Prostate-specific antigen flare induced by 223RaCl2 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Increase of prostate-specific antigen doubling time predicts survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients undergoing radium therapy

OBJECTIVE

Radium-223 (Ra-223) is an important treatment modality for bone-dominant metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, there is currently a lack of effective markers to monitor treatment response during treatment. We aim to investigate the response in prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT) as a potential marker for assessing Ra-223 treatment in mCRPC patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from mCRPC patients who underwent radium treatment at our institution between August 2020 and June 2023. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurements prior to treatment and during treatment were collected. Baseline PSADT was calculated from PSA measurements prior to Ra-223 treatment; interim PSADT was calculated from PSA measurements before Ra-223 treatment and prior to the fourth course injection. Overall survival was calculated from the start of treatment to the date of death. Univariable and multivariable analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model were performed to examine the association of factors with overall survival.

RESULTS

We included 35 patients from our institution, with a median overall survival of 13.3 months. Eighteen (51.4%) completed all six courses of treatment. PSA dynamic response (interim PSADT > baseline PSADT or decreased PSA) was observed in 20 patients. Overall survival was associated with a PSA dynamic response (HR = 0.318, 95% CI 0.133-0.762, p = 0.010) when compared to patients without response.

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic changes in PSADT were associated with survival in mCRPC patients receiving radium therapy. Comparing interim and baseline PSADT could serve as a valuable marker for determining treatment benefits.

Flare phenomenon visualized by 99mTc-bone scintigraphy has prognostic value for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the prognostic value of the flare phenomenon in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) using the bone scan index (BSI) derived from 99mTc-methylenediphosphonate (MDP) bone scintigraphy images.

METHODS

We categorized 72 patients from the PROSTAT-BSI registry with mCRPC who were followed-up for 2 years after starting docetaxel chemotherapy to groups based on pre-chemotherapy BSI values of < 1, 1-4, and > 4. We assessed the effects of the flare phenomenon (defined as a > 10% increase in the BSI within 3 months of starting chemotherapy, followed by > 10% improvement within the next 3 months) on survival using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard analyses.

RESULTS

The flare phenomenon was found in 26 (36%) of the 72 patients. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and hemoglobin (Hb) levels steadily increased, then deteriorated in patients with and without flare, respectively. Elevated BSI and PSA values at 3 months after starting therapy and the absence of abiraterone or/and enzalutamide therapy led to poor 2-year overall survival (OS) in the group without flare. In contrast, no influence was noticeable in the group with flare. The results of multivariable analyses that included only factors associated with PSA and BSI showed that increased baseline BSI (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.86; P = 0.023) and PSA (HR, 7.15; 95% CI 2.13-24.04; P = 0.0015) values could be independent risk factors for patients with mCRPC without flare. However, these factors lost significance during flare. The risk for all-cause death was significantly higher among patients with BSI > 4 without, than with flare. The results of univariable analyses indicated that flare positively impacted survival (HR, 0.24; 95% CI 0.06‒0.91; P = 0.035). Multivariable analysis did not identify any factors that could predict outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Favorable prognosis, with fewer disturbances from other factors such as the use of abiraterone or/and enzalutamide, PSA changes, and BSI, was attainable in cases when the mCRPC patient demonstrated flare phenomenon. Follow-up bone scintigraphy at least every 3 months could help to determine the prognosis of patients with bone metastasis of mCRPC.

Nuclear medicine imaging for bone metastases assessment: what else besides bone scintigraphy in the era of personalized medicine?

Accurate detection and reliable assessment of therapeutic responses in bone metastases are imperative for guiding treatment decisions, preserving quality of life, and ultimately enhancing overall survival. Nuclear imaging has historically played a pivotal role in this realm, offering a diverse range of radiotracers and imaging modalities. While the conventional bone scan using 99mTc marked bisphosphonates has remained widely utilized, its diagnostic performance is hindered by certain limitations. Positron emission tomography, particularly when coupled with computed tomography, provides improved spatial resolution and diagnostic performance with various pathology-specific radiotracers. This review aims to evaluate the performance of different nuclear imaging modalities in clinical practice for detecting and monitoring the therapeutic responses in bone metastases of diverse origins, addressing their limitations and implications for image interpretation.

Prevalence and Prognostic Implications of PSA Flares during Radium-223 Treatment among Men with Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer

Radium-223 (Ra233) prolongs the survival of men with symptomatic bone-predominant metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response patterns are not closely associated with Ra223 therapy outcomes. Herein, we sought to analyze the impact of Ra223-induced PSA flares on patient outcome. Using a retrospective cohort study of Ra223 treatment in four Ontario/Canada cancer centres, we identified 134 patients grouped into sub-cohorts according to distinct PSA response patterns: (i) initial PSA flare followed by eventual PSA decline; (ii) PSA response (≥30% PSA decrease within 12 weeks of treatment); and (iii) PSA non-response. We analyzed patient characteristics and outcome measures, including overall survival (OS), using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank testing. PSA flares were observed in 27 (20.2%), PSA responses in 11 (8.2%), and PSA non-responses in 96 (71.6%) patients. Amongst PSA flare patients, 12 presented with post-flare PSA decreases below baseline and 15 with PSA decreases below the flare peak but above baseline. Although only six flare patients achieved ≥30% PSA decreases below baseline, the median OS of all flare patients (16.8 months, 95% CI 14.9-18.7) was comparable to that of PSA responders and non-responders (p = 0.349). In summary, around 20% of mCRPC patients experience Ra223-induced PSA flares, whose outcome is similar to that of men with or without PSA responses. Further studies are needed regarding suitable biochemical surrogate markers of response to Ra223.

Assessing Therapeutic Response to Radium-223 with an Automated Bone Scan Index among Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients: Data from Patients in the J-RAP-BSI Trial

To evaluate the usefulness of change in the automated bone scan index (aBSI) value derived from bone scintigraphy findings as an imaging biomarker for the assessment of treatment response and survival prediction in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with Ra-223. This study was a retrospective investigation of a Japanese cohort of 205 mCRPC patients who received Ra-223 in 14 hospitals between July 2016 and August 2020 and for whom bone scintigraphy before and after radium-223 treatment was available. Correlations of aBSI change, with changes in the serum markers alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were evaluated. Additionally, the association of those changes with overall survival (OS) was assessed using the Cox proportional-hazards model and Kaplan-Meier curve results. Of the 205 patients enrolled, 165 (80.5%) completed six cycles of Ra-223. Following treatment, ALP decline (%ALP < 0%) was noted in 72.2% (148/205), aBSI decline (%aBSI < 0%) in 52.7% (108/205), and PSA decline (%PSA < 0%) in 27.8% (57/205). Furthermore, a reduction in both aBSI and ALP was seen in 87 (42.4%), a reduction in only ALP was seen in 61 (29.8%), a reduction in only aBSI was seen in 21 (10.2%), and in both aBSI and ALP increasing/stable (≥0%) was seen in 36 (17.6%) patients. Multiparametric analysis showed changes in PSA [hazard ratio (HR) 4.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.32-8.77, p < 0.0001], aBSI (HR 2.22, 95%CI 1.43-3.59, p = 0.0003), and ALP (HR 2.06, 95%CI 1.35-3.14, p = 0.0008) as significant prognostic factors for OS. For mCRPC patients treated with Ra-223, aBSI change is useful as an imaging biomarker for treatment response assessment and survival prediction.

Phase I Study of Niraparib in Combination with Radium-223 for the Treatment of Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

To identify the safety of niraparib, a PARP inhibitor, in combination with Radium-223 for the treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in men without known BRCA mutations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Men with progressive mCPRC following ≥1 line of androgen receptor (AR)-targeted therapy and bone metastases but no documented BRCA-1 or BRCA-2 alterations or bulky visceral disease were included. Niraparib dose was escalated in combination with standard dosing of Radium-223 using a time-to-event continual reassessment method. The highest dose level with a DLT probability <20% was defined as MTD. Secondary endpoints included PSA change and progression-free survival. Exploratory analyses included assessing DNA mutations found in ctDNA as well as gene expression changes assessed in whole blood samples.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were treated with niraparib and radium-223: 13 patients received 100 mg, 12 received 200 mg, and 5 patients received 300 mg of niraparib. There were six DLT events: two (13%) for neutropenia, two (13%) for thrombocytopenia, whereas fatigue and nausea each occurred once (3%). Anemia (2/13%) and neutropenia (2/13%) were the most common grade 3 adverse events. For patients with prior chemotherapy exposure, the MTD was 100 mg, whereas the MTD for chemotherapy naïve patients was 200 mg. Whole blood gene expression of PAX5 and CD19 was higher in responders and ARG-1, IL2R, and FLT3 expression was higher in nonresponders.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining niraparib with Radium-223 in patients with mCRPC was safe; however, further studies incorporating biomarkers will better elucidate the role of combinations of PARP inhibitors with DNA damaging and other agents.

Prostate-specific antigen doubling time following radium-223 treatment as a predictor of the clinical course in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Objectives

To identify useful biomarkers by reviewing laboratory data for a predictor of the clinical course following treatment with radium-223 dichloride (Ra-223) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Methods

Eighteen metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients who were administered Ra-223 at our hospital were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Prostate-specific antigen doubling times before and after the administration of Ra-223 were evaluated as prognostic factors for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with Ra-223 using the Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test.

Results

Four patients failed to complete the planned six-time Ra-223 treatments with the exacerbation of their condition. In the 14 patients who completed the planned Ra-223 treatment, before the Ra-223 treatment, no significant differences were observed in overall survival between patients with prostate-specific antigen doubling time of 6 months or less and those with prostate-specific antigen doubling time of more than 6 months or stable (p = 0.642). Following the completion of the Ra-223 treatment, overall survival was significantly shorter in patients with prostate-specific antigen doubling time of 6 months or less than in those with prostate-specific antigen doubling time of more than 6 months or stable (p = 0.007).

Conclusion

Prostate-specific antigen doubling time after the Ra-223 treatment is a useful predictor of the clinical course following treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients.

'FLARE' of tumor marker in advanced gastric cancer treated with first-line systemic therapy

BACKGROUND

Transient tumor marker elevations caused by chemotherapy were defined as 'Flare' and have been demonstrated in some solid tumors. In clinical practice, we observed that some patients were accompanied by elevated tumor markers during treatment, but subsequent imaging proved that the treatment they received was effective.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to study the Flare and the prognosis in advanced gastric cancer.

DESIGN

This is an observational retrospective study. A total of 167 patients were enrolled in this study. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 and CA125 values were obtained before the first, second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth cycles of treatment, respectively.

METHODS

Imaging for the first efficacy assessment was reviewed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) criteria. Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank tests were performed for overall survival (OS) analyses. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to determine the prognostic factor for OS and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

37.1% of patients were accompanied with at least one tumor marker Flare during the course of treatment. The median time to tumor marker peak was 24-30 days and the Flare duration lasted 49-53 days. Patients with tumor markers Flare had a worse OS. Flare may be associated with the use of 5-fluorouracil. Baseline CEA and CA125 levels were the independent prognostic factors for OS and baseline CA125 level was the independent prognostic factor for PFS.

CONCLUSION

Initial elevation of tumor markers during treatment is not an indication of tumor progression. Patients with tumor markers 'Flare' may had a worse OS.

mCRPC patients with PSA fluctuations under radioligand therapy have comparable survival benefits relative to patients with sustained PSA decrease

Introduction

In men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) scheduled for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT), biochemical response is assessed based on repeated measurements of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. We aimed to determine overall survival (OS) in patients experiencing sustained PSA increase, decrease, or fluctuations during therapy.

Materials and methods

In this bicentric study, we included 176 mCRPC patients treated with PSMA-directed RLT. PSA levels were determined using blood samples prior to the first RLT and on the admission days for the following cycles. We calculated relative changes in PSA levels compared to baseline. Kaplan–Meier curves as well as log-rank test were used to compare OS of different subgroups, including patients with sustained PSA increase, decrease, or fluctuations (defined as change after initial decrease or increase after the first cycle).

Results

Sixty-one out of one hundred seventy-six (34.7%) patients showed a sustained increase and 86/176 (48.8%) a sustained decrease in PSA levels. PSA fluctuations were observed in the remaining 29/176 (16.5%). In this subgroup, 22/29 experienced initial PSA decrease followed by an increase (7/29, initial increase followed by a decrease). Median OS of patients with sustained decrease in PSA levels was significantly longer when compared to patients with sustained increase of PSA levels (19 vs. 8 months; HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.22–0.56; P < 0.001). Patients with PSA fluctuations showed a significantly longer median OS compared to patients with sustained increase of PSA levels (18 vs. 8 months; HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30–0.80; P < 0.01), but no significant difference relative to men with sustained PSA decrease (18 vs. 19 months; HR 1.4, 95% CI 0.78–2.49; P = 0.20). In addition, in men experiencing PSA fluctuations, median OS did not differ significantly between patients with initial decrease or initial increase of tumor marker levels (16 vs. 18 months; HR 1.2, 95% CI 0.38–4.05; P = 0.68).

Conclusion

Initial increase or decrease of PSA levels is sustained in the majority of patients undergoing RLT. Sustained PSA decrease was linked to prolonged survival and men with PSA fluctuations under treatment experienced comparable survival benefits. As such, transient tumor marker oscillations under RLT should rather not lead to treatment discontinuation, especially in the absence of radiological progression.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-022-05910-w.

Survival Analysis and a Novel Nomogram Model for Progression-Free Survival in Patients with Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

This study sought to perform a survival analysis and construct a prognostic nomogram model based on the Gleason grade, total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA), alkaline phosphate (ALP), and TNM stage in patients with prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

The progression-free survival (PFS) of 255 PCa patients was analyzed in this study. The prognostic value of tPSA and ALP was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression analysis, and a nomogram model based on the Gleason grade, tPSA, ALP, and TNM stage was further established for PFS prediction in PCa patients.

RESULTS

PCa patients with different Gleason grades, tPSA and ALP levels, and TNM stages presented distinct PFS. The Gleason grade, tPSA, ALP, and TNM stage were four independent prognostic indicators. The C-index of the established nomogram was 0.705 for PFS in the test cohort and 0.687 for the validation cohort, and the calibration curves indicated a good consistency between predicted and actual PFS in PCa patients.

CONCLUSION

The data of this study demonstrated that the Gleason grade, tPSA, ALP, and TNM stage of PCa patients are independently correlated with PFS, and a nomogram model based on these indicators may be valuable for the PFS prediction in PCa patient.

Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 in Low-Volume Hormone-Sensitive Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Pilot Study

PURPOSE

[¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy (¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA) is a novel treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), which could also be applied to patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) with PSMA expression. In this prospective study (NCT03828838), we analyzed toxicity, radiation doses, and treatment effect of ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA in pateints with low-volume mHSPC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ten progressive patients with mHSPC following local treatment, with a maximum of ten metastatic lesions on [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/diagnostic-CT imaging (PSMA-PET) and serum PSA doubling time <6 months received two cycles of ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA. Whole-body single-photon emission CT/CT (SPECT/CT) and blood dosimetry was performed to calculate doses to the tumors and organs at risk (OAR). Adverse events (AE), laboratory values (monitoring response and toxicity), and quality of life were monitored until week 24 after cycle 2, the end of study (EOS). All patients underwent PSMA-PET at screening, 8 weeks after cycle 1, 12 weeks after cycle 2, and at EOS.

RESULTS

All patients received two cycles of ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA without complications. No treatment-related grade III-IV adverse events were observed. According to dosimetry, none of the OAR reached threshold doses for radiation-related toxicity. Moreover, all target lesions received a higher radiation dose than the OAR. All 10 patients showed altered PSA kinetics, postponed androgen deprivation therapy, and maintained good quality of life. Half of the patients showed a PSA response of more than 50%. One patient had a complete response on PSMA-PET imaging until EOS and two others had only minimal residual disease.

CONCLUSIONS

¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA appeared to be a feasible and safe treatment modality in patients with low-volume mHSPC.

Sodium Fluoride-18 and Radium-223 Dichloride Uptake Colocalize in Osteoblastic Mouse Xenograft Tumors

Background: Patients with osteoblastic bone metastases are candidates for radium-223 (²²³RaCl₂) therapy and may undergo sodium fluoride-18 (¹⁸F-NaF) positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging to identify bone lesions. ¹⁸F-NaF has been shown to predict ²²³RaCl₂ uptake, but intratumor distributions of these two agents remain unclear. In this study, the authors evaluate the spatial distribution and relative uptakes of ¹⁸F-NaF and ²²³RaCl₂ in Hu09-H3 human osteosarcoma mouse xenograft tumors at macroscopic and microscopic levels to better quantify their correlation. Materials and Methods: ¹⁸F-NaF and ²²³RaCl₂ were co-injected into Hu09-H3 xenograft tumor severe combined immunodeficient mice. Tumor content was determined from in vivo biodistributions and visualized by PET, single photon emission computed tomography, and CT imaging. Intratumor distributions were visualized by quantitative autoradiography of tumor tissue sections and compared to histology of the same or adjacent sections. Results: ¹⁸F and ²²³Ra accumulated in proportional amounts in whole Hu09-H3 tumors (r² = 0.82) and in microcalcified regions within these tumors (r² = 0.87). Intratumor distributions of ¹⁸F and ²²³Ra were spatially congruent in these microcalcified regions. Conclusions: ¹⁸F-NaF and ²²³RaCl₂ uptake are strongly correlated in heterogeneously distributed microcalcified regions of Hu09-H3 xenograft tumors, and thus, tumor accumulation of ¹⁸F is predictive of ²²³Ra accumulation. Hu09-H3 xenograft tumors appear to possess certain histopathological features found in patients with metastatic bone disease and may be useful in clarifying the relationship between administered ²²³Ra dose and therapeutic effect.

Flare phenomenon in prostate cancer: recent evidence on new drugs and next generation imaging

Over the years, an increasing proportion of metastatic prostate cancer patients has been found to experience an initial bone flare phenomenon under both standard therapies (androgen deprivation therapy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, abiraterone, enzalutamide) and novel agents (immunotherapy, bone-targeting radioisotopes). The underlying biological mechanisms of the flare phenomenon are still elusive and need further clarification, particularly in relation to different types of treatment and their treatment response assessment. Flare phenomenon is often underestimated and, in some cases, can negatively affect clinical outcome. In cases with suspected bone flare, the treatment should be continued for a minimum of 12 more weeks before further decisions about efficacy can be taken. Physicians and patients should be aware of this effect to avoid unwarranted anxiety and inadequate early discontinuation of treatment. This review aims at highlighting new evidence on flare phenomenon arising after the introduction of new drugs extending across the biochemical, radiographic and clinical spectrum of the disease.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted endoradiotherapy in metastatic prostate cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we present an update on the safety and efficacy of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand therapy (PRLT) of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

RECENT FINDINGS

Treatment of mCRPC with approved treatment agents leads to a survival advantage. The disease often progresses despite these treatments. PRLT with Lutetium-177 and Actinium-225 labeled with PSMA (LuPSMA and AcPSMA) have recently been shown to be effective and well tolerated for mCRPC treatment. LuPSMA is currently applied in patients who have exhausted approved treatment options or in whom these approved treatments are contraindicated. In this category of heavily pretreated patients, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (≥50% decline) is achieved in about 46% of patients. Side-effects are tolerable with rare reports of grade III-IV treatment-induced toxicity. AcPSMA is currently applied on a smaller scale in patients who relapsed after LuPSMA or in whom LuPSMA is contraindicated. PSA response occurs in up to 88% of patients treated with AcPSMA.

SUMMARY

PRLT with LuPSMA and AcPSMA is a well-tolerated and effective treatment modality for mCRPC. Prospective randomized control trials are necessary to facilitate its application as an approved therapy option.

Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen PET: Therapy Response Assessment in Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Therapy response assessment is a critical step in cancer management, leading clinicians to optimize the use of therapeutic options during the course of the disease. Imaging is a pivotal biomarker for therapy response evaluation in oncology and has gained wider use through the development of reproducible data-based guidelines, of which the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors is the most successful example. Disease-specific criteria have also been proposed, and the Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 criteria are the mainstay for prostate cancer (PC). However, conventional imaging evaluation in metastatic PC has several limitations, including (a) the inability to detect small-volume disease, (b) the high prevalence of bone (nonmeasurable) lesions at imaging, and (c) the established role of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels as the biomarker of choice for response assessment and disease progression. In addition, there are an increasing number of newer treatment options with various effects on imaging features. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET has improved patient selection for newer treatments, such as metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) or radionuclide therapy. The role of PSMA PET in response assessment for many metastatic PC therapeutic options (MDT, androgen deprivation therapy, chemotherapy, radionuclide therapy, and immunotherapy) is an evolving issue, with emerging data showing good correlation with PSA levels and clinical outcome. However, there are specific implications of each therapy (especially androgen deprivation therapy and immunotherapy) on PSMA expression by PC cells, leading to potential pitfalls and inaccuracies that must be known by radiologists. Despite some limitations, PSMA PET is addressing gaps left by conventional imaging methods (eg, CT and bone scanning) and nonimaging biomarkers (PSA levels) in metastatic PC therapy response assessment, a role that can be improved with advances like refinement of interpretation criteria and whole-body tumor burden quantification.^© RSNA, 2020See discussion on this article by Barwick and Castellucci.

Validation of the 3-variable prognostic score (3-PS) in mCRPC patients treated with 223Radium-dichloride: a national multicenter study

Objective

Radium-223 (²²³Ra) has been approved for treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostatic cancer (mCRPC) and bone metastasis. This α-emitting radionuclide has a beneficial effect on pain and is also capable to increase overall survival (OS). Several studies evaluated the prognostic value of different biomarkers at baseline, such as serum values, imaging parameters or pain. To date, however, clinicians lack a validated and simple system to assess which patients will most likely benefit from ²²³Ra treatment. The 3-variable prognostic score (3-PS), proposed in a single-center study in 2017 classifies patients in five prognostic groups with a specific OS. This study aims to validate the 3-PS in a larger multicenter population.

Methods

Four hundred and thirty mCRPC patients treated with ²²³Ra from six different centers were analyzed. The 3-PS score consists of the collection of baseline hemoglobin, prostatic specific antigen and Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status and was initially applied to the whole population (total group). The score was then validated on the 338 patient’s subgroup (clean group) obtained by subtracting the 92 patients enrolled for the original study of the 3-PS score. This purified group served as further validation evidence.

Results

Statistical analysis showed that the 3-PS score was valid on the total group as well as in the clean group as the AUC estimated (0.74) falls within the CI of the AUC calculated on the validation sample (95% CI 0.66–0.82).

Conclusion

This study confirms the validity of the 3-PS score for mCRPC patients. This score is simple, noninvasive and affordable and can be easily used to select patients that will most probably complete ²²³Ra treatment. In addition, this tool provides an exact estimate of life expectancy in terms of OS.

Radium-223 as an Approved Modality for Treatment of Bone Metastases

Radium-223 dichloride (²²³Ra) is an α-emitter radionuclide approved for treatment of osteoblastic metastases in castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. ²²³Ra increases overall survival, improves bone pain, increases the median time to the first skeletal-related event, reduces the use of external beam radiation therapy for bone pain palliation, reduces the rates of spinal cord compression, and hospitalization. ²²³Ra therapy has minimal side effects; the most common hematological side effects are anemia, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia while the nonhematological side effects that may occur are bone pain flare, nausea, fatigue, and diarrhea. Alongside ²²³Ra therapy there are currently a variety of first-line therapeutic options available to treat mCRPC patients and much debate regarding the appropriate treatment algorithm for these patients and the possible combination of therapies among the ones available. In this article, we review the rationale behind ²²³Ra therapy as well as ²²³Ra mechanisms of action, biodistribution and dosimetry, optimal timing possibilities to initiate ²²³Ra in contrast to other treatments available, the association of ²²³Ra with other therapies and the means of evaluating patients in order to properly deliver to ²²³Ra therapy. Furthermore, we will discuss ²²³Ra dose administration possibilities, patient and dose preparation and the challenges of treatment response evaluation during and after ²²³Ra.

Biomarkers of response to advanced prostate cancer therapy

Introduction: Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common adult malignancies worldwide, and a major leading cause of cancer-related death in men in Western societies. In the last years, the prognosis of advanced PCa patients has been impressively improved thanks to the development of different therapeutic agents, including taxanes (docetaxel and cabazitaxel), second-generation anti-hormonal agents (abiraterone and enzalutamide), and the radiopharmaceutical Radium-223. However, great efforts are still needed to properly select the most appropriate treatment for each single patient.Areas covered: Several prognostic or predictive biomarkers have been studied, none of which has an established validated role in daily clinical practice. This paper analyzed the major biomarkers (including PSA, androgen receptor (AR) splice variants, βIII-tubulin, ALP, circulating tumor cells, and DNA repair genes) with a potential prognostic and/or predictive role in advanced PCa patients.Expert commentary: Surrogate biomarkers - measurable, reproducible, closely associated with tumor behavior and linked to relevant clinical outcomes - are urgently needed to improve PCa patient management.

Role of Baseline and Post-Therapy 18F-FDG PET in the Prognostic Stratification of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Patients Treated with Radium-223

Radium-223 dichloride (Ra223) represents the unique bone-directed treatment option that shows an improvement in overall survival (OS) in metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, there is an urgent need for the identification of reliable biomarkers to non-invasively determine its efficacy (possibly improving patients’ selection or identifying responders’ after therapy completion). 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avidity is low in naïve prostate cancer, but it is enhanced in advanced and chemotherapy-refractory mCRPC, providing prognostic insights. Moreover, this tool showed high potential for the evaluation of response in cancer patients with bone involvement. For these reasons, FDG Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) might represent an effective tool that is able to provide prognostic stratification (improving patients selection) at baseline and assessing the treatment response to Ra223. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 28 mCRPC patients that were treated with Ra223 and submitted to bone scan and FDG-PET/CT for prognostic purposes at baseline and within two months after therapy completion. The following parameters were measured: number of bone lesions at bone scan, SUVmax of the hottest bone lesion, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). In patients who underwent post-therapy 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (FDG-PET/CT), (20/28), PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST), and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria were applied to evaluate the metabolic treatment response. The difference between end of therapy and baseline values was also calculated for Metabolic Tumor Volume (MTV), TLG, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), alkaline phosphatase (AP), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (termed deltaMTV, deltaTLG, deltaPSA, deltaAP and deltaLDH, respectively). Predictive power of baseline and post-therapy PET- and biochemical-derived parameters on OS were assessed by Kaplan–Meier, univariate and multivariate analyses. At baseline, PSA, LDH, and MTV significantly predicted OS. However, MTV (but not PSA nor LDH) was able to identify a subgroup of patients with worse prognosis, even after adjusting for the number of lesions at bone scan (which, in turn, was not an independent predictor of OS). After therapy, PERCIST criteria were able to capture the response to Ra223 by demonstrating longer OS in patients with partial metabolic response. Moreover, the biochemical parameters were outperformed by PERCIST in the post-treatment setting, as their variation after therapy was not informative on long term OS. The present study supports the role of FDG-PET as a tool for patient’s selection and response assessment in mCRPC patients undergoing Ra223 administration.

Scintigraphic load of bone disease evaluated by DASciS software as a survival predictor in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients candidates to 223RaCl treatment

Background

Aim of our study was to assess the load of bone disease at starting and during Ra-223 treatment as an overall survival (OS) predictor in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. Bone scan index (BSI) is defined as the percentage of total amount of bone metastasis on whole-body scintigraphic images. We present a specific software (DASciS) developed by an engineering team of “Sapienza” University of Rome for BSI calculation.

Patients and methods

127 mCRPC patients bone scan images were processed with DASciS software, and BSI was tested as OS predictor.

Results

546 bone scans were analyzed revealing that the extension of disease is a predictor of OS (0–3% = 28 months of median survival (MoMS]; 3%–5% = 11 MoMS, > 5% = 5 MoMS). BSI has been analyzed as a single parameter for OS, determining an 88% AUC. Moreover, the composition between the BSI and the 3-PS (3-variable prognostic score) determines a remarkable improvement of the AUC (91%), defining these two parameters as the best OS predictors.

Conclusions

This study suggests that OS is inversely correlated with the load of bone disease in mCRPC Ra-223-treated subjects. DASciS software appears a promising tool in identifying mCRPC patients that more likely take advantage from Ra-223 treatment. BSI is proposed as a predictive variable for OS and included to a multidimensional clinical evaluation permits to approach the patients’ enrollment in a rational way, allowing to enhance the treatment effectiveness together with cost optimization.

Development of Targeted Alpha Particle Therapy for Solid Tumors

Targeted alpha-particle therapy (TAT) aims to selectively deliver radionuclides emitting α-particles (cytotoxic payload) to tumors by chelation to monoclonal antibodies, peptides or small molecules that recognize tumor-associated antigens or cell-surface receptors. Because of the high linear energy transfer (LET) and short range of alpha (α) particles in tissue, cancer cells can be significantly damaged while causing minimal toxicity to surrounding healthy cells. Recent clinical studies have demonstrated the remarkable efficacy of TAT in the treatment of metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the current consensus regarding the properties of the α-particle-emitting radionuclides that are potentially relevant for use in the clinic; the TAT-mediated mechanisms responsible for cell death; the different classes of targeting moieties and radiometal chelators available for TAT development; current approaches to calculating radiation dosimetry for TATs; and lead optimization via medicinal chemistry to improve the TAT radiopharmaceutical properties. We have also summarized the use of TATs in pre-clinical and clinical studies to date.

Response assessment of bone metastatic disease: seeing the forest for the trees RECIST, PERCIST, iRECIST, and PCWG-2

Tumor response is often used as a surrogate marker for survival practically in all clinical trials. Therefore, robust and valid response criteria during the course of trials are fundamental for the assessment of response to therapy. This aspect, however, becomes particularly challenging when it comes to bone metastases. In the era of targeted therapies and immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), response assessment by morphologic-based criteria cannot detect the real tumor response and, consequently, fail to demonstrate the actual clinical benefit. This review will focus on some of the most common morphologic and metabolic response criteria and their application for bone lesions, highlighting relative strengths and weaknesses as well as potential future methods in the era of target therapies and immunotherapy with ICI.

68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for monitoring response to 177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the use of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT for monitoring response to ¹⁷⁷Lu-617 PSMA radioligand therapy in patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

METHODS

Patients from the University Hospital Bonn and the University Hospital Aachen were retrospectively reviewed for this study. We included 48 patients with mCRPC who were treated with ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617 and whose records included ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging before the first and after the third or fourth treatment cycle. A treatment response based on ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT was defined according to a modified version of the PERCIST criteria. A decline in PSA level of ≥50% was considered the reference standard. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and ROC curves were calculated, and patient survival times in relation to the PET results were also analysed.

RESULTS

⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT had a sensitivity of about 85% and a specificity of between 55% and 65%. The negative and positive predictive values ranged between 70% and 78%. The fitted ROC area was 0.70. The survival time was about 19.6 months in patients with a treatment response, while nonresponders had a survival time of about 15.9 months. However, this difference between the groups was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT could be a useful tool for the evaluation of response to ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy within a theranostic framework.