1330399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Dual-energy CT (DECT) is a non-invasive way to determine the presence of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals in the workup of gout. Color-coding distinguishes MSU from calcium following material decomposition and post-processing. Manually identifying these foci (most commonly labeled green) is tedious, and an automated detection system could streamline the process. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a deep-learning (DL) algorithm developed for detecting green pixelations on DECT on reader time, accuracy, and confidence. Methods We collected a sample of positive and negative DECTs, reviewed twice-once with and once without the DL tool-with a 2-week washout period. An attending musculoskeletal radiologist and a fellow separately reviewed the cases, simulating clinical workflow. Metrics such as time taken, confidence in diagnosis, and the tool's helpfulness were recorded and statistically analyzed. Results We included thirty DECTs from different patients. The DL tool significantly reduced the reading time for the trainee radiologist (p = 0.02), but not for the attending radiologist (p = 0.15). Diagnostic confidence remained unchanged for both (p = 0.45). However, the DL model identified tiny MSU deposits that led to a change in diagnosis in two cases for the in-training radiologist and one case for the attending radiologist. In 3/3 of these cases, the diagnosis was correct when using DL. Conclusions The implementation of the developed DL model slightly reduced reading time for our less experienced reader and led to improved diagnostic accuracy. There was no statistically significant difference in diagnostic confidence when studies were interpreted without and with the DL model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahriar Faghani
- Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Soham Patel
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | | | - Garret M. Powell
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | | | - Mana Moassefi
- Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | | | - Bradley J. Erickson
- Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Guermazi A, Omoumi P, Tordjman M, Fritz J, Kijowski R, Regnard NE, Carrino J, Kahn CE, Knoll F, Rueckert D, Roemer FW, Hayashi D. How AI May Transform Musculoskeletal Imaging. Radiology 2024; 310:e230764. [PMID: 38165245 PMCID: PMC10831478 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.230764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Revised: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
While musculoskeletal imaging volumes are increasing, there is a relative shortage of subspecialized musculoskeletal radiologists to interpret the studies. Will artificial intelligence (AI) be the solution? For AI to be the solution, the wide implementation of AI-supported data acquisition methods in clinical practice requires establishing trusted and reliable results. This implementation will demand close collaboration between core AI researchers and clinical radiologists. Upon successful clinical implementation, a wide variety of AI-based tools can improve the musculoskeletal radiologist's workflow by triaging imaging examinations, helping with image interpretation, and decreasing the reporting time. Additional AI applications may also be helpful for business, education, and research purposes if successfully integrated into the daily practice of musculoskeletal radiology. The question is not whether AI will replace radiologists, but rather how musculoskeletal radiologists can take advantage of AI to enhance their expert capabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Guermazi
- From the Department of Radiology, Boston University School of
Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G., F.W.R., D.H.); Department of Radiology, VA Boston
Healthcare System, 1400 VFW Parkway, Suite 1B105, West Roxbury, MA 02132 (A.G.);
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of
Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (P.O.); Department of Radiology, Hotel Dieu
Hospital and University Paris Cité, Paris, France (M.T.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.,
R.K.); Gleamer, Paris, France (N.E.R.); Réseau d’Imagerie Sud
Francilien, Clinique du Mousseau Ramsay Santé, Evry, France (N.E.R.);
Pôle Médical Sénart, Lieusaint, France (N.E.R.); Department
of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell
Medicine, New York, NY (J.C.); Department of Radiology and Institute for
Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Penn (C.E.K.);
Departments of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (F.K.) and
Radiology (F.W.R.), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen &
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen,
Germany (F.K.); School of Medicine & Computation, Information and
Technology Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich,
München, Germany (D.R.); Department of Computing, Imperial College
London, London, England (D.R.); and Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical
Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (D.H.)
| | - Patrick Omoumi
- From the Department of Radiology, Boston University School of
Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G., F.W.R., D.H.); Department of Radiology, VA Boston
Healthcare System, 1400 VFW Parkway, Suite 1B105, West Roxbury, MA 02132 (A.G.);
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of
Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (P.O.); Department of Radiology, Hotel Dieu
Hospital and University Paris Cité, Paris, France (M.T.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.,
R.K.); Gleamer, Paris, France (N.E.R.); Réseau d’Imagerie Sud
Francilien, Clinique du Mousseau Ramsay Santé, Evry, France (N.E.R.);
Pôle Médical Sénart, Lieusaint, France (N.E.R.); Department
of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell
Medicine, New York, NY (J.C.); Department of Radiology and Institute for
Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Penn (C.E.K.);
Departments of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (F.K.) and
Radiology (F.W.R.), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen &
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen,
Germany (F.K.); School of Medicine & Computation, Information and
Technology Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich,
München, Germany (D.R.); Department of Computing, Imperial College
London, London, England (D.R.); and Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical
Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (D.H.)
| | - Mickael Tordjman
- From the Department of Radiology, Boston University School of
Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G., F.W.R., D.H.); Department of Radiology, VA Boston
Healthcare System, 1400 VFW Parkway, Suite 1B105, West Roxbury, MA 02132 (A.G.);
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of
Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (P.O.); Department of Radiology, Hotel Dieu
Hospital and University Paris Cité, Paris, France (M.T.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.,
R.K.); Gleamer, Paris, France (N.E.R.); Réseau d’Imagerie Sud
Francilien, Clinique du Mousseau Ramsay Santé, Evry, France (N.E.R.);
Pôle Médical Sénart, Lieusaint, France (N.E.R.); Department
of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell
Medicine, New York, NY (J.C.); Department of Radiology and Institute for
Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Penn (C.E.K.);
Departments of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (F.K.) and
Radiology (F.W.R.), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen &
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen,
Germany (F.K.); School of Medicine & Computation, Information and
Technology Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich,
München, Germany (D.R.); Department of Computing, Imperial College
London, London, England (D.R.); and Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical
Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (D.H.)
| | - Jan Fritz
- From the Department of Radiology, Boston University School of
Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G., F.W.R., D.H.); Department of Radiology, VA Boston
Healthcare System, 1400 VFW Parkway, Suite 1B105, West Roxbury, MA 02132 (A.G.);
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of
Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (P.O.); Department of Radiology, Hotel Dieu
Hospital and University Paris Cité, Paris, France (M.T.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.,
R.K.); Gleamer, Paris, France (N.E.R.); Réseau d’Imagerie Sud
Francilien, Clinique du Mousseau Ramsay Santé, Evry, France (N.E.R.);
Pôle Médical Sénart, Lieusaint, France (N.E.R.); Department
of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell
Medicine, New York, NY (J.C.); Department of Radiology and Institute for
Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Penn (C.E.K.);
Departments of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (F.K.) and
Radiology (F.W.R.), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen &
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen,
Germany (F.K.); School of Medicine & Computation, Information and
Technology Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich,
München, Germany (D.R.); Department of Computing, Imperial College
London, London, England (D.R.); and Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical
Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (D.H.)
| | - Richard Kijowski
- From the Department of Radiology, Boston University School of
Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G., F.W.R., D.H.); Department of Radiology, VA Boston
Healthcare System, 1400 VFW Parkway, Suite 1B105, West Roxbury, MA 02132 (A.G.);
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of
Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (P.O.); Department of Radiology, Hotel Dieu
Hospital and University Paris Cité, Paris, France (M.T.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.,
R.K.); Gleamer, Paris, France (N.E.R.); Réseau d’Imagerie Sud
Francilien, Clinique du Mousseau Ramsay Santé, Evry, France (N.E.R.);
Pôle Médical Sénart, Lieusaint, France (N.E.R.); Department
of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell
Medicine, New York, NY (J.C.); Department of Radiology and Institute for
Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Penn (C.E.K.);
Departments of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (F.K.) and
Radiology (F.W.R.), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen &
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen,
Germany (F.K.); School of Medicine & Computation, Information and
Technology Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich,
München, Germany (D.R.); Department of Computing, Imperial College
London, London, England (D.R.); and Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical
Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (D.H.)
| | - Nor-Eddine Regnard
- From the Department of Radiology, Boston University School of
Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G., F.W.R., D.H.); Department of Radiology, VA Boston
Healthcare System, 1400 VFW Parkway, Suite 1B105, West Roxbury, MA 02132 (A.G.);
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of
Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (P.O.); Department of Radiology, Hotel Dieu
Hospital and University Paris Cité, Paris, France (M.T.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.,
R.K.); Gleamer, Paris, France (N.E.R.); Réseau d’Imagerie Sud
Francilien, Clinique du Mousseau Ramsay Santé, Evry, France (N.E.R.);
Pôle Médical Sénart, Lieusaint, France (N.E.R.); Department
of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell
Medicine, New York, NY (J.C.); Department of Radiology and Institute for
Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Penn (C.E.K.);
Departments of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (F.K.) and
Radiology (F.W.R.), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen &
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen,
Germany (F.K.); School of Medicine & Computation, Information and
Technology Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich,
München, Germany (D.R.); Department of Computing, Imperial College
London, London, England (D.R.); and Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical
Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (D.H.)
| | - John Carrino
- From the Department of Radiology, Boston University School of
Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G., F.W.R., D.H.); Department of Radiology, VA Boston
Healthcare System, 1400 VFW Parkway, Suite 1B105, West Roxbury, MA 02132 (A.G.);
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of
Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (P.O.); Department of Radiology, Hotel Dieu
Hospital and University Paris Cité, Paris, France (M.T.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.,
R.K.); Gleamer, Paris, France (N.E.R.); Réseau d’Imagerie Sud
Francilien, Clinique du Mousseau Ramsay Santé, Evry, France (N.E.R.);
Pôle Médical Sénart, Lieusaint, France (N.E.R.); Department
of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell
Medicine, New York, NY (J.C.); Department of Radiology and Institute for
Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Penn (C.E.K.);
Departments of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (F.K.) and
Radiology (F.W.R.), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen &
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen,
Germany (F.K.); School of Medicine & Computation, Information and
Technology Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich,
München, Germany (D.R.); Department of Computing, Imperial College
London, London, England (D.R.); and Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical
Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (D.H.)
| | - Charles E. Kahn
- From the Department of Radiology, Boston University School of
Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G., F.W.R., D.H.); Department of Radiology, VA Boston
Healthcare System, 1400 VFW Parkway, Suite 1B105, West Roxbury, MA 02132 (A.G.);
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of
Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (P.O.); Department of Radiology, Hotel Dieu
Hospital and University Paris Cité, Paris, France (M.T.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.,
R.K.); Gleamer, Paris, France (N.E.R.); Réseau d’Imagerie Sud
Francilien, Clinique du Mousseau Ramsay Santé, Evry, France (N.E.R.);
Pôle Médical Sénart, Lieusaint, France (N.E.R.); Department
of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell
Medicine, New York, NY (J.C.); Department of Radiology and Institute for
Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Penn (C.E.K.);
Departments of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (F.K.) and
Radiology (F.W.R.), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen &
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen,
Germany (F.K.); School of Medicine & Computation, Information and
Technology Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich,
München, Germany (D.R.); Department of Computing, Imperial College
London, London, England (D.R.); and Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical
Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (D.H.)
| | - Florian Knoll
- From the Department of Radiology, Boston University School of
Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G., F.W.R., D.H.); Department of Radiology, VA Boston
Healthcare System, 1400 VFW Parkway, Suite 1B105, West Roxbury, MA 02132 (A.G.);
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of
Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (P.O.); Department of Radiology, Hotel Dieu
Hospital and University Paris Cité, Paris, France (M.T.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.,
R.K.); Gleamer, Paris, France (N.E.R.); Réseau d’Imagerie Sud
Francilien, Clinique du Mousseau Ramsay Santé, Evry, France (N.E.R.);
Pôle Médical Sénart, Lieusaint, France (N.E.R.); Department
of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell
Medicine, New York, NY (J.C.); Department of Radiology and Institute for
Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Penn (C.E.K.);
Departments of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (F.K.) and
Radiology (F.W.R.), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen &
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen,
Germany (F.K.); School of Medicine & Computation, Information and
Technology Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich,
München, Germany (D.R.); Department of Computing, Imperial College
London, London, England (D.R.); and Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical
Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (D.H.)
| | - Daniel Rueckert
- From the Department of Radiology, Boston University School of
Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G., F.W.R., D.H.); Department of Radiology, VA Boston
Healthcare System, 1400 VFW Parkway, Suite 1B105, West Roxbury, MA 02132 (A.G.);
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of
Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (P.O.); Department of Radiology, Hotel Dieu
Hospital and University Paris Cité, Paris, France (M.T.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.,
R.K.); Gleamer, Paris, France (N.E.R.); Réseau d’Imagerie Sud
Francilien, Clinique du Mousseau Ramsay Santé, Evry, France (N.E.R.);
Pôle Médical Sénart, Lieusaint, France (N.E.R.); Department
of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell
Medicine, New York, NY (J.C.); Department of Radiology and Institute for
Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Penn (C.E.K.);
Departments of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (F.K.) and
Radiology (F.W.R.), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen &
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen,
Germany (F.K.); School of Medicine & Computation, Information and
Technology Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich,
München, Germany (D.R.); Department of Computing, Imperial College
London, London, England (D.R.); and Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical
Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (D.H.)
| | - Frank W. Roemer
- From the Department of Radiology, Boston University School of
Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G., F.W.R., D.H.); Department of Radiology, VA Boston
Healthcare System, 1400 VFW Parkway, Suite 1B105, West Roxbury, MA 02132 (A.G.);
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of
Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (P.O.); Department of Radiology, Hotel Dieu
Hospital and University Paris Cité, Paris, France (M.T.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.,
R.K.); Gleamer, Paris, France (N.E.R.); Réseau d’Imagerie Sud
Francilien, Clinique du Mousseau Ramsay Santé, Evry, France (N.E.R.);
Pôle Médical Sénart, Lieusaint, France (N.E.R.); Department
of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell
Medicine, New York, NY (J.C.); Department of Radiology and Institute for
Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Penn (C.E.K.);
Departments of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (F.K.) and
Radiology (F.W.R.), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen &
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen,
Germany (F.K.); School of Medicine & Computation, Information and
Technology Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich,
München, Germany (D.R.); Department of Computing, Imperial College
London, London, England (D.R.); and Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical
Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (D.H.)
| | - Daichi Hayashi
- From the Department of Radiology, Boston University School of
Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G., F.W.R., D.H.); Department of Radiology, VA Boston
Healthcare System, 1400 VFW Parkway, Suite 1B105, West Roxbury, MA 02132 (A.G.);
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of
Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (P.O.); Department of Radiology, Hotel Dieu
Hospital and University Paris Cité, Paris, France (M.T.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.,
R.K.); Gleamer, Paris, France (N.E.R.); Réseau d’Imagerie Sud
Francilien, Clinique du Mousseau Ramsay Santé, Evry, France (N.E.R.);
Pôle Médical Sénart, Lieusaint, France (N.E.R.); Department
of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell
Medicine, New York, NY (J.C.); Department of Radiology and Institute for
Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Penn (C.E.K.);
Departments of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (F.K.) and
Radiology (F.W.R.), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen &
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen,
Germany (F.K.); School of Medicine & Computation, Information and
Technology Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich,
München, Germany (D.R.); Department of Computing, Imperial College
London, London, England (D.R.); and Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical
Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (D.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Khan MA. HLA-B*27 and Ankylosing Spondylitis: 50 Years of Insights and Discoveries. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2023; 25:327-340. [PMID: 37950822 DOI: 10.1007/s11926-023-01118-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To commemorate the 50th anniversary of the groundbreaking discovery of a remarkably strong association between HLA-B*27 and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). RECENT FINDINGS In addition to HLA-B*27, more than 116 other recognized genetic risk variants have been identified, while epigenetic factors largely remain unexplored in this context. Among patients with AS who carry the HLA-B*27 gene, clonally expanded CD8 + T cells can be found in their bloodstream and within inflamed tissues. Moreover, the α and β chain motifs of these T-cell receptors demonstrate a distinct affinity for certain self- and microbial-derived peptides, leading to an autoimmune response that ultimately results in the onset of the disease. These distinctive peptide-binding and presentation characteristics are a hallmark of the disease-associated HLA-B*27:05 subtype but are absent in HLA-B*27:09, a subtype not associated with the disease, differing by only a single amino acid. This discovery represents a significant advancement in unraveling the 50-year-old puzzle of how HLA-B*27 contributes to the development of AS. These findings will significantly accelerate the process of identifying peptides, both self- and microbial-derived, that instigate autoimmunity. This, in return, will pave the way for the development of more accurate and effective targeted treatments. Moreover, the discovery of improved biomarkers, in conjunction with the emerging technology of electric field molecular fingerprinting, has the potential to greatly bolster early diagnosis capabilities. A very recently published groundbreak paper underscores the remarkable effectiveness of targeting and eliminating disease-causing T cells in a HLA-B*27 patients with AS. This pivotal advancement not only signifies a paradigm shift but also bolsters the potential for preventing the disease in individuals carrying high-risk genetic variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad A Khan
- Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Adler RS. Musculoskeletal ultrasound: a technical and historical perspective. J Ultrason 2023; 23:e172-e187. [PMID: 38020513 PMCID: PMC10668930 DOI: 10.15557/jou.2023.0027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
During the past four decades, musculoskeletal ultrasound has become popular as an imaging modality due to its low cost, accessibility, and lack of ionizing radiation. The development of ultrasound technology was possible in large part due to concomitant advances in both solid-state electronics and signal processing. The invention of the transistor and digital computer in the late 1940s was integral in its development. Moore's prediction that the number of microprocessors on a chip would grow exponentially, resulting in progressive miniaturization in chip design and therefore increased computational power, added to these capabilities. The development of musculoskeletal ultrasound has paralleled technical advances in diagnostic ultrasound. The appearance of a large variety of transducer capabilities and rapid image processing along with the ability to assess vascularity and tissue properties has expanded and continues to expand the role of musculoskeletal ultrasound. It should also be noted that these developments have in large part been due to a number of individuals who had the insight to see the potential applications of this developing technology to a host of relevant clinical musculoskeletal problems. Exquisite high-resolution images of both deep and small superficial musculoskeletal anatomy, assessment of vascularity on a capillary level and tissue mechanical properties can be obtained. Ultrasound has also been recognized as the method of choice to perform a large variety of interventional procedures. A brief review of these technical developments, the timeline over which these improvements occurred, and the impact on musculoskeletal ultrasound is presented below.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald Steven Adler
- Department of Radiology, New York University, Grossman School of Medicine, Langone Orthopedic Center, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fritz B, de Cesar Netto C, Fritz J. Multiaxial 3D MRI of the Ankle: Advanced High-Resolution Visualization of Ligaments, Tendons, and Articular Cartilage. Foot Ankle Clin 2023; 28:529-550. [PMID: 37536817 DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2023.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
MRI is a valuable tool for diagnosing a broad spectrum of acute and chronic ankle disorders, including ligament tears, tendinopathy, and osteochondral lesions. Traditional two-dimensional (2D) MRI provides a high image signal and contrast of anatomic structures for accurately characterizing articular cartilage, bone marrow, synovium, ligaments, tendons, and nerves. However, 2D MRI limitations are thick slices and fixed slice orientations. In clinical practice, 2D MRI is limited to 2 to 3 mm slice thickness, which can cause blurred contours of oblique structures due to volume averaging effects within the image slice. In addition, image plane orientations are fixated and cannot be changed after the scan, resulting in 2D MRI lacking multiplanar and multiaxial reformation abilities for individualized image plane orientations along oblique and curved anatomic structures, such as ankle ligaments and tendons. In contrast, three-dimensional (3D) MRI is a newer, clinically available MRI technique capable of acquiring high-resolution ankle MRI data sets with isotropic voxel size. The inherently high spatial resolution of 3D MRI permits up to five times thinner (0.5 mm) image slices. In addition, 3D MRI can be acquired image voxel with the same edge length in all three space dimensions (isotropism), permitting unrestricted multiplanar and multiaxial image reformation and postprocessing after the MRI scan. Clinical 3D MRI of the ankle with 0.5 to 0.7 mm isotropic voxel size resolves the smallest anatomic ankle structures and abnormalities of ligament and tendon fibers, osteochondral lesions, and nerves. After acquiring the images, operators can align image planes individually along any anatomic structure of interest, such as ligaments and tendons segments. In addition, curved multiplanar image reformations can unfold the entire course of multiaxially curved structures, such as perimalleolar tendons, into one image plane. We recommend adding 3D MRI pulse sequences to traditional 2D MRI protocols to visualize small and curved ankle structures to better advantage. This article provides an overview of the clinical application of 3D MRI of the ankle, compares diagnostic performances of 2D and 3D MRI for diagnosing ankle abnormalities, and illustrates clinical 3D ankle MRI applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Fritz
- Department of Radiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Forchstrasse 340, Zurich 8008, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Cesar de Cesar Netto
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
| | - Jan Fritz
- Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 660 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fritz J, Rashidi A, de Cesar Netto C. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Total Ankle Arthroplasty: State-of-The-Art Assessment of Implant-Related Pain and Dysfunction. Foot Ankle Clin 2023; 28:463-492. [PMID: 37536814 DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2023.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is an effective alternative for treating patients with end-stage ankle degeneration, improving mobility, and providing pain relief. Implant survivorship is constantly improving; however, complications occur. Many causes of pain and dysfunction after total ankle arthroplasty can be diagnosed accurately with clinical examination, laboratory, radiography, and computer tomography. However, when there are no or inconclusive imaging findings, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is highly accurate in identifying and characterizing bone resorption, osteolysis, infection, osseous stress reactions, nondisplaced fractures, polyethylene damage, nerve injuries and neuropathies, as well as tendon and ligament tears. Multiple vendors offer effective, clinically available MRI techniques for metal artifact reduction MRI of total ankle arthroplasty. This article reviews the MRI appearances of common TAA implant systems, clinically available techniques and protocols for metal artifact reduction MRI of TAA implants, and the MRI appearances of a broad spectrum of TAA-related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Fritz
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Ali Rashidi
- Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 660 1st Ave, 3rd Floor, Rm 313, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Cesar de Cesar Netto
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at StanDepartment of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Recht MP, White LM, Fritz J, Resnick DL. Advances in Musculoskeletal Imaging: Recent Developments and Predictions for the Future. Radiology 2023; 308:e230615. [PMID: 37642575 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.230615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P Recht
- From the Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 660 First Ave, 3rd Floor, New York, NY 10016 (M.P.R., J.F.); Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Sinai Health System and Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada (L.M.W.); and Department of Radiology, UCSD Teleradiology and Education Center, La Jolla, Calif (D.L.R.)
| | - Lawrence M White
- From the Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 660 First Ave, 3rd Floor, New York, NY 10016 (M.P.R., J.F.); Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Sinai Health System and Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada (L.M.W.); and Department of Radiology, UCSD Teleradiology and Education Center, La Jolla, Calif (D.L.R.)
| | - Jan Fritz
- From the Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 660 First Ave, 3rd Floor, New York, NY 10016 (M.P.R., J.F.); Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Sinai Health System and Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada (L.M.W.); and Department of Radiology, UCSD Teleradiology and Education Center, La Jolla, Calif (D.L.R.)
| | - Donald L Resnick
- From the Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 660 First Ave, 3rd Floor, New York, NY 10016 (M.P.R., J.F.); Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Sinai Health System and Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada (L.M.W.); and Department of Radiology, UCSD Teleradiology and Education Center, La Jolla, Calif (D.L.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lin DJ, Schwier M, Geiger B, Raithel E, von Busch H, Fritz J, Kline M, Brooks M, Dunham K, Shukla M, Alaia EF, Samim M, Joshi V, Walter WR, Ellermann JM, Ilaslan H, Rubin D, Winalski CS, Recht MP. Deep Learning Diagnosis and Classification of Rotator Cuff Tears on Shoulder MRI. Invest Radiol 2023; 58:405-412. [PMID: 36728041 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Detection of rotator cuff tears, a common cause of shoulder disability, can be time-consuming and subject to reader variability. Deep learning (DL) has the potential to increase radiologist accuracy and consistency. PURPOSE The aim of this study was to develop a prototype DL model for detection and classification of rotator cuff tears on shoulder magnetic resonance imaging into no tear, partial-thickness tear, or full-thickness tear. MATERIALS AND METHODS This Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant, institutional review board-approved study included a total of 11,925 noncontrast shoulder magnetic resonance imaging scans from 2 institutions, with 11,405 for development and 520 dedicated for final testing. A DL ensemble algorithm was developed that used 4 series as input from each examination: fluid-sensitive sequences in 3 planes and a sagittal oblique T1-weighted sequence. Radiology reports served as ground truth for training with categories of no tear, partial tear, or full-thickness tear. A multireader study was conducted for the test set ground truth, which was determined by the majority vote of 3 readers per case. The ensemble comprised 4 parallel 3D ResNet50 convolutional neural network architectures trained via transfer learning and then adapted to the targeted domain. The final tear-type prediction was determined as the class with the highest probability, after averaging the class probabilities of the 4 individual models. RESULTS The AUC overall for supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and subscapularis tendon tears was 0.93, 0.89, and 0.90, respectively. The model performed best for full-thickness supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and subscapularis tears with AUCs of 0.98, 0.99, and 0.95, respectively. Multisequence input demonstrated higher AUCs than single-sequence input for infraspinatus and subscapularis tendon tears, whereas coronal oblique fluid-sensitive and multisequence input showed similar AUCs for supraspinatus tendon tears. Model accuracy for tear types and overall accuracy were similar to that of the clinical readers. CONCLUSIONS Deep learning diagnosis of rotator cuff tears is feasible with excellent diagnostic performance, particularly for full-thickness tears, with model accuracy similar to subspecialty-trained musculoskeletal radiologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana J Lin
- From the Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | - Jan Fritz
- From the Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Mitchell Kline
- From the Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Michael Brooks
- From the Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Kevin Dunham
- From the Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Mehool Shukla
- From the Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Erin F Alaia
- From the Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Mohammad Samim
- From the Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Vivek Joshi
- From the Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - William R Walter
- From the Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Jutta M Ellermann
- Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | | | | | | | - Michael P Recht
- From the Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Park EH, Fritz J. The role of imaging in osteoarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2023; 37:101866. [PMID: 37659890 DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2023.101866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/04/2023]
Abstract
Osteoarthritis is a complex whole-organ disorder that involves molecular, anatomic, and physiologic derangement. Advances in imaging techniques have expanded the role of imaging in evaluating osteoarthritis and functional changes. Radiography, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography (CT), and ultrasonography are commonly used imaging modalities, each with advantages and limitations in evaluating osteoarthritis. Radiography comprehensively analyses alignment and osseous features, while MRI provides detailed information about cartilage damage, bone marrow edema, synovitis, and soft tissue abnormalities. Compositional imaging derives quantitative data for detecting cartilage and tendon degeneration before structural damage occurs. Ultrasonography permits real-time scanning and dynamic joint evaluation, whereas CT is useful for assessing final osseous detail. Imaging plays an essential role in the diagnosis, management, and research of osteoarthritis. The use of imaging can help differentiate osteoarthritis from other diseases with similar symptoms, and recent advances in deep learning have made the acquisition, management, and interpretation of imaging data more efficient and accurate. Imaging is useful in monitoring and predicting the prognosis of osteoarthritis, expanding our understanding of its pathophysiology. Ultimately, this enables early detection and personalized medicine for patients with osteoarthritis. This article reviews the current state of imaging in osteoarthritis, focusing on the strengths and limitations of various imaging modalities, and introduces advanced techniques, including deep learning, applied in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun Hae Park
- Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA; Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea
| | - Jan Fritz
- Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Acute knee injury ranges among the most common joint injuries in professional and recreational athletes. Radiographs can detect joint effusion, fractures, deformities, and malalignment; however, MR imaging is most accurate for radiographically occult fractures, chondral injury, and soft tissue injuries. Using a structured checklist approach for systematic MR imaging evaluation and reporting, this article reviews the MR imaging appearances of the spectrum of traumatic knee injuries, including osteochondral injuries, cruciate ligament tears, meniscus tears and ramp lesions, anterolateral complex and collateral ligament injuries, patellofemoral translation, extensor mechanism tears, and nerve and vascular injuries.
Collapse
|
19
|
Fritz B, Fritz J. MR Imaging–Ultrasonography Correlation of Acute and Chronic Foot and Ankle Conditions. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2023; 31:321-335. [PMID: 37019553 DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2023.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]
Abstract
Foot and ankle injuries are common musculoskeletal disorders. In the acute setting, ligamentous injuries are most common, whereas fractures, osseous avulsion injuries, tendon and retinaculum tears, and osteochondral injuries are less common. The most common chronic and overuse injuries include osteochondral and articular cartilage defects, tendinopathies, stress fractures, impingement syndromes, and neuropathies. Common forefoot conditions include traumatic and stress fractures, metatarsophalangeal and plantar plate injuries and degenerations, intermittent bursitis, and perineural fibrosis. Ultrasonography is well-suited for evaluating superficial tendons, ligaments, and muscles. MR imaging is best for deeper-located soft tissue structures, articular cartilage, and cancellous bone.
Collapse
|
20
|
Burke CJ, Fritz J, Samim M. Musculoskeletal Soft-tissue Masses. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2023; 31:285-308. [PMID: 37019551 DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2022.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
Evaluation of soft-tissue masses has become a common clinical practice indication for imaging with both ultrasound and MR imaging. We illustrate the ultrasonography and MR imaging appearances of soft-tissue masses based on the various categories, updates, and reclassifications of the 2020 World Health Organization classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Burke
- NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY 10003, USA.
| | - Jan Fritz
- NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY 10003, USA
| | - Mohammad Samim
- NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY 10003, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rapid lumbar MRI protocol using 3D imaging and deep learning reconstruction. Skeletal Radiol 2023; 52:1331-1338. [PMID: 36602576 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-022-04268-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Revised: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Three-dimensional (3D) imaging of the spine, augmented with AI-enabled image enhancement and denoising, has the potential to reduce imaging times without compromising image quality or diagnostic performance. This work evaluates the time savings afforded by a novel, rapid lumbar spine MRI protocol as well as image quality and diagnostic differences stemming from the use of an AI-enhanced 3D T2 sequence combined with a single Dixon acquisition. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-five subjects underwent MRI using standard 2D lumbar imaging in addition to a "rapid protocol" consisting of 3D imaging, enhanced and denoised using a prototype DL reconstruction algorithm as well as a two-point Dixon sequence. Images were graded by subspecialized radiologists and imaging times were collected. Comparison was made between 2D sagittal T1 and Dixon fat images for neural foraminal stenosis, intraosseous lesions, and fracture detection. RESULTS This study demonstrated a 54% reduction in total acquisition time of a 3D AI-enhanced imaging lumbar spine MRI rapid protocol combined with a sagittal 2D Dixon sequence, compared to a 2D standard-of-care protocol. The rapid protocol also demonstrated strong agreement with the standard-of-care protocol with respect to osseous lesions (κ = 0.88), fracture detection (κ = 0.96), and neural foraminal stenosis (ICC > 0.9 at all levels). CONCLUSION 3D imaging of the lumbar spine with AI-enhanced DL reconstruction and Dixon imaging demonstrated a significant reduction in imaging time with similar performance for common diagnostic metrics. Although previously limited by long postprocessing times, this technique has the potential to enhance patient throughput in busy radiology practices while providing similar or improved image quality.
Collapse
|
22
|
Modern Low-Field MRI of the Musculoskeletal System: Practice Considerations, Opportunities, and Challenges. Invest Radiol 2023; 58:76-87. [PMID: 36165841 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides essential information for diagnosing and treating musculoskeletal disorders. Although most musculoskeletal MRI examinations are performed at 1.5 and 3.0 T, modern low-field MRI systems offer new opportunities for affordable MRI worldwide. In 2021, a 0.55 T modern low-field, whole-body MRI system with an 80-cm-wide bore was introduced for clinical use in the United States and Europe. Compared with current higher-field-strength MRI systems, the 0.55 T MRI system has a lower total ownership cost, including purchase price, installation, and maintenance. Although signal-to-noise ratios scale with field strength, modern signal transmission and receiver chains improve signal yield compared with older low-field magnetic resonance scanner generations. Advanced radiofrequency coils permit short echo spacing and overall compacter echo trains than previously possible. Deep learning-based advanced image reconstruction algorithms provide substantial improvements in perceived signal-to-noise ratios, contrast, and spatial resolution. Musculoskeletal tissue contrast evolutions behave differently at 0.55 T, which requires careful consideration when designing pulse sequences. Similar to other field strengths, parallel imaging and simultaneous multislice acquisition techniques are vital for efficient musculoskeletal MRI acquisitions. Pliable receiver coils with a more cost-effective design offer a path to more affordable surface coils and improve image quality. Whereas fat suppression is inherently more challenging at lower field strengths, chemical shift selective fat suppression is reliable and homogeneous with modern low-field MRI technology. Dixon-based gradient echo pulse sequences provide efficient and reliable multicontrast options, including postcontrast MRI. Metal artifact reduction MRI benefits substantially from the lower field strength, including slice encoding for metal artifact correction for effective metal artifact reduction of high-susceptibility metallic implants. Wide-bore scanner designs offer exciting opportunities for interventional MRI. This review provides an overview of the economical aspects, signal and image quality considerations, technological components and coils, musculoskeletal tissue relaxation times, and image contrast of modern low-field MRI and discusses the mainstream and new applications, challenges, and opportunities of musculoskeletal MRI.
Collapse
|
23
|
Artificial Intelligence-Driven Ultra-Fast Superresolution MRI: 10-Fold Accelerated Musculoskeletal Turbo Spin Echo MRI Within Reach. Invest Radiol 2023; 58:28-42. [PMID: 36355637 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the keystone of modern musculoskeletal imaging; however, long pulse sequence acquisition times may restrict patient tolerability and access. Advances in MRI scanners, coil technology, and innovative pulse sequence acceleration methods enable 4-fold turbo spin echo pulse sequence acceleration in clinical practice; however, at this speed, conventional image reconstruction approaches the signal-to-noise limits of temporal, spatial, and contrast resolution. Novel deep learning image reconstruction methods can minimize signal-to-noise interdependencies to better advantage than conventional image reconstruction, leading to unparalleled gains in image speed and quality when combined with parallel imaging and simultaneous multislice acquisition. The enormous potential of deep learning-based image reconstruction promises to facilitate the 10-fold acceleration of the turbo spin echo pulse sequence, equating to a total acquisition time of 2-3 minutes for entire MRI examinations of joints without sacrificing spatial resolution or image quality. Current investigations aim for a better understanding of stability and failure modes of image reconstruction networks, validation of network reconstruction performance with external data sets, determination of diagnostic performances with independent reference standards, establishing generalizability to other centers, scanners, field strengths, coils, and anatomy, and building publicly available benchmark data sets to compare methods and foster innovation and collaboration between the clinical and image processing community. In this article, we review basic concepts of deep learning-based acquisition and image reconstruction techniques for accelerating and improving the quality of musculoskeletal MRI, commercially available and developing deep learning-based MRI solutions, superresolution, denoising, generative adversarial networks, and combined strategies for deep learning-driven ultra-fast superresolution musculoskeletal MRI. This article aims to equip radiologists and imaging scientists with the necessary practical knowledge and enthusiasm to meet this exciting new era of musculoskeletal MRI.
Collapse
|
24
|
Radiomics and Deep Learning for Disease Detection in Musculoskeletal Radiology: An Overview of Novel MRI- and CT-Based Approaches. Invest Radiol 2023; 58:3-13. [PMID: 36070548 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Radiomics and machine learning-based methods offer exciting opportunities for improving diagnostic performance and efficiency in musculoskeletal radiology for various tasks, including acute injuries, chronic conditions, spinal abnormalities, and neoplasms. While early radiomics-based methods were often limited to a smaller number of higher-order image feature extractions, applying machine learning-based analytic models, multifactorial correlations, and classifiers now permits big data processing and testing thousands of features to identify relevant markers. A growing number of novel deep learning-based methods describe magnetic resonance imaging- and computed tomography-based algorithms for diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament tears, meniscus tears, articular cartilage defects, rotator cuff tears, fractures, metastatic skeletal disease, and soft tissue tumors. Initial radiomics and deep learning techniques have focused on binary detection tasks, such as determining the presence or absence of a single abnormality and differentiation of benign versus malignant. Newer-generation algorithms aim to include practically relevant multiclass characterization of detected abnormalities, such as typing and malignancy grading of neoplasms. So-called delta-radiomics assess tumor features before and after treatment, with temporal changes of radiomics features serving as surrogate markers for tumor responses to treatment. New approaches also predict treatment success rates, surgical resection completeness, and recurrence risk. Practice-relevant goals for the next generation of algorithms include diagnostic whole-organ and advanced classification capabilities. Important research objectives to fill current knowledge gaps include well-designed research studies to understand how diagnostic performances and suggested efficiency gains of isolated research settings translate into routine daily clinical practice. This article summarizes current radiomics- and machine learning-based magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography approaches for musculoskeletal disease detection and offers a perspective on future goals and objectives.
Collapse
|
25
|
Meng X, Wang Z, Ma X, Liu X, Ji H, Cheng JZ, Dong P. Fully automated measurement on coronal alignment of lower limbs using deep convolutional neural networks on radiographic images. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:869. [PMID: 36115981 PMCID: PMC9482267 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05818-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) system is proposed to measure the lower limb parameters of the mechanical lateral distal femur angle (mLDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), and mechanical axis of the lower limbs. Methods Standing X-rays of 1000 patients’ lower limbs were examined for the DCNN and assigned to training, validation, and test sets. A coarse-to-fine network was employed to locate 20 key landmarks on both limbs that first recognised the regions of hip, knee, and ankle, and subsequently outputted the key points in each sub-region from a full-length X-ray. Finally, information from these key landmark locations was used to calculate the above five parameters. Results The DCNN system showed high consistency (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.91) for all five lower limb parameters. Additionally, the mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean squared error (RMSE) of all angle predictions were lower than 3° for both the left and right limbs. The MAE of the mechanical axis of the lower limbs was 1.124 mm and 1.416 mm and the RMSE was 1.032 mm and 1.321 mm, for the right and left limbs, respectively. The measurement time of the DCNN system was 1.8 ± 1.3 s, which was significantly shorter than that of experienced radiologists (616.8 ± 48.2 s, t = -180.4, P < 0.001). Conclusions The proposed DCNN system can automatically measure mLDFA, MPTA, LDTA, JLCA, and the mechanical axis of the lower limbs, thus helping physicians manage lower limb alignment accurately and efficiently. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05818-4.
Collapse
|
26
|
Klontzas ME, Karantanas AH. Research in Musculoskeletal Radiology: Setting Goals and Strategic Directions. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2022; 26:354-358. [PMID: 35654100 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The future of musculoskeletal (MSK) radiology is being built on research developments in the field. Over the past decade, MSK imaging research has been dominated by advancements in molecular imaging biomarkers, artificial intelligence, radiomics, and novel high-resolution equipment. Adequate preparation of trainees and specialists will ensure that current and future leaders will be prepared to embrace and critically appraise technological developments, will be up to date on clinical developments, such as the use of artificial tissues, will define research directions, and will actively participate and lead multidisciplinary research. This review presents an overview of the current MSK research landscape and proposes tangible future goals and strategic directions that will fortify the future of MSK radiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michail E Klontzas
- Department of Medical Imaging, University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece.,Advanced Hybrid Imaging Systems, Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology (FORTH), Heraklion, Crete, Greece.,Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Apostolos H Karantanas
- Department of Medical Imaging, University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece.,Advanced Hybrid Imaging Systems, Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology (FORTH), Heraklion, Crete, Greece.,Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Radiomics of Musculoskeletal Sarcomas: A Narrative Review. J Imaging 2022; 8:jimaging8020045. [PMID: 35200747 PMCID: PMC8876222 DOI: 10.3390/jimaging8020045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Bone and soft-tissue primary malignant tumors or sarcomas are a large, diverse group of mesenchymal-derived malignancies. They represent a model for intra- and intertumoral heterogeneities, making them particularly suitable for radiomics analyses. Radiomic features offer information on cancer phenotype as well as the tumor microenvironment which, combined with other pertinent data such as genomics and proteomics and correlated with outcomes data, can produce accurate, robust, evidence-based, clinical-decision support systems. Our purpose in this narrative review is to offer an overview of radiomics studies dealing with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-based radiomics models of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas that could help distinguish different histotypes, low-grade from high-grade sarcomas, predict response to multimodality therapy, and thus better tailor patients’ treatments and finally improve their survivals. Although showing promising results, interobserver segmentation variability, feature reproducibility, and model validation are three main challenges of radiomics that need to be addressed in order to translate radiomics studies to clinical applications. These efforts, together with a better knowledge and application of the “Radiomics Quality Score” and Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative reporting guidelines, could improve the quality of sarcoma radiomics studies and facilitate radiomics towards clinical translation.
Collapse
|
28
|
Artificial intelligence-based automatic assessment of lower limb torsion on MRI. Sci Rep 2021; 11:23244. [PMID: 34853401 PMCID: PMC8636587 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02708-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Abnormal torsion of the lower limbs may adversely affect joint health. This study developed and validated a deep learning-based method for automatic measurement of femoral and tibial torsion on MRI. Axial T2-weighted sequences acquired of the hips, knees, and ankles of 93 patients (mean age, 13 ± 5 years; 52 males) were included and allocated to training (n = 60), validation (n = 9), and test sets (n = 24). A U-net convolutional neural network was trained to segment both femur and tibia, identify osseous anatomic landmarks, define pertinent reference lines, and quantify femoral and tibial torsion. Manual measurements by two radiologists provided the reference standard. Inter-reader comparisons were performed using repeated-measures ANOVA, Pearson’s r, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Mean Sørensen-Dice coefficients for segmentation accuracy ranged between 0.89 and 0.93 and erroneous segmentations were scarce. Ranges of torsion as measured by both readers and the algorithm on the same axial image were 15.8°–18.0° (femur) and 33.9°–35.2° (tibia). Correlation coefficients (ranges, .968 ≤ r ≤ .984 [femur]; .867 ≤ r ≤ .904 [tibia]) and ICCs (ranges, .963 ≤ ICC ≤ .974 [femur]; .867 ≤ ICC ≤ .894 [tibia]) indicated excellent inter-reader agreement. Algorithm-based analysis was faster than manual analysis (7 vs 207 vs 230 s, p < .001). In conclusion, fully automatic measurement of torsional alignment is accurate, reliable, and sufficiently fast for clinical workflows.
Collapse
|