Dosimetry in leakage of (188)Re-DTPA during intracoronary balloon brachytherapy

Intravascular radiation therapy with a Re-188 liquid-filled balloon in patients with in-stent restenosis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of intravascular radiation therapy (IVRT) using Re-188 filled balloon system in patients with in-stent stenosis.

METHODS

A total of 39 patients with in-stent restenosis were enrolled as the IVRT (22 patients) and control groups (17 patients) of this study after a successful coronary angioplasty. For irradiation the angioplasty balloon was replaced by a noncompliant balloon of the same diameter but 10 mm longer in length with a proximal and distal radio-opaque marker to deliver the dose of 18 Gy at 0.5 mm depth from the surface of the balloon into the vessel wall. Angiographic follow-up was performed after 6 months.

RESULTS

The length of the irradiated segment was between 9.14 and 22 mm and the diameter between 2.5 and 3 mm. In the IVRT group, two patients who did not receive antiplatelet therapy had myocardial infarction. Four patients who presented with stable angina earlier also had angiographically documented in-stent occlusion (two patients) and edge stenosis (two patients) of the target lesion and received angioplasty (18.1%). In the control group, three patients with recurrent angina and four asymptomatic patients had documented in-stent occlusion angiographically at 6 months and these seven patients underwent target lesion revascularization (41.2%). The overall restenosis rate in the IVRT and control groups were 23.91 and 39.86%, respectively (P=0.013). No complications were documented, except anginal pain and ST segment changes.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicated that the Re-188 liquid-filled balloon is feasible, safe, and effective in patients with in-stent restenosis.

Three-Year Clinical Follow-up Results of Intracoronary Radiation Therapy Using a Rhenium-188-Diethylene-Triamine-Penta-Acetic-Acid-Filled Balloon System

BACKGROUND

Intracoronary radiation therapy (IRT) prevents recurrent in-stent restenosis, but its long-term safety and efficacy remain uncertain. In the present study, the long-term clinical outcome of IRT using the rhenium-188 ((188)Re)-filled balloon system was evaluated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

After successful catheter-based treatment of either a de novo or restenotic lesion, 187 patients were randomly assigned to either the radiation (N=104) or the control (N=83) group. The (188)Re-filled balloon system was designed to deliver 17.6 Gy to 1.0-mm tissue depth. Angiographic restenosis was significantly reduced with IRT at 9 months (18.9% vs 45.9%, p<0.001), but the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including death, myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization (TVR) by 3 years showed no difference. Lack of clinical benefit might be related to TVR caused by geographic miss (6/22, 28.6%), balloon-induced unhealed dissection (3/22, 13.6%) and late thrombosis (2/22, 9.1%). In the restenotic subgroup (N=39), the MACE rate within 3 years was significantly reduced with IRT (14.3% vs 54.5%, p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

IRT using the (188)Re -filled balloon system is safe and technically feasible. Although IRT failed to show favorable outcomes for de novo lesion, the clinical benefits for restenotic lesions seem durable for 3 years. Furthermore, preventing geographic miss and dissection might improve long-term outcomes.