Therapy assessment in prostate cancer using choline and PSMA PET/CT

Diagnostic Performance of PSMA-Based 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Patients After Definitive Treatment With PSA Level ≤0.2 ng/mL

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT in the evaluation of prostate cancer (PC) patients after definitive treatment and with low-level prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of ≤0.2 ng/mL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in PC patients who received definitive treatments with PSA level of ≤0.2 ng/mL and underwent 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT within a 1-week interval of PSA examination, and without interval treatment change or history of other cancer. Patient and tumor characteristics at initial diagnosis, treatment regimens, and findings on 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT were collected. Patients with minimal 6-month (median, 11 months; range, 6-21 months) follow-up or definitive biopsy results of the suspected PET/CT findings were included. Imagine findings were reached with consensus among experienced board-certified nuclear medicine physicians. Comprehensive follow-up and/or biopsy results were used as definitive determination of presence or absence of disease. Comparisons between groups of positive and negative 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT were done by using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 96 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CTs from 93 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median Gleason score (GS) of positive group is 8 (range, 6-10), whereas negative group is 7 (range, 6-10). The median age of positive group is 71 (range, 50-90), whereas negative group is 69 (range, 45-88). There were 49 positive (51%) and 47 negative 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CTs (49%). Detection rates at PSA level of ≤0.1 and 0.2 ng/mL were 58.7% (27/46) and 44% (22/50), respectively. The scan-based sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value are 100%, 95%, 96%, and 100% in group with PSA level of ≤0.1 ng/mL, and 100%, 97%, 95%, and 100% in group with PSA level of 0.2 ng/mL, respectively. Sites of involvement on positive 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CTs were prostate bed, pelvic lymph nodes, bone, chest and supraclavicular lymph nodes, lung, and adrenal glands. The SUV max value on positive lesions ranged from 1.9 to 141.4; the smallest positive lymph node was 0.4 cm. High GS of 8-10, known metastatic status (M1), presence of extraprostatic extension, presence of seminal vesicle invasion, and very high-risk PC are significantly associated with positive 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT results ( P < 0.05). Of all analyzed treatment regimes, upfront surgery (radical prostatectomy with or without pelvic lymph node dissection) had strong correlation with negative PET/CT results ( P < 0.001). If patients received ADT only, or ADT plus chemotherapy, the PET/CT results were most likely positive ( P = 0.026). For other treatment regimes, there were no statistical differences between the groups ( P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In the presence of low PSA level in PC patients after definitive treatment, 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT is most beneficial in detection of disease in patients with GS of 8 or higher at the time of diagnosis, and the ones who have history of ADT only, or ADT plus chemotherapy. There is excellent negative prediction value of 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT. However, there is no cutoff PSA level for 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT indication and no correlation between PSA level and SUV max of positive lesions on 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT.

PSMA and Choline PET for the Assessment of Response to Therapy and Survival Outcomes in Prostate Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review from the Literature

Simple Summary

Radiolabeled choline and PSMA PET have been largely tested in the initial staging of prostate cancer and for biochemical recurrence. Moreover, diverse data are now available about their role in the evaluation of response to local and systematic therapies, and their predictive impact on the prognosis, before and after therapy. Therefore, in the present systematic review, we aimed to describe the available data, to summarize the current evidence in these settings of disease.

Abstract

The aims of this systematic review were to (1) assess the utility of PSMA-PET and choline-PET in the assessment of response to systemic and local therapy, and to (2) determine the value of both tracers for the prediction of response to therapy and survival outcomes in prostate cancer. We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed/Scopus/Google Scholar/Cochrane/EMBASE databases (between January 2010 and October 2021) accordingly. The quality of the included studies was evaluated following the “Quality Assessment of Prognostic Accuracy Studies” tool (QUAPAS-2). We selected 40 articles: 23 articles discussed the use of PET imaging with [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA-11 (16 articles/1123 patients) or [¹¹C]/[¹⁸F]Choline (7 articles/356 patients) for the prediction of response to radiotherapy (RT) and survival outcomes. Seven articles (three with [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA-11, three with [¹¹C]Choline, one with [¹⁸F]Choline) assessed the role of PET imaging in the evaluation of response to docetaxel (as neoadjuvant therapy in one study, as first-line therapy in five studies, and as a palliative regimen in one study). Seven papers with radiolabeled [¹⁸F]Choline PET/CT (n = 121 patients) and three with [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA-11 PET (n = 87 patients) were selected before and after enzalutamide/abiraterone acetate. Finally, [¹⁸F]Choline and [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA-11 PET/CT as gatekeepers for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer with Radium-223 were assessed in three papers. In conclusion, in patients undergoing RT, radiolabeled choline and [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA-11 have an important prognostic role. In the case of systemic therapies, the role of such new-generation imaging techniques is still controversial without sufficient data, thus requiring additional in this scenario.

Targeting PSMA Revolutionizes the Role of Nuclear Medicine in Diagnosis and Treatment of Prostate Cancer

Simple Summary

Imaging plays a crucial role in the accurate staging of prostate cancer. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is overexpressed in prostate cancer cells, and targeting the PSMA protein for diagnostic purposes has become of great clinical value. Another valuable feature of PSMA is its opportunity to serve as a target for delivering radionuclide therapy to cancer cells. PSMA-ligands can be labeled with various radionuclides, such as alpha and beta-emitters. This review offers an overview of the literature on recent developments in nuclear medicine regarding PSMA in prostate cancer diagnostics and targeted radionuclide therapy.

Abstract

Targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) protein has become of great clinical value in prostate cancer (PCa) care. PSMA positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is increasingly used in initial staging and restaging at biochemical recurrence in patients with PCa, where it has shown superior detection rates compared to previous imaging modalities. Apart from targeting PSMA for diagnostic purposes, there is a growing interest in developing ligands to target the PSMA-protein for radioligand therapy (RLT). PSMA-based RLT is a novel treatment that couples a PSMA-antibody to (alpha or beta-emitting) radionuclide, such as Lutetium-177 (¹⁷⁷Lu), to deliver high radiation doses to tumor cells locally. Treatment with ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA RLT has demonstrated a superior overall survival rate within randomized clinical trials as compared to routine clinical care in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The current review provides an overview of the literature regarding recent developments in nuclear medicine related to PSMA-targeted PET imaging and Theranostics.

E-PSMA: the EANM standardized reporting guidelines v1.0 for PSMA-PET

RATIONALE

The development of consensus guidelines for interpretation of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is needed to provide more consistent reports in clinical practice. The standardization of PSMA-PET interpretation may also contribute to increasing the data reproducibility within clinical trials. Finally, guidelines in PSMA-PET interpretation are needed to communicate the exact location of findings to referring physicians, to support clinician therapeutic management decisions.

METHODS

A panel of worldwide experts in PSMA-PET was established. Panelists were selected based on their expertise and publication record in the diagnosis or treatment of PCa, in their involvement in clinical guidelines and according to their expertise in the clinical application of radiolabeled PSMA inhibitors. Panelists were actively involved in all stages of a modified, nonanonymous, Delphi consensus process.

RESULTS

According to the findings obtained by modified Delphi consensus process, panelist recommendations were implemented in a structured report for PSMA-PET.

CONCLUSIONS

The E-PSMA standardized reporting guidelines, a document supported by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), provide consensus statements among a panel of experts in PSMA-PET imaging, to develop a structured report for PSMA-PET in prostate cancer and to harmonize diagnostic interpretation criteria.

Combination of 99mTc-Labeled PSMA-SPECT/CT and Diffusion-Weighted MRI in the Prediction of Early Response After Carbon Ion Therapy in Prostate Cancer: A Non-Randomized Prospective Pilot Study

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the potential of ^99mTc-labeled PSMA-SPECT/CT and diffusion-weighted image (DWI) for predicting treatment response after carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) in prostate cancer.

Patients and Methods

We prospectively registered 26 patients with localized prostate cancer treated with CIRT. All patients underwent ^99mTc-labeled PSMA-SPECT/CT and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before and after CIRT. The tumor/background ratio (TBR) and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC_mean) were measured on the tumor and the percentage changes before and after therapy (ΔTBR and ΔADC_mean) were calculated. Patients were divided into two groups: good response and poor response according to clinical follow-up.

Results

The median follow up time was 38.3months. The TBR was significantly decreased (p=0.001), while the ADC_mean was significantly increased compared with the pretreatment value (p<0.001). The ΔTBR and ΔADC_mean were negatively correlated with each other (p = 0.002). On ROC curve analysis for predicting treatment response, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of ΔTBR (0.867) for predicting good response was higher than that of ΔADC_mean (0.819). The AUC of combined with ΔTBR and ΔADC_mean (0.895) was higher than that of either ΔADC_mean or ΔTBR alone. The combined use of ΔTBR and ΔADC_mean showed 91.4% sensitivity and 95.2% specificity.

Conclusion

Our preliminary data indicate that the changes of TBR and ADC_mean maybe an early bio-marker for predicting prognosis after CIRT in localized prostate cancer patients. In addition, the ΔTBR seems to be a more powerful prognostic factor than ΔADC_mean in prostate cancer treated with CIRT.

Is There Any Role for 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT in the Presence of Undetectable PSA in Prostate Cancer Patients After Definitive Treatment?

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of F-fluciclovine PET/CT in the evaluation of prostate cancer (PC) patients after definitive treatment in the presence of undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in PC patients who had undetectable PSA level and underwent fluciclovine PET/CT within a 2-week interval of PSA examination and without interval treatment or other cancer. Patient and tumor characteristics at initial diagnosis, treatment regimens, and findings on fluciclovine PET/CT were collected. Comparisons between groups of positive and negative fluciclovine PET/CT were done by using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 34 fluciclovine PET/CTs from 34 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 4 positive (11.8%) and 30 negative fluciclovine PET/CTs (88.2%). All of the patients with positive results had an initial Gleason score of 7 or higher and locally advanced tumor (T3-T4). More common features at the time of diagnosis among positive study patients as compared with negative ones were atypical histologic variants (25% vs 0%) and very high-risk PC (50% vs 30%). Most of the patients with positive study received second-line hormonal therapy (HT) (50%), whereas patients with negative results received first-line HT (53.3%). Chemotherapy naivety was less common among positive patients (75% vs 96.7%). Sites of involvement on positive fluciclovine PET/CTs were pelvic lymph nodes (2/4, 50%), lung and mediastinal lymph node (1/4, 25%), and prostatectomy bed (1/4, 25%).

CONCLUSIONS

In the presence of undetectable PSA in PC patients after definitive treatment, fluciclovine PET/CT would benefit most to patients with Gleason score of 7 or higher, high disease burden (T3-T4), and atypical histologic variants at the time of diagnosis, and the ones who have history of second-line HT and/or chemotherapy.

Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen PET: Therapy Response Assessment in Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Therapy response assessment is a critical step in cancer management, leading clinicians to optimize the use of therapeutic options during the course of the disease. Imaging is a pivotal biomarker for therapy response evaluation in oncology and has gained wider use through the development of reproducible data-based guidelines, of which the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors is the most successful example. Disease-specific criteria have also been proposed, and the Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 criteria are the mainstay for prostate cancer (PC). However, conventional imaging evaluation in metastatic PC has several limitations, including (a) the inability to detect small-volume disease, (b) the high prevalence of bone (nonmeasurable) lesions at imaging, and (c) the established role of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels as the biomarker of choice for response assessment and disease progression. In addition, there are an increasing number of newer treatment options with various effects on imaging features. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET has improved patient selection for newer treatments, such as metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) or radionuclide therapy. The role of PSMA PET in response assessment for many metastatic PC therapeutic options (MDT, androgen deprivation therapy, chemotherapy, radionuclide therapy, and immunotherapy) is an evolving issue, with emerging data showing good correlation with PSA levels and clinical outcome. However, there are specific implications of each therapy (especially androgen deprivation therapy and immunotherapy) on PSMA expression by PC cells, leading to potential pitfalls and inaccuracies that must be known by radiologists. Despite some limitations, PSMA PET is addressing gaps left by conventional imaging methods (eg, CT and bone scanning) and nonimaging biomarkers (PSA levels) in metastatic PC therapy response assessment, a role that can be improved with advances like refinement of interpretation criteria and whole-body tumor burden quantification.^© RSNA, 2020See discussion on this article by Barwick and Castellucci.

Clinical application of Fluciclovine PET, choline PET and gastrin-releasing polypeptide receptor (bombesin) targeting PET in prostate cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to explore the clinical application of different PET radiopharmaceuticals in prostate cancer (PCa), beyond inhibitors of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA).

RECENT FINDINGS

Choline PET represented in the last decades the standard of reference for PET imaging in PCa and has been recently included in clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of metastasis-directed therapy in oligo-metastatic disease. Fluciclovine, as synthetic amino acid, has been proposed for investigating PCa. The results obtained by the first prospective studies led to FDA approval in 2016 in patients with biochemical recurrence. Recently, phase II/III trials explored its accuracy compared with PSMA PET and its impact on patient management. Imaging the gastrin-releasing polypeptide receptor (GRPR) recently drawn attention. Radio-labelled GRPR antagonists have the potential to be used as theranostic agents. Further evaluation is needed to understand the relation between GRPR expression and hormonal-resistant PCa, and for tumors characterized by heterogeneity of receptors expressed (e.g. PSMA-negative) on their cell surface.

SUMMARY

Other new generation PET tracers may play an important role in PCa, namely in case of PSMA-negative phenotypes.

Metastasis-directed therapy for oligometastatic urological tumours: still no second-hand news

For patients presenting with limited metastatic disease burden, known as the oligometastatic state of disease, a more aggressive treatment approach targeting the new or progressive metastatic lesions might improve patient outcome, with no or only limited toxicity to be expected from the treatment. This review provides an overview of the existing evidence and on-going trials on oligometastatic disease and metastasis-directed therapy in the field of renal, bladder and prostate cancer.

68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in recurrent hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC): a prospective single-centre study in patients eligible for salvage therapy

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT to detect recurrent location(s) in hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (PCa). Secondary objectives are (1) to evaluate changes in clinical management; (2) to determine which covariates independently predict positive scan; (3) to assess ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT performance in different settings of PSA relapse.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Inclusion criteria include (1) histologically diagnosed PCa; (2) previous radical therapy; (3) proven biochemical recurrence (BCR) or biochemical persistence (BCP); (4) hormone-sensitive PCa (HSPC); (5) androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-free for at least 6 months; (6) PSA < 1.5 ng/mL or any PSA in case of negative choline-PET/CT (n = 38). Changes in clinical management were defined by multidisciplinary tumour-board. Clinical settings were BCP (group-1, n = 25); first-time BCR (group-2, n = 121); BCR after salvage therapy (group-3, n = 77).

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-three (223) consecutive patients were enrolled: median PSA = 0.65 ng/mL (0.2-8.9) and median PSAdt = 9.3 months (0.4-144.6). 96.9% received RP as primary therapy. ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT positivity rate was 39.9% (CI95% 33.5-46.7%). Disease confined to pelvis was detected in 23.3% of cases. At least one distant lesion was observed in 16.6% of cases. Secondary objectives are as follows: (1) changes in clinical management were observed in 34.5% of patients; (2) PSA, PSAdt and T stage > 3a were independent predictors (all p < 0.03); (3) ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT positivity rate was 56% (in group 1, 36.3% in group 2, 40.3% in group 3.

CONCLUSION

This study attested the overall good performance of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT to detect PCa locations in HSPC patients eligible for salvage therapy, influencing the therapy management in 35.4% of cases. Furthermore, patient characteristics are influencing factors of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT positivity rate and should be considered to reduce false negative scan.

ImmunoPET: Concept, Design, and Applications

Immuno-positron emission tomography (immunoPET) is a paradigm-shifting molecular imaging modality combining the superior targeting specificity of monoclonal antibody (mAb) and the inherent sensitivity of PET technique. A variety of radionuclides and mAbs have been exploited to develop immunoPET probes, which has been driven by the development and optimization of radiochemistry and conjugation strategies. In addition, tumor-targeting vectors with a short circulation time (e.g., Nanobody) or with an enhanced binding affinity (e.g., bispecific antibody) are being used to design novel immunoPET probes. Accordingly, several immunoPET probes, such as ⁸⁹Zr-Df-pertuzumab and ⁸⁹Zr-atezolizumab, have been successfully translated for clinical use. By noninvasively and dynamically revealing the expression of heterogeneous tumor antigens, immunoPET imaging is gradually changing the theranostic landscape of several types of malignancies. ImmunoPET is the method of choice for imaging specific tumor markers, immune cells, immune checkpoints, and inflammatory processes. Furthermore, the integration of immunoPET imaging in antibody drug development is of substantial significance because it provides pivotal information regarding antibody targeting abilities and distribution profiles. Herein, we present the latest immunoPET imaging strategies and their preclinical and clinical applications. We also emphasize current conjugation strategies that can be leveraged to develop next-generation immunoPET probes. Lastly, we discuss practical considerations to tune the development and translation of immunoPET imaging strategies.

[68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for monitoring response to treatment in metastatic prostate cancer: is there any added value over standard follow-up?

Background

The aim of the current study was to assess whether and to what extent monitoring response to treatment using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based positron-emitting tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) studies contribute clinically relevant data to routine clinical follow-up during treatment of patients with metastatic prostate cancer (PCa).

Results

Fifty-two patients with metastatic PCa who underwent [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level measurements before and during treatment were investigated. Response was categorized by serum PSA dynamics according to improvement, stable disease, and disease progression and compared to change in imaging findings on pre- and post-treatment PET/CTs. McNemar’s test was used to assess agreement between PET/CT- and PSA-based responses to treatment.

Thirty-four patients (65.4%) had compatible biochemical- and imaging-based response to treatment. However, the imaging and biochemical responses were discrepant in 18/52 patients (34.6%). PET/CT showed progressive disease in 5/52 patients (9.6%) and improvement/stable disease in 13/52 (25%) compared to biochemical assessment results. Discrepancy between imaging and biochemical response was most prominent in biochemically stable patients (90.9%), followed by patients with biochemical progression (33.3%), and in only few (8.7%) patients with biochemical improvement. The imaging-based response was suitable for choosing subsequent treatment in 22 of 30 patients (73.3%) with longer follow-up (median time of 10.3 months (IQR 6.3–18.2)). The relevance of the imaging methodology was reflected by its ability to assess individual lesions in cases of heterogeneous lesion responses, reveal the appearance of new lesions, and identify lesions that required specific consideration, such as targeted radiotherapy.

Conclusions

Results of this retrospective analysis showed that biochemical responses to treatment and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT-based responses to treatment differ in one third of metastatic PCa patients. The latter additionally enabled lesion-based and not solely patient-based analysis. Monitoring response during treatment by [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT is suitable for decision-making in patient management and choice of treatment in the majority of patients.

Imaging Diagnosis and Follow-up of Advanced Prostate Cancer: Clinical Perspectives and State of the Art

The management of advanced prostate cancer has changed substantially with the availability of multiple effective novel treatments, which has led to improved disease survival. In the era of personalized cancer treatments, more precise imaging may help physicians deliver better care. More accurate local staging and earlier detection of metastatic disease, accurate identification of oligometastatic disease, and optimal assessment of treatment response are areas where modern imaging is rapidly evolving and expanding. Next-generation imaging modalities, including whole-body MRI and molecular imaging with combined PET and CT and combined PET and MRI using novel radiopharmaceuticals, create new opportunities for imaging to support and refine management pathways in patients with advanced prostate cancer. This article demonstrates the potential and challenges of applying next-generation imaging to deliver the clinical promise of treatment breakthroughs.

Advances in prostate-specific membrane antigen PET of prostate cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In recent years, a large number of reports have been published on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)/PET in prostate cancer (PCa). This review highlights advances in PSMA PET in PCa during the past year.

RECENT FINDINGS

PSMA PET/computed tomography (CT) is useful in detection of biochemical recurrence, especially at low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values. The detection rate of PSMA PET is influenced by PSA level. For primary PCa, PSMA PET/CT shows promise for tumour localization in the prostate, especially in combination with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). For primary staging, PSMA PET/CT can be used in intermediate and high-risk PCa. Intraoperative PSMA radioligand guidance seems promising for detection of malignant lymph nodes. While the use of PSMA PET/MRI in primary localized disease is limited to high and intermediate-risk patients and localized staging, in the recurrence setting, PET/MRI can be particularly helpful when the lesions are subtle. PSMA PET/CT is superior to choline PET/CT and other conventional imaging modalities.

SUMMARY

Molecular imaging with PSMA PET continues to pave the way for personalized medicine in PCa.However, large prospective clinical studies are still needed to fully evaluate the role of PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRI in the clinical workflow of PCa.

Uptake of Radium-223 Dichloride and Early [18F]NaF PET Response Are Driven by Baseline [18F]NaF Parameters: a Pilot Study in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to identify predictive factors on baseline [¹⁸F]NaF positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) of early response to radium-223 dichloride after 3 cycles of treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients.

PROCEDURES

Analysis of 152 metastases was performed in six consecutive patients who underwent [¹⁸F]NaF PET/CT at baseline and for early monitoring after 3 cycles of radium-223 dichloride. All metastases depicted on whole-body [¹⁸F]NaF PET/CT were contoured and CT (density in Hounsfield units, sclerotic, mixed, or lytic appearance) as well as [¹⁸F]NaF [maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max), SUV_mean, and lesion volume (V_18F-NaF)] patterns were recorded. Tumor response was defined as percentage change in SUV_max and SUV_mean between baseline and post-treatment PET. Bone lesions were defined as stable, responsive, or progressive, according to thresholds derived from a recent multicentre test-retest study in [¹⁸F]NaF PET/CT. Total [¹⁸F]NaF uptake in metastases, defined as MATV × SUV_mean, was correlated to uptake of radium-223 on biodistribution scintigraphy performed 7 days after the first cycle of treatment.

RESULTS

Among metastases, 116 involved the axial skeleton and 36 the appendicular skeleton. Lesions were sclerotic in 126 cases and mixed in 26 cases. No lytic lesion was depicted. ROC analysis showed that SUV_max and SUV_mean were better predictors of lesion response than V_18F-NaF and density on CT (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.001, respectively). SUV_max and SUV_mean were predictors of individual tumor response in separate multivariate models (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively). CT pattern (mixed versus sclerotic) and lesion density were independent predictors only when assessing response with delta SUV_max (P = 0.002 and 0.007, respectively). A good correlation between total [¹⁸F]NaF uptake within metastases and their relative radium-223 uptake assessed by two observers 7 days after treatment (r = 0.72 and 0.77, P < 0.0001) was found.

CONCLUSIONS

SUV_max and SUV_mean on baseline [¹⁸F]NaF PET/CT are independent predictors of bone lesions' response to 3 cycles of radium-223 dichloride, supporting the use of NaF to select patients more likely to respond to treatment.

Clinical perspectives of PSMA PET/MRI for prostate cancer

Prostate cancer imaging has become an important diagnostic modality for tumor evaluation. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) has been extensively studied, and the results are robust and promising. The advent of the PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has added morphofunctional information from the standard of reference MRI to highly accurate molecular information from PET. Different PSMA ligands have been used for this purpose including 68gallium and 18fluorine-labeled PET probes, which have particular features including spatial resolution, imaging quality and tracer biodistribution. The use of PSMA PET imaging is well established for evaluating biochemical recurrence, even at low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, but has also shown interesting applications for tumor detection, primary staging, assessment of therapeutic responses and treatment planning. This review will outline the potential role of PSMA PET/MRI for the clinical assessment of PCa.

Importance of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in hospital practice. View of the radiation oncologist

Radiotherapy is a treatment with curative intent, both in patients with primary diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) and in patients presenting with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP). Moreover, the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy as a metastasis directed therapy in patients with oligometastatic PCa has significantly increased in the recent years. Conventional imaging techniques, including transrectal ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), morphologic magnetic resonance and bone scintigraphy have traditionally played a minor role in all those clinical scenarios due to its low diagnostic accuracy. The recent development of the positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracer ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA binding to the prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA), a transmembrane glycoprotein overexpressed in PCa cells, has shown promising results. Detection rates for PCa lesions are higher than CT and higher than the best technique available, the PET/CT with choline. Its superiority has been demonstrated even at very low PSA levels (<1 ng/ml). This increase in diagnostic accuracy represents a potential impact on patient management, especially in radiotherapy. Even if this imaging technique is already available for routine clinical practice in some European countries, in Spain, unfortunately, there is very limited access. In this review, we analyze the main studies that investigate the usefulness of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT in patients with PCa and its potential impact on radiotherapy treatments. In addition, we compared the ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT, with the multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and the PET/CT with choline, in the different clinical scenarios.

Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of Prostate Cancer with Ga-68-Labeled Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor Agonist BBN7-14 and Antagonist RM26

Radiolabeled bombesin (BBN) analogs have long been used for developing gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) targeted imaging probes, and tracers with excellent in vivo performance including high tumor uptake, high contrast, and favorable pharmacokinetics are highly desired. In this study, we compared the ⁶⁸Ga-labeled GRPR agonist (Gln–Trp–Ala–Val–Gly–His–Leu–Met–NH₂, BBN_7–14) and antagonist (d-Phe–Gln–Trp–Ala–Val–Gly–His–Sta–Leu–NH₂, RM26) for the positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of prostate cancer. The in vitro stabilities, receptor binding, cell uptake, internalization, and efflux properties of the probes ⁶⁸Ga–1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid (NOTA)–Aca–BBN_7–14 and ⁶⁸Ga–NOTA–poly(ethylene glycol)₃ (PEG₃)–RM26 were studied in PC-3 cells, and the in vivo GRPR targeting abilities and kinetics were investigated using PC-3 tumor xenografted mice. BBN_7–14, PEG₃-RM26, NOTA–Aca–BBN_7–14, and NOTA–PEG₃–RM26 showed similar binding affinity to GRPR. In PC-3 tumor-bearing mice, the tumor uptake of ⁶⁸Ga–NOTA–PEG₃–RM26 remained at around 3.00 percentage of injected dose per gram of tissue within 1 h after injection, in contrast with ⁶⁸Ga–NOTA–Aca–BBN_7–14, which demonstrated rapid elimination and high background signal. Additionally, the majority of the ⁶⁸Ga–NOTA–PEG₃–RM26 remained intact in mouse serum at 5 min after injection, while almost all of the ⁶⁸Ga–NOTA–Aca–BBN_7–14 was degraded under the same conditions, demonstrating more-favorable in vivo pharmacokinetic properties and metabolic stabilities of the antagonist probe relative to its agonist counterpart. Overall, the antagonistic GRPR targeted probe ⁶⁸Ga–NOTA–PEG₃–RM26 is a more-promising candidate than the agonist ⁶⁸Ga–NOTA–Aca–BBN_7–14 for the PET imaging of prostate cancer patients.