1
|
Wada N, Kurokawa Y, Takahashi T, Saito T, Yamamoto K, Yamashita K, Tanaka K, Makino T, Nakajima K, Tatsumi M, Eguchi H, Doki Y. Accurate Preoperative Evaluation of the Location of Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma Using Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography. Am Surg 2023; 89:6005-6012. [PMID: 37312037 DOI: 10.1177/00031348231183120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The surgical procedure for esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma usually depends on the location of its epicenter or proximal margin, but accurate evaluation of these positions is often difficult. The usefulness of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for this purpose is unknown. METHODS Between June 2005 and February 2015, we enrolled 30 patients with cT2-4 EGJ adenocarcinoma (Siewert type I/II) who underwent surgical resection. We ascertained the sensitivity and specificity of preoperative PET-CT for identifying the primary tumor and regional lymph node metastasis, and compared PET-CT and pathological findings in terms of the distance from the EGJ to the tumor epicenter or proximal tumor margin. RESULTS PET-CT detected the primary tumor with a sensitivity of 97% (29/30), and detected lymph node metastasis with a sensitivity and specificity of 22% (4/18) and 100% (8/8), respectively. No significant association was observed between the maximal standardized uptake value and histological type, tumor size, or pT status. Regarding the accuracy of evaluating tumor location, the median differences between PET-CT and pathological measurements were .6 cm for the tumor epicenter and .5 cm for the proximal margin from the EGJ. PET-CT and pathological findings showed agreement regarding Siewert classification type (I or II) and lengths of esophageal involvement exceeding 4 cm or 2 cm in 77% (10/13), 85% (11/13), and 85% (11/13) of cases, respectively. DISCUSSION PET-CT had high sensitivity for primary EGJ adenocarcinoma. It may effectively locate the tumor epicenter and proximal margin and thus help clinicians determine the optimal surgical procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noriko Wada
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Surgery, Ikeda City Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yukinori Kurokawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takuro Saito
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazuyoshi Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kotaro Yamashita
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Koji Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tomoki Makino
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kiyokazu Nakajima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Mitsuaki Tatsumi
- Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Eguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Doki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Boustani J, Créhange G. [Dose-escalated radiotherapy in esophageal cancer: A review of the literature]. Cancer Radiother 2022; 26:884-889. [PMID: 36008261 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/25/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
For non-operable, localized esophageal cancer, definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment. Currently, the radiation dose recommended is 50 to 50,4Gy. However, the optimal radiation dose remains controversial. Many studies have demonstrated that locoregional failure remains a common failure pattern, most likely to occur within the original gross tumor volume. Several retrospective studies have indicated that higher radiation dose may improve local control and survival while others failed to demonstrate improved oucomes. In three randomized trials (INT0123, ARTDECO, and CONCORDE), dose escalation did not improve locoregional control nor survival, establishing 50Gy as the standard chemoradiation dose for patients who will not undergo surgery. Here, we reviewed the results of dose escalation in the literature in the neoadjuvant and definitive settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Boustani
- Département de radiothérapie, Centre hospitalo-universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France.
| | - G Créhange
- Département de radiothérapie, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhu H, Liu Q, Xu H, Mo M, Wang Z, Lu K, Zhou J, Chen J, Zheng X, Ye J, Ge X, Luo H, Liu Q, Deng J, Ai D, Hao S, Zhang J, Tseng IH, Song S, Chen Y, Zhao K. Dose escalation based on 18F-FDG PET/CT response in definitive chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase III, open-label, randomized, controlled trial (ESO-Shanghai 12). Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:134. [PMID: 35906623 PMCID: PMC9338557 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02099-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Definitive chemoradiotherapy has established the standard non-surgical treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer. The standard dose of 50-50.4 Gy has been established decades ago and been confirmed in modern trials. The theorical advantage of better local control and technical advances for less toxicity have encouraged clinicians for dose escalation investigation. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) have the potential to tailor therapy for esophageal patients not showing response to CRT and pioneers the PET-based dose escalation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The ESO-Shanghai 12 trial is a prospective multicenter randomized phase 3 study in which patients are randomized to either 61.2 Gy or 50.4 Gy of radiation dose by PET response. Both groups undergo concurrent chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel/cisplatin regimen for 2 cycles followed by consolidation chemotherapy for 2 cycles. Patients with histologically confirmed ESCC [T1N1-3M0, T2-4NxM0, TxNxM1 (Supraclavicular lymph node metastasis only), (AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th Edition)] and without any prior treatment of chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery against esophageal cancer will be eligible. The primary endpoints included overall survival in PET/CT non-responders (SUVmax > 4.0) and overall survival in total population. Patients will be stratified by standardized uptake volume, gross tumor volume and tumor location. The enrollment could be ended, when the number of PET/CT non-responder reached 132 and the total population reached 646 for randomization. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This trial has been approved by the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center Institutional Review Board. Trial results will be disseminated via peer reviewed scientific journals and conference presentations. Trial registration The trial was initiated in 2018 and is currently recruiting patients. Trial registration number NCT03790553.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongcheng Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiufang Liu
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Hao Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Miao Mo
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Cancer Prevention and Statistics, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Zezhou Wang
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Cancer Prevention and Statistics, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Kui Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taizhou Second People's Hospital, Taizhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jialiang Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
| | - Junqiang Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xiangpeng Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jinjun Ye
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaolin Ge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Honglei Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Huaian No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huai'an, Jiangsu, China
| | - Qi Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiaying Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Dashan Ai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Shengnan Hao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Junhua Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - I Hsuan Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Shaoli Song
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Yun Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China. .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. .,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China.
| | - Kuaile Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China. .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. .,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vollenbrock SE, Voncken FEM, Bartels LW, Beets-Tan RGH, Bartels-Rutten A. Diffusion-weighted MRI with ADC mapping for response prediction and assessment of oesophageal cancer: A systematic review. Radiother Oncol 2019; 142:17-26. [PMID: 31431376 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2019] [Revised: 07/02/2019] [Accepted: 07/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim was to perform a systematic review on the value of diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping in the prediction and assessment of response to chemo- and/or radiotherapy in oesophageal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic search was performed on Pubmed, Embase, Medline and Cochrane databases. Studies that evaluated the ADC for response evaluation before, during or after chemo- and/or radiotherapy were included. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the quality of the included studies. RESULTS Fourteen studies, comprising 516 patients, in which the response to treatment in oesophageal cancer was evaluated on ADC maps were included. Acquisition parameter settings for DW-MRI and ROI placement varied substantially. The reference standard was RECIST or endoscopic assessment in eight non-surgery studies and histopathology after surgery in six studies. A high pre-treatment ADC significantly correlated with good response in three out of 12 studies; conversely, one study reported a significantly higher pre-treatment ADC in poor responders. In five out of eight studies good responders showed a significantly larger relative increase in ADC two weeks after the onset of treatment (range 23-59%) than poor responders (range 1.5-17%). After chemo- and/or radiotherapy ADC results varied considerably, amongst others due to large variation in the interval between completion of therapy and DW-MRI. CONCLUSION DW-MRI for response evaluation to chemo- and/or radiotherapy in oesophageal cancer shows variable methods and results. A large relative ADC increase after two weeks of treatment seems most predictive for good response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie E Vollenbrock
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Francine E M Voncken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lambertus W Bartels
- Image Sciences Institute, Imaging Division, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarieke Bartels-Rutten
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bütof R, Hofheinz F, Zöphel K, Schmollack J, Jentsch C, Zschaeck S, Kotzerke J, van den Hoff J, Baumann M. Prognostic value of SUR in patients with trimodality treatment of locally advanced esophageal carcinoma. J Nucl Med 2018; 60:jnumed.117.207670. [PMID: 30166358 PMCID: PMC8833854 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.207670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2018] [Accepted: 06/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The prognosis of patients with esophageal carcinoma remains dismal despite ongoing efforts to improve treatment options. For locally advanced tumors, several randomized trials have shown the benefit of neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery compared to surgery alone. The aim of this exploratory study was to evaluate the prognostic value of different baseline positron emission tomography (PET) parameters and their potentially additional prognostic impact at the end of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Furthermore, the standard uptake ratio (SUR) as a new parameter for quantification of tumor metabolism was compared to the conventional PET parameters metabolic active volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and standardized uptake value (SUV) taking into account known basic parameters. Methods:18F-FDG-PET/CT was performed in 76 consecutive patients ((60±10) years, 71 males) with newly diagnosed esophageal cancer before and during the last week of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. MTV of the primary tumor was delineated with an adaptive threshold method. The blood SUV was determined by manually delineating the aorta in the low dose CT. SUR values were computed as scan time corrected ratio of tumor SUVmax and mean blood SUV. Univariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis with respect to locoregional control (LRC), freedom from distant metastases (FFDM), and overall survival (OS) was performed. Additionally, independence of PET parameters from standard clinical factors was analyzed with multivariate Cox regression. Results: In multivariate analysis two parameters showed a significant correlation with all endpoints: restaging MTV and restaging SUR. Furthermore, restaging TLG was prognostic for LCR and FFDM. For all endpoints the largest effect size was found for restaging SUR. The only basic factors remaining significant in multivariate analyses were histology for OS and FFDM and age for LRC. Conclusion: PET provides independent prognostic information for OS, LRC, and FFDM in addition to standard clinical parameters in this patient cohort. Our results suggest that the prognostic value of tracer uptake can be improved when characterized by SUR rather than by SUV. Overall, our investigation revealed a higher prognostic value of restaging parameters compared to baseline PET; therapy-adjustments would still be possible at this point of time. Further investigations are required to confirm these hypothesis-generating results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay–National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Frank Hofheinz
- PET Center, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay–National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Julia Schmollack
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christina Jentsch
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay–National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay–National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- OncoRay–National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg van den Hoff
- PET Center, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay–National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; and
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology–OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Luo Y, Mao Q, Wang X, Yu J, Li M. Radiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma: dose, response and survival. Cancer Manag Res 2017; 10:13-21. [PMID: 29343986 PMCID: PMC5749557 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s144687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Esophageal cancer (EC) is an extremely aggressive, lethal malignancy that is increasing in incidence worldwide. At present, definitive chemoradiotherapy is accepted as the standard treatment for locally advanced EC. The EC guidelines recommend a radiation dose of 50.4 Gy for definitive treatment, yet the outcomes for patients who have received standard-dose radiotherapy remain unsatisfactory. However, some studies indicate that a higher radiation dose could improve local tumor control, and may also confer survival benefits. Some studies, however, suggest that high-dose radiotherapy does not bring survival benefit. The available data show that most failures occurred in the gross target volume (especially in the primary tumor) after definitive chemoradiation. Based on those studies, we hypothesize that at least for some patients, more intense local therapy may lead to better local control and survival. The aim of this review is to evaluate the radiation dose, fractionation strategies, and predictive factors of response to therapy in functional imaging for definitive chemoradiotherapy in esophageal carcinoma, with an emphasis on seeking the predictive model of response to CRT and trying to individualize the radiation dose for EC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yijun Luo
- Department of Oncology, The People's Hospital of Jiangxi, Nanchang
| | - Qingfeng Mao
- School of Medical and Life Sciences, University of Jinan-Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences.,Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiology, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Xiaoli Wang
- Department of Oncology, The People's Hospital of Jiangxi, Nanchang
| | - Jinming Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiology, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Minghuan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiology, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cremonesi M, Gilardi L, Ferrari ME, Piperno G, Travaini LL, Timmerman R, Botta F, Baroni G, Grana CM, Ronchi S, Ciardo D, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Garibaldi C, Orecchia R. Role of interim 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the early prediction of clinical outcomes of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) during radiotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy. A systematic review. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017; 44:1915-1927. [PMID: 28681192 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3762-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2017] [Accepted: 06/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) is characterized by aggressiveness and includes the majority of thorax malignancies. The possibility of early stratification of patients as responsive and non-responsive to radiotherapy with a non-invasive method is extremely appealing. The distribution of the Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) in tumours, provided by Positron-Emission-Tomography (PET) images, has been proved to be useful to assess the initial staging of the disease, recurrence, and response to chemotherapy and chemo-radiotherapy (CRT). OBJECTIVES In the last years, particular efforts have been focused on the possibility of using ad interim 18F-FDG PET (FDGint) to evaluate response already in the course of radiotherapy. However, controversial findings have been reported for various malignancies, although several results would support the use of FDGint for individual therapeutic decisions, at least in some pathologies. The objective of the present review is to assemble comprehensively the literature concerning NSCLC, to evaluate where and whether FDGint may offer predictive potential. METHODS Several searches were completed on Medline and the Embase database, combining different keywords. Original papers published in the English language from 2005 to 2016 with studies involving FDGint in patients affected by NSCLC and treated with radiation therapy or chemo-radiotherapy only were chosen. RESULTS Twenty-one studies out of 970 in Pubmed and 1256 in Embase were selected, reporting on 627 patients. CONCLUSION Certainly, the lack of univocal PET parameters was identified as a major drawback, while standardization would be required for best practice. In any case, all these papers denoted FDGint as promising and a challenging examination for early assessment of outcomes during CRT, sustaining its predictivity in lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Cremonesi
- Radiation Research Unit, European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy.
| | - Laura Gilardi
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Gaia Piperno
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Robert Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Francesca Botta
- Medical Physics Unit, European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy
| | - Guido Baroni
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano University, Milano, Italy
| | - Chiara Maria Grana
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy
| | - Sara Ronchi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy
| | - Delia Ciardo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Orecchia
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milano, Italy.,Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ma J, Wang Z, Wang C, Chen E, Dong Y, Song Y, Wang W, You D, Jiang W, Zang R. Individualized Radiation Dose Escalation Based on the Decrease in Tumor FDG Uptake and Normal Tissue Constraints Improve Survival in Patients With Esophageal Carcinoma. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2016; 16:75-80. [PMID: 26834115 DOI: 10.1177/1533034615627583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To determine whether individualized radiation dose escalation after planned chemoradiation based on the decrease in tumor and normal tissue constraints can improve survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma. METHODS From August 2005 to December 2010, 112 patients with squamous esophageal carcinoma were treated with radical concurrent chemoradiation. Patients received positron emission tomography-computer tomography scan twice, before radiation and after radiation dose of 50.4 Gy. All patients were noncomplete metabolic response groups according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in solid tumors. Only 52 patients with noncomplete metabolic response received individualized dose escalation based on tumor and normal tissue constraints. Survival and treatment failure were observed and analyzed using SPSS (13.0). RESULTS The rate of complete metabolic response for patients with noncomplete metabolic response after dose escalation reached 17.3% (9 of 52). The 2-year overall survival rates for patients with noncomplete metabolic response in the conventional and dose-escalation groups were 20.5% and 42.8%, respectively( P = .001). The 2-year local control rates for patients were 35.7% and 76.2%, respectively ( P = .002). When patients were classified into partial metabolic response and no metabolic response, 2-year overall survival rates for patients with partial metabolic response were significantly different in conventional and dose-escalation groups (33.8% vs 78.4%; P = .000). The 2-year overall survival rates for patients with no metabolic response in two groups (8.6% vs 15.1%) did not significantly differ ( P = .917). CONCLUSION Individualized radiation dose escalation has the potential to improve survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma according to increased rate of complete metabolic response. However, further trials are needed to confirm this and to identify patients who may benefit from dose escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinbo Ma
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, School of Medicine, Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Zhaoyang Wang
- 2 Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, School of Medicine, Qingdao University, Yantai, P.R. China
| | - Chengde Wang
- 2 Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, School of Medicine, Qingdao University, Yantai, P.R. China
| | - Ercheng Chen
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, School of Medicine, Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Yaozong Dong
- 2 Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, School of Medicine, Qingdao University, Yantai, P.R. China
| | - Yipeng Song
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, School of Medicine, Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Wei Wang
- 2 Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, School of Medicine, Qingdao University, Yantai, P.R. China
| | - Dong You
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, School of Medicine, Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Wei Jiang
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, School of Medicine, Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Rukun Zang
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, School of Medicine, Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hamai Y, Hihara J, Emi M, Furukawa T, Yamakita I, Kurokawa T, Okada M. Ability of Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography to Predict Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgical Treatment for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 102:1132-9. [PMID: 27319990 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2015] [Revised: 02/13/2016] [Accepted: 04/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Responses of esophageal cancer to neoadjuvant therapy and patient prognosis are difficult to predict preoperatively. This study aimed to determine the ability of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)FDG) positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to predict outcomes of trimodal therapy on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS The responses of 111 patients with ESCC were monitored using FDG-PET before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgical treatment. Associations between the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and pathologic responses (PRs) and prognosis were analyzed. RESULTS Responses were significantly associated with SUVmax after nCRT (post-SUVmax) and with the rate of decreases in the SUVmax (%ΔSUVmax) of the primary tumor. The optimal cutoffs for post-SUVmax and %ΔSUVmax determined from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were 2.7 (area under the curve [AUC], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.78; p = 0.001) and 75 (AUC, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.54-0.75; p = 0.01) for predicting a pathologic complete response (pCR) and 3.7 (AUC, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63-0.89; p < 0.001) and 70 (AUC, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.52-0.78; p = 0.02) for predicting a good response according to Japan Esophageal Society response criteria. These values reliably separated patients into groups with and without pCR and with and without a good response. Multivariate analysis showed that %ΔSUVmax (≤70 and >70) was an independent prognostic factor for disease-specific survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.21-0.98; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS SUVmax is a valuable preoperative predictor of tumor response and survival among patients who undergo trimodal therapy for ESCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoichi Hamai
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Jun Hihara
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
| | - Manabu Emi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Takaoki Furukawa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Ichiko Yamakita
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Kurokawa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Morihito Okada
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Although many PET tracers are in use, FDG still is the most widely used in clinical oncology practice. FDG therefore deserves an in-depth discussion, which is even more interesting because of the huge increase in the molecular biology of glucose metabolism. Obviously, other tracers are of increasing importance as well, and these will be discussed in short.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk De Ruysscher
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.
- Maastricht University Medical Center, GROW, Maastro clinic, Louvain, Belgium.
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, University Hospital for Radiation Oncology Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Elimova E, Wang X, Etchebehere E, Shiozaki H, Shimodaira Y, Wadhwa R, Planjery V, Charalampakis N, Blum MA, Hofstetter W, Lee JH, Weston BR, Bhutani MS, Rogers JE, Maru D, Skinner HD, Macapinlac HA, Ajani JA. 18-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission computed tomography as predictive of response after chemoradiation in oesophageal cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 2015; 51:2545-52. [PMID: 26321501 PMCID: PMC4663130 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2015] [Revised: 07/07/2015] [Accepted: 07/30/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to evaluate if a baseline, an interim or a post-chemoradiation (CTRT) 18-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) studies could provide information on pathologic response to CTRT and overall survival (OS). MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-one patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus, fit for trimodality therapy were prospectively enrolled. Most were men (93.5%), and had a stage III cancer (74.2%). Chemotherapy consisted of oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil (45.2%) and taxane/5-fluorouracil (54.8%). All patients underwent a baseline, an interim (performed 12 ± 2 days after the onset of CTRT) and a post-CTRT 18F-FDG PET/CT study. The 18F-FDG PET/CT variables evaluated were at baseline, interim and post-CTRT studies maximum standardised uptake value (SUV max) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). Clinical and 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters were correlated with pathologic complete response (pathCR) and OS. RESULTS Among the 31 patients studied, 61.3% achieved a clinical complete response (cCR) and 87.1% had surgery. The median OS was 35.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 19.9-NA). PathCR rate was 22.2%. There was only a marginal association between cCR and pathCR (p = 0.06). None of the other variables was predictive of pathCR. There was association between OS and baseline TLG (p = 0.03) at the optimal cutoff TLG value of 75.15. Additionally, TLG and ΔTLG post-CTRT were also associated with OS (p = 0.01 and 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSION None of the PET parameters is predictive of pathCR but TLG at baseline and post-CTRT are prognostic of OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Elimova
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd (FC10.3022), Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Xuemei Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd (FC10.3022), Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Elba Etchebehere
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd (FC10.3022), Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Hironori Shiozaki
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd (FC10.3022), Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yusuke Shimodaira
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd (FC10.3022), Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Roopma Wadhwa
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd (FC10.3022), Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Venkatram Planjery
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd (FC10.3022), Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Nikolaos Charalampakis
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd (FC10.3022), Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Mariela A Blum
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd (FC10.3022), Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Wayne Hofstetter
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd (FC10.3022), Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jeff H Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd (FC10.3022), Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Brian R Weston
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd (FC10.3022), Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Manoop S Bhutani
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd (FC10.3022), Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jane E Rogers
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd (FC10.3022), Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Dipen Maru
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd (FC10.3022), Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Heath D Skinner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd (FC10.3022), Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Homer A Macapinlac
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd (FC10.3022), Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jaffer A Ajani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd (FC10.3022), Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gauthé M, Richard-Molard M, Cacheux W, Michel P, Jouve JL, Mitry E, Alberini JL, Lièvre A. Role of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in gastrointestinal cancers. Dig Liver Dis 2015; 47:443-54. [PMID: 25766918 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2015.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2015] [Accepted: 02/06/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) has become a routine imaging modality for many malignancies and its use is currently increasing. In the present review article, we will summarize the evidence for FDG-PET/CT use in digestive cancers (excluding neuroendocrine tumours), and review the existing recommendations. While PET/CT is nowadays considered to be an important tool in the initial workup of oesophageal and anal cancers, new data are emerging regarding its use in assessing therapeutic efficacy, radiotherapy treatment planning, and detection of recurrence in case of isolated tumour marker elevation. Moreover, PET/CT may help decision making by detecting distant metastatic sites especially in potentially resectable metastatic colorectal cancer and, to a lesser extent, in localized gastric and pancreatic cancers. Finally, incidental focal colonic FDG uptakes require exploration by colonoscopy, as they are often associated with premalignant or malignant lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Gauthé
- Institut Curie, René Huguenin Hospital, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saint-Cloud, France; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
| | - Marion Richard-Molard
- Institut Curie, René Huguenin Hospital, Department of Radiation Therapy, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Wulfran Cacheux
- Institut Curie, Department of Medical Oncology, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Michel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rouen University Hospital, France; University of Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - Jean-Louis Jouve
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dijon University Hospital, University of Burgundy, INSERM U866, Dijon, France
| | - Emmanuel Mitry
- Institut Curie, René Huguenin Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Cloud, France; University of Versailles Saint Quentin, Faculty of Health Sciences, Montigny-Le-Bretonneux, France
| | - Jean-Louis Alberini
- Institut Curie, René Huguenin Hospital, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saint-Cloud, France; University of Versailles Saint Quentin, Faculty of Health Sciences, Montigny-Le-Bretonneux, France
| | - Astrid Lièvre
- Institut Curie, René Huguenin Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Cloud, France; University of Versailles Saint Quentin, Faculty of Health Sciences, Montigny-Le-Bretonneux, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Detecting Interval Metastases and Response Assessment Using 18F-FDG PET/CT After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer. Clin Nucl Med 2014; 39:862-7. [DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000000517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
14
|
|
15
|
Wilson JM, Partridge M, Hawkins M. The application of functional imaging techniques to personalise chemoradiotherapy in upper gastrointestinal malignancies. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2014; 26:581-96. [PMID: 24998430 PMCID: PMC4150923 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2014.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2014] [Revised: 05/22/2014] [Accepted: 06/12/2014] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Functional imaging gives information about physiological heterogeneity in tumours. The utility of functional imaging tests in providing predictive and prognostic information after chemoradiotherapy for both oesophageal cancer and pancreatic cancer will be reviewed. The benefit of incorporating functional imaging into radiotherapy planning is also evaluated. In cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract, the vast majority of functional imaging studies have used (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). Few studies in locally advanced pancreatic cancer have investigated the utility of functional imaging in risk-stratifying patients or aiding target volume definition. Certain themes from the oesophageal data emerge, including the need for a multiparametric assessment of functional images and the added value of response assessment rather than relying on single time point measures. The sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET to predict treatment response and survival are not currently high enough to inform treatment decisions. This suggests that a multimodal, multiparametric approach may be required. FDG-PET improves target volume definition in oesophageal cancer by improving the accuracy of tumour length definition and by improving the nodal staging of patients. The ideal functional imaging test would accurately identify patients who are unlikely to achieve a pathological complete response after chemoradiotherapy and would aid the delineation of a biological target volume that could be used for treatment intensification. The current limitations of published studies prevent integrating imaging-derived parameters into decision making on an individual patient basis. These limitations should inform future trial design in oesophageal and pancreatic cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Wilson
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Gray Laboratories, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, UK.
| | - M Partridge
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Gray Laboratories, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, UK
| | - M Hawkins
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Gray Laboratories, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dai T, Popa E, Shah MA. The Role of 18F-FDG PET Imaging in Upper Gastrointestinal Malignancies. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2014; 15:351-64. [DOI: 10.1007/s11864-014-0301-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
17
|
Schollaert P, Crott R, Bertrand C, D'Hondt L, Borght TV, Krug B. A systematic review of the predictive value of (18)FDG-PET in esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation on the survival outcome stratification. J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 18:894-905. [PMID: 24638928 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-014-2488-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2013] [Accepted: 02/19/2014] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We studied the predictive value of [(18) F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography ((18)FDG-PET) for assessing disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS A literature search (PUBMED/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane) was performed to identify full papers with (18)FDG-PET and survival data, using indexing terms and free text words. Studies with >10 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, presenting sequential or at least one post-adjuvant treatment (18)FDG-PET data and Kaplan-Meier survival curves with >6 months median follow-up period were included. We performed a meta-analysis for DFS and OS using the hazard ratio (HRs) as outcome measure. Sources of heterogeneity study were also explored. RESULTS We identified 26 eligible studies including a total of 1,544 patients (average age 62 years, 82% males). The TNM distribution was as follows: stage I 7%, II 24%, III 53% and IV 15%. The pooled HRs for complete metabolic response versus no response were 0.51 for OS (95% CI, 0.4-0.64; P < 0.00001) and 0.47 for DFS (95% CI, 0.38-0.57; P < 0.00001), respectively. No statistical heterogeneity was present. To explore sources of clinical heterogeneity, we also realised subgroup and regression analyses. Taken into account the moderate correlation between OS and DFS (ρ = 0.54), we used joint bivariate random regression model. These analyses did not show a statistically significant impact of study characteristics and PET modalities on the pooled outcome estimates. CONCLUSION Despite methodological and clinical heterogeneity, metabolic response on (18)FDG-PET is a significant predictor of long-term survival data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascaline Schollaert
- Nuclear Medicine Division, CHU UCL Mont-Godinne - Dinant, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1 Dr Therasse, 5530, Yvoir, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gillebert Q, Gligorov J, Kerrou K. Modification du métabolisme tumoral au cours du traitement : suivi de la réponse thérapeutique par tomographie par émission de positons. ONCOLOGIE 2013. [DOI: 10.1007/s10269-013-2322-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
19
|
Kwee RM, Vliegen RFA. Predicting tumour response to chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer by early interim 18F-FDG PET: where do we stand and where should we go? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2013; 40:475-6. [DOI: 10.1007/s00259-013-2347-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|