PET in lymphoma: what are the oncologist's needs?

Noninvasive phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging predicts outcome to first-line chemotherapy in newly diagnosed patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Based on their association with malignant proliferation, using noninvasive phosphorus MR spectroscopic imaging ((31)P MRSI), we measured the tumor content of the phospholipid-related phosphomonoesters (PME), phosphoethanolamine and phospholcholine, and its correlation with treatment outcome in newly diagnosed patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) receiving standard first-line chemotherapy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The PME value normalized to nucleoside triphosphates (PME/NTP) was measured using (31)P MRSI in tumor masses of 20 patients with DLBCL before receiving standard first-line chemotherapy. Response at 6 months was complete in 13 patients and partial in seven. Time to treatment failure (TTF) was ≤11 months in eight patients, from 18 to 30 months in three, and ≥60 months in nine.

RESULTS

On a t test, the pretreatment tumor PME/NTP mean value (SD, n) of patients with a complete response at 6 months was 1.42 (0.41, 13), which was significantly different from the value of 2.46 (0.40, 7) in patients with partial response (P < .00001). A Fisher test significantly correlated the PME/NTP values with response at 6 months (sensitivity and specificity at 0.85, P < .004) while a Cox proportional hazards regression significantly correlated the PME/NTP values with TTF (hazard ratio = 5.21, P < .02). A Kaplan-Meier test set apart a group entirely composed of patients with TTF ≤ 11 months (hazard ratio = 8.66, P < .00001).

CONCLUSIONS

The pretreatment tumor PME/NTP values correlated with response to treatment at 6 months and time to treatment failure in newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL treated with first-line chemotherapy, and therefore they could be used to predict treatment outcome in these patients.

Role of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography scan in differentiating enhancing brain tumors

Aim:

To determine whether F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (F-18-FDG PET) can be used to differentiate among common enhancing brain tumors such as gliomas, metastatic brain tumors, and lymphoma.

Materials and Methods:

We evaluated 20 patients with an enhancing brain tumor on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). FDG PET scan was done in all patients pre operatively. For PET image analysis, regions of interest were placed over the tumor (T), contralateral cortex (C), and white matter (WM). Average and maximum pixel values were determined at each site. On the basis of these measurements, average and maximum standard uptake values (SUV _avg and SUV _max ) were calculated, and comparisons among lesions were then made.

Results:

SUV_avg and SUV_max are significantly higher for central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma than for other tumors (P < 0.01). High-grade gliomas showed significantly higher SUV_avg and SUV_max than the low grade gliomas (P < 0.05) and metastatic tumor showed higher SUV_avg and SUV_max than all gliomas, both low and high grade (P < 0.05). When the lowest values of CNS lymphoma parameter were used as cutoff levels to distinguish CNS lymphomas from other tumors (i.e. 100% sensitivity), SUV_max was the most accurate parameter. Using a SUV_max of 15.0 as a cutoff for diagnosing CNS lymphoma, only one case of metastasis (SUV _max , 16.3) was found to be false positive in this study.

Conclusion:

FDG PET appears to provide additional information for differentiating common enhancing malignant brain tumors, namely lymphoma versus high grade glioma and metastatic tumor, particularly when differential diagnoses are difficult to narrow using MRI alone.

Radiation exposure and mortality risk from CT and PET imaging of patients with malignant lymphoma

Objective

To quantify radiation exposure and mortality risk from computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) in patients with malignant lymphoma (Hodgkin’s disease [HD] or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma [NHL]).

Methods

First, organ doses were assessed for a typical diagnostic work-up in children with HD and adults with NHL. Subsequently, life tables were constructed for assessment of radiation risks, also taking into account the disease-related mortality.

Results

In children with HD, cumulative effective dose from medical imaging ranged from 66 mSv (newborn) to 113 mSv (15 years old). In adults with NHL the cumulative effective dose from medical imaging was 97 mSv. Average fractions of radiation-induced deaths for children with HD [without correction for disease-related mortality in brackets] were 0.4% [0.6%] for boys and 0.7% [1.1%] for girls, and for adults with NHL 0.07% [0.28%] for men and 0.09% [0.37%] for women.

Conclusion

Taking into account the disease-related reduction in life expectancy of patients with malignant lymphoma results in a higher overall mortality but substantial lower incidence of radiation induced deaths. The modest radiation risk that results from imaging with CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET can be considered as justified, but imaging should be performed with care, especially in children.

Key Points

Survival of malignant lymphoma has improved dramatically over the past decades.

PET and CT currently play important roles for malignant lymphoma patients.

The potential hazard of ionising radiation has become an increasingly important issue.

When assessing radiation risks, disease-related reduction in life expectancy should be considered.

CT and¹⁸F-FDG PET create a modest radiation-induced mortality risk.

On the added value of baseline FDG-PET in malignant lymphoma

Purpose

The added value of baseline positron emission tomography (PET) scans in therapy evaluation in malignant lymphoma is unclear. In guidelines, baseline PET is recommended but not mandatory except in lymphoma types with variable fluoro-d-glucose uptake. The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that adding baseline PET information decreases false positive readings with posttreatment PET and improves observer agreement.

Methods

Forty-four patients (mean age 56 years, standard deviation 14) with malignant lymphoma were included. Two nuclear medicine physicians retrospectively and independently evaluated the posttreatment PET, 3 weeks later followed by paired reading of baseline and posttreatment PET. For each PET, 22 regions were classified as positive, negative, or equivocal, resulting in an overall PET score of positive, unclear, or negative. In case of discrepancies, consensus was reached.

Results

Addition of baseline to posttreatment PET evaluation affected the classification of metabolic response in 34% of malignant lymphoma patients treated with first-line chemotherapy. In one out of seven patients, addition of the baseline PET lead to opposite conclusions (95% confidence interval 4–14). False positivity was reduced by adding the baseline scan information, but the effect on false negativity was similar. In addition, the amount of unclear classifications halved after paired reading. Observer agreement did not improve upon adding the baseline PET data.

Conclusion

Without any other clinical information, pretreatment PET facilitates changes the interpretation of a posttreatment PET in a third of the patients, resulting in both upgrading and downgrading of the posttreatment situation of a malignant lymphoma patient. If these results are confirmed for PET–computed tomography systems, they favor the addition of baseline PET to the current work-up of patients with malignant lymphoma.

99mTc-labelled rituximab, a new non-Hodgkin's lymphoma imaging agent: first clinical experience

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to explore the possibility of using Tc-rituximab as an imaging agent to assess expression of CD20 antigen in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) before (radio) immunotherapy, for staging and subsequent evaluation of remission of NHL.

METHODS

Rituximab was purified from Mabthera and photoactivated by ultraviolet light. The irradiated solution was aliquoted and labelled with pertechnetate. The effectiveness of the labelling method was evaluated by determination of the number of free thiol groups per photoreduced antibody, radiochemical purity determination and in-vitro stability. Immunoreactivity of Tc-rituximab was assessed on Ramos cells using a direct binding assay. Ten patients (age 31-70 years, mean 50 years) were included, nine with CD20 B-cell NHL and one with CD20-NHL. Whole-body and single photon emission computed tomography images were taken 1, 3, 6 and 20 h postinjection of Tc-rituximab. Scintigraphic results were compared with computerized tomography (CT) findings.

RESULTS

In all cases radiochemical purity over 95% was observed with preserved affinity for CD20 antigen. In all patients expected activity was seen in the blood pool, liver, kidneys and spleen. Pathological, moderately to markedly increased Tc-rituximab activity was seen in all but one CT-confirmed NHL involved sites 6 and 20 h postinjection. In one patient, increased activity of Tc-rituximab was additionally seen in one region not seen on CT. In three patients increased accumulation was seen in bone marrow.

CONCLUSION

Tc-rituximab is a promising imaging agent suitable for assessing expression of CD20 in patients with NHL before (radio) immunotherapy.

FDG PET in lymphoma: the need for standardization of interpretation. An observer variation study

OBJECTIVE

To measure and describe patterns of interobserver variation in visual interpretation of 18-FDG PET in malignant lymphoma.

METHODS

Eleven nuclear medicine physicians with different levels of PET experience independently reviewed 37 18F-FDG PET scans of lymphoma patients (10 obtained at presentation, 27 during or after therapy). They were requested to identify and localize suspicious lymphoma sites and to assign a stage to the baseline scans, and to interpret the remaining scans for the presence of viable lymphoma. Individual (extra-)nodal regions were assessed for the likelihood of malignancy as positive, negative or equivocal. These results were compared to expert readings after dichotomization in conservative and sensitive reading classifications.

RESULTS

Sixty-one percent and 56% (using sensitive and conservative reading, respectively) of the baseline scans were scored in accordance with the experts. Fourteen of the 27 scans obtained for therapy evaluation with viable tumour sites were scored in accordance with the experts in 82% and 94% of the patients, using conservative and sensitive reading, respectively. The 13 negative scans were scored in agreement with the experts in only 45% of the cases. False positivity pertained especially to the neck, periclavicular, axilla, mediastinum, lung and bone marrow. More experienced observers tended to have fewer false negative scores.

CONCLUSION

There are substantial disparities among nuclear medicine physicians' interpretations of FDG PET scans of lymphoma patients, which may affect patient care and results of multi-institutional clinical trials. A well-defined set of criteria is urgently needed to improve consistency.

18F-FDG PET in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma

To evaluate the sensitivity of 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. A total of 32 patients with a histological diagnosis of extra-nodal MALT lymphoma were referred to the PET Centers in the last 2 years (2003 - 2004) and scanned with 18F-FDG-PET following standard procedures. Overall, the results of 50 18F-FDG-PET scans performed in either active disease state or in complete remission were reviewed. Sites of primary disease included stomach, lung, parotid, skin, orbit, mandible, esophagus and uterus. This study retrospectively enrolled 26 patients with known active disease. 18F-FDG-PET was true positive (TP) in 21/26 patients and false negative (FN) in 5/26. Sensitivity of 18F FDG-PET for extra-nodal MALT was 81%. The data show that 18FDG-PET is a useful diagnostic tool in order to stage, restage or monitor disease in patients with extra-nodal MALT lymphoma.

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the management of Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

The incidence of Hodgkin's disease (HD) and Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is around 8% of all malignancies. Fortunately, HD and NHL are among the few malignancies that are potentially curable with current existing treatment modalities, even in advanced or recurrent disease. Accurate staging, early therapy monitoring, and posttreatment evaluation of lymphomas are important for optimum management of these patients. We reviewed the imaging findings of patients with histologically proved lymphoma who underwent staging positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), early monitoring therapy PET/CT (after 3 cycles of chemotherapy), and posttreatment PET/CT. PET/CT imaging findings are shown. Utility of PET/CT in recognizing false-positive and false-negative cases of CT and PET alone is addressed. Pitfalls and diagnostic difficulties are analyzed. PET/CT is a new imaging technology that improves the evaluation of lymphoma. This review will help the reader to better understand the imaging findings and applications of PET/CT in the management of lymphoma.

Is CT scan still necessary for staging in Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients in the PET/CT era?

BACKGROUND

The clinical impact of fused PET/CT data on staging and patient management of Hodgkin disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) was assessed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 103 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed NHL (n = 68) and HD (n = 35) were assessed retrospectively. Three comparisons were carried out in an attempt to assess the added value of each modality.

RESULTS

For NHL patients, there were significant differences between staging by CT versus PET/CT (P = 0.0001). Disease was upstaged by PET/CT in 31% (mostly in stages I and II) and downstaged in only 1% of patients. In 25% of the patients, the treatment approach was changed according to CT versus PET/CT findings. For HD patients, disease was upstaged by PET/CT in 32% and downstaged by PET/CT in 15% (P = NS). As for NHL, upstaging by PET/CT versus CT was evident mostly for stages I and II. The treatment strategy was altered as determined by CT versus PET/CT in 45% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of PET/CT to CT changed the management decisions in approximately a quarter of NHL and a third of HD patients, mostly in early disease stages. Thus, PET/CT performed as the initial staging procedure may well obviate the need for additional diagnostic CT in the majority of patients.

99mTc-rituximab radiolabelled by photo-activation: a new non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma imaging agent

PURPOSE

Rituximab was the first chimeric monoclonal antibody to be approved for treatment of indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). It is directed against the CD20 antigen, which is expressed by 95% of B-cell NHLs. The aim of this study was to explore the possibility of radiolabelling rituximab with (99m)Tc for use as an imaging agent in NHL for early detection, staging, remission assessment, monitoring for metastatic spread and tumour recurrence, and assessment of CD20 expression prior to (radio)immunotherapy.

METHODS

Rituximab was purified from Mabthera solution (Roche), photo-activated at 302 nm by UV irradiation and radiolabelled with (99m)Tc. The effectiveness of the labelling method was evaluated by determination of the number of free thiol groups per photoreduced antibody, radiochemical purity and in vitro stability of (99m)Tc-rituximab.

RESULTS

On average, 4.4 free thiol groups per photoreduced antibody were determined. Radiolabelling yields greater than 95% were routinely observed after storage of the photo-activated antibody at -80 degrees C for 195 days. The direct binding assay showed preserved ability of (99m)Tc-rituximab to bind to CD20, with an average immunoreactive fraction of 93.3%. The internalisation rate was proven to be low, with only 5.3% of bound (99m)Tc-rituximab being internalised over 4 h at 37 degrees C.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that (99m)Tc-rituximab of high radiochemical purity and with preserved binding affinity for the antigen can be prepared by photoreduction and that the method shows good reproducibility. (99m)Tc-rituximab will be further explored as an imaging agent applicable in NHL for the purposes mentioned above.

Potential pitfalls of 18F-FDG PET in a large series of patients treated for malignant lymphoma: prevalence and scan interpretation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence and scan interpretation criteria useful in identifying non-tumoural F-FDG focal uptakes (potential pitfalls) in patients who had been previously treated for a malignant lymphoma studied by positron emission tomography (PET).

MATERIALS

Nine hundred and ninety-six consecutive PET scans obtained in 706 patients with malignant lymphoma were reviewed. All patients had been previously treated by first-line chemo-radiotherapy, plus surgery when required, and were then studied by FDG PET to investigate suspected recurrence at doubtful or inconclusive conventional radiological imaging (ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging). PET was obtained with patients in the fasted condition and after i.v. injection of 370 MBq of F-FDG; imaging was acquired 60-90 min later. In patients with focal FDG uptake the final diagnosis was reached on the basis of histological findings or long-term follow-up.

RESULTS

Thirty-one of 134 PET scans (23.1%) showing focal FDG uptake were diagnosed as non-tumoural radiotracer uptake, related to the presence of brown fat in seven cases, thymic hyperplasia in five, muscles contraction in four, lymph node unspecific inflammation in four, mediastinal/pulmonary unspecific inflammation in four, gastritis in two, colitis in two, bacterial abscess in one, lactating breast in one, and herpes zoster in one. Each of the above cited situations has been reported in the literature, generally in the form of sporadic reports, as a potential cause of misinterpretation (false positive) in reading a PET scan with the potential for incorrect patient management. An accurate diagnosis in these patients was important for the following therapeutic decision making.

CONCLUSIONS

In the whole series of patients with treated malignant lymphoma, the prevalence of non-tumoural FDG focal uptake during follow-up was relatively low (3.1%); conversely, it was relatively high when considering the sub-group of 'positive' PET only (23.1%). The importance of knowing these situations in order to avoid misinterpretation in reading PET scans needs to be emphasized. In this light, an accurate patient's history and a skilful nuclear medicine physician are very important factors. For the same purpose, it is reasonable to think that the use of hybrid PET/CT tomographs could also play an important role in helping to identify non-tumoural FDG focal uptake.

18F-FDG PET early after radiotherapy in lymphoma patients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of postactinic inflammatory alterations that could lead to false-positive results in FDG-PET images, in a group of lymphoma patients studied with positron emission tomography (PET) early after the end of radiation therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen (16) consecutive patients were referred to our center for malignant lymphoma; 14 of 16 patients had a mediastinal bulky mass at diagnosis. Each patient underwent chemotherapy and then radiotherapy (RT): for clinical reasons, shortly after RT (range, 25-56 days; mean, 38.7 days) a FDG PET scan was required to evaluate the effect of therapy. We intravenously injected 370 MBq of 18F-FDG, and after 60-90 minutes we recorded images.

RESULTS

Despite a relatively short time after RT, there was no pathological tracer uptake in 13 of 16 patients. In 3 cases, a mild increase in FDG uptake was observed, but no findings which would lead to a false-positive diagnosis. In 2 of 3 cases, postactinic pneumopathy was diagnosed (PET scan performed 51 and 52 days after RT); while in 1 patient, soft-tissue inflammation was present (PET scan performed 42 days after RT).

CONCLUSION

Our data indicates that the rate of postactinic PET inflammatory alterations in lymphoma patients is not very high and appear to be not strictly linked to the elapsed time since the end of RT treatment.

18F-FDG PET in malignant lymphoma: significance of positive findings

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the significance of increased uptake of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in patients with malignant lymphoma (ML) studied by positron emission tomography (PET).

METHODS

A total of 1,120 consecutive scans carried out in 848 patients were reviewed; all patients had a diagnosis of ML [574 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and 274 Hodgkin's disease (HD)] and were studied at completion of therapy, for suspected recurrence or during follow-up. PET was carried out after intravenous injection of 370 MBq of 18F-FDG; images were recorded after 60-90 min. Patients were selected whose reports indicated areas of increased FDG uptake. PET findings were considered positive for lymphomatous localisation when uptake occurred at sites of previous disease, in asymmetrical lymph nodes or in nodes unlikely to be affected by inflammation (mediastinal, except for hilar, and abdominal). PET findings were adjudged negative for neoplastic localisations in the following instances: physiological uptake (urinary, muscular, thymic or gastrointestinal in patients without MALT), symmetrical nodal uptake, uptake in lesions unrelated to lymphoma that had already been identified by other imaging methods at the time of PET scan, uptake at sites atypical for lymphoma, very low uptake and non-focal uptake. PET findings were compared with the results of other diagnostic procedures (including CT and ultrasound), biopsy findings and follow-up data.

RESULTS

Overall, 354 scans (in 256 patients) showed increased FDG uptake (244 scans in NHL and 110 in HD): in 286 cases, FDG uptake was considered pathological and indicative of ML, in 41 cases the findings were described as uncertain or equivocal and in 37 cases, FDG uptake was considered unrelated to ML (in ten scans, concurrent findings of abnormal FDG uptake attributed to ML and uptake assigned to other causes were obtained) . Of the 286 patients with positive PET findings, 274 (95.8%) were found to have residual or recurrent ML (i.e. true positives). Four of the 41 patients with inconclusive findings turned out to have ML, while in 13 patients, pathological processes other than ML could be identified as the cause of FDG uptake. ML was excluded in all patients with findings reported as non-pathological (100% true-negative rate). Therefore, the false-positive rate in our series was about 5%. The main cause of increased FDG uptake mimicking ML was inflammation.

CONCLUSION

Our data confirm that 18F-FDG-PET has very high but not absolute specificity for ML. As already suggested, increased FDG uptake may also be observed in patients without active disease; in most cases, however, non-pathological FDG accumulation is properly identified. Less frequently, inconclusive scans are encountered; these cases are usually caused by inflammation, which subsequently resolves.