The "reset button" revisited: why high activity 131I therapy of advanced differentiated thyroid cancer after dosimetry is advantageous for patients

Personalized Dosimetry in the Context of Radioiodine Therapy for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

The most frequent thyroid cancer is Differentiated Thyroid Cancer (DTC) representing more than 95% of cases. A suitable choice for the treatment of DTC is the systemic administration of 131-sodium or potassium iodide. It is an effective tool used for the irradiation of thyroid remnants, microscopic DTC, other nonresectable or incompletely resectable DTC, or all the cited purposes. Dosimetry represents a valid tool that permits a tailored therapy to be obtained, sparing healthy tissue and so minimizing potential damages to at-risk organs. Absorbed dose represents a reliable indicator of biological response due to its correlation to tissue irradiation effects. The present paper aims to focus attention on iodine therapy for DTC treatment and has developed due to the urgent need for standardization in procedures, since no unique approaches are available. This review aims to summarize new proposals for a dosimetry-based therapy and so explore new alternatives that could provide the possibility to achieve more tailored therapies, minimizing the possible side effects of radioiodine therapy for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

Comparison of Choi, RECIST and Somatostatin Receptor PET/CT Based Criteria for the Evaluation of Response and Response Prediction to PRRT

Aim: The most suitable method for assessment of response to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) of neuroendocrine tumors (NET) is still under debate. In this study we aimed to compare size (RECIST 1.1), density (Choi), Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) and a newly defined ZP combined parameter derived from Somatostatin Receptor (SSR) PET/CT for prediction of both response to PRRT and overall survival (OS). Material and Methods: Thirty-four NET patients with progressive disease (F:M 23:11; mean age 61.2 y; SD ± 12) treated with PRRT using either Lu-177 DOTATOC or Lu-177 DOTATATE and imaged with Ga-68 SSR PET/CT approximately 10–12 weeks prior to and after each treatment cycle were retrospectively analyzed. Median duration of follow-up after the first cycle was 63.9 months (range 6.2–86.2). A total of 77 lesions (2–8 per patient) were analyzed. Response assessment was performed according to RECIST 1.1, Choi and modified EORTC (MORE) criteria. In addition, a new parameter named ZP, the product of Hounsfield unit (HU) and SUVmean (Standard Uptake Value) of a tumor lesion, was tested. Further, SUV values (max and mean) of the tumor were normalized to SUV of normal liver parenchyma. Tumor response was defined as CR, PR, or SD. Gold standard for comparison of baseline parameters for prediction of response of individual target lesions to PRRT was change in size of lesions according to RECIST 1.1. For prediction of overall survival, the response after the first and second PRRT were tested. Results: Based on RECIST 1.1, Choi, MORE, and ZP, 85.3%, 64.7%, 61.8%, and 70.6% achieved a response whereas 14.7%, 35.3%, 38.2%, and 29.4% demonstrated PD (progressive disease), respectively. Baseline ZP and ZPnormalized were found to be the only parameters predictive of lesion progression after three PRRT cycles (AUC ZP 0.753; 95% CI 0.6–0.9, p 0.037; AUC ZPnormalized 0.766; 95% CI 0.6–0.9; p 0.029). Based on a cut-off-value of 1201, ZP achieved a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 67%, while ZPnormalized reached a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 76% at a cut-off-value of 198. Median OS in the total cohort was not reached. In univariate analysis amongst all parameters, only patients having progressive disease according to MORE after the second cycle of PRRT were found to have significantly shorter overall survival (median OS in objective responders not reached, in PD 29.2 months; p 0.015). Patients progressive after two cycles of PRRT according to ZP had shorter OS compared to those responding (median OS for responders not reached, for PD 47.2 months, p 0.066). Conclusions: In this explorative study, we showed that Choi, RECIST 1.1, and SUVmax-based response evaluation varied significantly from each other. Only patients showing progressive disease after two PRRT cycles according to MORE criteria had a worse prognosis while baseline ZP and ZPnormalized performed best in predicting lesion progression after three cycles of PRRT.

Dosimetry of nuclear medicine therapies: current controversies and impact on treatment optimization

Nuclear medicine therapeutic procedures have considerably expanded over the last few years, and their number is expected to grow exponentially in the future. Internal dosimetry has significantly developed as well, but has not yet been uniformly accepted as a valuable tool for prediction of therapeutic efficacy and toxicity. In this paper, we briefly summarize some of the arguments about the implementation of internal dosimetry in clinical practice. In addition, we provide a few examples of radionuclide anticancer therapies for which internal dosimetry demonstrated a significant impact on treatment optimization and patient outcome.

Dosimetric optimization of nuclear medicine therapy based on the Council Directive 2013/59/EURATOM and the Italian law N. 101/2020. Position paper and recommendations by the Italian National Associations of Medical Physics (AIFM) and Nuclear Medicine (AIMN)

This recommendation by the Italian Associations of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) and Medical Physics (AIFM) focuses on the dosimetric optimization of Nuclear Medicine Therapy (NMT) as clearly requested by the article 56 of the EURATOM Directive 2013/59 and its consequent implementation in article 158 in the Italian Law n. 101/2020. However, this statement must deal with scientific and methodological limits that still exist and, above all, with the currently available limited resources. This paper addresses these specific issues. It distinguishes among many possible kinds of NMT. For each type, dosimetric optimization is recommended or considered optional, according to the general criteria adopted in any human choice, i.e. a check of technical feasibility first, followed by a cost/benefit argument. The classification of therapies as standardized or non-standardized is presented. This is based on the complexity of the type of pathology, on the variability of the treatment outcome, and on the risks involved. According to the present document, which was officially delivered to Italian Health Ministry as necessary interpretation of the law, a therapeutic team can, in science and consciousness, overcome the indications of posology, to optimize and tailoring a treatment with dosimetry, on the basis of published national or international data or guidelines, without need of an Ethics Committee approval. Data collected in this way will provide additional evidence about optimal dosimetric reference values. As conclusion, a formal appeal is made to the European and National regulatory agencies for pharmaceuticals to obtain the official acknowledgment of this principle.

Managing radioiodine refractory thyroid cancer: the role of dosimetry and redifferentiation on subsequent I-131 therapy

Poor responses to iodine-131 (I-131) therapy can relate to either low iodine uptake and retention in thyroid cancer cells or to increased radioresistance. Both mechanisms are currently termed radioactive iodine (RAI)-refractory (RAI-R) thyroid cancer but the first reflects unsuitability for I-131 therapy that can be evaluated in advance of treatment, whereas the other can only be identified post hoc. Management of both represents a considerable challenge in clinical practice as failure of I-131 therapy, the most effective treatment of metastatic thyroid cancer, is associated with a poor overall prognosis. The development of targeted therapies has shown substantial promise in the treatment of RAI-R thyroid cancer in progressive patients. Recent studies show that selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting B-type rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma kinase (BRAF) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) can be used as redifferentiation agents to re-induce RAI uptake, thereby (re)enabling I-131 therapy. The use of dosimetry prior- and post-TKI treatment can assist in quantifying RAI uptake and improve identification of patients that will benefit from I-131 therapy. It also potentially offers the prospect of calculating individualized therapeutic administered activities to enhance efficacy and limit toxicity. In this review, we present an overview of the regulation of RAI uptake and clinically investigated redifferentiation agents, both reimbursed and in experimental setting, that induce renewed RAI uptake. We describe the role of dosimetry in redifferentiation and subsequent I-131 therapy in RAI-R thyroid cancer, explain different dosimetry approaches and discuss limitations and considerations in the field.

Prospects for Personalised Treatment of Patients with Radioiodine-avid Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Thyroid Cancer

Although most patients with metastatic or inoperable locally recurrent differentiated thyroid cancer have radioiodine-avid disease, the outcome for patients who do not achieve remission with radioiodine therapy is poor. Most centres use fixed empirical activities of radioiodine to treat these patients, which is in contrast to other areas of oncology, where there is a shift to more individualised treatment. The use of dosimetry techniques to calculate a more appropriate activity of radioiodine for each patient may increase the effectiveness of radioiodine therapy but is more complex, time-consuming and of unproven benefit. This review addresses some of the limitations of empirical radioiodine therapy, discusses existing dosimetry-based approaches to individualising therapy and proposes further work in this area. A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing empirical activities of radioiodine with activities guided by a combination of lesional dosimetry and maximum safe dose has not been carried out previously. Although considerable challenges in the design of such a study remain, a network of centres in the UK now has the potential to take this forward.

Thyroid uptake test with portable device (COTI) after 131I tracer administration: proof of concept

COTI (collar therapy indicator) has been recently introduced for the detection of gamma rays with emphasis on thyroid investigations. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of a prototype version of COTI including activity detectors with low sensitivity in performing thyroid uptake measurements for a large group of patients. Consequently, thyroid uptake tests were carried out for a total of 89 patients (22 males and 67 females; age: 44 ± 13 years) with thyroid cancer (n = 74), hyperthyroidism (n = 16) at 2 and 24 h after administration of 0.44-2 MBq of ¹³¹I. Eight individuals among the thyroid cancer patients were monitored up to 96 h after administration. The COTI device was equipped with two CsI (Tl) detectors, known as LoHi type, sensitive to activity ranges from 0.02 to 30 MBq of ¹³¹I. The uptake values from COTI were compared with those measured with a standard probe. It was found that the mean uptake of thyroid activity in thyroid cancer patients was 2.1 ± 1.3% at 2 h when measured with the standard probe, while it was 2.2 ± 1.2% when measured with COTI. In addition, the average uptake at 24 h after administration was 2.5 ± 3.2% and 3.2 ± 3.8% measured with COTI and the standard probe, respectively. A strong correlation was found at 24 h between the results obtained with COTI and the standard probe, while a weaker correlation was seen at 2 h. Overall, there was no significant difference between the results obtained with the standard probe and those obtained with COTI at both 2 and 24 h (P_value ≥ 0.05). Besides, 85% of the uptake values measured with COTI were less than those measured with the standard probe at the 24 h after administration. The average uptake value was 0.9 ± 0.8% after 96 h by COTI, and 1.4 ± 1.3% by the standard probe. Pertaining to the hyperthyroidism patients, COTI showed mean uptake values of 20 ± 16% and 23 ± 18% at 2 and 24 h, respectively. In contrast, the standard probe suggested higher mean uptake values of 26 ± 18% and 30 ± 22%, respectively. It is concluded that the prototype of COTI used in the present study has been proved to be a feasible and promising tool in thyroid investigations. It is noted, however, that the next COTI generation should include detectors equipped with collimator and energy discrimination.

Theranostic approaches in nuclear medicine: current status and future prospects

Introduction: Theranostics is an emerging field in which diagnosis and specific targeted therapy are combined to achieve a personalized treatment approach to the patient. In nuclear medicine clinical practice, theranostics is often performed utilizing the same molecule labeled with two different radionuclides, one radionuclide for imaging and another for therapy.Areas covered: The authors review the clinical applications of different radiopharmaceuticals in the field of interest, including the well-established use of radioactive iodine in differentiated thyroid cancer, radiolabeled metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) in neuroblastoma and the clinical impact of peptide radionuclide receptorial therapy (PRRT) in the management of neuroendocrine tumors. Furthermore, the more cutting-edge and recently introduced theranostic approaches will be reviewed, such as the radioligand therapy with ¹⁷⁷Lu-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and targeted alpha therapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Finally, the main applications of PET for the imaging of biomarkers suitable for the non-radionuclide targeted therapy will be covered.Expert opinion: Theranostics is envisaging a revolutionary clinical approach which is deeply connected with the concept of personalized medicine and ruled by a 'patient-centered' vision. In this perspective, the theranostic applications will need well-trained specialists, capable to manage not only the technological aspects of the discipline, but also to deal with the more innovative oncological therapies in a multidisciplinary setting.

Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway Inhibition for Redifferentiation of Radioiodine Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: An Evolving Protocol

Background: Some patients with metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) lack iodine avidity and are therefore unsuitable for radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy. Limited experience suggests that single-agent selective mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway inhibitors can restore expression of the sodium-iodide symporter rendering RAI refractory (RAIR) DTC patients amenable to RAI therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of mutation-guided MAPK-pathway blockade combined with thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW) for redifferentiation. Methods: This is a retrospective review of metastatic RAIR DTC and driver mutation in MAPK pathway, treated on a redifferentiation protocol. All patients had metastatic disease that had never been RAI-avid and/or imaging and biochemical progression despite treatment with RAI within the past 12 months. Patients with tumors harboring an NRAS mutation were treated with an MEK inhibitor (trametinib), and tumors with a BRAF^V600E mutation with combined BRAF and MEK inhibition (dabrafenib and trametinib; or vemurafenib and cobimetinib) for four weeks. Thyrotropin stimulation was performed by THW for four weeks. Restoration of RAI uptake was determined by ¹²⁴I positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging. The response was assessed at least three months post-RAI. Results: From 2015 to 2017, six patients (age 45-70, four females) received redifferentiation therapy. Three patients had an NRAS mutation; two with follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) and one with a poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma (PDTC); and three patients had a BRAF^V600E mutation and papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). One NRAS and all BRAF^V600E mutation cases demonstrated restoration of RAI uptake and proceeded to RAI therapy with a median follow-up of 16.6 months (range 13.5-42.3 months). The patient with an NRAS mutation and two of three patients with a BRAF^V600E demonstrated partial imaging response beyond a three-month follow-up. Grade 3 adverse events (acneiform rash) were observed in two patients with NRAS mutations. Conclusions: Mutation-guided MAPK pathway inhibition with MEK inhibitor or a combination of BRAF inhibitor and MEK inhibitor under concurrent THW is a feasible and a promising strategy to redifferentiate RAIR DTC, thereby rendering them suitable for RAI therapy with satisfactory retention following treatment.

Salivary gland function in thyroid cancer patients with radioiodine administration history

AIM

Radioiodine (RAI) improves survival in patients with locally advanced or metastatic differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). Although there has been an ongoing debate on RAI-induced salivary gland damage, published data have been inconsistent. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to compare salivary gland function in intermediate and high risk DTC patients after single or repeated RAI treatment with their age- and sex-matched RAI-naive counterparts.

METHODS

Uptake and excretion of parotid and submandibular glands were quantitatively evaluated using ^99mTc-pertechnetate salivary gland scintigraphy in 23 patients previously treated with RAI. Patients (median 9.25 GBq ¹³¹I-NaI; Q1-Q3: 5.55-16.65; range: 5.55-27.5) were divided into subgroups according to previously administered ¹³¹I-NaI activity using cut-off values 5.55 GBq and 9.25 GBq. Their salivary gland scintigraphy results were compared with RAI-naive patients using Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

Compared to RAI-naive patients, parotid glands pertechnetate uptake was significantly lower in those treated with > 9.25 GBq (P=0.034) and parotid glands excretion fraction was already decreased with RAI activities > 5.55 GBq (P=0.031). In submandibular glands, no statistically significant difference in either function was observed even with RAI activity > 9.25 GBq.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that RAI therapy using activities ≤ 5.55 GBq does not substantially decrease saliva production. Activities > 5.55 GBq may lead to significant decrease in parotid excretion, and activities > 9.25 GBq also diminish parotid uptake. Surprisingly, submandibular glands, providing majority of seromucinous saliva under basal condition, seem to be unaffected even by RAI activities above 9.25 GBq.

Perspectives for Concepts of Individualized Radionuclide Therapy, Molecular Radiotherapy, and Theranostic Approaches

Radionuclide therapy (RNT) stands on the delivery of radiation to tumors or non-tumor target organs using radiopharmaceuticals that are designed to have specific affinity to targets. RNT is recently called molecular radiotherapy (MRT) by some advocators in order to emphasize its characteristics as radiotherapy and the relevance of dosimetry-guided optimization of treatment. Moreover, RNT requires relevant radiation protection standards because it employs unsealed radionuclides and gives therapeutic radiation doses in humans. On the basis of these radiation protection standards, the development and use of radiopharmaceuticals for combined application through diagnostics and therapeutics lead to theranostic approaches that will enhance the efficacy and safety of treatment by implementing dosimetry-based individualization.

European Perspective on 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Proceedings of an Interactive International Symposium

BACKGROUND

The American Thyroid Association (ATA) management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) are highly influential practice recommendations. The latest revision appeared in 2015 ("ATA 2015"). These guidelines were developed predominantly by North American experts. European experts frequently have different perspectives, given epidemiological, technological/methodological, practice organization, and medicolegal differences between the respective regions.

SUMMARY

Divergent viewpoints were the focus of an invited symposium organized by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine involving 17 European thyroidologists, four ATA Guidelines Taskforce members, and an audience of 200 international experts. The group discussed the preoperative assessment of thyroid nodules, surgery and the role of pathology, radioiodine (RAI) therapy (RAIT), the assessment of initial therapy and dynamic risk stratification, and the treatment of persistent disease, recurrences, and advanced thyroid cancer. The dialogue resulted in this position paper contrasting European and ATA 2015 perspectives on key issues. One difference pertains to the permissiveness of ATA 2015 regarding lobectomy for primary tumors ≤4 cm. European panelists cited preclusion of RAIT, potential need for completion thyroidectomy, frequent inability to avoid chronic thyroid hormone replacement, and limitations of supportive evidence as arguments against widely applying lobectomy. Significant divergence involved ATA 2015's guidance regarding RAIT. European panelists favored wider use of postoperative RAIT than does ATA 2015. Rationales included the modality's association with favorable patient outcomes and generally limited toxicity, and lack of high-quality evidence supporting withholding RAIT. Additionally, European panelists favored recombinant human thyrotropin (rhTSH) in more settings than does ATA 2015, citing avoidance of hypothyroid morbidity and quality-of-life impairment, without apparent sacrifice in oncologic outcomes. Based on clinical evidence plus theoretical advantages, European experts advocated dosimetric versus fixed-activity RAIT approaches for advanced DTC. European panelists noted that the ATA 2015 risk-stratification system requires information sometimes unavailable in everyday practice. ATA 2015 recommendations regarding RAI-refractory DTC should consider potential palliative benefits of RAIT in patients who also have RAI-susceptible lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

European panelists suggested modifications to approximately one-third of ATA 2015 recommendations. Varying European and ATA 2015 perspectives can stimulate analysis and discussion of the literature and performance of primary research to resolve discrepant recommendations and potentially improve patient outcomes.

Red bone marrow dose estimation using several internal dosimetry models for prospective dosimetry-oriented radioiodine therapy

The aim of the present study was to review the available models developed for calculating red bone marrow dose in radioiodine therapy using clinical data. The study includes 18 patients (12 females and six males) with metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer. Radioiodine tracer of 73 ± 16 MBq ¹³¹I was orally administered, followed by blood sampling (2 ml) and whole-body scans (WBSs) done at several time points (2, 6, 24, 48, 72, and ≥ 96 h). Red bone marrow dose was estimated using the OLINDA/EXM 1.0, IDAC-Dose 2.1, and EANM models, the models developed by Shen and co-workers, Keizer and co-workers and Siegel and co-workers, and Traino and co-workers, as well as the single measurement model (SMM). The results were then compared to the standard reference model Revised Sgouros Model (RSM) reported by Wessels and co-workers. The mean dose deviations of the Traino, Siegel, Shen, Keizer, OLINDA/EXM, EANM, SMM, and IDAC-Dose 2.1 models from the RSM were - 17%, - 24%, 6%, - 29%, - 15%, 40%, 48%, and - 8%, respectively. The statistical analysis demonstrated no significant difference between the results obtained with the RSM and with those obtained with the Shen, Traino, OLINDA/EXM, and IDAC-Dose 2.1 models (t test; p_value > 0.05). However, a significant difference was found between RSM doses and those obtained with the EANM, SMM, and Keizer models (t test; p_value < 0.05). The correlation between red marrow dose from the SMM and EANM models was modest (R² = 0.65), while the crossfire dose calculated with the OLINDA/EXM and IDAC-Dose 2.1 models were in good agreement with each other and with the reference model. The findings obtained indicate that most of the dosimetry models can be used for a reliable dosimetry, and the calculated total body doses can be considered as a reliable non-invasive option for a conservative activity planning. In addition, the excellent performance of the IDAC-Dose 2.1 model will be of particular importance for a practical and accurate dosimetry, with the advantages of allowing for the use of realistic advanced phantoms and updated dose fractions, and of providing information about the blood dose contribution to the red bone marrow.

Low-Activity Radioactive Iodine Therapy for Thyroid Carcinomas Exhibiting Nodal Metastases and Extrathyroidal Extension May Lead to Early Disease Recurrence

BACKGROUND

The application of radioactive iodine in differentiated thyroid carcinomas has become more selective in an attempt to decrease morbidity. While ablative success has been documented, it is less clear how changes in radioactive iodine treatment strategies will influence long-term recurrence rates for patients with larger tumors and adverse pathological features, including extrathyroidal extension and nodal metastases.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed between 1995 and 2008 with differentiated thyroid carcinoma treated with thyroidectomy followed by radioactive iodine treatment were eligible. All patients were followed for a minimum of five years using a standardized follow-up protocol requiring both biochemical and imaging assessments for recurrent disease (n = 219). Patients were stratified by initial radioactive iodine activity, and disease-free survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with significant differences defined by the log-rank test.

RESULTS

In this cohort, 46% of patients had clinical metastases and 74% had primary tumors >1.5 cm. Patients who had recurrences were more likely to present with extrathyroidal extension (p = 0.002) and lymph node metastases at diagnosis (p < 0.001). Patients presenting with both extrathyroidal extension and lymph node metastases had a significantly worse time to progression if treated with <1850 MBq radioactive iodine compared to those patients treated with >1850 MBq (25 months vs. 121 months; p = 0.004). The use of lower-activity radioactive iodine ablative therapy was associated with more early recurrences (p = 0.003). Being aged younger or older than 45 years did not impact the time to recurrence nor did the use of level 6 dissection. On multivariate analysis, lymph node metastases at diagnosis and multiple applications of radioactive iodine were linked to increased risk of recurrence. Patients with neither, or only one, adverse pathologic feature had excellent outcomes, regardless of initial ablative activity, with <10% of patients recurring over a 10-year time span.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrent disease in differentiated thyroid carcinoma is more common in patients treated with low-activity radioactive iodine in patients with lymph node metastases and extrathyroidal extension. These recurrences typically occur within four years of initial treatment. Patients lacking both of these risk factors treated with low radioactive iodine activity (<1850 MBq) have excellent outcomes, even after 10 years.