Diagnostic performance of 18F-fluorothymidine PET/CT for primary colorectal cancer and its lymph node metastasis: comparison with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT

Comparison of 18F-fluorothymidine Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Patients with Breast Cancer

The uptake of ¹⁸F-fluorothymidine (¹⁸F-FLT) depends on cells' proliferative rates. We compared the characteristics of ¹⁸F-FLT positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with those of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) PET/CT for breast cancer. We prospectively diagnosed patients with breast cancer who underwent ¹⁸F-FLT PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. Subsequently, significant differences and correlation coefficients of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in primary breast cancer and axillary lymph nodes were statistically evaluated. We enrolled eight patients with breast cancer. In six treatment-naive patients, the SUVmax for primary lesions showed a significant difference (mean, 2.1 vs. 4.1, p = 0.031) and a strong correlation (r = 0.969) between ¹⁸F-FLT and ¹⁸F-FDG. Further, although the SUVmax for the axillary lymph nodes did not show a significant difference between ¹⁸F-FLT and ¹⁸F-FDG (P = 0.246), there was a strong correlation between the two (r = 0.999). In a patient-by-patient study, there were cases in which only ¹⁸F-FDG uptake was observed in lymph nodes and normal breasts. Bone metastases demonstrated lower accumulation than bone marrow on the ¹⁸F-FLT PET/CT. In conclusion, a strong correlation was observed between the ¹⁸F-FLT PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT uptake. Differences in the biochemical characteristics of ¹⁸F-FLT and ¹⁸F-FDG were reflected in the accumulation differences for breast cancer, metastatic lesions, and normal organs.

Advanced Imaging Techniques in Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer

Imaging techniques are clinical decision-making tools in the evaluation of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this article is to discuss the potential of recent advances in imaging for diagnosis, prognosis, therapy planning, and assessment of response to treatment of CRC. Recent developments and new clinical applications of conventional imaging techniques such as virtual colonoscopy, dual-energy spectral computed tomography, elastography, advanced computing techniques (including volumetric rendering techniques and machine learning), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-based magnetization transfer, and new liver imaging techniques, which may offer additional clinical information in patients with CRC, are summarized. In addition, the clinical value of functional and molecular imaging techniques such as diffusion-weighted MR imaging, dynamic contrast material-enhanced imaging, blood oxygen level-dependent imaging, lymphography with contrast agents, positron emission tomography with different radiotracers, and MR spectroscopy is reviewed, and the advantages and disadvantages of these modalities are evaluated. Finally, the future role of imaging-based analysis of tumor heterogeneity and multiparametric imaging, the development of radiomics and radiogenomics, and future challenges for imaging of patients with CRC are discussed. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2018.

A pilot study of the diagnostic and prognostic values of FLT-PET/CT for pancreatic cancer: comparison with FDG-PET/CT

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to examine the diagnostic and prognostic values of ¹⁸F-fluorothymidine (FLT)-PET/CT for pancreatic cancer by comparing with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/CT.

METHODS

Fifteen patients with newly diagnosed pancreatic cancer underwent both FLT and FDG-PET/CT scans before treatment. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in detecting nodal and distant metastases were compared between both scans using McNemar exact or χ ² test. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic significance was assessed by Cox proportional hazards analysis.

RESULTS

Both scans visualized all primary cancers. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy per patient basis for detecting nodal metastasis were equal and 63.6% (7/11), 100% (4/4), and 73.3% (11/15) for both scans, and for detecting distant metastasis were 100% (6/6), 88.9% (8/9), and 93.3% (14/15) for FDG-PET/CT, and 50.0% (3/6), 100% (9/9), and 80.0% (12/15) for FLT-PET/CT, respectively, without significant difference in each of them between both scans (p > 0.05). However, of 4 patients with multiple liver metastases, FDG-PET/CT was positive in all, but FLT-PET/CT was negative in three patients. At univariate analysis, only FLT-SUV_max correlated with PFS (hazard ratio, 1.306, p = 0.048), and FDG total lesion glycolysis (TLG), FLT-SUV_max, and FLT-total lesion proliferation (TLP) correlated with OS (p = 0.021, p = 0.005, and p = 0.022, respectively). At bivariate analysis, FLT-SUV_max was superior to FDG-TLG or FLT-TLP for prediction of OS [HR (adjusted for FDG-TLG), 1.491, p = 0.034, HR (adjusted for FLT-TLP), 1.542, p = 0.023].

CONCLUSION

FLT-PET/CT may have a potential equivalent to FDG-PET/CT for detecting primary and metastatic cancers except liver metastasis. FLT-SUV_max can provide the most significant prognostic information.

Current clinical status of 18F-FLT PET or PET/CT in digestive and abdominal organ oncology

Positron emission tomography (PET) or PET/computed tomography (CT) using ¹⁸F-3'-fluoro-3'-deoxythymidine (¹⁸F-FLT) offers noninvasive assessment of cell proliferation in human cancers in vivo. The present review discusses the current status on clinical applications of ¹⁸F-FLT-PET (or PET/CT) in digestive and abdominal oncology by comparing with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG)-PET (or PET/CT). The results of this review show that although ¹⁸F-FLT uptake is lower in most cases of digestive and abdominal malignancies compared with ¹⁸F-FDG uptake, ¹⁸F-FLT-PET can be used to detect primary tumors. ¹⁸F-FLT-PET has shown greater specificity for N staging than ¹⁸F-FDG-PET which can show false-positive uptake in areas of inflammation. However, because of the high background uptake in the liver and bone marrow, it has a limited role of assessing liver and bone metastases. Instead, ¹⁸F-FLT-PET will be a powerful tool for monitoring response to treatment and provide prognostic information in digestive and abdominal oncology.

FLT-PET/CT diagnosis of primary and metastatic nodal lesions of gastric cancer: comparison with FDG-PET/CT

PURPOSE

To examine the diagnostic performance of (18)F-fluorothymidine (FLT)-PET/CT of primary and metastatic nodal lesions of gastric cancer by comparing with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/CT.

METHODS

The enrolled study population comprised 17 patients with 17 newly diagnosed gastric cancers who underwent surgery of the primary lesion and regional nodes after both FDG- and FLT-PET/CT scans. Visual detectability of the primary gastric lesions was correlated with pathological factors using the Fisher exact or Mann-Whitney U test. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in detecting nodal lesions were compared between both PET/CT scans using the McNemar exact or χ (2) test.

RESULTS

Fourteen of 17 (82.4%) primary cancers were visualized by both FDG- and FLT-PET/CT scans. Although FDG or FLT visibility was not significantly associated with tumor size (p = 0.16) or histological type (p = 1.00), the 3 nonvisible lesions were pathologically early (T1) cancers. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting nodal metastasis were 44.8% (13/29), 98.7% (164/166), and 90.8% (177/195) for FDG-PET/CT, and 31.0% (9/29), 100% (166/166), and 89.7% (175/195) for FLT-PET/CT, respectively. No significant difference was found between the two scans in sensitivity (p = 0.13), specificity (p = 0.48), or accuracy (p = 1.00).

CONCLUSION

FLT-PET/CT may have the same diagnostic value as FDG-PET/CT for detection of primary and nodal lesions of gastric cancer.

Correlations of (18)F-fluorothymidine uptake with pathological tumour size, Ki-67 and thymidine kinase 1 expressions in primary and metastatic lymph node colorectal cancer foci

OBJECTIVE

To examine correlations of (18)F-fluorothymidine (FLT) uptake with pathological tumour size and immunohistochemical Ki-67, and thymidine kinase 1 (TK-1) expressions in primary and metastatic node colorectal cancer foci.

METHODS

Thirty primary cancers (PCs) and 37 metastatic nodes (MNs) were included. FLT uptake was assessed by visual scores (non-visible: 0-1 and visible: 2-4), standardized uptake value (SUV), and correlated with size, Ki-67, and TK-1. SUV was measured in visible lesions. FLT heterogeneity was assessed by visual scores (no heterogeneous uptake: 0 and heterogeneous uptake: 1-4).

RESULTS

Forty-two lesions were visible. The visible group showed significantly higher values than the non-visible group in size, Ki-67, and TK-1 (each p < 0.05). Size correlated significantly with visual score (PC; ρ = 0.74 and MN; ρ = 0.63), SUVmax (PC; ρ = 0.49, and MN; ρ = 0.76), and SUVmean (PC; ρ = 0.40 and MN; ρ = 0.76) (each p < 0.05). Visual score correlated significantly with size (ρ = 0.86), Ki-67max (ρ = 0.35), Ki-67mean (ρ = 0.38), TK-1max (ρ = 0.35) and TK-1mean (ρ = 0.25) (each p < 0.05). No significant correlations were found between FLT uptake and Ki-67 or TK-1 in 42 visible lesions (each p > 0.05). Heterogeneous FLT uptake was noted in 73 % (22/30) of PCs.

CONCLUSION

FLT uptake correlated with size. Heterogeneous FLT distribution in colorectal cancers may be one of the causes of weak or lack of FLT uptake/Ki-67 or TK-1 correlation.

KEY POINTS

FLT uptake correlated well with tumour size in colorectal cancer. Weak or lack of FLT uptake/Ki-67 and TK-1 correlations were observed. Immunohistochemical Ki-67 and TK-1 expressions are not always correlated with FLT uptake.

PET probes beyond (18)F-FDG

During the past several decades, positron emission tomography (PET) has been one of the rapidly growing areas of medical imaging; particularly, its applications in routine oncological practice have been widely recognized. At present, (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) is the most broadly used PET probe. However, (18)F-FDG also suffers many limitations. Thus, scientists and clinicians are greatly interested in exploring and developing new PET imaging probes with high affinity and specificity. In this review, we briefly summarize the representative PET probes beyond (18)F-FDG that are available for patients imaging in three major clinical areas (oncology, neurology and cardiology), and we also discuss the feasibility and trends in developing new PET probes for personalized medicine.