Likelihood of hip infection with image-guided hip aspiration dry tap: a 10-year retrospective study

Imaging approach to prosthetic joint infection

The diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains challenging, despite multiple available laboratory tests for both serum and synovial fluid analysis. The clinical symptoms of PJI are not always characteristic, particularly in the chronic phase, and there is often significant overlap in symptoms with non-infectious forms of arthroplasty failure. Further exacerbating this challenge is lack of a universally accepted definition for PJI, with publications from multiple professional societies citing different diagnostic criteria. While not included in many of the major societies' guidelines for diagnosis of PJI, diagnostic imaging can play an important role in the workup of suspected PJI. In this article, we will review an approach to diagnostic imaging modalities (radiography, ultrasound, CT, MRI) in the workup of suspected PJI, with special attention to the limitations and benefits of each modality. We will also discuss the role that image-guided interventions play in the workup of these patients, through ultrasound and fluoroscopically guided joint aspirations. While there is no standard imaging algorithm that can universally applied to all patients with suspected PJI, we will discuss a general approach to diagnostic imaging and image-guided intervention in this clinical scenario.

When to lavage in the absence of a sonographically visible joint effusion in painful total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective longitudinal study

OBJECTIVE

To determine if knee arthroplasty without sonographically visible effusion needs to undergo lavage to rule out infection.

METHODS

Patients were accrued by a retrospective search of a longitudinally maintained radiology database looking for patients referred for ultrasound guided aspiration of suspected TKA infection. Clinical presentations, laboratory tests, intraoperative findings, and follow-up were reviewed.

RESULTS

Four hundred sixty-nine patients were included (mean age of 67 years (range, 36-91)) including 251 females. Four hundred three patients had effusions, of which 57 were infected based on ultrasound-guided and surgical aspirates. Sixty-four patients lacked effusions, of which 47 underwent lavage at the clinicians' request, with 6/47 infected. Nineteen patients without effusion were not lavaged at the clinicians' request due to low suspicion, and none were infected. Patients with positive lavage cultures all had clinical risk factors. Infection rates were significantly higher in patients with joint effusion and clinical suspicion for infection compared to absent joint effusion and absent clinical suspicion. A significantly higher proportion of patients with hyperemia or moderate-severe synovial thickening on ultrasound were symptomatic and had joint effusion and positive joint cultures. Aspiration of native fluid had 85% sensitivity and 100% specificity while lavage had a sensitivity of 57% and specificity of 100%. Negative predictive value for native aspirates was 94% compared to 86% for lavage.

CONCLUSION

A TKA with low clinical suspicion of infection does not need to undergo lavage in the absence of a sonographically visible effusion.

A "Dry Tap" in Prosthetic Joint Infection Workup of Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Not Reassuring

BACKGROUND

Synovial fluid analysis is important in diagnosing prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The rate of culture-positive PJI in patients who have a dry tap of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) is not well described.

METHODS

We reviewed all image-guided THA aspirations, performed from 2014 to 2021 at a single academic institution. Aspirations were categorized as successful (≥ 0.5 mL) or unsuccessful (< 0.5 mL, "dry tap"). We analyzed culture data on all repeat aspirations and revision surgeries performed within 90 days of the initial dry tap.

RESULTS

We reviewed 275 consecutive attempted THA aspirations of which 100 (36.4%) resulted in a dry tap. The dry tap cohort had a significantly higher percentage of fluoroscopic-guided aspirations (64%) and fewer ultrasound-guided aspirations (36%) compared to the successful aspiration cohort (48.9% fluoroscopic, 53.1% ultrasound, P = .0061). Of the 100 patients who have dry taps, 48 underwent revision surgery within 90 days of the initial dry tap, and 15 resulted in 2 or more positive cultures. The rate of PJI defined by MusculoSkeletal Infection Society major criteria in the dry tap cohort was 16.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Attempted aspiration of a THA resulted in a dry tap 36.4% of the time. Of those patients who had a dry tap, 16.0% were subsequently found to have PJI based on MusculoSkeletal Infection Society major criteria. Therefore, a "dry tap" does not exclude the diagnosis of infection and should not be considered reassuring for the absence of PJI.

Predictive value of joint fluid volume on advanced pre-procedure imaging related to success of arthrocentesis and presence of septic arthritis

PURPOSE

Septic arthritis is a dangerous medical condition requiring prompt diagnosis, often via arthrocentesis. A "dry tap" occurs when no fluid is aspirated. We hypothesized that the absence of a joint effusion on pre-procedure advanced imaging would reliably predict a dry tap and exclude septic arthritis.

METHODS

A cohort of 217 arthrocentesis cases of large joints (hips, shoulders, knees) from our institution, with pre-procedure advanced imaging (CT, MR, US) of the same joint performed within the previous 48 h, was analyzed. Exclusion criteria included non-native joints or inadequate imaging of the affected joint. These cases underwent blinded review by 4 radiologists who measured the deepest pocket of joint fluid on the pre-procedure imaging. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was performed comparing joint fluid pocket size to outcomes of successful aspiration and final diagnosis.

RESULTS

A smaller average joint pocket fluid size was present on advanced imaging in both dry taps compared with successful arthrocenteses (p < .0001), and in uninfected joints compared with septic joints (p = .0001). However, the overlap of values was too great to allow for a perfectly predictive cutoff. 29% (5/17) of patients with no visible joint fluid on pre-aspiration imaging underwent successful arthrocentesis, one case representing septic arthritis.

CONCLUSION

Volume of joint fluid on advanced pre-arthrocentesis imaging cannot reliably predict subsequent dry tap nor exclude septic arthritis.

Fluoroscopic-guided procedures of the lower extremity

This article reviews the literature and the authors' experiences regarding the performance of lower extremity fluoroscopically guided procedures from the hip to the toes. An overview of injections and aspirations, their indications, risks, and complications are provided, focusing on anesthetics, corticosteroids, and contrast agents. A variety of approaches to each joint and the associated pearls and pitfalls of each approach will be discussed.