1
|
Jian-Lüssi N, Pfirrmann CWA, Buck FM, Frauenfelder T, Rosskopf AB. A novel adapted MRI-based scheme for Dejour classification of trochlear dysplasia. Skeletal Radiol 2024:10.1007/s00256-024-04748-7. [PMID: 39042200 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-024-04748-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2024] [Revised: 07/03/2024] [Accepted: 07/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To elaborate an optimized scheme for the Dejour classification of trochlear dysplasia based on axial and sagittal MR images and to evaluate its intra- and inter-reader reliability. MATERIAL AND METHODS Over a period of 20 months patients with a knee MRI and the diagnosis of trochlear dysplasia were retrospectively included. Exclusion criteria were incomplete examination, qualitatively non-diagnostic examination, post trochlear surgery, missing informed consent for research purposes. Three independent evaluations were performed by two radiologists: first using an established description of the Dejour classification (types A-D) and then two evaluations using a new adapted scheme (types A-D). The adapted scheme includes a shallow trochlea, in type A no spur/no cliff, in type B with spur/no cliff, in type C no spur/with cliff, and in type D with spur/with cliff. RESULTS One hundred seventy-one knee MRIs (female:65.5%; left side:52.6%) were included with a median age of 34.3 years (range:11.3-79.2). Inter-reader reliability using the established description was fair for the four-type-classification (kappa(k) = 0.23; 95%CI:0.11-0.34), fair for differentiation low-grade versus high-grade dysplasia (k = 0.28;0.13-0.43), slight for differentiation spur versus no-spur types (k = 0.20;0.05-0.34). Inter-reader reliability using the adapted scheme was substantial (k = 0.79;0.75-0.83) for the four-type-classification, substantial for differentiation low-grade versus high-grade dysplasia (k = 0.80;0.75-0.85), substantial for differentiation spur versus no-spur presence (k = 0.76;0.71-0.81). Intra-reader reliability was almost perfect for the adapted scheme (k-values: 0.88-0.95; 95%CIs: 0.84-0.98). CONCLUSION The novel adapted scheme for Dejour classification shows an almost perfect intra-reader reliability and a substantially higher inter-reader reliability. It may become a helpful tool in the daily diagnostic work of radiologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ni Jian-Lüssi
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christian W A Pfirrmann
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Medical Radiological Institute (MRI) Zurich, Schulthess Clinic, Lengghalde 2, CH-8008, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Florian M Buck
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Medical Radiological Institute (MRI) Zurich, Schulthess Clinic, Lengghalde 2, CH-8008, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Frauenfelder
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Andrea B Rosskopf
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
- Medical Radiological Institute (MRI) Zurich, Schulthess Clinic, Lengghalde 2, CH-8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Watts RE, Gorbachova T, Fritz RC, Saad SS, Lutz AM, Kim J, Chaudhari AS, Shea KG, Sherman SL, Boutin RD. Patellar Tracking: An Old Problem with New Insights. Radiographics 2023; 43:e220177. [PMID: 37261964 PMCID: PMC10262599 DOI: 10.1148/rg.220177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Patellofemoral pain and instability are common indications for imaging that are encountered in everyday practice. The authors comprehensively review key aspects of patellofemoral instability pertinent to radiologists that can be seen before the onset of osteoarthritis, highlighting the anatomy, clinical evaluation, diagnostic imaging, and treatment. Regarding the anatomy, the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the primary static soft-tissue restraint to lateral patellar displacement and is commonly reconstructed surgically in patients with MPFL dysfunction and patellar instability. Osteoarticular abnormalities that predispose individuals to patellar instability include patellar malalignment, trochlear dysplasia, and tibial tubercle lateralization. Clinically, patients with patellar instability may be divided into two broad groups with imaging findings that sometimes overlap: patients with a history of overt patellar instability after a traumatic event (eg, dislocation, subluxation) and patients without such a history. In terms of imaging, radiography is generally the initial examination of choice, and MRI is the most common cross-sectional examination performed preoperatively. For all imaging techniques, there has been a proliferation of published radiologic measurement methods. The authors summarize the most common validated measurements for patellar malalignment, trochlear dysplasia, and tibial tubercle lateralization. Given that static imaging is inherently limited in the evaluation of patellar motion, dynamic imaging with US, CT, or MRI may be requested by some surgeons. The primary treatment strategy for patellofemoral pain is conservative. Surgical treatment options include MPFL reconstruction with or without osseous corrections such as trochleoplasty and tibial tubercle osteotomy. Postoperative complications evaluated at imaging include patellar fracture, graft failure, graft malposition, and medial patellar subluxation. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert E. Watts
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.E.W., A.M.L., R.D.B.) and
Orthopaedic Surgery (S.L.S.), Stanford University School of Medicine, 300
Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5101; Department of Radiology, Einstein
Healthcare Network and Jefferson Health, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas
Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (T.G.); Department of Musculoskeletal
Radiology, National Orthopedic Imaging Associates, Greenbrae, CA (R.C.F.);
Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Atlantic Medical Imaging, Galloway, NJ
(S.S.S.); Department of Radiology, Benning Martin Army Community Hospital, Fort
Benning, GA (J.K.); Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Data Science,
Stanford University, Stanford, CA (A.S.C.); and Department of Orthopaedic
Surgery, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford, Palo Alto, CA
(K.G.S.)
| | - Tetyana Gorbachova
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.E.W., A.M.L., R.D.B.) and
Orthopaedic Surgery (S.L.S.), Stanford University School of Medicine, 300
Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5101; Department of Radiology, Einstein
Healthcare Network and Jefferson Health, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas
Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (T.G.); Department of Musculoskeletal
Radiology, National Orthopedic Imaging Associates, Greenbrae, CA (R.C.F.);
Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Atlantic Medical Imaging, Galloway, NJ
(S.S.S.); Department of Radiology, Benning Martin Army Community Hospital, Fort
Benning, GA (J.K.); Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Data Science,
Stanford University, Stanford, CA (A.S.C.); and Department of Orthopaedic
Surgery, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford, Palo Alto, CA
(K.G.S.)
| | - Russell C. Fritz
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.E.W., A.M.L., R.D.B.) and
Orthopaedic Surgery (S.L.S.), Stanford University School of Medicine, 300
Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5101; Department of Radiology, Einstein
Healthcare Network and Jefferson Health, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas
Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (T.G.); Department of Musculoskeletal
Radiology, National Orthopedic Imaging Associates, Greenbrae, CA (R.C.F.);
Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Atlantic Medical Imaging, Galloway, NJ
(S.S.S.); Department of Radiology, Benning Martin Army Community Hospital, Fort
Benning, GA (J.K.); Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Data Science,
Stanford University, Stanford, CA (A.S.C.); and Department of Orthopaedic
Surgery, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford, Palo Alto, CA
(K.G.S.)
| | - Sherif S. Saad
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.E.W., A.M.L., R.D.B.) and
Orthopaedic Surgery (S.L.S.), Stanford University School of Medicine, 300
Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5101; Department of Radiology, Einstein
Healthcare Network and Jefferson Health, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas
Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (T.G.); Department of Musculoskeletal
Radiology, National Orthopedic Imaging Associates, Greenbrae, CA (R.C.F.);
Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Atlantic Medical Imaging, Galloway, NJ
(S.S.S.); Department of Radiology, Benning Martin Army Community Hospital, Fort
Benning, GA (J.K.); Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Data Science,
Stanford University, Stanford, CA (A.S.C.); and Department of Orthopaedic
Surgery, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford, Palo Alto, CA
(K.G.S.)
| | - Amelie M. Lutz
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.E.W., A.M.L., R.D.B.) and
Orthopaedic Surgery (S.L.S.), Stanford University School of Medicine, 300
Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5101; Department of Radiology, Einstein
Healthcare Network and Jefferson Health, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas
Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (T.G.); Department of Musculoskeletal
Radiology, National Orthopedic Imaging Associates, Greenbrae, CA (R.C.F.);
Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Atlantic Medical Imaging, Galloway, NJ
(S.S.S.); Department of Radiology, Benning Martin Army Community Hospital, Fort
Benning, GA (J.K.); Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Data Science,
Stanford University, Stanford, CA (A.S.C.); and Department of Orthopaedic
Surgery, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford, Palo Alto, CA
(K.G.S.)
| | - Jiyoon Kim
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.E.W., A.M.L., R.D.B.) and
Orthopaedic Surgery (S.L.S.), Stanford University School of Medicine, 300
Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5101; Department of Radiology, Einstein
Healthcare Network and Jefferson Health, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas
Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (T.G.); Department of Musculoskeletal
Radiology, National Orthopedic Imaging Associates, Greenbrae, CA (R.C.F.);
Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Atlantic Medical Imaging, Galloway, NJ
(S.S.S.); Department of Radiology, Benning Martin Army Community Hospital, Fort
Benning, GA (J.K.); Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Data Science,
Stanford University, Stanford, CA (A.S.C.); and Department of Orthopaedic
Surgery, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford, Palo Alto, CA
(K.G.S.)
| | - Akshay S. Chaudhari
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.E.W., A.M.L., R.D.B.) and
Orthopaedic Surgery (S.L.S.), Stanford University School of Medicine, 300
Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5101; Department of Radiology, Einstein
Healthcare Network and Jefferson Health, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas
Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (T.G.); Department of Musculoskeletal
Radiology, National Orthopedic Imaging Associates, Greenbrae, CA (R.C.F.);
Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Atlantic Medical Imaging, Galloway, NJ
(S.S.S.); Department of Radiology, Benning Martin Army Community Hospital, Fort
Benning, GA (J.K.); Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Data Science,
Stanford University, Stanford, CA (A.S.C.); and Department of Orthopaedic
Surgery, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford, Palo Alto, CA
(K.G.S.)
| | - Kevin G. Shea
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.E.W., A.M.L., R.D.B.) and
Orthopaedic Surgery (S.L.S.), Stanford University School of Medicine, 300
Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5101; Department of Radiology, Einstein
Healthcare Network and Jefferson Health, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas
Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (T.G.); Department of Musculoskeletal
Radiology, National Orthopedic Imaging Associates, Greenbrae, CA (R.C.F.);
Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Atlantic Medical Imaging, Galloway, NJ
(S.S.S.); Department of Radiology, Benning Martin Army Community Hospital, Fort
Benning, GA (J.K.); Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Data Science,
Stanford University, Stanford, CA (A.S.C.); and Department of Orthopaedic
Surgery, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford, Palo Alto, CA
(K.G.S.)
| | - Seth L. Sherman
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.E.W., A.M.L., R.D.B.) and
Orthopaedic Surgery (S.L.S.), Stanford University School of Medicine, 300
Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5101; Department of Radiology, Einstein
Healthcare Network and Jefferson Health, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas
Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (T.G.); Department of Musculoskeletal
Radiology, National Orthopedic Imaging Associates, Greenbrae, CA (R.C.F.);
Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Atlantic Medical Imaging, Galloway, NJ
(S.S.S.); Department of Radiology, Benning Martin Army Community Hospital, Fort
Benning, GA (J.K.); Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Data Science,
Stanford University, Stanford, CA (A.S.C.); and Department of Orthopaedic
Surgery, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford, Palo Alto, CA
(K.G.S.)
| | - Robert D. Boutin
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.E.W., A.M.L., R.D.B.) and
Orthopaedic Surgery (S.L.S.), Stanford University School of Medicine, 300
Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5101; Department of Radiology, Einstein
Healthcare Network and Jefferson Health, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas
Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (T.G.); Department of Musculoskeletal
Radiology, National Orthopedic Imaging Associates, Greenbrae, CA (R.C.F.);
Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Atlantic Medical Imaging, Galloway, NJ
(S.S.S.); Department of Radiology, Benning Martin Army Community Hospital, Fort
Benning, GA (J.K.); Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Data Science,
Stanford University, Stanford, CA (A.S.C.); and Department of Orthopaedic
Surgery, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford, Palo Alto, CA
(K.G.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sharma N, Al-Mouazzen L, Kuiper JH, Gallacher P, Barnett A. Functional outcomes after Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction show inverted J-shaped relation with Body Mass Index. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2023:10.1007/s00167-023-07391-2. [PMID: 37036473 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07391-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) is a recognised surgical procedure for the treatment of recurrent patellofemoral instability with excellent outcomes reported. The aim of this study is to determine if body mass index can influence these outcomes. METHODS This is a single-centre retrospective analysis of a longitudinal patellofemoral database. Patients with recurrent patellar instability, without patellar alta or severe trochlear dysplasia were treated using a MPFL-R between 2015 and 2019 at The Robert Jones & Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital. The clinical efficacy following surgery was assessed by Kujula, International Knee Documentation Committee Score (IKDC), and EuroQol-5 score (EQ-5D) at baseline and up to 26 months post-operatively; their safety assessed by complication rate and requirement for further surgery. The effect of Body Mass Index (BMI) on clinical outcome was analysed using linear, curvilinear, and segmented models following propensity score weighting. RESULTS A total of 97 patients (97 Knees, mean age 25y) were analysed. Of these, 61 patients had a BMI < 30 kg/m2 (mean age 23y, mean BMI 24) of which 7 patients (12.3%) required additional surgery. A further 36 patients had a BMI > 30 kg/m2 (mean age 27y, mean BMI 36) of which 2 patients (5.6%) required additional surgery. The re-dislocation rate was 0% in each BMI group. Both groups had a significantly improved mean outcome following surgery, with improvements in mean IKDC above the minimum clinical important differences (MCID) of 20.5. BMI had an inverted J-shaped association with functional outcome, showing peak outcomes at BMI of 20.5 (95% CI 18.5 to 22.4; IKDC and Kujala) or BMI of 28 (EQ-5D index). No evidence for an association between BMI and complication risk was found. CONCLUSION BMI influences the functional outcomes in MPFL-R with an inverted J-shaped relation, without evidence it affected the complication or re-dislocation rate. In the absence of patella alta and severe trochlear dysplasia, an isolated MPFL reconstruction is a safe and effective procedure to treat patellar instability, with the best functional outcome in patients with a BMI around 20 to 21. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Sharma
- Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Gobowen, Oswestry, SY10 7AG, UK.
- , 28 Buckingham Road, Penn, Wolverhampton, WV4-5TJ, UK.
| | - L Al-Mouazzen
- Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Gobowen, Oswestry, SY10 7AG, UK
| | - J H Kuiper
- Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Gobowen, Oswestry, SY10 7AG, UK
- Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - P Gallacher
- Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Gobowen, Oswestry, SY10 7AG, UK
| | - A Barnett
- Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Gobowen, Oswestry, SY10 7AG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tanaka MJ, Sodhi A, Wadhavkar I, Kane K, Velasquez Hammerle MV, Mangudi Varadarajan K, Tornetta P. Redefining Trochlear Dysplasia: Normal Thresholds Vary by Measurement Technique, Landmarks, and Sex. Am J Sports Med 2023; 51:1202-1210. [PMID: 36942723 DOI: 10.1177/03635465231158099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trochlear dysplasia is a known risk factor for patellar instability. Multiple radiographic measurements exist to assess trochlear morphology, but the optimal measurement technique and threshold for instability are unknown. PURPOSE To describe the optimal measurements and thresholds for trochlear dysplasia on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that can identify knees with patellar instability in male and female patients. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. METHODS Knee MRI scans of patients with patellar instability were compared with those of age- and sex-matched controls. Measurements of the sulcus angle, lateral trochlear inclination (LTI), and trochlear depth were performed on axial images using bony and cartilaginous landmarks. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed, with the area under the curve (AUC) describing the accuracy of each diagnostic test. Optimal cutoff values were calculated to distinguish between knees with and without patellar instability. AUC and cutoff values were reported for each measurement as well as for male and female subgroups. RESULTS A total of 238 knee MRI scans were included in this study (138 female, 100 male; age range, 18-39 years). Trochlear depth measurements had the greatest diagnostic value, with AUCs of 0.79 and 0.82 on bone and cartilage, respectively. All measurements (sulcus angle, LTI, trochlear depth) on bone and cartilage had an AUC ≥0.7 (range, 0.70-0.86), with optimal cutoff values of 145° (bone) and 154° (cartilage) for the sulcus angle, 17° (bone) and 13° (cartilage) for LTI, and 4 mm (bone) and 3 mm (cartilage) for trochlear depth. Optimal cutoff values in female patients varied from those in male patients for all measurements except for cartilaginous trochlear depth. CONCLUSION Normal thresholds for trochlear dysplasia varied based on the use of bony versus cartilaginous landmarks. Cartilaginous trochlear depth measurements had the greatest ability to identify knees with patellar instability. Furthermore, optimal cutoff values for all measurements except for cartilaginous trochlear depth differed between female and male patients. These findings suggest that sex-specific parameters of normal values may be needed in the assessment of risk factors for patellofemoral instability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miho J Tanaka
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alisha Sodhi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Isha Wadhavkar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kylynn Kane
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Maria V Velasquez Hammerle
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kartik Mangudi Varadarajan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Paul Tornetta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chen J, Ye Z, Wu C, Zhang X, Zhao J, Xie G. Sulcus depth, congruence angle, Wiberg index, TT-TG distance, and CDI are strong predictors of recurrent patellar dislocation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022:10.1007/s00167-022-07245-3. [PMID: 36463567 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07245-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To characterize patellofemoral morphology, determine radiological cutoff values based on computed tomography (CT) images, and clarify predominant anatomic risk factors in young patients with recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD). METHODS A total of 212 knees (age 23.0 ± 5.3 years, female: male = 110:102) with CT-confirmed RPD were enrolled for analysis. The control group was matched by age and sex (2:1). Patellofemoral and trochlear morphology, patellofemoral alignment, and other parameters were assessed by CT. Standardized methods were used for measurements. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) were used to assess accuracy in diagnosing RPD. The index of union (IU) was employed to identify a cutoff value for risk. A binary logistic regression model (Forward, LR) was constructed, and standardized coefficients were calculated to compare the relative strength of different predictors. Factors included in the model were employed to calculate distributions in the studied population. RESULTS The majority of measurements showed a significant difference between the RPD and control groups when comparing mean values. The AUC value was favorable for sulcus depth and significantly better than that for other trochlear morphology parameters (P < 0.0001). Cutoff values were 0.58 for the Wiberg index, 153.3° for the sulcus angle, 3.6 mm for the sulcus depth, 1.94 for the trochlear width ratio, 16.2° for the lateral trochlear inclination, 17.2° for the patellar lateral tilt, 25.5° for the congruence angle, 1.2 for the patellar height [Caton-Deschamps index (CDI)], 6.1° for the knee rotation, and 16.4 mm for the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance. A binary logistic regression model (χ2 = 20.826, P = 0.008) including the Wiberg index, sulcus depth, congruence angle, patellar height (CDI), and TT-TG distance was constructed for RPD (P ≤ 0.015), which showed excellent diagnostic performance, as indicated by an AUC of 0.989 (95% CI, 0.979 to 0.998). Sulcus depth showed the strongest relationship with RPD, followed by the congruence angle and Wiberg index, as indicated by the standardized coefficients - 1.43, 1.02, and 0.97, respectively. Eighty-seven percent of the RPD population had sulcus depth ≤ 3.6 mm. CONCLUSIONS This study provides a systematic reference of cutoff values based on CT data. The combination of five anatomic risk factors (sulcus depth, congruence angle, Wiberg index, TT-TG distance, and CDI) may be an excellent predictor of RPD as initial risk assessment. Sulcus depth, as the most frequently observed anatomic risk factor, showed the best diagnostic performance among trochlear morphological parameters and the strongest relationship with RPD, followed by the congruence angle and Wiberg index. In clinical practice, the sulcus depth, congruence angle, Wiberg index, TT-TG distance, and CDI with the proposed cutoff values can be used in combination to evaluate RPD. When assessing trochlear morphology, sulcus depth is recommended as the best radiological parameter. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiebo Chen
- Department of Sports Medicine, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China
| | - Zipeng Ye
- Department of Sports Medicine, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China
| | - Chenliang Wu
- Department of Sports Medicine, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China
| | - Xueying Zhang
- Department of Sports Medicine, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China
| | - Jinzhong Zhao
- Department of Sports Medicine, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China.
| | - Guoming Xie
- Department of Sports Medicine, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China.
| |
Collapse
|