A risk stratification model for nodal peripheral T-cell lymphomas based on the NCCN-IPI and posttreatment Deauville score

PET/CT in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: An Update

Non-Hodgkin lymphomas represents a heterogeneous group of lymphoproliferative disorders characterized by different clinical courses, varying from indolent to highly aggressive. ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT is the current state-of-the-art diagnostic imaging, for the staging, restaging and evaluation of response to treatment in lymphomas with avidity for ¹⁸F-FDG, despite it is not routinely recommended for surveillance. PET-based response criteria (using five-point Deauville Score) are nowadays uniformly applied in FDG-avid lymphomas. In this review, a comprehensive overview of the role of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET in Non-Hodgkin lymphomas is provided, at each relevant point of patient management, particularly focusing on recent advances on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma, with brief updates also on other histotypes (such as marginal zone, mantle cell, primary mediastinal- B cell lymphoma and T cell lymphoma). PET-derived semiquantitative factors useful for patient stratification and prognostication and emerging radiomics research are also presented.

The role of pre-treatment and mid-treatment 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in evaluating prognosis of peripheral T-cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS)

BACKGROUND

It has been reported the prognostic value of MTV in predicting the disease prognosis of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) through pre-treatment PET/CT imaging. However, these are limited data on pretreatment evaluation and prognosis assessments of peripheral T-cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS). This study aimed to determine the prognostic values of pre-treatment and mid-treatment total metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and Deauville 5-Point Scale (D-5PS) in accessing the prognosis of PTCL-NOS.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted in 31 patients with pathologically diagnosed PTCL-NOS. These patients have undergone positron emission PET/CT scanning before and during chemotherapy. Follow-ups were also done to investigate the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) of these patients. During [Formula: see text]F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([Formula: see text]F-FDG) PET/CT scans, the MTV and TLG were recorded. Meanwhile, [Formula: see text]MTV and [Formula: see text]TLG were calculated. Furthermore, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was employed to classify and to define the threshold values. On the other hand, the mid-chemotherapy assessment and staging of these 31 patients were done by utilizing D-5PS. Subsequently, based on the D-5PS scores obtained, these patients were grouped into two categories: a group of patients with a score of <4 and another group with [Formula: see text]4 points. For these two groups of patients, the survival analysis was done by Kaplan-Meier analysis and a multivariate COX regression model. Moreover, Pearson's chi-square test ([Formula: see text] test) and Spearman rank correlation coefficient were used to comparing the collected data, respectively.

RESULTS

During the 2-year follow-up period, 15 out of the 31 patients experienced disease progression. The optimal threshold values for both baseline MTV and TLG were 158.16 cm[Formula: see text] and 677.40.Additionally, the difference in 2-year PFS between the progressive and non-progressive groups was statistically significant ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]; [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]), significant between-group difference was detected for MTV and for TLG ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]; [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). On the other hand, when these patients were classified into two groups according to the mid-chemotherapy Deauville score of <4 and [Formula: see text]4, the statistical difference of 2-year PFS between these two groups was significant, too ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]),but there is no significant between-group difference in OS ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). COX analysis revealed that D-5PS are the independent factors influencing PFS, while MTV is the independent influencing factor of OS.

CONCLUSION

The baseline total MTV obtained by PET/CT scanning, and D-5PS are crucial prognostic factors in evaluating the prognosis of PTCL-NOS.

A risk model for relapsed/refractory aggressive NHL integrating clinical risk factors and pretransplant Deauville score

There are limited data regarding the combined value of the pretransplant Deauville score (DS) from a positron emission tomography scan and clinical risk factors in patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). We performed a retrospective analysis to assess the prognostic role of pretransplant DS in patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive NHL who underwent salvage chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). We identified 174 eligible patients between January 2013 and March 2019. In multivariable analysis, pretransplant DS, B symptoms, and secondary International Prognostic Index (sIPI) were independent risk factors for event-free survival (EFS). These variables were used to derive an integrated risk score that categorized 166 patients with available information for all risk factors into 3 groups: low (n = 92; 55.4%), intermediate (n = 48; 28.9%), and high (n = 26; 15.7%). The new prognostic index showed a strong association with EFS (low-risk vs intermediate-risk hazard ratio [HR], 3.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.16-7.17; P < .001; low-risk vs high-risk HR, 10.83; 95% CI, 5.81-20.19; P < .001) and outperformed models based on clinical risk factors or DS alone. These results were validated in 60 patients from an independent external cohort (low-risk vs intermediate-risk HR, 4.04; 95% CI, 1.51-10.82; P = .005; low-risk vs high-risk HR, 10.49; 95% CI, 4.11-26.73; P < .001). We propose and validate a new prognostic index that risk-stratifies patients undergoing salvage chemotherapy followed by ASCT, thereby identifying patients at high risk for posttransplant treatment failure.

[Hybrid imaging in lymphoma]

Hybrid imaging using the tracer [18F]FDG (2‑deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose) is regarded as the backbone of the diagnostic workup of lymphomas. All international guidelines, and especially the Lugano and RECIL (Response Evaluation Criteria in Lymphoma) guidelines, currently recommend [18F]FDG-PET/CT (positron emission tomography/computed tomography) for staging and treatment response assessment. With the exception of pediatric lymphomas, neither PET/MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) nor whole-body MRI are currently endorsed by international guidelines, despite the fact that both techniques have clear advantages over [18F]FDG-PET/CT in the assessment of lymphomas with variable FDG avidity. Of the new, more specific PET tracers that are being evaluated for the use in lymphomas, the CXCR4 (CXC motif chemokine receptor 4) tracer [68Ga]Pentixafor is of particular interest, as initial studies have shown that it may be used to visualize frequently non-FDG-avid lymphomas such as small-cell lymphocytic lymphoma, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma and lymphomplasmacytic lymphoma.

The prognostic role of 18F-FDG PET/CT baseline quantitative metabolic parameters in peripheral T-cell lymphoma

Objectives: The aim of this study is to investigate the prognostic significance of baseline maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), whole body SUVmax (WBSUVmax), whole body metabolic tumor volume (WBMTV) and whole body total lesion glycolysis (WBTLG) in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). Methods: Eighty patients with PTCL who underwent pretreatment ¹⁸F-PET/CT were enrolled in this study. WBMTV and WBTLG were computed by using the margin threshold of SUV>3.0. WBSUVmax was obtained by summing of SUVmax of the whole-body SUVmax of 11 nodal and 10 extra-nodal lesions. Results: Median SUVmax was 13.8 (range, 4.6-35.5), median WBSUVmax was 24.6 (range, 4.6-153.4), median WBMTV was 149 cm³ (range, 4-4545 cm³) and median WBTLG was 1017 (range, 16.5-23739). Six patients with anaplastic large cell lymphoma, ALK positive were excluded in the following statistical analysis for their unique pathological types and good prognosis. The receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis showed that the optimal cut-off values of WBSUVmax, WBMTV and WBTLG with overall survival (OS) were 22.2, 169.5 cm³ and 746.1, respectively. Patients with high WBSUVmax, WBMTV and WBTLG had a poor prognosis. WBSUVmax, WBMTV and WBTLG were associated with international prognostic index (IPI) and prognostic index for T-cell lymphoma (PIT). In multivariate analysis, WBTLG and PIT were independent prognostic factors of both progression free survival (PFS) and OS. Conclusions: Our study shows that high WBTLG, WBMTV and WBSUVmax could predict a relatively poor prognosis, and has a highly significant association with PIT and IPI.WBTLG could be an independent predictive factor for survival outcomes in patients with PTCL.

MRI and PET/MRI in hematologic malignancies

The role of MRI differs considerably between the three main groups of hematological malignancies: lymphoma, leukemia, and myeloma. In myeloma, whole‐body MRI (WB‐MRI) is recognized as a highly sensitive test for the assessment of myeloma, and is also endorsed by clinical guidelines, especially for detection and staging. In lymphoma, WB‐MRI is presently not recommended, and merely serves as an alternative technique to the current standard imaging test, [¹⁸F]FDG‐PET/CT, especially in pediatric patients. Even for lymphomas with variable FDG avidity, such as extranodal mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (MALT), contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (CT), but not WB‐MRI, is presently recommended, despite the high sensitivity of diffusion‐weighted MRI and its ability to capture treatment response that has been reported in the literature. In leukemia, neither MRI nor any other cross‐sectional imaging test (including positron emission tomography [PET]) is currently recommended outside of clinical trials. This review article discusses current clinical applications as well as the main research topics for MRI, as well as PET/MRI, in the field of hematological malignancies, with a focus on functional MRI techniques such as diffusion‐weighted imaging and dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI, on the one hand, and novel, non‐FDG PET imaging probes such as the CXCR4 radiotracer [⁶⁸Ga]Ga‐Pentixafor and the amino acid radiotracer [¹¹C]methionine, on the other hand.

Level of Evidence: 5

Technical Efficacy Stage: 3

J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:1325–1335.